How to phrase critical realist interview questions in applied social science research

References

• Aguinis, Herman, and Angelo M. Solarino. 2019. “Transparency and Replicability in Qualitative Research: The Case of Interviews with Elite Informants.” Strategic Management Journal, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret Scotford. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret Scotford. 1996. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret Scotford. 2007. Making our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. M., C. B. Martin, and U. T. Place. 2002. Dispositions: A Debate. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Paul, and David Silverman. 1997. “Kundera’s Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of the Self.” Qualitative Inquiry 3 (3): 304–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300304.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Sussex: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bygstad, Bendik. 2010. “Generative Mechanisms for Innovation in Information Infrastructures.” Information and Organization 20 (3): 156–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Wayne. 2013. “Moving Through Uncertain Times: A Morphogenetic Approach to Understanding People’s Response to Crisis in Two Forest Community Contexts in Rural British Columbia.” PhD diss., University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., M. Ekstrom, L. Jakobsen, and J. Karlsson. 2005. Explaining Society: An Introduction to Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, Philip, Paul Jackson, and Denise Gengatharen. 2013. “Explaining Broadband Adoption in Rural Australia: Modes of Reflexivity and the Morphogenetic Approach.” MIS Quarterly 37 (3): 965–991. doi:https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, Marlon, Marcello La Rosa, Jan Mendling, and Hajo A. Reijers. 2018. Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edgley, Alison, Theodore Stickley, Stephen Timmons, and Andy Meal. 2016. “Critical Realist Review: Exploring the Real, Beyond the Empirical.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 40 (3): 316–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2014.953458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, Louise Harder, and Richard Baskerville. 2018. “Revising the Socio-Technical Perspective for The 21st Century: New Mechanism at Work.” International Journal of Social and Organizational Dynamics and IT 7 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, Steve. 2005. “Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Organization 12 (2): 197–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, Steve. 2011. “Powers and Tendencies Revisited.” Journal of Critical Realism 10 (1): 80–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v10i1.80.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J. 1977. “The Theory of Affordances.” In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, edited by Robert E. Shaw, and John Bransford, 67–82. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gnassounou, B., and M. Kistler. 2016. Dispositions and Causal Powers. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, Joanne, and Ana Manzano. 2021. “Understanding ‘Context’ in Realist Evaluation and Synthesis.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1918484.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, Paul. 2019. Business Process Change: A Business Process Management Guide for Managers and Process Professionals. Cambridge: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Hedström, Peter, and Richard Swedberg. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoddy, Eric T. 2019. “Critical Realism in Empirical Research: Employing Techniques from Grounded Theory Methodology.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (1): 111–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1503400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrocks, Ivan. 2006. “Exploring Information Systems Development in English Local Government: A Morphogenetic Approach.” PhD diss., The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Kahryn, Jason Hughes, and Fabienne Portier-Le Cocq. 2020. “Introduction: Making the Case for Qualitative Interviews.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 23 (5): 541–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1766756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. Gordon. 2012. “Creating Qualitative Interview Protocols.” International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development 4 (3): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/jskd.2012070101.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., and L. Christensen. 2008. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Robert B., and Stephen P. Smith. 2010. “How Critical Realism Clarifies Validity Issues in Theory-Testing Research: Analysis and Case.” In Information Systems Foundations: The Role of Design Science, edited by Dennis N. Hart, and Shirley D. Gregor, 21–47. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• lannacci, Federico. 2014. “Routines, Artefacts and Technological Change: Investigating the Transformation of Criminal Justice in England and Wales.” Journal of Information Technology 29 (4): 294–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 1997. Economics and Reality, Economics as Social Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lune, H., and B. L. Berg. 2017. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lusted, Jim. 2018. “A Critical Realist Morphogenetic Approach to Researching Sport Policy: Reflections on a Large-Scale Study of Policy Implementation in Grassroots English Football.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 10 (4): 705–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1522658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzano, Ana. 2016. “The Craft of Interviewing in Realist Evaluation.” Evaluation 22 (3): 342–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016638615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchal, Bruno, Sara van Belle, Josefien van Olmen, Tom Hoerée, and Guy Kegels. 2012. “Is Realist Evaluation Keeping its Promise? A Review of Published Empirical Studies in the Field of Health Systems Research.” Evaluation 18 (2): 192–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012442444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAvoy, John, and Tom Butler. 2018. “A Critical Realist Method for Applied Business Research.” Journal of Critical Realism 17 (2): 160–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2018.1455477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, Phil, and David Richards. 2006. “A Critical Realist Rationale for Using a Combination of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” Journal of Research in Nursing 11 (1): 66–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987106060192.
   Google Scholar
• Mihailescu, Daniela, and Marius Mihailescu. 2012. “Exploring the Adaptation of Enterprise Systems Implementation Methodology: A Morphogenetic Approach.” In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Orlando: Acad Conferences Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mihailescu, Daniela, Marius Mihailescu, and Sven Carlsson. 2018. “Instantiations of an ERP Implementation Methodology: A Critical Realist Case Study.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Kent D., and Eric W. K. Tsang. 2011. “Testing Management Theories: Critical Realist Philosophy and Research Methods.” Strategic Management Journal 32 (2): 139–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, John. 2006. Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mirani, Rajesh. 2013. “A Case Study of Morphogenetic Change in Long-Term Offshoring.” International Journal of Information Management 33 (4): 663–673. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, Paul. 2006. “Using Critical Realism to Explain Strategic Information Systems Planning.” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 8 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, Ferdinand C., Bruno Marchal, Sara Van Belle, and Brian van Wyk. 2020. “Using the Realist Interview Approach to Maintain Theoretical Awareness in Realist Studies.” Qualitative Research 20 (4): 485–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119881985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, Jack. 2020. “Critical Realism, Critical Discourse Analysis, and the Morphogenetic Approach.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (5): 433–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1758986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njihia, James Muranga. 2008. “ICT for Development Reconsidered: A Critical Realist Approach to the Strategic Context in Kenya’s Transition to E-Governance.” PhD diss., University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Njihia, James Muranga, and Yasmin Merali. 2013. “The Broader Context for ICT4D Projects: A Morphogenetic Analysis.” MIS Quaterly 37 (3): 881–905. doi:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.10.
   Google Scholar
• Norrie, Alan. 2010. Dialectic and Difference. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nuryatno, Edi Triono. 2017. “Exploring ‘People’ as the Key Element in Enterprise Architecture Implementation: A Critical Realist Perspective.” PhD diss., Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1878. “How to Make our Ideas Clear.” Popular Science Monthly 12: 286–302.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, Douglas V. 2016. “The Recent Methods Debate in American Sociology and how Critical Realism Fits Into it.” Journal of Critical Realism 15 (4): 342–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1193674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Sam. 2015. “The Uncritical Realism of Realist Evaluation.” Evaluation 21 (1): 65–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014566134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Robert. 1991. “Replication in Behavioral Research.” In Replication Research in Behavioral Sciences, edited by James W. Neuliep, 1–30. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, Andrew. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, Andrew. 2010. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Scambler, Graham. 2013. “Resistance in Unjust Times: Archer, Structured Agency and the Sociology of Health Inequalities.” Sociology 47 (1): 142–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512455878.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, Chris, and Tony Elger. 2014. “Critical Realism and Interviewing Subjects.” In Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism, edited by Paul K. Edwards, Joe O’Mahoney, and Steve Vincent, 109–131. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, Eric W. K., and Kai-Man Kwan. 1999. “Replication and Theory Development in Organizational Science: A Critical Realist Perspective.” The Academy of Management Review 24: 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/259353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath, Susan A. Brown, and Hillol Bala. 2013. “Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 37 (1): 21–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, Steve, and Joe O’Mahoney. 2018. “Critical Realism and Qualitative Research: An Introductory Overview.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: History and Traditions, edited by Catherine Cassell, Ann L. Cunliffe, and Gina Grandy, 201–216. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Volkoff, Olga, Diane M. Strong, and Michael B. Elmes. 2007. “Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change.” Organization Science 18 (5): 832–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, Gareth, and Noora Ronkainen. 2021. “A Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis: Making Sense of Qualitative Data Through Experiential, Inferential and Dispositional Themes.” Journal of Critical Realism 20 (2): 159–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1894909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimalasena, Lakshman. 2017. “Reflexivity and Women’s Agency: a Critical Realist Morphogenetic Exploration of the Life Experience of Sri Lankan Women.” Journal of Critical Realism 16 (4): 383–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2017.1346988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, Donald, and Clay K. Williams. 2012. “Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 36 (3): 787–810. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41703481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, Donald, and Clay K. Williams. 2020. “Recent Advances and Opportunities for Improving Critical Realism-Based Case Study Research in IS.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 50–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00592.
   Google Scholar
• Zachariadis, Markos, Susan Scott, and Michael Barrett. 2013. “Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research.” MIS Quarterly 37 (3): 855–879. doi:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar