The contributions of scientific realism and critical realism to realist evaluation

References

• Allana, S., and A. Clark. 2018. “Applying Meta-Theory to Qualitative and Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion of Critical Realism and Heart Failure Disease Management Interventions Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1177/1609406918790042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allzén, S. 2021. “Scientific Realism and Empirical Confirmation: A Puzzle.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90 (February): 153–159. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.10.008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvesson, M. 2002. Postmodernism and Social Research. Open University Press. https://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/2/alvesson.html.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557675.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2020. “The Morphogenetic Approach; Critical Realism’s Explanatory Framework Approach.” Virtues and Economics 5: 137–150. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26114-6_9.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1975. “Forms of Realism.” Philosophica 15 (1): 99–127. doi:10.21825/philosophica.82713.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1989. Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1998. Critical Realism and Dialectic. Edited by M. Archer. Routledge. https://philpapers.org/rec/BHACRA-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2009. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203879849.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2016. “Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism.” In Journal of Critical Realism, edited by Mervyn Hartwig, vol. 4, 244 p. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315542942.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R., and T. Lawson. 2013. “Introduction: Basic Texts and Developments.” In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, edited by Margaret Archer, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie, 3–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brekke, J., J. Anastas, J. Floersch, and J. Longhofer. 2019. “The Realist Frame.” Shaping a Science of Social Work, 22–40. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190880668.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Brönnimann, A. 2021. “How to Phrase Critical Realist Interview Questions in Applied Social Science Research.” Journal of Critical Realism 21: 1–24. doi:10.1080/14767430.2021.1966719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoff, F. 2007. “Critical Realism, Scientific Realism and International Relations Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (2): 399–407. doi:10.1177/03058298070350021701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, D. M., and R. Magalhães. 2019. “Evaluation of Health Programs, Strategies, and Actions: A Dialogue with Critical Realism.” Saúde em Debate 43 (spe7): 189–203. doi:10.1590/0103-11042019s715.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, J., M. Chiarella, and T. Buckley. 2015. “Preparing a Realist Evaluation to Investigate the Impact of Privately Practising Nurse Practitioners on Patient Access to Care in Australia.” International Journal of Nursing 2 (2): 1–10. doi:10.15640/ijn.v2n2a1.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., M. Ekström, and J. C. Karlsson. 2019. “Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences.” In Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9781351017831.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza, D. E. 2014. “Culture, Context and Society – The Underexplored Potential of Critical Realism as a Philosophical Framework for Theory and Practice.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 17 (2): 141–151. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza, D. E. 2022. “A Critical Realist Approach to Systems Thinking in Evaluation.” Evaluation 28 (1): 72–90. doi:10.1177/13563890211064639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Weger, E., N. J. E. Van Vooren, G. Wong, S. Dalkin, B. Marchal, H. W. Drewes, and C. A. Baan. 2020. “What’s in a Realist Configuration? Deciding Which Causal Configurations to Use, How, and Why.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19: 160940692093857. doi:10.1177/1609406920938577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downward, P., and A. Mearman. 2007. “Retroduction as Mixed-Methods Triangulation in Economic Research: Reorienting Economics Into Social Science.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (1): 77–99. doi:10.1093/cje/bel009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2008. “Searching for Realism, Structure and Agency in Actor Network Theory.” The British Journal of Sociology 59 (3): 455–473. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00203.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2010. “The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structures and Agency.” In Structure (First). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761720.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. (2015). Disassembling Actor-network Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1): 100–121. doi:10.1177/0048393114525858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelopoulos, G. 2013. “Scientific Realism in the Philosophy of Science and International Relations.” Phd diss., London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, S. 2017. “The Critical Realist Conception of Open and Closed Systems.” Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (1): 41–68. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2016.1218532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. J. 2017. “Applying Critical Realism in Qualitative Research: Methodology Meets Method.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2): 181–194. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage, N. L. 2016. “The Paradigm Wars and Their Aftermath A “Historical” Sketch of Research on Teaching Since 1989.” Educational Researcher 18 (7): 4–10. doi:10.3102/0013189X018007004.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, J., and A. Manzano. 2021. “Understanding ‘Context’ in Realist Evaluation and Synthesis.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 25 (5): 583–595. doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1918484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., G. Wong, J. Jagosh, J. Greenhalgh, A. Manzano, G. Westhorp, and R. Pawson. 2015. “Protocol—the RAMESES II study: Developing Guidance and Reporting Standards for Realist Evaluation: Figure 1.” BMJ Open 5 (8): e008567. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harre, R., and P. F. Secord. 1972. The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. 2006. How to Change Reality: Story v. Structure – A Debate Between Rom Harre and Roy Bhaskar. Edited by G. Lopez and J. Potter. The Athlone Press. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=556_556459-ypjayidpkt&title=COVID-19-and-key-workers-What-role-do-migrants-play-in-your-region.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, K., and K. Dickson. 2021. “Realist Synthesis: A Critique and an Alternative.” Journal of Critical Realism 20 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/14767430.2020.1860425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M., 1974. The Structure of Scientific Inference. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagosh, J. 2020. “Retroductive Theorizing in Pawson and Tilley's Applied Scientific Realism.” Journal of Critical Realism 19 (2): 121–130. doi:10.1080/14767430.2020.1723301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keat, R. 1971. “Positivism, Naturalism, and Anti-Naturalism in the Social Sciences.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1971.tb00163.x.
   Google Scholar
• Khalidi, M. A. 2016. “Mind-Dependent Kinds.” Journal of Social Ontology 2 (2): 223–246. doi:10.1515/jso-2015-0045.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2001. “Economics and Explanation.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 217 (3): 371–393. doi:10.3917/rip.217.0371
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, B., S. van Belle, J. van Olmen, T. Hoerée, and G. Kegels. 2012. “Is Realist Evaluation Keeping its Promise? A Review of Published Empirical Studies in the Field of Health Systems Research.” Evaluation 18 (2): 192–212. doi:10.1177/1356389012442444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MESH. 2017. Article: Critical Realist Evaluation, October 13. https://mesh.tghn.org/articles/critical-realist-evaluation/.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. B., and B. Lunnay. 2013. “The Application of Abductive and Retroductive Inference for the Design and Analysis of Theory-Driven Sociological Research.” Sociological Research Online 18: 86. doi:10.5153/sro.2819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C. 2021. “Retroductive Theorizing: A Contribution of Critical Realism to Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 17 (0): 93–114. doi:10.1177/15586898211049847.
   Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., E. M. Kabongo, and J. G. Eastwood. 2021. “Examining the Application of Retroductive Theorizing in Realist-Informed Studies.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20: 1–14. doi:10.1177/16094069211053516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., B. Marchal, S. Van Belle, and B. Van Wyk. 2018. “Unearthing How, Why, for Whom and Under What Health System Conditions the Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence Club Intervention in South Africa Works: A Realist Theory Refining Approach.” BMC Health Services Research 18. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3150-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., S. Van Belle, B. Marchal, and B. Van Wyk. 2016. “Realist Evaluation of the Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence Club Programme in Selected Primary Healthcare Facilities in the Metropolitan Area of Western Cape Province, South Africa: A Study Protocol.” BMJ Open 6 (4): e009977. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, F. C., S. Van Belle, B. Marchal, and B. Van Wyk. 2017. “An Exploration of Group-Based HIV/AIDS Treatment and Care Models in Sub-Saharan Africa Using a Realist Evaluation (Intervention-Context-Actor-Mechanism-Outcome) Heuristic Tool: A Systematic Review.” Implementation Science 12: 1. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0638-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1999. “Paradigm Wars: Some Thoughts on a Personal and Public Trajectory.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2 (3): 247–254. doi:10.1080/136455799295041.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. 1998a. Social Constructionism: Discourse and Realism. SAGE. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-06306-000.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Ian. 1998b. Social Constructionism, Discourse, and Realism. SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446217412.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2006. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. University of Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2013. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781473913820.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., T. Greenhalgh, G. Harvey, and K. Walshe. 2005. “Realist Review - A New Method of Systematic Review Designed for Complex Policy Interventions.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10 (1_suppl): 21–34. doi:10.1258/1355819054308530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997a. “An Introduction to Scientific Realist Evaluation.” In Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, 405–418. doi:10.4135/9781483348896.N29.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and Nick Tilley. 1997b. Realistic Evaluation. Sage. doi:10.1177/135638909800400213.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 2004. Realist Evaluation. http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. 2015a. “Realist Evaluation: An Immanent Critique.” Nursing Philosophy 16 (4): 239–251. doi:10.1111/nup.12100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. 2015b. “The Uncritical Realism of Realist Evaluation.” Evaluation 21 (1): 65–82. doi:10.1177/1356389014566134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. 2015c. “Realist Evaluation: An Immanent Critique.” Nursing Philosophy 16 (4): 239–251. doi:10.1111/nup.12100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. 2017. “Evaluating Realist Evaluation: A Response to Pawson's Reply.” Nursing Philosophy 18 (2): e12155. doi:10.1111/nup.12155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., and P. O’Halloran. 2012. “The Use and Limitation of Realistic Evaluation as a Tool for Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Nursing Inquiry 19 (1): 18–28. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00551.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 2000. “The Present State of the Scientific Realism Debate.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (SUPPL.): 705–728. doi:10.1093/bjps/51.4.705.
   Google Scholar
• Renmans, D., N. Sarkar, S. Van Belle, C. Affun-Adegbulu, B. Marchal, and F. C. Mukumbang. 2022. “Realist Evaluation in Times of Decolonising Global Health.” The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 37: 37–44. doi:10.1002/hpm.3530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., M. W. Lipsey, and G. T. Henry. 2018. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 8th ed. London: Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, H. 2001. “Scientific Realism: An Elaboration and a Defence.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 98: 35–54. doi:10.1515/krt-2021-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, H. 2021. “Realism and the Epistemic Objectivity of Science.” KRITERION – Journal of Philosophy 35 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1515/krt-2021-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and Social Science. SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446218730.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, R. G. M., D. F. L. Hertroijs, F. C. Mukumbang, M. E. A. L. Kroese, D. Ruwaard, and A. M. J. Elissen. 2021. “First Things First: How to Elicit the Initial Program Theory for a Realist Evaluation of Complex Integrated Care Programs.” The Milbank Quarterly 100 (0): 151–189. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12543.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorrell, S. 2018. “Explaining Sociotechnical Transitions: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Research Policy 47 (7): 1267–1282. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, E., E. Miller, K. Costantino, D. De Souza, H. Coupland, P. Fotheringham, and J. Eastwood. 2020. “A Critical Realist Evaluation of an Integrated Care Project for Vulnerable Families in Sydney, Australia.” BMC Health Services Research 20 (1). doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05818-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, V., and B. McCormack. 2006. “Critical Realism as Emancipatory Action: The Case for Realistic Evaluation in Practice Development.” Nursing Philosophy 7 (1): 45–57. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00248.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar