Harnessing the value of open innovation: change in the moderating role of absorptive capability

References

• Amsden, A. H., & Tschang, F. T. (2003). A new approach to assessing the technological complexity of different categories of R&D (with examples from Singapore). Research Policy, 32(4), 553–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquilani, B., Abbate, T., & Codini, A. (2017). Overcoming cultural barriers in open innovation processes through intermediaries: A theoretical framework. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(3), 447–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahemia, H., & Squire, B. (2010). A contingent perspective of open innovation in new product development projects. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(04), 603–627.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. F., Olesen, M. H., & Kjær, J. S. (2005). The industrial dynamics of open innovation – Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, 34(10), 1533–1549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, F., & Rice, J. (2009). The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating “open innovation” outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(02), 201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, K.-P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10), 368–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 39(4), 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Park, Y. (2009). Structural effects of R&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8986–8992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2016). “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 11.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-De Castro, G., Delgado-Verde, M., Amores-Salvadó, J., & Navas-López, J. E. (2013). Linking human, technological, and relational assets to technological innovation: Exploring a new approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 11(2), 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mortara, L., & Minshall, T. (2011). How do large multinational companies implement open innovation? Technovation, 31(10), 586–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). Frascati manual 2015 – Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Salge, T. O., Bohné, T. M., Farchi, T., & Piening, E. P. (2012). Harnessing the value of open innovation: The moderating role of innovation management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(03), 1240005.
   Google Scholar
• Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31(1), 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines, R., Jones, M., & McCarthy, G. (2015). Collaborating across institutional and jurisdictional boundaries: Enabling the emergence of a national innovation system through public knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(2), 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43, 805–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzeman, S., Slowinski, G., Dirkx, R., Gollob, L., Tao, J., Ward, S., & Miraglia, S. (2006). Harnessing external technology for innovation. Research-Technology Management, 49(3), 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, J. J. (2015). How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian dynamics of open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1(1), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, J. J., Park, K., Kim, J., & Yang, J. (2016a). Open innovation effort, entrepreneurship orientation and their synergies onto innovation performance in SMEs of Korea. Science, Technology and Society, 21(3), 366–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, J. J., Won, D., & Park, K. (2016b). Dynamics from open innovation to evolutionary change. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 469–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar