University-industry technology transfer: the commercialization of university’s patents

References

• Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: From Exploring MIT Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 48(1), 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, A., Uddin, M., & Yazdifar, H. (2019). Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arqué-Castells, P., Cartaxo, R. M., García-Quevedo, J., & Godinho, M. M. (2016). Royalty sharing, effort and invention in universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain. Research Policy, 45, 1858–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTP-PROTON. (2018). ASTP-PROTON 2018 Survey Report on Knowledge Transfer Activities in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.astp-proton.eu/resource-center/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Baldini, N. (2009). Implementing Bayh–Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity. Research Policy, 38, 1217–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blind, K., Pohlisch, J., & Zi, A. (2018). Publishing, patenting, and standardization: Motives and barriers of scientists. Research Policy, 47(7), 1185–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36, 694–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broström, A. (2012). Firms’ rationales for interaction with research universities and the principles for public co-funding. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(3), 313–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32(6), 887–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartaxo, R. M., & Godinho, M. M. (2017). How institutional nature and available resources determine the performance of technology transfer offices. Industry and Innovation, 24(7), 713–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–Industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2019). Science, Technology and Innovation - Overview. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/science-technology-innovation
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C., & Ratten, V. J. (2019). The effects of technology transfers and institutional factors on economic growth: Evidence from Europe and Oceania. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-019-09730-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35, 790–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuri, P., Munari, F., & Pasquini, M. (2013). What determines university patent commercialization? Empirical evidence on the role of IPR ownership. Industry and Innovation, 20(5), 488–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göktepe-Hulten, D., & Mahagaonkar, P. (2010). Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: In the expectation of money or reputation? Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 401–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeussler, C., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40(1), 41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halilem, N., Amara, N., Olmos-Peñuela, J., & Mohiuddin, M. (2017). “To Own, or not to Own?” A multilevel analysis of intellectual property right policies’ on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 46(8), 1479–1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, J., & Castiaux, A. (2017). Contingent knowledge transfers in university–Industry R&D projects. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(1), 68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. (1999). Does university–Industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science and Technology, 15(4), 74–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. (2015). The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation, 36–37, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., & Goe, W. R. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33(5), 691–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy, 40, 1354–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (2000). The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2). doi:10.3152/095820208X287171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. P. C., Caraça, J. M. G., & Diz, H. (2006). How can university-industry-government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal? - the case of te University of Coimbra. Technovation, 26, 534–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. California, Estados Unidos da América: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moutinho, P., Fontes, M., & Godinho, M. (2007). Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organisations. Scientometrics, 70(2), 355–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblet, J. P., Simon, E., & Parent, R. (2011). Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(4), 367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–Industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polt, W., Gassler, H., Schibany, A., Rammer, C., & Schartinger, D. (2001). Benchmarking industry—Science relations: The role of framework conditions. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 247–258.
   Google Scholar
• Pordata. (2019). Science, technology and information society - R&D Expenditure and Government Budget. https://www.pordata.pt/en/Subtheme/Europe/R+D+Expenditure+and+Government+Budget-127
   Google Scholar
• Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and Econmics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampat, B. N., & Nelson, R. R. (2000). The evolution of university patenting and licensing procedures: An empirical study of institutional change. In P. Ingram & B. S. Silverman (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Strategic Management (Vol. 19, pp. 135–164). Howard House, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111–133.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of University Technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 489–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkokari, K., Passi, J., & Rantala, T. (2012). Managing knowledge within networked innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10(1), 27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E. C. (2010). Determinants of R&D investment: The extreme-bounds analysis approach applied to 26 OECD countries. Research Policy, 39, 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Welch, E. W., & Huang, W. (2015). Commercialization of university inventions: Individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents. Technovation, 36–37, 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. California: Estados Unidos da América SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar