823
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Performance-based Research Fund, gender and a cultural cringe

Pages 87-109 | Received 16 Jan 2014, Accepted 06 Dec 2014, Published online: 20 Jan 2015

References

  • Adams, J. 2008. Strategic Review of the Performance-based Research Fund: The Assessment Process. Leeds: Evidence Limited.
  • Association of Commonwealth Universities. 2008. Commonwealth Universities Yearbook. London: Association of Commonwealth Universities.
  • Association of University Staff. 2007. “AUS Tertiary Update: PBRF Still Unfair for Women.” Scoop Education. July 12. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/ED0707/S00044.htm.
  • Baker, M. 2012. Academic Careers and the Gender Gap. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  • Boston, J., B. Mischewski, and R. Smyth. 2005. “Performance-based Research Fund – Implications for Research in the Social Sciences and Social Policy.” Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 24: 55–84.
  • Chan, D. K. K. 2007. “Global Agenda, Local Responses: Changing Education Governance in Hong Kong’s Higher Education.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 5 (1) 109–124. doi:10.1080/14767720601133504.
  • Crothers, C. 2006. Mapping the Social Sciences: Characteristics of New Zealand academic research outputs. BRCSS Occasional Paper Series No. 3, ISSN 1177-2360. Palmerston North: Building Research Capability in the Social Sciences.
  • Cullen, M. 2004. “Speech to Hamilton Club ABN AMRO Craig’s Economic Breakfast Briefing: NZ’s Path to Growth.” Hamilton Club, Hamilton, July 15.
  • Cullen, M. 2007. Forward, in Performance-based Research Fund: Evaluating Research Excellence: The 2006 Assessment, Tertiary Education Commission. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission, v.
  • Curtis, B. 2007. “Academic Life: Commodification, Continuity, Collegiality, Confusion and the Performance-based Research Fund.” New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 33 (2): 1–16.
  • Curtis, B. 2008. “The Performance-based Research Fund: Research Assessment and funding in New Zealand.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 6 (2): 179–194. doi:10.1080/14767720802061488.
  • Curtis, B. Forthcoming. “New Zealand after Neo-liberalism: What Remains?” New Zealand Sociology 30 (2).
  • Curtis, B., and S. Matthewman. 2005. “The Managed University: The PBRF, Its Impacts and Staff Attitudes.” New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 30 (2): 1–18.
  • Curtis, B., S. Phibbs, and Z. Meager. 2011. “Exploring the Underperformance of Female Academics in the Performance-based Research Fund.” In Local Lives/Global Networks: The Australian Sociological Association 2011 Proceedings, edited by S. Threadgold, E. Kirby, and J. Germov. University of Newcastle, ISBN 978-0-646-56779-2.
  • Dale, R. 2003. “Editorial: Introduction.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 1 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1080/1476772032000061789.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
  • Farrar, D. 2012. The Great PBRF Scam. Accessed January 14, 2014. http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/03/the_great_pbrf_scam.html.
  • Grant, J., P.-B. Brutscher, S. E. Kirk, L. Butler, and S. Wooding. 2010. Capturing Research Impacts: A Review of International Practice. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
  • Hacking, I. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hawke, G. R. 1988. Report on Postcompulsory Education and Training in New Zealand. Wellington: Office of the Associate Minister of Education.
  • Head, B., and J. Walter, eds. 1988. Intellectual Movements and Australian Society. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Heald, S. 2004. “Feminism and Teaching about Globalization: Contradictions and Insights.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 2 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/1476772042000177087.
  • Heward, S. 2005. “ The Changing Face of Professional Work in New Zealand.” Masters Thesis in Sociology, The University of Auckland.
  • Hume, L. J. 1991. “Another Look at Cultural Cringe.” Political Theory Newsletter 3: 1–36.
  • Jesson, B. 1987. Behind the Mirror Glass. Auckland: Penguin.
  • Jesson, B. 1989. Fragments of Labour: The Story Behind the Labour Government. Auckland: Penguin.
  • Joyce, S. 2013. Forward, in Performance-based Research Fund: Evaluating Research Excellence: The 2012 Assessment, Tertiary Education Commission. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission, 4.
  • Kelsey, J. 1995. The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
  • Lewis, N. 2005. “Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students: Making a Global Industry in New Zealand.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 3 (1): 5–47. doi:10.1080/14767720500046146.
  • Lewis, J. 2013. Academic Governance: Disciplines and Policy. New York: Routledge.
  • Lyotard, J. 1994. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Maharey, S. 2004. Forward, in Performance-based Research Fund: Evaluating Research Excellence: The 2003 Assessment, Tertiary Education Commission. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission, vii–ix.
  • Mandel, E. 1975. Late Capitalism. London: New Left Books.
  • Murphy, T., and D. Sage. 2014. “Perceptions of the UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2014: A Media Analysis.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36 (6): 603–615. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.957890.
  • Openshaw, R. 2014. “Revisiting New Zealand's Radical Educational Reforms: Continuities and Disjunctures.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 46 (2): 190–206. doi:10.1080/00220620.2014.889098.
  • Pawson. E., and J. Cupples. 2012. “Giving an Account of Oneself: The PBRF and the Neoliberal University.” New Zealand Geographer 68 (1): 14–24.
  • Pearce, G. 1986. “Where Is New Zealand Going?” Doctor thesis in Sociology, in the University of Canterbury.
  • Peters, M. A. 1989. “Techno-Science, Rationality, and the University: Lyotard on the ‘Postmodern Condition’.” Educational Theory 39 (2): 93–105. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1989.40000.x.
  • Peters, M. A. 2001. “Education, Enterprise Culture and the Entrepreneurial Self: A Foucauldian Perspective.” Journal of Educational Enquiry 2 (2): 58–71.
  • Peters, M. C. 2001. Performance-based Research Funding (PBRF): Mixed Model Implementation Details. Discussion Paper (Part C). Wellington: New Zealand Vice Chancellors’ Committee.
  • Phibbs, S., and B. Curtis. 2006. “Gender, Nursing and the PBRF.” Nursing Praxis 22 (2): 4–12.
  • Phillips, A. 1950. “The Cultural Cringe.” Meanjin 9 (4): 299–302.
  • Pickles, K. 2011. “Transnational History and Cultural Cringe: Some Issues for Consideration in New Zealand, Australia and Canada Transnational History and Cultural Cringe.” History Compass 9 (9): 657–673. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00794.x.
  • Pusey, M. 1993. “Reclaiming the Middle Ground: From New Right Economic Rationalism.” In Economic Rationalism: Dead End or Way Forward? edited by S. King and P. Lloyd, 12–27. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
  • Richards, L. 2003. “Class Struggle and Travelling Theory: From the Chile Experience to the New Zealand Experiment.” New Zealand Sociology 18 (2): 115–138.
  • Roberts, P. 2007. “Neoliberalism, Performativity and Research.” Review of Education 53 (4): 349–365.
  • Roberts, P. 2009. “A New Patriotism? Neoliberalism, Citizenship and Tertiary Education in New Zealand.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (4): 410–423.
  • Robertson, S. L. 2010. “Corporatisation, Competitiveness, Commercialisation: New Logics in the Globalising of UK Higher Education.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 8 (2): 191–203. doi:10.1080/14767721003776320.
  • Sector Reference Group 2009. Performance-based Research Fund Sector Reference Group Consultation Paper: Maori Research. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.
  • Shore, C., and L. McLauchlan. 2012. “Universities and the Commercial Construction of Reality: Reply to Commentaries.” Social Anthropology 20 (3): 298–303. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00210.x.
  • Shore, C., and M. Taitz. 2013. “Who ‘Owns’ the University? Institutional Autonomy and Academic Freedom in an Age of Knowledge Capitalism.Globalisation, Societies and Education 10 (2): 201–219.
  • Smith, R., and J. Jesson, eds. 2005. Punishing the DisciplineThe PBRF Regime: Evaluating the Position of EducationWhere to from Here? Auckland: Auckland University of Technology.
  • Tertiary Education Commission. 2004. Performance-based Research Fund: Evaluating Research Excellence: The 2003 Assessment. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.
  • Tertiary Education Commission. 2006. The Performance Based Research Fund (PBRF) Guidelines 2006. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.
  • Tertiary Education Commission. 2007. Performance-based Research Fund: Evaluating Research Excellence: The 2006 Assessment. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.
  • Tertiary Education Commission. 2013. Performance-based Research Fund: Evaluating Research Excellence: The 2012 Assessment. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.
  • White, P., and J. Grice. 2008. Participation and Performance by Māori and Pacific Peoples Researchers in the Performance-based Research Fund, 20032006. A Working Paper Contributing to the Independent Strategic Review of the Performance-based Research Fund. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.