References
- Addey, C. 2017. “Golden Relics & Historical Standards: How the OECD is Expanding Global Education Governance Through PISA for Development.” Critical Studies in Education 58: 311–325.
- Alacaci, C., and A. K. Erbas. 2010. “Unpacking the Inequality among Turkish Schools: Findings from PISA 2006.” International Journal of Educational Development 30 (2): 182–192.
- Auld, E., and P. Morris. 2019. “Science by Streetlight and the OECD’s Measure of Global Competence: a new Yardstick for Internationalization?” Policy Futures in Education 17 (6): 677–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318819246.
- Auld, E., J. Rappleye, and P. Morris. 2019. “PISA for Development: How the OECD and World Bank Shaped Educational Governance Post-2015.” Comparative Education 55: 197–219.
- Ball, S. 2012. Global Education Inc.: new Policy Networks and the neo-Liberal Imaginary. London: Routledge.
- Bower, C. 1987. Elements of the Post-Liberal Theory of Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Carnoy, M. 2006. “Rethinking the Comparative - and the International.” Comparative Education Review 50 (4): 551–570.
- Dale, R. 2005. “Globalisation, Knowledge Economy, and Comparative Education.” Comparative Education 41 (2): 117–149.
- Elfert, M. 2019. “The OECD, American Power, and the Rise of the “Economics of Education.” In The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education: The Formation of a Global Governing Complex, edited by C. Ydesen, 39–61. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Engel, L. C., and D. Rutkowski. 2018. “Pay to Play: What Does PISA Participation Cost in the US?” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1503591.
- Ertl, H. 2006. “) Educational Standards and the Changing Discourse on Education: the Reception and Consequences of the PISA Study in Germany.” Oxford Review of Education 32 (5): 619–634. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976320.
- European Commission (EU). 2019. The Economic Benefits of Improving Educational Achievement in the European Union: An Update and Extension. Brussels: European Commission.
- Fischman, G. E., A. M. Topper, I. Silova, J. Goebel, and J. L. Holloway. 2018. “Examining the Influence of International Large-Scale Assessments on National Education Policies.” Journal of Education Policy 34 (4): 470–499.
- Galtung, J. 1981. “Structure, Culture, and Intellectual Style: an Essay Comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic, and Nipponic Approaches.” Social Science Information 2 (6): 817–856.
- Gamboa, L., and F. Waltenberg. 2012. “Inequality of Opportunity for Educational Achievement in Latin America: Evidence from PISA 2006-2009.” Economics of Education Review 31 (5): 694–708.
- Gorur, R. 2017. “Towards Productive Critique of Large Scale Comparisons in Education.” Critical Studies in Education 58 (3): 341–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1327876.
- Gorur, R., and M. Wu. 2015. “Leaning Too far? PISA, Policy and Australia's ‘top Five’ Ambitions.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (5): 647–664. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.930020.
- Grek, S. 2009. “Governing by Numbers: the PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (1): 23–37.
- Grey, S., and P. Morris. 2018. “PISA: Multiple ‘Truths’ and Mediatized Global Governance.” Comparative Education 54 (2): 109–131.
- Hanushek, E. 1981. “Throwing Money at Schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1 (1): 19–41.
- Hanushek, E. 1986. “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools.” Journal of Economic Literature 24 (3): 1141–1177.
- Hanushek, E. A., and D. D. Kimko. 2000. “Schooling, Labor-Force Quality, and the Growth of Nations.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 1184–1208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1184.
- Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2007. Education Quality and Economic Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2015a. The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Hayashi, A. 2021. “Some Japanese Ways of Conducting Comparative Educational Research.” Comparative Education [online first: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1805862?journalCode=cced20]
- Helibron, J. 2013. “The Social Sciences as an Emerging Global Field.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 685–703.
- Henrich, J., S. Heine, and A. Norenzayan. 2010. “Most People are not WEIRD.” Nature 466: 29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a.
- Hitokoto, Hidehumi, and Yukiko Uchida. 2015. “Interdependent Happiness: Theoretical Importance and Measurement Validity.” Journal of Happiness Studies 16 (1): 211–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9505-8.
- Hori, G. Victor Sogen. 1994. “Teaching and Learning in the Rinzai Zen Monastery.” Journal of Japanese Studies 20 (1): 5–35.
- International Telecommunications Union (ITU). 2017. Measuring the Information Society Report 2017. Geneva: ITU. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2017/MISR2017_Volume1.pdf.
- Klees, S. 2002. “World Bank Education Policy: new Rhetoric, old Ideology.” International Journal of Educational Development 22 (5): 451–474.
- Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2017a. “A New Global Policy Regime Founded on Invalid Statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and Economic Growth.” Comparative Education 53 (2): 166–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008.
- Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2017b. “Did the Shift to Computer-Based Testing in PISA 2015 Affect Reading Scores? A View from East Asia.” Compare 47 (4): 616–623.
- Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2017c. “A PISA Paradox? an Alternative Theory of Learning as A Possible Solution for Variations in PISA Scores.” Comparative Education Review 61 (2): 269–297.
- Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2018. “Is Exam Hell the Cause of High Academic Achievement in East Asia? The Case of Japan and the Case for Transcending Stereotypes.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (5): 802–826.
- Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2020a, July 22. TINA comes to European Education? The European Commission, PISA, PIAAC, and American-Style Knowledge Capital Theory. NORRAG Blog. https://www.norrag.org/tina-comes-to-european-education-the-european-commission-pisa-piaac-and-american-style-knowledge-capital-theory-by-hikaru-komatsu-and-jeremy-rappleye/.
- Komatsu, H., and J. Rappleye. 2020b. “Reimagining Modern Education: Contributions from Modern Japanese Philosophy and Practice?” ECNU Review of Education 3 (1): 20–45.
- Komatsu, H., I. Silova, and J. Rappleye. 2021. “Student-Centered Learning and Sustainability: Solution or Problem?” Comparative Education Review 65.
- Kurasawa, F. 2004. The Ethnological Imagination: A Cross-Cultural Critique of Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Lewis, S., S. Sellar, and B. Lingard. 2016. “‘PISA for Schools': Topological Rationality and new Spaces of the OECD's Global Educational Governance.” Comparative Education Review 60 (1): 27–57.
- Meyer, H., P. Andrews, L. Atkinson, S. J. Ball, M. Barber, L. Beckett, J. Berardi, et al. 2014. “OECD and PISA Tests are Damaging Education Worldwide-Academics.” Guardian, May 6.
- Meyer, H.-D., and A. Benavot, eds. 2013. PISA, Power and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance. Oxford: Symposium.
- Mohamed, M., and P. Morris. 2021. “Buying, Selling and Outsourcing Educational Reform: the Global Education Industry and ‘Policy Borrowing’ in the Gulf.” Compare. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1607255.
- Nishihira, Tadashi. 2016. “ Preparation for Creative Inspiration: From the Teachings of Japanese Classical Keiko .” International Workshop on Advanced Future Studies, Kyoto University.
- OECD. 2015b. “New Approach Needed to Deliver on Technology’s Potential in Schools” OECD, September 15. Accessed February 24, 2017. http://www.oecd.org/education/new-approach-neededto-deliver-on-technologys-potential-in-schools.htm.
- OECD. 2018a. Education Policy in Japan: Building Bridges towards 2030. Review of National Policies for Education. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264302402-en.pdf?expires=1610417075&id=id&accname=ocid177290&checksum=46B71C08D2BEABEAC355D2FECA432107.
- OECD. 2018b. The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD. Accessed 1 October 2018. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/.
- OECD – Schleicher. 2017. “Press release: Most teenagers happy with their lives but schoolwork anxiety and bullying an issue”. Accessed June 19, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/most-teenagershappy-with-their-lives-but-schoolwork-anxiety-and-bullying-an-issue.htm.
- Rappleye, J. 2020. “Comparative Education as Cultural Critique.” Comparative Education 56 (1): 39–56.
- Rappleye, J., and H. Komatsu. 2017. “How to Make Lesson Study Work in America: a Japanese Perspective on the Onto-Cultural Basis of (Teacher) Education.” Research in Comparative and Interational Education 12 (4): 398–430.
- Rappleye, J., and H. Komatsu. 2018. “Stereotypes as Anglo-American Exam Ritual? Comparisons of Students’ Exam Anxiety in East Asia, America, Australia, and the United Kingdom.” Oxford Review of Education 44: 730–754. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1444598.
- Rappleye, J., and H. Komatsu. 2020. “Is Shadow Education the Driver of East Asia's High Performance on Comparative Learning Assessments?” Educational Policy Analysis Archives 28 (67). https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/4990.
- Rappleye, J., and H. Komatsu. 2021. “Is Knowledge Capital Theory Degenerate? PIAAC, PISA, and Economic Growth.” Compare. (online first). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1612233?tab=permissions&scroll=top.
- Rappleye, Jeremy, Hikaru Komatsu, Yukiko Uchida, Kuba Krys, and Hazel Markus. 2020. “‘Better Policies for Better Lives’?: Constructive Critique of the OECD’s (Mis)Measure of Student Well-Being.” Journal of Education Policy 35 (2): 258–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1576923.
- Sayer, A. 2009. Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science?” Current Sociology 57 (6): 767–786.
- Schleicher, A. 2008. “PIAAC: A New Stategy For Assessing Adult Competencies.” International Review of Education 54 (5): 637–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9105-0.
- Sellar, S., and B. Lingard. 2013. “The OECD and Global Governance in Education.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 710–725.
- Silova, I., J. Rappleye, and E. Auld. 2020. “Beyond the Western Horizon: Rethinking Education, Values, and Policy Transfer.” In Handbook of Education Policy Studies, edited by G. Fan, and T. Popkewitz, 3–29. Singapore: Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/https://doi.org/10.1007/2F978-981-13-8347-2_1#citeas.
- Sorensen, T., and S. Robertson. 2020. “Ordinalization and the OECD’s Governance of Teachers.” Comparative Education Review 64 (1): 21–45.
- Suwa, T. 2014. “Puro Kyoshi” no Ryugi [The Way That “ Professional Teachers” Use]. Tokyo: Chuko.
- Takayama, K. 2008. “The Politics of International League Tables: PISA in Japan’s Achievement Crisis Debate.” Comparative Education 44 (4): 387–407.
- Tröhler, D. 2013. “The OECD and Cold War Culture: Thinking Historically About PISA.” In PISA, Power and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance, edited by H.-D. Meyer, and A. Benavot, 141–161. Oxford: Symposium.
- Tsujimoto, M. 2012. “Manabi” no Fukken [The Restoration of “ Learning”]. Tokyo: Iwanami.
- Uchida, T. 2008. Machiba no Kyoikuron [Education Discourse on the Street]. Kyoto: Mishima.
- Uchida, Y. 2020. Kore kara no shiawase: bunkateki kofukukan no susume [The Future of Happiness: Towards a Cultural View]. Tokyo: Shinyo Publishers.
- Verger, A., C. Fontdevila, and A. Zancajo. 2016. The Privatization of Education: A Political Economy of Global Education Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Waldow, F. 2009. “What Pisa Did and Did Not Do: Germany After the ‘PISA-Shock’.” European Educational Research Journal 8 (3): 476–483.
- Williamson, B. 2021. “Psychodata: Disassembling the Psychological, Economic, and Statistical Infrastructure of ‘Social-Emotional Learning.” Journal of Education Policy 36 (1): 129–154.
- Willis, P. 2000. The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- World Bank. 1995. Priorities and Strategies for Education. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
- World Economic Forum. 2005. “Technology Index.” NationMaster, Accessed January 24, 2017. http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Economy/Technology-index.
- Wulf, C. 2013. Anthropology: A Continental Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Ydesen, C., ed. 2019. The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education: The Formation of a Global Governing Complex. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Zhao, Y. 2020. “Two Decades of Havoc: A Synthesis of Criticism Against PISA.” Journal of Educational Change 21: 245–266.