The future of university–industry collaboration: scenario analysis based on case of Estonia

References

• Al Shami, A., Lotfi, A., Coleman, S., & Dostál, P. (2015). Unified knowledge-based economy hybrid forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. T., & Martin, D. P. (2013). Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence-based comparison of knowledge transfer offices practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1), 38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities–Industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T., Pashby, I. A. N., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative r & d projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272–285.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettis, R., & Hitt, M. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, C. (2018). The power of human–machine collaboration: Artificial intelligence, business automation, and the smart economy. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 13(4), 51.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, G. (2016). The practice of scenario planning: An analysis of inter#and intra#organizational strategizing. British Journal of Management, 27(1),77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36, 694–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennenraedts, R., Bekkers, R., & Verspagen, B. (2006, March). The different channels of university-industry knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence from biomedical engineering. In Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies (pp. 1–19), The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G. (2012). Series foreword. In E. G. Carayannis, U. Varblane, & T. Roolaht (Eds.), Innovation systems in small catching-up economies. New perspectives on practice and policy (pp. v–viii). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the “Mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 327–372.
   Google Scholar
• Chermack, T. J., Lynham, S. A., & van der Merwe, L. (2006). Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of learning organization characteristics. Futures, 38(7), 767–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R & amp; D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, C. E., Ford, D. P., Gallupe, B., Turel, O., & Zweig, D. (2009). The effects of competition and time constraints on knowledge transfer: Exploratory findings from two experiments. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesHICSS (pp. 1–10). Big Island, HI, USA. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2009.429
   Google Scholar
• Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO. (2018). Global innovation index 2018: Energizing the World with innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, Geneva
   Google Scholar
• Davey, T., Baaken, T., Galan Muros, V., & Meerman, A. (2011). The state of European University-business cooperation. Final Report – Study on the cooperation between Higher Education Institutions and public and private organisations in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.ub-cooperation.eu/pdf/final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davey, T., Meerman, A., Galan Muros, V., Orazbayeva, B., & Baaken, T. 2018. The state of university-business cooperation in Europe. Final Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2766/676478
   Google Scholar
• Dewi Rosadi, S., Suhardi, S., & Kristyan, S. A. (2018, January). Privacy challenges in the application of smart city in Indonesia. In 2017 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation,ICITSI 2017 - Proceedings (pp. 405–409). Bandung, Indonesia. doi:10.1109/ICITSI.2017.8267978
   Google Scholar
• Dirgová, E., Janičková, J., & Klencová, J. (2018). New trends in the labor market in the context of shared economy. TEM Journal,7(4), 791–797.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• EAS. (2016). EAS. Retrieved from www.eas.ee
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123 doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, J. J. (2013). Knowledge spillovers: Cooperation between universities and KIBS. R&D Management, 43(5), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J., Dana, L., & Ratten, V. (2017). Knowledge spillover-based strategic entrepreneurship. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fiaz, M., & Baseerat, R. (2011). University-industry ecosystem: Factors for collaborative environment, In International conference on advanced software engineering and its applications. (pp. 651–661). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Firlej, K., & Żmija, D. (2017). The specificity of knowledge management in the food industry in Poland. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 20(1), 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–Industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galán-Muros, V., & Plewa, C. (2016). What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessment. R and D Management, 46(2), 369–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Almeida, D. J., & Klassen, N. (2017). The influence of knowledge-based factors on taxi competitiveness at island destinations: An analysis on tips. Tourism Management, 59, 110–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goltz, N. S., Cameron-Huff, A., & Dondoli, G. (2018). Rethinking global-regulation: World’s law meets artificial intelligence. Information & Communications Technology Law, 1–10. doi:10.1080/13600834.2019.1557400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G., & Sherwell, V. (2002). Risks in university-industry research links and the implications for university management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(1), 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., & Es-Sadki, N. (2018). European innovation scoreboard 2018. Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.1177/0964663912467814
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, S., Kansy, S., Mueller-Seitz, G., & Ringlstetter, M. (2009). Weblogs for organizational knowledge sharing and creation: A comparative case study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7(2), 120–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, J., & Nourbakhsh, I. (2018). Teaching artificial intelligence and humanity. Communications of the ACM, 61(2), 29–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajoux, B. A. R. (2013). Big data spawns new bills, SEC tools, and court cases. Washington Update.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton Smith, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The Triple Helix in the context of global change: Dynamics and challenges. Prometheus, 32(4), 321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Liew, M. S., Shahdan, T. N. T., & Lim, E. S. (2013). Enablers in enhancing the relevancy of university-industry collaboration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1889–1896.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. H. S. (2018). Examining social capital, organizational learning and knowledge transfer in cultural and creative industries of practice. Tourism Management, 64, 258–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livesey, D., Borrell-Damian, L., & Smith, J. H. (2012). University-business collaborative research: Goals, outcomes and new assessment tools. European University Association, The EUIMA Collaborative Research Project Report.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Leyva, S., & Mungaray-Moctezuma, A. B. (2017). Knowledge-based economy as a foundation for the economic development of countries. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(4), 481–501.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems – Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119.
   Google Scholar
• Masso, J., Eamets, J., Meriküll, J., & Kanep, H. (2009). Support for evolution in the knowledge-based economy: Demand for PhDs in Estonia. Baltic Journal of Economics, 9(1), 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinert, S. (2014). Field manual – Scenario building. European Trade Union Institute (p. 32). Retrieved from https://www.etui.org/Publications2/Guides/Field-manual-Scenario-building
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., Mcadam, R., Moffett, S., Alexander, A., & Puthusserry, P. (2016). Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: An absorptive capacity perspective. R and D Management, 46(2), 383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C., & Cappelen, K. (2014). Exploring the mechanisms of knowledge transfer in University-industry collaborations: A study of companies, students and researchers. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(4), 375–393.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Ocde/Gd, 96(102), 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Okamuro, H., & Nishimura, J. (2013). Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 273–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., … Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polt, W., Rammer, C., Gassler, H., Schibany, A., & Schartinger, D. (2001). Benchmarking industry–science relations: The role of framework conditions. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 247–258.
   Google Scholar
• Quiceno, G., Álvarez, C., Ávila, R., Fernández, Ó., Franco, C. J., Kunc, M., & Dyner, I. (2019). Scenario analysis for strategy design: A case study of the Colombian electricity industry. Energy Strategy Reviews, 23, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. (2017). University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62–63, 42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(3), 237–262.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, F., & Rosli, A. (2014). Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1970–1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxburgh, C. (2009). The use and abuse of scenarios. McKinsey Quarterly, 1(10), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: Their impact on technology transfer activities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J., & van der Heijden, C. A. (1992). Integrating scenarios into strategic planning at Royal Dutch/Shell. Planning Review, 20(3), 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view: Planning for the future in an uncertain world. New York: Doubleday Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Seppo, M, Rõigas, K, & Varblane, U. (2014). Governmental support measures for university–industry cooperation—comparative view in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 388–408. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0193-8
   Google Scholar
• Seppo, M., Rõigas, K., & Varblane, U. (2014). Governmental support measures for university–industry cooperation—Comparative view in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 388–408.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, J. (2018). Smart machines and smarter policy: Foreign investment regulation, national security, and technology transfer in the age of artificial intelligence. The John Marshall Law Review, 51(2), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skórska, A. (2015). Knowledge-intensive business services – State and forecast of development. Econometrics, 3(49), 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tapinos, E. (2012). Perceived environmental uncertainty in scenario planning. Futures, 44(4), 338–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, S. J., Veiga, P. M., & Fernandes, C. A. (2019). The knowledge transfer and cooperation between universities and enterprises. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–12. doi:10.1080/14778238.2018.1561166
   Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.
   Google Scholar
• Vadi, M., & Rajalo, S. (2013) Ettevõtete ja teadusasutuste koostöö eripärad. Uuringu vahearuanne. Teadus- ja innovatsioonipoliitika seireprogramm (TIPS). (in Estonian). Retrieved from http://tips.ut.ee/index.php?module=32&op=1&id=3596
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, K., Bradfield, R., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Wright, G. (2002). The sixth sense: Accelerating organizational learning with scenarios. Baffins Lane, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Varblane, U., Mets, T., & Ukrainski, K. (2008). Role of university–industry–government linkages in the innovation processes of a small catching-up economy. Industry and Higher Education, 22(6), 373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Varblane, U., Roolaht, T., Lilles, A., Lukason, O., & Seppo, M. (2015). Raport, Uuringu „Ettevõtete ja kõrgkoolide koostöökogemuse seire“. Tartu. (in Estonian)
   Google Scholar
• Venkitachalam, K., & Ambrosini, V. (2017). A triadic link between knowledge management, information technology and business strategies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–Industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vochozka, M. (2018). Participating in a highly automated society: How artificial intelligence disrupts the job market. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 13(4), 57.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2017). The global competitiveness index historical dataset [Data set]. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-index-2017-2018/downloads/?fbclid=IwAR14gafTYytQHTfHbhxMk-eV6XJrBNlf3rRzBFiVdHzokwnAAzoTUOiqqk4
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M., Clarysseb, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaertd, M. (2008). Midrange universities’ linkages with industry: knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37, 1205–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2017). Space commercialization and the development of Space Law. In P. Read et al. (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of planetary science. Oxford University Press, id. 42. ISBN:978-0-190-64792-6.
   Google Scholar