Passports to the Global South, UN flags, favourite experts: understanding the interplay between UNESCO and the OECD within the SDG4 context

References

• Addey, C. 2017. “Golden Relics & Historical Standards: How the OECD Is Expanding Global Education Governance through PISA for Development.” Critical Studies in Education 58 (3): 311–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addey, C. 2018. “The Assessment Culture of International Organizations: From Philosophical Doubt to Statistical Certainty through the Appearance and Growth of International Education Assessments.” In Assessment Cultures – Historical Perspectives, edited by C. Alarcón, and M. Lawn, 379–408. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, Euan, Jeremy Rappleye, and Paul Morris. 2018. “PISA for Development: how the OECD and World Bank Shaped Education Governance Post-2015.” Comparative Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1538635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 1999. “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53 (4): 699–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World, International Organizations in Global Politics. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloem, Simone. 2013. PISA in low and Middle Income Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, Nicholas. 2019. “Invited Essay: It’s Past Time to fix the Broken International Architecture for Education.” International Journal of Educational Development 68: 15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, Peter, and A. Aynsley Kellow. 2011. The OECD: A Study of Organisational Adaptation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cussò, Roser. 2006. “Restructuring UNESCO’s Statistical Services—The ‘Sad Story’ of UNESCO’s Education Statistics: 4 Years Later.” International Journal of Educational Development 26: 532–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem Sarah, Michelle D. Young, Anjalé D. Welton, Katherine Cumings Mansfield, and Pei-Ling Lee. 2014. "The Intellectual Landscape of Critical Policyanalysis." International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27 (9): 1068–1090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916007.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. Brent, Jr., Taeko Okitsu, Romina da Costa, Yuto Kitamura. 2018. Organizational Legitimacy in the Global Education Policy Field: Learning from UNESCO and the Global Monitoring Report. Comparative Education Review, v 62 n1 p31-63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, Laura, and David Rutkowski. 2018. “Pay to Play: What Does PISA Participation Cost in the US?” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1503591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, Sotiria. 2013. “Expert Moves: International Comparative Testing and the Rise of Expertocracy.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 695–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, Miriam, Robert Lingard, Fazal Rizvi, and Sandra Taylor. 2001. The OECD, Globalization and Education Policy. London: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Heyneman, Stephen. 1999. "The Sad Story of UNESCO’s Education Statistics." International Journal of Educational Development 19 (1): 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyneman, Stephen. 2012. The Struggle to Improve Education Statistics in UNESCO: 1980-2000.” Paper presented at the World Bank, May 21, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Phillip. 1999. “Globalisation and the UNESCO Mandate: Multilateral Prospects for Educational Development.” International Journal of Educational Development 19 (1): 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, Hikaru, and Jeremy Rappleye. 2017. “A new Global Policy Regime Founded on Invalid Statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and Economic Growth.” Comparative Education 53 (2): 166–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulnazarova, Aigul, and Christian Ydesen, eds. 2016. UNESCO Without Borders: Educational Campaigns for International Understanding. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, Bryan, ed. 2018. International Large-Scale Assessments in Education. Insider Research Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury. 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, Kerstin. 2007. “How to Become an Influential Actor - the ‘Comparative Turn’.” In OECD Education Policy. New Arenas in Education Governance, edited by Kerstin Martens, Alessandra Rusconi, and Kathrin Leuze, 40–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. 2011. “Constructing the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment.” In Pisa Under Examination, edited by M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, and R. Cowen, 47–59. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-740-0_4.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, Karen. 2006. "Education for All and the New Development Compact." Review of Education 52: 23–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-005-5610-6.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, Karen. 2019. Innovations and Challenges in the Aid Architecture for Education, Keynote talk. GLOBED conference, 19th-20th September 2019, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, Karen, and Francine Menashy. 2014. “The World Bank and Private Provision of Schooling: A Look through the Lens of Sociological Theories of Organizational Hypocrisy.” Comparative Education Review 58 (3): 401–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. The OECD’s Contribution on Education to the Post-2015 Framework: PISA for Development (OECD and post-2015 reflection series). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pizmony Levy, Oren. 2015. Power, Conflict, and Change in World Society: The Case of International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Lecture at Beijing Normal University, China.
   Google Scholar
• Puryear, Jeffrey. 1995. “International Education Statistics and Research: Status and Problems.” International Journal Educational Development 15 (1): 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, Fazal, and Bob Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, Sam, and Bob Lingard. 2013. “The OECD and the Expansion of PISA: New Global Modes of Governance in Education.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (6): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, Gita. 2015. “Standards are Good (for) Business: Standardised Comparison and the Private Sector in Education.” Globalisation, Societies and Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2015.1014883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikly, L. P. 2017. The Future of Education for All as a Global Regime of Educational Governance. Comparative Education Review 1: 22–57.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Richard. 2009. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaomin, L., and E. Auld. 2020. “A Historical Perspective on the OECD’s ‘Humanitarian Turn’: PISA for Development and the Learning Framework 2030.” Comparative Education, 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1781397.
   Google Scholar
• Ydesen, C. 2019. The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education the Formation of a Global Governing Complex. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ydesen, C., and A. Bomholt. 2020. “Accountability Implications of the OECD’s Economistic Approach to Education: A Historical Case Analysis.” Journal of Educational Change 21 (1): 37–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09355-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ydesen, Christian, and Sotiria Grek. 2019. “Securing Organisational Survival – a Historical Inquiry Into the Configurations and Positions of the OECD’s Work in Education During the 1960s.” Paedagogica Historica. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2019.1604774.
   Google Scholar