Universal basic income, services, or time politics? A critical realist analysis of (potentially) transformative responses to the care crisis

References

• Aglietta, Michel. 1979/2015. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, Anthony. 1996. “The Case for a Participation Income.” The Political Quarterly Publishing 27 (1): 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1996.tb01568.x
   Google Scholar
• Aulenbacher, Brigitte, Fabienne Décieux, and Birgit Riegraf. 2018. "Capitalism Goes Care: Elder and Child Care Between Market, State, Profession, and Family and Questions of Justice and Inequality.” Equality Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 37 (4): 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-10-2017-0218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulenbacher, Brigitte, Michael Leiblfinger, et al. 2019. “The ‘Fictitious Commodity’ Care and the Reciprocity of Caring: A Polanyian and neo-Institutionalist Perspective on the Brokering of 24-Hour Care.” In Capitalism in Transformation Movements and Countermovements in the 21st Century, edited by Roland Atzmüller, 245–260. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, Richard, and Ian Gough. 2023. “Provisioning for Sufficiency: Envisaging Production Corridors.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2218690. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.2218690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, Richard, Andreas Novy, and Leonhard Plank. 2021. “The Foundational Economy as a Cornerstone for a Social-Ecological Transformation.” Sustainability 13 (18): 10460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, Richard, Andreas Novy, and Basil Stadelmann. 2020. “A Polanyi-Inspired Perspective on Social-Ecological Transformations of Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 45 (2): 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1834404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhambra, Gurminder. 2021. “Colonial Global Economy: Towards a Theoretical Reorientation of Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 28 (2): 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1975/2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy, et al. 1998. “Societies.” In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, edited by Tony Lawson, 206–257. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 2014. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, Tithi. 2017. Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. 2021. “Is Capitalism Structurally Indifferent to Gender?: Routes to a Value Theory of Reproductive Labour.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53 (7): 1749–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211031572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesecker, Adelheid, and Sabine Hofmeister. 2010. “(Re)Productivity: Sustainable Relations Both Between Society and Nature and Between the Genders.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1703–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, Vinca, and Ioana Negru. 2008. “From Fragmentation to Ontologically Reflexive Pluralism.” Journal of Philosophical Economics 1 (2): 127–150. https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.10565
   Google Scholar
• Bohnenberger, Katharina. 2020. “Money, Vouchers, Public Infrastructures? A Framework for Sustainable Welfare Benefits.” Sustainability 12 (2): 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coote, Anna. 2020. “Universal Basic Services: Building Our Social Infrastructure.” Prime Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Coote, Anna. 2021. ““Universal Basic Services and Sustainable Consumption.” Sustainability: Science.” Practice and Policy 17 (1): 32–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1843854
   Google Scholar
• Coote, Anna, and Andrew Percy. 2020. The Case for Universal Basic Services. Cambridge, UK ; Medford, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Costa, Mariarosa, and Selma James. 1972. The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, Berth. 2019. “Applied Interdisciplinary Research: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Journal of Critical Realism 18 (4): 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2019.1644983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, Ronjon, Jon Frauley, and Frank Pearce. 2010. “Situation Critical.” Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2): 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v9i2.227
   Google Scholar
• Dengler, Corinna. 2022. “Critical Realism, Feminisms, and Degrowth: A Plea for Metatheory-Informed Pluralism in Feminist Ecological Economics.” Pluralism and Economics Education 13 (1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEE.2022.124571
   Google Scholar
• Dengler, Corinna, and Miriam Lang. 2022. “Commoning Care: Feminist Degrowth Visions for a Socio-Ecological Transformation.” Feminist Economics 28 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1942511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, Corinna, and Birte Strunk. 2018. “The Monetized Economy Versus Care and the Environment: Degrowth Perspectives On Reconciling an Antagonism.” Feminist Economics 24 (3): 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2017.1383620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, Corinna, Miriam Lang, and Lisa M. Seebacher. 2022. “Care: An Overview of Strategies for Social-Ecological Transformation in the Field of Care.” In Degrowth & Strategy: How to Bring About Social-Ecological Transformation, edited by Nathan Barlow, Livia Regen, Noémie Cadiou, Ekaterina Chertkovskaya, Max Hollweg, Christina Plank, Merle Schulken, and Verena Wolf, 311–324. Colchester: Mayfly.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, Andrea. 2022. “‘Time is not Time is not Time:’ A Feminist Ecological Approach to Clock Time, Process Time, and Care Responsibilities.” Time & Society 0 (0): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X221133894
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, Emma. 2017. “Confronting Capital’s Care Fix: Care Through the Lens of Democracy.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 37 (4): 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2017-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, Emma. 2021. The Care Crisis. What Caused It and How Can We End It? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, Barbara, and Arlie Russell Hochschild. 2003. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• England, Paula. 2005. “Emerging Theories of Care Work.” Annu. Rev. Sociol 31 (1): 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FaDA. 2020. “Collaborative Feminist Degrowth: Pandemic as an Opening for a Care-Full Radical Transformation.” https://www.degrowth.info/en/feminisms-and-degrowth-alliance-fada/collective-research-notebook/. Access December 10 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Susan. 2020. Women and Work: Feminism, Labour and Social Reproduction. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, Martha. 2000. “Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, and Self-Sufficiency.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law 8 (13): 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2014a. “Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode: For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism.” New Left Review 86: 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2014b. “Can Society Be Commodities All the Way Down? Post-Polanyian Reflections on Capitalist Crisis.” Economy and Society 43 (4): 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.898822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2016. “Contradictions of Capital and Care.” New Left Review 100: 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Doris, Marlyne Sahakian, Tobias Gumbert, Antonietta Di Giulio, and Michael Maniates. 2021. Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life Within Sustainable Limits. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, Greta. 2017. Critical Ecofeminism. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, Jean-David, and Julien-François Gerber. 2017. “Decommodification as a Foundation for Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 131: 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, Ian. 2017. Heat, Greed and Human Need. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, Ian. 2019. “Universal Basic Services: A Theoretical and Moral Framework.” The Political Quarterly 90 (3): 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, Antonino. 1930/2003. Selection from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Green New Deal for Europe. 2019. A Blueprint for Europe’s Just Transition. https://report.gndforeurope.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Blueprint-for-Europes-Just-Transition-2nd-Ed.pdf. Access December 10 2021.
   Google Scholar
• GWS. 2020. Open letter to governments – A Care Income Now! https://globalwomenstrike.net/open-letter-to-governments-a-care-income-now/. Access December 10 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Haagh, Louise. 2019. The Case for Universal Basic Income. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2004. “New Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession.” In The New Imperial Challenge, edited by Leo Panitch, and Colin Leys, 63–87. London: Socialist Register.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Frigga. 2008. Die Vier-in-einem-Perspektive. Politik von Frauen für eine neue Linke. Hamburg: Argument.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Frigga. 2011. “Die Vier-in-Einem Perspektive und das Bedingungslose Grundeinkommen, Notizen aus Einem Diskussionsprozess.” In ‘Den Maschinen die Arbeit … uns das Vergnügen!’ Beiträge zum Existenzgeld, edited by Anne Allex, and Harald Rein, 49–62. Neu-Ulm: AG SPAK.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie. 2012. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. Revised Edition. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2021. Liberal Solidarity: The Political Economy of Social Democratic Liberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. 2018. Care Work and Care Jobs for the Future of Decent Work. Geneva: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2005. “Critical Realism and the Strategic-Relational Approach.” New Formations: A Journal of Culture, Theory and Politics 56: 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2015. “The Symptomatology of Crises, Reading Crises and Learning from Them: Some Critical Realist Reflections.” Journal of Critical Realism 14 (3): 238–271. https://doi.org/10.1179/1572513815Y.0000000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochimsen, Maren. 2003. Careful Economics. Integrating Caring Activities and Economic Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, Giorgos, Susan Paulson, Giacomo D’Alisa, and Federico Demaria. 2020. The Case for Degrowth. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karamessini, Maria, and Jill Rubery. 2013. Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, Stephen. 2005. “Critical Realism and the Limits of Philosophy.” European Journal of Social Theory 8 (2): 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431005051762
   Google Scholar
• Ketterer, Hanna. 2021. “Living Differently? A Feminist-Bourdieusian Analysis of the Transformative Power of Basic Income.” The Sociological Review 69 (6): 1309–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211034674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittay, Eva, et al. 2014. “The Moral Harm of Migrant Carework: Realizing a Global Right to Care.” In Gender and Global Justice, edited by Alison Jaggar, 62–84. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Kyle, Eugene Rosa, and Juliet Schor. 2013. “Could Working Less Reduce Pressures on the Environment? A Cross-National Panel Analysis of OECD Countries, 1970–2007.” Global Environmental Change 23 (4): 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, Max. 2022. “State-civil Society Relations in Gramsci, Poulantzas and Bourdieu: Strategic Implications for the Degrowth Movement.” Ecological Economics 193: 107275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laruffa, Francesco. 2022. “Re-Thinking Work and Welfare for the Social-Ecological Transformation.” Sociologica 16 (1): 123–151. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11784
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, Helma. 2017. “Care as a Fictitious Commodity: Reflections on the Intersections of Migration, Gender and Care Regimes.” Migration Studies 5 (3): 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnx046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxemburg, Rosa. 1913/2003. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1848/1976. Marx & Engels Collected Works Vol 06: Marx and Engels: 1854–1848. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, Alessandra, and Sanjita Majumder. 2020. “Towards a Feminist Political Economy of Time: Labour Circulation, Social Reproduction & the ‘Afterlife’ of Cheap Labour.” Review of International Political Economy, 29 (6): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1857293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mies, Maria. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oksala, Johanna. 2018. “Feminism, Capitalism, and Ecology.” Hypatia 33 (2): 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, Jamie. 2013. “For Polanyian Economic Geographies.” Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1545–1568. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Karl. 1944/2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, Smriti. 2021. “Beyond the Coronavirus: Understanding Crises of Social Reproduction.” Global Labour Journal 12 (1): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v12i1.4307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, Lydia. 1981. Women and Revolution. A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoppek, Dorothea Elena. 2021. “How Do We Research Possible Roads to Alternative Futures? Theoretical and Methodological Considerations.” Journal of Critical Realism 20 (2): 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1894908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, Juliet. 2005. “Sustainable Consumption and Worktime Reduction.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 9: 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Prosperity Network. 2017. Social Prosperity for the Future: A Proposal for Universal Basic Service. UCL: IGP.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, Clive. 2020. “A Tale of Three Paradigms: Realising The Revolutionary Potential of Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 169: 106518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Matthew. 2022. “Money for Everything? Universal Basic Income in a Crisis.” Economy and Society 51 (3): 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2022.2035930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toupin, Louise. 2018. Wages for Housework. A History of an International Feminist Movement 1972–77. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein. 1899/2003. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Pennsylvania: A Penn State Electronic Classic Series Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, Lise. 2013. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, Jefim, Julia K. Steinberger, Daniel W. O’Neill, William F. Lamb, and Jaya Krishnakumar. 2021. “Socio-Economic Conditions for Satisfying Human Needs at Low Energy Use: An International Analysis of Social Provisioning.” Global Environmental Change 69: 102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, Kathi. 2020. “Anti/Postwork Feminist Politics and a Case for Basic Income.” TripleC 18 (2): 575–594. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1174
   Google Scholar
• Wichterich, Christa. 2015. “Contesting Green Growth, Connecting Care, Commons and Enough.” In Practicing Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the ‘Green Economy, edited by Wendy Harcourt, and Ingrid Nelson, 67–100. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Widerquist, Karl. 2019. “Three Waves of Basic Income Support.” In The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income: Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, edited by Malcom Torry, 31–45. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winker, Gabriele. 2015. Care Revolution. Schritte in eine Solidarische Gesellschaft. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Winker, Gabriele. 2021. Solidarische Care-Ökonomie: Revolutionäre Realpolitik für Care und Klima. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Zelleke, Almaz. 2008. “Institutionalizing the Universal Caretaker Through a Basic Income?” Basic Income Studies 3 (3): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1133
   Google Scholar
• Zwickl, Klara, Franziska Disslbacher, and Sigrid Stagl. 2016. “Work-Sharing for a Sustainable Economy.” Ecological Economics 121 (1): 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar