Putting philosophy to work: developing the conceptual architecture of research projects

References

• Ackroyd, Stephen, and Jan Ch. Karlsson. 2014. “Critical Realism, Research Techniques, and Research Designs.” In Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide, edited by P. K. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, and S. Vincent, 21–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, Priscilla. 2021. Critical Realism for Health and Illness Research: A Practical Introduction. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, Jens. 2016. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Leeds Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 2016. Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brönnimann, Andreas. 2022. “How to Phrase Critical Realist Interview Questions in Applied Social Science Research.” Journal of Critical Realism 21 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/14767430.2021.1966719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark, Berth, Mats Ekström, and Jan Ch. Karlsson. 2019. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Charlotte A. 2008. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Downward, Paul, John H. Finch, and John Ramsay. 2002. “Critical Realism, Empirical Methods and Inference: A Critical Discussion.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (4): 481–500. doi:10.1093/cje/26.4.481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Paul, Joe O'Mahoney, and Steve Vincent. 2014. Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, Dave. 2007a. “A Method for Social Ontology.” Journal of Critical Realism 6 (2): 226–249. doi:10.1558/jocr.v6i2.226.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, Dave. 2007b. “Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action.” Sociological Theory 25 (4): 325–346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00312.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, Dave. 2010. The Causal Power of Social Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, Dave. 2022. Inventing Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Amber J. 2017. “Applying Critical Realism in Qualitative Research: Methodology Meets Method.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2): 181–194. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 105–117. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, Rom. 2002. “Social Reality and the Myth of Social Structure.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (1): 111–123. doi:10.1177/13684310222225333.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, Catherine. 2021a. “A Critical Realist Methodology in Empirical Research: Foundations, Process, and Payoffs.” Journal of Critical Realism 20 (5): 458–473. doi:10.1080/14767430.2021.1958440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, Catherine. 2021b. “Homelessness and Critical Realism: A Search for Richer Explanations.” Housing Studies 36 (5): 737–757. doi:10.1080/02673037.2020.1729960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel, Manuel. 2023. “Water Service Providers and Debt Emitters: Kenya’s Transformation of Public Water and Sanitation Utilities’ Financing.” PhD diss., University of Sheffield. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/32498/.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl G. 1968. “Explanation in Science and in History.” In The Philosophy of Science, edited by P. H. Nidditch, 54–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, Martin. 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2019. The Nature of Social Reality: Issues in Social Ontology. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., Susan A. Lynham, and Egon G. Guba. 2011. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 97–128. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maisuria, Alpesh, and Grant Banfield. 2022. Working with Critical Realism: Stories of Methodological Encounters. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mukumbang, Ferdinand C. 2023. “Retroductive Theorizing: A Contribution of Critical Realism to Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 17 (1): 93–114. doi:10.1177/15586898211049847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol, Adam J. 2020. “Critically Investigating the Complex, Emergent (Non)influence of Sport Coaching Practice.” PhD diss., University of Northumbria at Newcastle. nichol.adam_phd.pdf (northumbria.ac.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Nichol, Adam J., Edward T. Hall, Will Vickery, and Philip R. Hayes. 2019. “Examining the Relationships Between Coaching Practice and Athlete “Outcomes”: A Systematic Review and Critical Realist Critique.” International Sport Coaching Journal 6 (1): 13–29. doi:10.1123/iscj.2017-0105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol, Adam J., Philip R. Hayes, Will Vickery, Emma Boocock, Paul Potrac, and Edward T. Hall. 2021. “Athletes as “Sites of Normative Intersectionality”: Critically Exploring the Ontology of Influence in Sport Coaching.” Sociology of Sport Journal 38 (3): 241–250. doi:10.1123/ssj.2020-0114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol, Adam J., Paul Potrac, Philip R. Hayes, Emma Boocock, Will Vickery, Callum T. Morgan, and Edward T. Hall. 2023. “Coaching in the Shadows: Critically Examining the Unintended (Non)Influence of Pedagogical Practice.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 28 (4): 362–379. doi:10.1080/17408989.2021.1990244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Wendy. 2022. Systematic Mixed-Methods Research for Social Scientists. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Wendy, and Jamie Morgan. 2005. “A Critical Epistemology of Analytical Statistics: Addressing the Sceptical Realist.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (3): 255–284. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00279.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orléan, André. 2014. The Empire of Value: A New Foundation for Economics. Translated by M.B. Debevoise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, Douglas. 2011. “Recovering Causality: Realist Methods in Sociology.” In Sociological Realism, edited by A. Maccarini, E. Morandi, and R. Prandini, 149–167. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, Douglas V. 2015. Reconstructing Sociology: The Critical Realist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Leigh, and Lee Martin. 2018. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Applied Critical Realism in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Critical Realism 17 (2): 89–96. doi:10.1080/14767430.2018.1468148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quraishi, Muzammil, Lamia Irfan, Mallory Schneuwly Purdie, and Matthew L. N. Wilkinson. 2021. “Doing ‘Judgemental Rationality’ in Empirical Research: The Importance of Depth-Reflexivity When Researching in Prison.” Journal of Critical Realism 21 (1): 25–45. doi:10.1080/14767430.2021.1992735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, Andrew. 1992. Method in Social Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, Andrew C, and Brett Smith. 2014. Qualitative Research Methods in Sport, Exercise and Health: From Process to Product. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tamminen, Katherine, and Zoё A. Poucher. 2020. “Research Philosophies.” In The Routledge International Encyclopedia of Sport and Exercise Psychology: Volume 1: Theoretical and Methodological Concepts, edited by D. Hackfort and R. Schinke, 535–549. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, Sarah J. 2020. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Steve, and Joe O’Mahoney. 2018. “Critical Realism and Qualitative Research: An Introductory Overview.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods, edited by C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, and G. Grandy, 201–216. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weizenegger, Bree. 2022. “Cobbling Together Methods for a Coherent Critical Realist Methodology.” In Working with Critical Realism: Stories of Methodological Encounters, edited by A. Maisuria and G. Banfield, 63–76. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Richard, and Kate Pickett. 2010. The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, Gareth, and Noora Ronkainen. 2021. “A Realist Approach to Thematic Analysis: Making Sense of Qualitative Data Through Experiential, Inferential and Dispositional Themes.” Journal of Critical Realism 20 (2): 159–180. doi:10.1080/14767430.2021.1894909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2017. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zachariadis, Markos, Susan Scott, and Michael Barrett. 2013. “Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research.” MIS Quarterly 37 (3): 855–879. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar