Popular education and learning as the bridge between activism and knowledge production

References

• Allman, P. 2010. Critical Education Against Global Capitalism. Roterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beeman, J. 2012. Quand la détermination ne suffit pas : la situation des travailleuses de la construction au Québec. Montréal (QC): Conseil d’intervention pour l’accès des femmes au travail (CIAFT).
   Google Scholar
• Bevington, D., and C. Dixon. 2005. “Movement-relevant Theory: Rethinking Social Movement and Scholar Activism.” Social Movement Studies 4 (3): 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bleakney, D., and M. Morrill. 2010. “Worker education and social movement knowledge production: Practical tensions and lessons.” In Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production, edited by A. Choudry, and D. Kapoor, 139–155. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo Adademicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, F., and M. R. Wolf. 2003. “Subjectivity and Reflexivity in the Social Sciences: Epistemic Windows and Methodical Consequences.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 4 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16 (1): 4–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2000. “Introduction.” In Global Ethnography. Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world, edited by M. Burawoy, J. A. Blum, S. George, Z. Gille, T. Gowan, L. Hanney, and M. Thayer. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S., and M. Shahrzad. 2017. Revolutionary Learning: Marxism, Feminism and Knowledge. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charest, É, C. Chatigny, M. Laberge, J. Riel, M. Chadoin, T. Chanady, A. Poirier-Saumure, and T. Sedzro. 2017. Intimidation et harcèlement dans le secteur de la construction: Comprendre une réalité complexe afin de mieux intervenir. Montréal: Commission de la construction du Québec (CCQ).
   Google Scholar
• Chesney, L. 2008. The awareness-raising of Paulo Freire. Rhec No. 11, 53-74.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A. 2010. “Global justice? Contesting NGOization: Knowledge Politics and Containment in Antiglobalization Networks.” In Learning from the Ground Up, edited by D. Kapoor, and A. Choudry, 17–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A. 2013. “Activist Research Practice: Exploring Research and Knowledge Production for Social Action.” Socialist Studies 9 (1): 128–151.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A. 2014. “Everything you always wanted to know about activist research but were afraid to ask: What activist researchers say about theory and methodology.” Contention: The multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest 1 (2): 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A. 2015. Learning Activism. The intellectual life of contemporary Social Movements. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choudry, A., and D. Kapoor. 2013. “Introduction. NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects.” In NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects, edited by A. Choudry, and D. Kapoor, 1–23. London-New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Commission de la construction. 2021. Les femmes dans la construction - portrait statistique 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Conti, G. J. 1977. “Rebels With a Cause: Myles Horton and Paulo Freire.” Community College Review 5 (1): 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• DeFilippis, R., R. Fisher, and E. Shragge. 2010. Contesting Community: The Limits and Potential of Local Organizing. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa Santos, B. 2014. “Más allá del pensamiento abismal: de las líneas globales a una ecología de saberes.” In Epistemologías del sur, edited by B. de Sousa Santos, and M. Meneses, 21–67. Madrid: Ediciones Akal S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, G. 2013. Une mixité en chantier: Les femmes dans les métiers de la construction. Québec: Conseil du statut de la femme (CSF). En ligne:.
   Google Scholar
• Falkembach, E., and A. Torres Carillo. 2020. “Systematization of Experiences: A Practice of Participatory Research from Latin America.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research, edited by H. Bradbury. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. 2012. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. Oakland, CA : Brooklyn, NY : London, UK: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Femmes regroupées en options non traditionnelles (FRONT). 2007. Les mesures d’accès et de maintien des femmes dans l’industrie de la construction. Rapport d’étape déposé au Comité d’encadrement du projet Construire avec elles, mai 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 2000. “Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln, 70–82. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, J. 2006. Workers Centres. Organizing Communities at the Edge of the Dream. Ithaca and London: ILR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, J. 2011. “New Forms to Settle Old Scores: Updating the Worker Centre Story in the United States.” Industrial Relations 66 (4): 604–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flacks, R. 2004. “Knowledge for what? Thoughts on the state of social movements studies.” In Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Culture and Emotion, edited by J. Goodwin, and J. Jasper, 135–153. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, B. 1998. “Labor education in the maesltrom of class struggle.” In Rising from the ashes? Labor in the age of “global” capitalism, edited by P. Meiksins, E. Meiksins Wood, and M. Yates, 100–126. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, G. 1999. “Adult Education and Capitalist Reorganisation.” In Learning in Social Action: A contribution to understand informal education, edited by G. Foley, 66–87. London-New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1971. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel-Roy, L., É Dumont-Lagacé, and S. Coulombe. 2019. Typologie des violences à caractère sexiste et sexuel dans l’industrie de la construction et de leurs impacts sur le maintien en emploi des femmes. Montréal (QC): Action travail des femmes (ATF).
   Google Scholar
• Holford, J. 1995. “Why Social Movements Matter: Adult Education Theory, Cognitive Praxis, And the Creation of Knowledge.” Adult Education Quarterly 45 (2): 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, M., and D. Jacobs. 2003. The Myles Horton reader: Education for social change. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, S. 2012. Sex, Race and Class the Perspective of Winning: A Selection of Writings, 1952-2011. Oakland: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. 2003. “Who stole my methodology? Co-opting PAR [1].” Globalisation, Societies and Education 1 (2): 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N. H., and G. M. Russell. 2002. “Research as Interacting Dialogic Processes: Implications for Reflexivity.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3 (3).
   Google Scholar
• King, G., and E. N. Powell. 2008. How not to lie without statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Naples, N. 1997. Community Activism and Feminist Politics: Organizing Across Race, Class, and Gender. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neigh, S. 2012. Resisting the State: Canadian History Through the Stories of Activists. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Novelli, M. 2010. “Learning to Win: Exploring Knowledge and Strategy Development in Antiprivatization Struggles in Colombia.” In Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production, edited by A. Choudry, and D. Kapoor, 121–138. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 1989. The Everyday World As Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern.
   Google Scholar
• Soussi, A. S., and Y. Sadik. 2020. Are the Realities of the South Soluble in the Thought of the North? Challenges and Prospects. Revue Interventions Économiques.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlau, R. 2019. Occupying Schools, Occupying Land. How the Landless Workers Movement Transformed Brazilian Education. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. L. 1983. Learning Liberation: Women’s Response to Men’s Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. 1996. “The Colonizer/colonized Chicano Ethnographer: Identity, Marginalization, and Co-optation in the Field.” Harvard Education Review, 711–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar