Cambridge social ontology, the philosophical critique of modern economics and social positioning theory: an interview with Tony Lawson, part 1

References

• Archer, M. S., and J. Morgan. 2020. “Contributions to Realist Social Theory: An Interview with Margaret S. Archer.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (2): 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1997 [1975]. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenburg, S., C. Lawson, T. Lawson, P. Lewis, S. Pratten, and J. Runde. 2002. “Introduction.” [special issue on Critical Realism] Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (6): 679–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., and W. Dolfsma., ed. 2015. Elgar Companion to Social Economics. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Downward, P., ed. 2003. Applied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, P., S. Pratten, and J. Runde. 2017. “Cambridge Social Ontology: Clarification, Development and Deployment.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (5): 1265–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, S., ed. 1999. Critical Realism in Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fullbrook, E., ed. 2009. Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and His Critics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2003. “Representing Reality: The Critical Realism Project.” Feminist Economics 9 (1): 151–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C., C. DeRosches, and T. Lawson. 2009. “Cambridge Social Ontology: An Interview with Tony Lawson.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 2 (1): 100–122.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, T. H., L. Chester, and C. D’Ippoliti, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Heterodox Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, A., and T. Lawson. 1980. “On the Nature of Industrial Decline in the UK.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 4 (1): 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lainá, P. 2018. “Meta-theory as a Uniting Framework for Economics and Global Political Economy.” Journal of Critical Realism 17 (3): 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1981. “Keynesian Model Building and the Rational Expectations Critique.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 5 (4): 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1982. “On the Stability of the Inter-Industry Structure of Earnings in the UK: 1954-1978.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (3): 249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1983. “Different Approaches to Economic Modelling.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 7 (1): 77–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1985. “Uncertainty and Economic Analysis.” The Economic Journal 95 (380): 909–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1987. “The Relative/Absolute Nature of Knowledge and Economic Analysis.” The Economic Journal 97 (388): 951–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1988. “Probability and Uncertainty in Economic Analysis.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 11 (1): 38–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1989. “Abstraction, Tendencies and Stylised Facts: A Realist Approach to Economic Analysis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 13 (1): 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1994a. “The Nature of Post Keynesianism and its Links to Other Traditions: A Realist Perspective.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 16 (4): 503–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1994b. “Why are so Many Economists so Opposed to Methodology?” Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1): 105–134.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1994c. “A Realist Theory for Economics.” In New Directions in Economic Methodology, edited by R. Backhouse, 257–285. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1995a. “A Realist Perspective on Contemporary ‘Economic Theory’.” Journal of Economic Issues 29 (1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1995b. “The ‘Lucas Critique’: A Generalisation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 (2): 257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1997. Economics & Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 1999. “Feminism, Realism and Universalism.” Feminist Economics 5 (2): 25–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2003a. “Ontology and Feminist Theorizing.” Feminist Economics 9 (1): 119–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2003b. “Theorizing Ontology.” Feminist Economics 9 (1): 161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2003c. Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2005. “The (Confused) State of Equilibrium Analysis in Modern Economics: An Explanation.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27 (3): 423–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2006. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (4): 483–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2009a. “Applied Economics, Contrast Explanation and Asymmetric Explanation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (3): 405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2009b. “The Current Economic Crisis: Its Nature and the Course of Academic Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (4): 759–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2012. “Ontology and the Study of Social Reality: Emergence, Organization, Community, Power, Social Relations, Corporations, Artefacts and Money.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (2): 345–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2013. “What is This ‘School’ Called Neoclassical Economics?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (5): 947–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2015a. “Process, Order and Stability in Veblen.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (4): 993–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2015b. “The Nature of the Firm and Peculiarities of the Corporation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2015c. Essays on The Nature and State of Modern Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2015d. “A Conception of Social Ontology.” In Social Ontology and Modern Economics, edited by S. Pratten, 19–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2016a. “Comparing Conceptions of Social Ontology: Emergent Social Entities and/or Institutional Facts?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (4): 359–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2016b. “Some Critical Issues in Social Ontology: Reply to John Searle.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (4): 426–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2016c. “Ontology and Social Relations: Reply to Doug Porpora and to Colin Wight.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (4): 438–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2017. “What is Wrong with Modern Economics, and Why Does it Stay Wrong?” Journal of Australian Political Economy 80: 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2019. The Nature of Social Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C., J. Latsis, and N. Martins. 2007. Contributions to Social Ontology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T., R. Tarling, and F. Wilkinson. 1982. “Changes in the Inter-Industry Structure of Wages: Some Theoretical Positions.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (3): 227–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F., and B. Cronin, eds. 2016. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Heterodox Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P., ed. 2004. Transforming Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N. 2014. The Cambridge Revival of Political Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N. 2017. “Cambridge’s Contribution to the Revival of Classical Political Economy.” In The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics, edited by R. Cord, 3–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mearman, A., S. Berger, and D. Guizzo. 2018a. “Whither Political Economy? Evaluating the CORE Project as a Response to Calls for Change in Economics Teaching.” Review of Political Economy 30 (2): 241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearman, A., S. Berger, and D. Guizzo. 2018b. “Is UK Economics Teaching Changing? Evaluating the new Subject Benchmark Statement.” Review of Social Economy 76 (3): 377–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2012. “Economics Critique: Framing Procedures and Lawson’s Realism in Economics.” Journal of Critical Realism 11 (1): 94–125.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2013. “Forward-looking Contrast Explanation, Illustrated Using the Great Moderation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (4): 737–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2015a. “Is Economics Responding to Critique? What do the UK QAA 2015 Subject Benchmarks for Economics Indicate?” Review of Political Economy 27 (4): 518–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2015b. “Seeing the Potential of Realism in Economics.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (2): 176–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2015c. “What’s in a Name? Tony Lawson on Neoclassical Economics and Heterodox Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (3): 843–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2016a. What is Neoclassical Economics? Debating the Origins, Meaning and Significance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2016b. “The Contemporary Relevance of a Cambridge Tradition: Economics as Political Economy, Political Economy as Social Theory and Ethical Theory.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (2): 663–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2016c. “Critical Realism as a Social Ontology for Economics.” In Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Heterodox Economics, edited by Fred Lee, and Bruce Cronin, 15–34. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. 2016d. “Review: Tony Lawson, Essays on the Nature and State of Economics.” Oeconomica 6 (2): 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J., and J. Embery. 2018. “Heterodox Economics as a Living Body of Knowledge: Community, (in)Commensurability, Critical Engagement and Pluralism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Heterodox Economics, edited by Tae-Hee Jo, Lynne Chester, and Carlo D’ippolita, 515–533. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J., and H. Patomäki. 2017. “Contrast Explanation in Economics: its Context, Meaning, and Potential.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (5): 1391–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, M. 2000. “Explaining Theory Choice: An Assessment of the Critical Realist Contribution to Explanation in Science.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (3): 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. V. 2016. “Response to Tony Lawson: Sociology Versus Economics and Philosophy.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (4): 420–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. V. 2017. “Tony Lawson from a Sociological Point of View.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (5): 1525–1537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. V., and J. Morgan. 2020. “American Sociology, Realism, Structure and Truth: An Interview with Douglas V.Porpora.” Journal of Critical Realism, doi:10.1080/14767430.2020.1782708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratten, S., ed. 2015. Social Ontology and Modern Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N., and J. Morgan. 2020. “Philosophical Purpose and Purposive Philosophy: An Interview with Nicholas Rescher.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (1): 58–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. 2016. “The Limits of Emergence: Reply to Tony Lawson.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (4): 400–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade-Caffarel, Y. 2019. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics Revisited.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 43 (3): 527–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wight, C. 2016. “Over Socialising the Social World(s)?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (4): 413–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar