Formal-informal channels of university-industry knowledge transfer: the case of Australian business schools

References

• AACSB. (2018). Association to advance collegiate schools of business. Retrieved July 28 https://www.aacsb.edu.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA. (2016). ACARA STEM connections project report Sydney. Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, A. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4), 285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrah, S. N., Burgess, T. F., Grimshaw, P., & Shaw, N. E. (2013). Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit. Technovation, 33(2–3), 50–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AQF. (2018). Australian qualifications framework. Retrieved July 20 https://www.aqf.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Arenas, J. J., & González, D. (2018). Technology transfer models and elements in the University-Industry collaboration. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austrade. (2018). Why Australia. Benchmark Report. Sydney: Australian Trade and Investment Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2018a). Australian government response to innovation and science Australia’s Australia 2030: Prosperity through innovation. Canberra: Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2018b). State and territory government. Retrieved from https://www.australia.gov.au/about-government/how-government-works/state-and-territory-government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Technology Network. (2018). Our universities. Retrieved July 10 https://www.atn.edu.au/about-us/our-universities/.
   Google Scholar
• Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. L. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76–77(August–September), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37, 1837–1853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–Industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, H., Zhang, Z., Huang, Q., & Liao, Z. (2018). The effect of university–Industry collaboration policy on universities’ knowledge innovation and achievements transformation: Based on innovation chain. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9653-9
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). National innovation and science agenda. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte Access Economics. (2014). Australia’s STEM workforce: A survey of employers. ACT, Australia: Office of the Chief Scientist.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training - Australian Government. (2018). Higher education sector. Retrieved July 20 https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-0.
   Google Scholar
• Díez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sánchez, Á. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park. Technovation, 50–51(April–May), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Education Council. (2018). Optimising STEM industry-school partnerships: inspiring Australia’s next generation. Melbourne: Education Services Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., Perkins, K., Pearce, J., & Hong, J. (2015). Work integrated learning in stem in Australian universities. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2014). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• EQUIS. (2018). European quality improvement system. Retrieved July 28 https://efmdglobal.org/accreditations/business-schools/equis/.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘mode 2ʹ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EY. (2018). Can the universities of today lead learning for tomorrow? The university of the future. Melbourne: Ernst & Young Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., Raposo, M., Rutten, R., & Varga, A. (2013). Cooperation, clusters, and knowledge transfer – universities and firms towards regional competitiveness. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, B. B., Schaeffer, P. R., Vonortas, N. S., & Queiroz, S. (2018). Quality comes first: University-industry collaboration as a source of academic entrepreneurship in a developing country. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 263–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, M., & Haase, H. (2015). University–Industry cooperation: Researchers’ motivations and interaction channels. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 36(April–June), 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Frunzaru, V., Vătămănescu, E.-M., Gazzola, P., & Bolisani, E. (2018). Challenges to higher education in the knowledge economy: Anti-intellectualism, materialism and employability. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(3), 388–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group of Eight Australia. (2018). Member information. Retrieved July 10 https://go8.edu.au/page/member-information.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities: Emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 551–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Jasovska, P., Rammal, H. G., & Rose, E. L. (2018). Global mobility of professionals and the transfer of tacit knowledge in multinational service firms. Journal of Knowledge Management. doi:10.1108/JKM-09-2017-0399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. (2017, October 11). How Australian universities must change in a digital world. AcuityMag.
   Google Scholar
• Hermans, J., & Castiaux, A. (2017). Contingent knowledge transfers in university–Industry R&D projects. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(1), 68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innovation and Science Australia. (2017). Australia 2030: Prosperity through innovation. A plan for Australia to thrive in the global innovation race. Canberra: Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklauskas, A., Banaitis, A., Ferreira, F. A. F., Ferreira, J. J. M., Amaratunga, D., Lepkova, N., … Banaitienė, N. (2018). An evaluation system for University–Industry partnership sustainability: Enhancing options for entrepreneurial universities. Sustainability, 10(1), 119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. (2015). The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation, 36–37, 1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, P. (2018, February 28). $2.2bn funding cut to universities ‘a cap on opportunity for all’. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University–Industry links for technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Muscio, A., & Vallanti, G. (2014). Perceived obstacles to University–Industry collaboration: Results from a qualitative survey of Italian academic departments. Industry and Innovation, 21(5), 410–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). A Guiding Framework for Entrepreneurial Universities: The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Develop and the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Chief Scientist. (2013). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, H., Fernandez-Esquinas, M., & Uyarra, E. (2015). Universities and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as sources of knowledge for innovative firms in peripheral regions. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1873–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piterou, A., & Birch, C. (2014). The role of higher education institutions in supporting innovation in SMEs: University-based incubators and student internships as knowledge transfer tools. Inimpact: the Journal of Innovation Impact:, 7(1), 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2010). Innovation, spillovers and university–Industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 231–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QUT. (2018). QUT leaves ATN. Retrieved from https://www.qut.edu.au/news?id=136330.
   Google Scholar
• Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. (2017). University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62–63, 42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RMIT. (2018). Home page. Retrieved from https://www.rmit.edu.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Scandura, A. (2016). University–Industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. Research Policy, 45(9), 1907–1922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university–Industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Soh, P.-H., & Subramanian, A. M. (2014). When do firms benefit from university–Industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(6), 807–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Study in Australia - Australian Government. (2018a). List of Australian universities. Retrieved July 10 https://www.studyinaustralia.gov.au/english/australian-education/universities-and-higher-education/list-of-australian-universities.
   Google Scholar
• Study in Australia - Australian Government. (2018b). TEQSA. Retrieved July 20 https://www.studyinaustralia.gov.au/english/australian-education/universities-and-higher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Times Higher Education. (2018, September 27). World university rankings 2019. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2019/world-ranking#!/page/1/length/25/locations/AU/subjects/3096/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• UniSA. (2018). Business school division brochure. Adelaide, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Universities Australia. (2018a, January 30). Innovation plan will rely on a strong university sector. Universities Australia Media Release.
   Google Scholar
• Universities Australia. (2018b). University profiles. Retrieved July 10 https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/australias-universities/university-profiles#.W685DC97HVo.
   Google Scholar
• Vedovello, C. (1997). Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation, 17(9), 491–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitwell, G. (2015). Our strategic intent 2016–2020: Business not as usual. Sydney, NSW: : The University of Sydney Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2018, July 9). Funds warning to unis over lack of STEM teachers. Perth Now.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar