Identifying and Ranking Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques Affecting Organizational Information Security Improvement

References

• Asian Productivity Organization (APO). (2010). Knowledge management tools and techniques manual. Retrived from http://www.apo-tokyo.org/00e-books/IS-43_KM-ools_and_Techniques_2010/IS-43_KM-ools_and_Techniques_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Azar, A., & Faraji, H. (2010). Fuzzy management science (pp. 50–180). Tehran, Iran: Mehraban Nashr Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benaroch, M., Chernobai, A., & Goldstein, J. (2012). An internal control perspective on the market value consequences of IT operational risk events. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(4), 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertino, E., Khan, L. R., Sandhu, R., & Thuraisingham, B. (2006). Secure knowledge management: Confidentiality, trust, and privacy. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans, 36(3), 429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, L. D., Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2008). Information security and risk management. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 64–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., & Güleryüz, S. (2016). An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebula, J. J., & Young, L. R. (2010). A taxonomy of operational cyber security risks (pp. 1–47).  Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12168–12179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. H., Hsu, T. S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 908–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, V. Y. C., Lien, H. P., Liu, C. H., Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Yang, L. S. (2011). Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 11(1), 265–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C., Lien, H. P., & Tzeng, G. H. (2010). Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 926–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y.-J., Chen, H.-C., Tzeng, G.-H., & Shyu, J. Z. (2015). Marketing strategy based on customer behavior for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2), 143–165.
   Google Scholar
• Comm Ja‘Nel Esterhuysen, B. (2003).The management of operational risk in South African banks, Dissertation submitted for the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Commerce, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education
   Google Scholar
• Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M., & Batieha, F. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 8384–8391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESFANDYAR Pour, R. Z.,  & Akbari, M. (2016). Identifying mental models in terms of information security polices. IT Management, 8(2), 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Freimer, M., & Yu, P. L. (1976). Some new results on compromise solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 22(6), 688–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Radfar, I. (2011). A research on hybrid models of balanced scorecard and MADM methods for selecting the best hybrid model. American Journal of Scientific Research, 36, 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, J. W. R., Tsai, C. L., Tzeng, G.H., & Fang, S. K. (2011). Combined dematel technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on capm. Expertsystems with Applications, 38, 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. Y., Tzeng, G. H., & Ho, W. R. J. (2011). System on chip design service e-business value maximization through a novel MCDM framework. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 7947–7962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, Y. H., Chou, S. C. T., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). Knowledge management adoption and assessment for SMEs by a novel MCDM approach. Decision Support Systems, 51(2), 270–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilvonen, I., Jussila, J., & Kärkkäinen, H. (2015). Towards a business-driven process model for knowledge security risk management: making sense of knowledge risks. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, C., & Singh, U. K. (2017). Information security risks management framework – A step towards mitigating security risks in university network. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 35, 128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouini, M., Rabai, L. B. A., & Aissa, A. B. (2014). Classification of security threats in information systems. In Procedia Computer Science, 32, 489–496.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, M., & Alizadeh, A. (2014). Combined approach of ANP and DEMATEL to use advertising media. Research Operation and Its Applications, 11th Year, 4(43), 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Khani, M., & Nadi, F. (2011). Knowledge management system performance assessment based on balanced scorecard using fuzzy model (Case study: Ministry of road and transportation). IT Management, 3(9), 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Kimiz, D. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Burlington, USA: Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, M., & Dorantes, C. (2006). The impact of information security breaches on financial performance of the breached firms: An empirical investigation. J Inf Technol Manage, 17(2), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. A. N. E. P. (2012). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (pp. 295–310). New Jersey, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. S., Tzeng, G. H., Guan, J. L., Chien, K. T., & Huang, J. M. (2009). Combined MCDM techniques for exploring stock selection based on Gordon model. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3 PART 2), 6421–6430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009a). Identification of interrelationship of key customers’ needs based on structural model for services/capabilities provided by a semiconductor-intellectual property mall. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 215(6), 2001–2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009b). Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9891–9898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S. (2003). Knowledge management technologies and applications – Literature review from 1995 to 2002. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(2), 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G. H., Tsai, C. Y., & Hsu, C. C. (2011). A hybrid ANP model in fuzzy environments for strategic alliance partner selection in the airline industry. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 11(4), 3515–3524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, J. J. H., Tzeng, G.-H., & Chang, H.-C. (2007). Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13, 243–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Strategies for improving cruise product sales using hybrid “multiple criteria decision making” models. The Service Industries Journal, 33(5), 542–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhart, M., & Thalmann, S. (2015). Protecting organizational knowledge: A structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 190–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Sánchez, J. F., Martínez-Palacios, M. T. V., & Venegas-Martínez, F. (2016). An analysis on operational risk in international banking: A Bayesian approach (2007–2011). Estudios Gerenciales, 32(140), 208–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massingham, P. (2014). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – Managing knowledge resources. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1075–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, Y. K., Roy, S., & Saxena, M. (2010). A knowledge management model to improve information security. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 7(6), 105–108. Retrieved from http://www.ijcsi.org/papers/7-6-105-108.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nikoukar, G., Soltani, M., & Pashai, A. (2014). Knowledge management infrastructures in one of Armed Force Universities. IT Management, 6(3), 505–528.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. (1998). Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering. Belgrade, 2(1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou Yang, Y.-P., Shieh, H.-M., Leu, J.-D., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2009). A VIKOR-based multiple criteria decision method for improving information security risk. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(2), 267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panahi, S., Watson, J., & Partridge, H. (2013). Towards tacit knowledge sharing over social web tools. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollet, H. (2003). Knowledge management processes and technologies. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggles, R. (1997). Knowledge management tools. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, M., Lytras, M., & Maier, R. (2008). Knowledge management strategies: a handbook of applied technologies. Hershey, PA: USA IGI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, R. W. (2003). Decision making in complex environment: The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh: Super Decisions.
   Google Scholar
• Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Chen, I. S., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Akbarzadeh, Z. (2011). Using DEMATEL method for cause and effect relations of BSC in Universities of Iran, The 1st International Symposium and 10th Balkan Conference on Operational Research (BALCOR), Thessaloniki, 333–340.
   Google Scholar
• Said, A. R., Abdullah, H., Uli, J., & Mohamed, Z. A. (2014). Relationship between organizational characteristics and information security knowledge management implementation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 433–443.
   Google Scholar
• Shamala, P., Ahmad, R., Zolait, A., & Sedek, M. (2017). Integrating information quality dimensions into information security risk management (ISRM). Journal of Information Security and Applications, 36, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y. C., Lin, G. T. R., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1468–1481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., Gupta, M., & Ojha, A. (2014). Identifying factors of “ organizational information security management .”. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(5), 644–667.
   Google Scholar
• Taj Far, A. H., Mahmudi, M., Soltani, F., & Soltani, P. (2014). Ranking barriers to information security management system and extent of readiness for discovery management. IT Management, 6(4), 551–566.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. H., & Chou, W. C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2 PART 1), 1444–1458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., Lin, C. W., & Opricovic, S. (2005). Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1373–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., Teng, M. H., Chen, J. J., & Opricovic, S. (2002). Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(2), 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Uriarte, F. A. (2008). Introduction to knowledge management. Jakarta: ASEAN Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 5600–5615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. L., & Tzeng., G. H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1417–1424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P. L. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19(8), 936–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar