Critical realist hermeneutics

References

• Albert, K., J. Brundage, P. Sweet, and F. Vandenberghe. 2020. “Towards a Critical Realist Epistemology.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 50 (3): 357–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apel, K. O. 1985. Understanding and Explanation. A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective. Boston: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 1988. Culture and Agency. The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory. The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M., C. Decoteau, P. Gorski, D. Porpora, T. Rutzou, C. Smith, G. Steinmetz, and F. Vandenberghe. 2016. “What Is Critical Realism?” Perspectives. A Newsletter of the Theory Section.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M., and F. Vandenberghe. 2019. Le réalisme critique. Une nouvelle ontologie pour la sociologie. Lormont: Le bord de l’eau.
   Google Scholar
• Baechler, J. 2004. “Mais qu'est-ce que la sociologie?” Revue du MAUSS 24 (2): 147–153.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, T. 1977. Philosophical Foundations of the Three Sociologies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1993. Dialectic. The Pulse of Freedom. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2016. Enlightened Common Sense. The Philosophy of Critical Realism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R., and M. Hartwig. 2010. The Formation of Critical Realism: A Personal Perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., J. C. Chamboredon, and J. C. Passeron. (1968) 1991. The Craft of Sociology. Epistemological Preliminaries. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Caillé, A. 2020. The Gift Paradigm. A Short Introduction to the Anti-Utilitarian Movement in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonnier, P., G. Salmon, and P. Skafish. 2017. Comparative Metaphysics. Ontology after Anthropology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, L. 1986. Essays on Individualism. Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. 2013. Toleration in Conflict. Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France (1978–1979). Paris: EHESS/Gallimard/Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. 1975. Truth and Method. New York: Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Godbout, J., and A. Caillé. 1998. The World of the Gift. Montreal: McGill.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2014. Debt. The First 5000 Years. London: Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2015. “Radical Alterity Is Just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’: A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.” Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1967) 1988. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity?” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff and E. Potter, 49–82. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1989. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keat, R., and J. Urry. 1975. Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge & Kegan.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1984) 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 1967. History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics. London: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 2016. The Gift. Chicago, IL: Hau Books.
   Google Scholar
• Outhwaite, W. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rutzou, T., and D. Elder-Vass. 2019. “On Assemblages and Things: Fluidity, Stability, Causation Stories, and Formation Stories.” Sociological Theory 37 (4): 401–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos de Souza, B. 1989. Introdução a uma ciência pósmoderna. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
   Google Scholar
• Santos de Souza, B. 2014. Epistemologies of the South. Justice Against Epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 1997–98. Une histoire critique de la sociologie allemande. Aliénation et réification. 2 vols. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2005. “Review Essay: The Archers: A Tale of Folk (Final Episode?).” European Journal of Social Theory 8 (2): 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2006. Complexités du posthumanisme. Trois essais dialectiques sur la sociologie de Bruno Latour. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2009. A Philosophical Critique of German Sociology. Alienation and Reification. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2010. “Falsification Falsified. A Swansong for Lord Karl.” In On Objective Knowledge in Social Sciences and Humanities, edited by C. Valentini, 73–77. Florence: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2014. What’s Critical About Critical Realism? Essays in Reconstructive Social Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2017. “Critical Realism, Anti-Utilitarianism and Axiological Engagement.” Revue du MAUSS 27 (2 (no. 50)): 347–358.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2018. “Principles of Reconstructive Social Theory.” In Critical Realism, History, and Philosophy in the Social Sciences (Political Power and Social Theory, vol. 34), edited by G. Steinmetz and T. Rutzou, 73–88. Bingley: Emerald Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2019. “The Normative Foundations of Critical Realism.” Journal of Critical Realism 18 (3): 319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2021. “The Axiomatics of the Gift. Alain Caillé’s Reinvention of Marcel Mauss.” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. 2022. “After Words: The Spirit of Evolution and Envelopment.” In Metatheory for the Anthropocene. Vol. 1: Big Picture Perspectives on Planetary Flourishing, edited by S. Esbjörn-Hargens and N. Hedlund. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggershaus, R. 1994. The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, P. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar