377
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Student stories as source of knowledge for decision-making – mix method study from the university

& ORCID Icon
Pages 165-182 | Received 21 May 2019, Accepted 19 Nov 2020, Published online: 08 Jan 2021

References

  • Algeo, C. T. (2015). Using reflection and storytelling to inform evidence-based decisions. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2014 United States, 1( 1).
  • Boldosova, V., & Luoto, S. (2019). Storytelling, business analytics and big data interpretation. Management Research Review, 43(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2019-0106
  • Brophy, P. (2009). Narrative-based practice. Abingdon, GBR.
  • Brophy, P. (2016). Narrative-based practice. Routledge.
  • Brown, J. S., Prusak, L., Denning, S., & Groh, K. (2005). Storytelling in organizations: Why storytelling is transforming 21st-century organizations and management. Routledge.
  • Burnett, S., Grinnall, A., & Williams, D. (2015). What have we learned so far? The development and application of an organisational learning narrative. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.38
  • Chai, S., Das, S., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Factors affecting bloggers’ knowledge sharing: An investigation across gender. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 309–342. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280309
  • Charband, Y., & Navimipour, N. J. (2016). Online knowledge sharing mechanisms: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(6), 1131–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9628-z
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
  • Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Lee, Z. W. (2013). Understanding the continuance intention of knowledge sharing in online communities of practice through the post‐knowledge‐sharing evaluation processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1357–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22854
  • Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002
  • Corbin, J. S., & Strauss, A. A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  • De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (eds). (2015). The handbook of narrative analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Denning, S. (2012). The springboard. Routledge.
  • Denning, S. (2014). The springboard: How storytelling ignites action in knowledge-era organizations. Routledge
  • Freda, M. F., de Luca Picione, R., & Esposito, G. (2015). Reflexivity: Applying a reflexive process to an educational context. In G. Marsico, R. Ruggeri, & S. Salvatore (Eds.), YIS: Reflexivity and change in Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 195–225). Information Age Publishers (IAP).
  • Freda, M. F., & Esposito, G. (2017). Promoting reflection and reflexivity through narrative devices: Narrative mediation path qualitative multimodal method. Qualitative Research Journal, 17(1), 2–19. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Giovanna_Esposito3/publication/313970552_Promoting_reflection_and_reflexivity_through_narrative_devices_Narrative_mediation_path_qualitative_multimodal_method/links/5b3cbfcb4585150d23f70891/Promoting-reflection-and-reflexivity-through-narrative-devices-Narrative-mediation-path-qualitative-multimodal-method.pdf
  • Geck, C. (2007). The generation Z connection: Teaching information literacy to the newest net generation. Toward a 21st-Century School Library Media Program, 235, 2007. https://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/397034/the_generation_z_connection_teaching_information_literacy_to_the_newest
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
  • González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., & Ávila, C. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage, 32(2), 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.037
  • Greenhalgh, T. (1999). Narrative based medicine in an evidence-based world. BMJ, 318(7179), 323–325. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7179.323
  • Gretzel, U., Yoo, K. H., & Purifoy, M. (2007). Online travel review study: Role and impact of online travel reviews. Laboratory for Intelligent Systems in Tourism, Texas A&M University.  http://www.tripadvisor.com/pdfs/OnlineTravelReviewReport
  • Gross, K. (2008). Here comes generation Z. Youth Studies Australia, 27(3), 8–9.
  • Gündüz, Ş. (2019). Metaphorising knowledge management: “ALICE in Wonderland”. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1589398
  • Hayes, J., & Maslen, S. (2015). Knowing stories that matter: Learning for effective safety decision-making. Jurnal of Risk Research, 18(6), 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.910690
  • Hayesová, N. (2000). Základy sociální psychologie. Portál.
  • Kittnar, O. (2011). Lékařská fyziologie. Grada.
  • Kokanović, R., & Flore, J. (2017). Subjectivity and illness narratives. Subjectivity, 10(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-017-0038-6
  • Koskinen, K. U., & Vartia, J. (2006). Role of storytelling in the mentoring process. OKLC Conference, at the University of Warwick, 20th–22nd March.
  • Lipman, D. (2006). Storytelling as a tool for coaches. Using Narrative to Bring Out People’s Best. Vortrag (Masterclass) 2. Europäischer Kongress für Storytelling 16.
  • Lissack, M., & Ross, J. (1999). The next common sense: Mastering corporate complexity through coherence. Nicholas Brealey Publishing Limited.
  • Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011
  • Margaryan, A., Boursinou, E., Lukic, D., & Zwart, H. (2015). Narrating your work: An approach to supporting knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.58
  • Mládková, L. (2012). Management of knowledge workers. Iura Edition, SR.
  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin.
  • Park, J. Y., Im, I., & Sung, C. S. (2017). Is social networking a waste of time? The impact of social network and knowledge characteristics on job performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(4), 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0071-9
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Suny Press.
  • Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106
  • Reichel, J. (2009). Kapitoly metodologie sociálních výzkumů. Grada Publishing as.
  • Roundy, P. T., & Graebner, M. (2013). Can stories shape strategy? Narrative-structured information and strategic decision making. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013( 1), 10851. Academy of Management.
  • Shank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Process.
  • Snowden, D. (1999). Story telling: An old skill in a new context. Business Information Review, 16(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382994237045
  • Snowden, D. (2001). Narrative patterns: The perils and possibilities of using a story in organisations. Knowledge Management, 4(10), 200.
  • Sole, D., & Wilson, D. G. (2002). Storytelling in organizations: The power and traps of using stories to share knowledge in organizations. LILA, Harvard, Graduate School of Education, 1–12. http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/Storytelling_in_Organizations.pdf
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. sage.
  • Tuckett, D., & Nikolic, M. (2017). The role of conviction and narrative in decision-making under radical uncertainty. Theory & Psychology, 27(4), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317713158
  • Turner, B. A. (1983). The use of grounded theory for the qualitative analysis of organizational behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00211.x
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.
  • Widrich, L. (2012, May 12). The science of storytelling: Why telling a story is the most powerful way to activate our brains. Lifehacker. https://lifehacker.com/the-science-of-storytelling-why-telling-a-story-is-the-5965703.
  • Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. McGraw-hill education (UK).
  • Winterbottom, A., Bekker, H. L., Conner, M., & Mooney, A. (2008). Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. Social science & medicine, 67(12), 2079–2088.
  • Yang, H. L., & Lai, C. Y. (2011). Understanding knowledge-sharing behaviour in Wikipedia. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.516019
  • Yip, J. T., & Lee, R. W. (2017). Knowledge elicitation practices for organizational development intervention. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.28
  • Zahavi, D. (2014). Self & other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy and shame. Oxford University Press.
  • Zak, P. J. (2012). The moral molecule: How trust works. Penguin
  • Zak, P. J. (2013). How stories change the brain. Greater Good: The Science of a Meaningful Life
  • Zak, P. J. (2014). Why your brain loves good storytelling. Harvard Business Review, 1–5
  • Zou, T. X., & Lee, W. B. (2016). Eliciting and mapping tacit knowledge on teamwork success of six sigma teams. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2014.27

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.