Evolutionary distinctiveness and conservation priority of the endangered Najas ancistrocarpa (Hydrocharitaceae)

References

• Agnarsson, I., Kuntner, M., & May-Collado, L. J. (2010). Dogs, cats, and kin: A molecular species-level phylogeny of Carnivora. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 54, 726–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arponen, A. (2012). Prioritizing species for conservation planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 875–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, B. G. (1992). Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: An example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1, 3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, R. R., Heled, J., Kuehnert, D., Vaughan, T. G., Wu, C. -H., Xie, D., … Drummond, A. J. (2014). BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. Public Library of Science Computational Biology, 10, e1003537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, M. W., Salamin, N., Wilkinson, M., Dunwell, J. M., Kesanakurthi, R. P., Haidar, N., & Savolainen, V. (2005). Land plants and DNA barcodes: Short-term and long-term goals. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 360, 1889–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C. D. K. (1996). Aquatic and wetland plants of India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuénoud, P., Savolainen, V., Chatrou, L. W., Powell, M., Grayer, R. J., & Chase, M. W. (2002). Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany, 89, 132–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wilde, W. J. J. O. (1962). Najadaceae. In C. G. G. J. van Steenis (Ed.), Flora Malesiana ( Ser. 1, Vol. 6, pp. 157–171). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. J., & Doyle, J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 11–15).
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006). Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. Public Library of Science Biology, 4, e88.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. J., & Rambaut, A. (2007). BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BioMed Central Evolutionary Biology, 7, 214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenker, J., Tedeschi, L. G., Pyron, R. A., & Nogueira, C. de C. (2014). Phylogenetic diversity, habitat loss and conservation in South American pitvipers (Crotalinae: Bothrops and Bothrocophias). Diversity and Distributions, 20, 1108–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaiarsa, M. P., Alencar, L. R. V., Valdujo, P. H., Tambosi, L. R., & Martins, M. (2015). Setting conservation priorities within monophyletic groups: An integrative approach. Journal for Nature Conservation, 24, 49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, R. K., & Wooton, J. W. (1979). Aquatic and Wetland Plants of the Southeastern United States. Monocotyledons. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. R. (1977). The Najadaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 58, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. R. (1979). Revision of North and Central American Najas (Najadaceae). Sida, 8, 34–56.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. R. (2000). Najadaceae. In Flora of North America Editorial Committee (Eds.), Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 22, Magnoliophyta: Alismatidae, Arecidae, Commelinidae (in part), and Zingiberidae (pp. 77–83). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. R. (2001). Hydrocharitaceae. In T. Santisuk & K. Larsen (Eds.), Flora of Thailand 7 (pp. 365–382). Bagnkok: The Forest Herbarium, Royal Forest Department.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, D. (2012). Threatened reef corals of the world. Public Library of Science One, 7, e34459.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, N. J. B., Redding, D. W., Meredith, H. M., & Safi, K. (2012). Phylogenetically-informed priorities for amphibian conservation. Public Library of Science One, 7, e43912.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, N. J. B., Turvey, S. T., Collen, B., Waterman, C., & Baillie, J. E. M. (2007). Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. Public Library of Science One, 2, e296.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, Y., Tanaka, N., Gale, S., Yano, O., & Li, J. (2017). Phylogeny of Najas (Hydrocharitaceae) revisited: Implications for systematics and evolution. Taxon, 66, 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN (2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Retrieved from: www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 24 January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jetz, W., Thomas, G., Joy, J., Redding, D., Hartmann, K., & Mooers, A. (2014). Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds. Current Biology, 24, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. L. (2017). Algorithmic improvements to species delimitation and phylogeny estimation under the multispecies coalescent. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 74, 447–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. L., Aydin, Z., & Oxelman, B. (2015). DISSECT: An assignment-free Bayesian discovery method for species delimitation under the multispecies coalescent. Bioinformatics, 31, 991–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 772–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubugata, G., & Kato, M. (2015 . onwards). Global red list of Japanese threatened plants. Retrieved from: http://www.kahaku.go.jp/english/research/db/botany/redlist/index.html (accessed 31 December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Kress, W. J., Wurdack, K. J., Zimmer, E. A., Weigt, L. A., & Janzen, D. H. (2005). Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 8369–8374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Les, D. H., Peredo, E. L., King, U. M., Benoit, L. K., Tippery, N. P., Ball, C. J., & Shannon, R. K. (2015). Through thick and thin: Cryptic sympatric speciation in the submersed genus Najas (Hydrocharitaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 82, 15–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Les, D. H., Sheldon, S. P., & Tippery, N. P. (2010). Hybridization in hydrophiles: Natural interspecific hybrids in Najas (Hydrocharitaceae). Systematic Botany, 35, 736–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, D. P., & Barrington, D. S. (2003). Major evolutionary events in the origin and diversification of the fern genus Polystichum (Dryopteridaceae). American Journal of Botany, 90, 508–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowden, R. M. (1986). Taxonomy of the Najas L. (Najadaceae) in the neotropics. Aquatic Botany, 24, 147–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison, W. P., & Maddison, D. R. (2011). Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75. Retrieved from: http://mesquiteproject.org (accessed 11 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, W. P., & Mooers, A. Ø. (2007). Tuatara: Conservation priority in a phylogenetic context. Version 1.0. Retrieved from: http://mesquiteproject.org/packages/tuatara (accessed 11 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. (1870). Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Gattung Najas. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
   Google Scholar
• Malaney, J. L., & Cook, J. A. (2013). Using biogeographical history to inform conservation: The case of Preble's meadow jumping mouse. Molecular Ecology, 22, 6000–6017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marris, E. (2007). Conservation priorities: What to let go. Nature, 450, 152–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, R. M. (1990). Taxonomy as destiny. Nature, 347, 129–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., & Schwartz, T. (2010). Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) (pp. 1–8). 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Mooers, A. Ø., Faith, D. P., & Maddison, W. P. (2008). Converting endangered species categories to probabilities of extinction for phylogenetic conservation prioritization. Public Library of Science One, 3, e3700.
   Google Scholar
• Nylander, J. A. A. (2002). MrModeltest. Version 1.0. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University. Retrieved from: http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html (accessed 11 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut, A. (2009). FigTree version 1.3.1: Tree Figure Drawing Tool. Retrieved from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ ( accessed 11 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut, A., Suchard, M. A., Xie, W., & Drummond, A. J. (2014). Tracer. Version 1.6. Retrieved from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (accessed 11 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Redding, D. W., & Mooers, A. O. (2015). Ranking mammal species for conservation and the loss of both phylogenetic and trait diversity. Public Library of Science Biology, 10, e0141435.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., … Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2012). MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61, 539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setoguchi, H., & Ohba, H. (1995). Phylogenetic relationships in Crossostylis (Rhizophoraceae) inferred from restriction site variation of chloroplast DNA. Journal of Plant Research, 108, 87–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22, 2688–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., & Rougemont, J. (2008). A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology, 57, 758–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 40b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Triest, L. (1988). A revision of the genus Najas L. (Najadaceae) in the Old World. Brussells: Academie Royale des Sciences d'Outre-Mer. Classe des Sciences naturelles et medicales, 22, 1–172.
   Google Scholar
• Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J., & Williams, P. H. (1991). What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation, 55, 235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. F., Guo, Y. H., Haynes, R. R., & Hellquist, C. B. (2010). Hydrocharitaceae. In Z. Y. Wu & P. H. Raven (Eds.), Flora of China (Vol. 4, pp. 91–102). Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitten, W. M., Williams, N. H., & Chase, M. W. (2000). Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: Combined molecular evidence. American Journal of Botany, 87, 1842–1856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, P. G., Soltis, P. S., & Soltis, D. E. (1994). Phylogenetic relationships of Dennstaedtioid ferns: Evidence from rbcL sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 3, 383–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. -P. (2000). Najadaceae. In T. C., Huang, D. E., Boufford, C. F., Hsieh, C. S., Kuoh, H., Ohashi, & H. J., Su (Eds.), Flora of Taiwan (2nd ed, Vol. 5, pp. 32–34). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (1997). Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 717–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar