What is the role of sutureless aortic valves in today’s armamentarium?

References

• Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(22):2438–2488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahanian A, Otto CM. Risk stratification of patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(4):416–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(13):1231–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1696–1704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2187–2198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1609–1620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genereux P, Head SJ, Hahn R, et al. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the new Achilles’ heel? A comprehensive review of the literature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(11):1125–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magovern GJ, Cromie HW. Sutureless prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963;46:726–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SM, Sethi GK, Flye MW, et al. The sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: experience with and technical considerations for replacement of the early model. Ann Surg. 1976;184(2):174–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sarraf N, Thalib L, Hughes A, et al. Cross-clamp time is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in low- and high-risk cardiac patients. Int J Surg. 2011;9(1):104–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borger MA, Moustafine V, Conradi L, et al. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(1):17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21(2):168–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen A, Forcillo J, Stevens L, et al. Perioperative outcomes with the Intuity versus Perceval valve system: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in intermediate-risk patients. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(10):S172.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers J, Pullan M, Mediratta N, et al. A need for speed? Bypass time and outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(1):21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranucci M, Frigiola A, Menicanti L, et al. Aortic cross-clamp time, new prostheses, and outcome in aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012;21(6):732–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salis S, Mazzanti VV, Merli G, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass duration is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22(6):814–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Tsai YC, Niranjan N, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):100–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minh TH, Mazine A, Bouhout I, et al. Expanding the indication for sutureless aortic valve replacement to patients with mitral disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(4):1354–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazine A, Vistarini N, El-Hamamsy I, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement in the setting of triple-valve surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2015;10(4):291–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrari E, Siniscalchi G, Marinakis S, et al. ‘Fast-implantable’ aortic valve implantation and concomitant mitral procedures. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(4):682–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha M, Folliguet TA, Pfeiffer S, et al. Aortic valve replacement and concomitant procedures with the Perceval valve: results of European trials. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(4):1294–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollari F, Santarpino G, Dell’Aquila AM, et al. Better short-term outcome by using sutureless valves: a propensity-matched score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(2):611-616;discussion 616-617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa E, Messina A, Cirillo M, et al. Perceval sutureless valve in freestyle root: new surgical valve-in-valve therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):e155–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmanov DS, Solinas M, Kallushi E, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement for aortic incompetence. J Card Surg. 2015;30(5):391–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber M, Ferrarini M, Lio A, et al. Dealing with a stenotic bicuspid aortic valve: is this still an off-label procedure for a sutureless valve? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(4):858–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen A, Fortin W, Mazine A, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement in patients who have bicuspid aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(4):851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersak B, Fischlein T, Folliguet TA, et al. Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(3):709–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber M, Moten SC, Quaini E, et al. International expert consensus on sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement using minimally invasive approaches. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(3):165–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Varennes B, Lachapelle K, Cecere R, et al. North American single-center experience with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(3):735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folliguet TA, Laborde F, Zannis K, et al. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(5):1483–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A, et al. One-year outcomes of the surgical treatment of aortic stenosis with a next generation surgical aortic valve (Triton) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Intuity Valve System. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):110-115; discussion 115-116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens S, Sadowski J, Eckstein FS, et al. Clinical experience with the ATS 3f Enable(R) sutureless bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(3):749–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazine A, Teoh K, Bouhout I, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a Canadian multicentre study. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(1):63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Concistre G, et al. The Perceval S aortic valve has the potential of shortening surgical time: does it also result in improved outcome? Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(1):77-81; discussion 81-72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha M, Maeding I, Hoffler K, et al. Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: are sutureless valves the future? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17(5):778-782; discussion 782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoneim A, Bouhout I, Demers P, et al. Management of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: a comparative study among different biological options. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(4):1019–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli A, Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve: early outcomes and one-year survival from two European centers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):2838–2843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vola M, Albertini A, Campisi S, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: early outcomes and 1-year follow-up from 2 European centers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(4):1052–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengart TK, Feldman T, Borger MA, et al. Percutaneous and minimally invasive valve procedures: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2008;117(13):1750–1767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtuza B, Pepper JR, Stanbridge RD, et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(3):1121–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(3):670–679. e675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, et al. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(2):460-465; discussion 465-466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan S, Dzemali O, Wimmer-Greinecker G, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003;12(1):76–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machler HE, Bergmann P, Anelli-Monti M, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(4):1001–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalen M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, et al. Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: a multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(2):524–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmanov D, Miceli A, Ferrarini M, et al. Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy: can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1585–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vola M, Fuzellier JF, Campisi S, et al. Total endoscopic sutureless aortic valve replacement: rationale, development, perspectives. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):170–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(2):198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhoff F, Abawi M, Agostoni P, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the new balloon-expandable Sapien 3 versus Sapien XT valve system: a propensity score-matched single-center comparison. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(6):e002408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkapic D, De Rosa S, Kelava A, et al. Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(4):391–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siontis GC, Juni P, Pilgrim T, et al. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(2):129–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JG, Dvir D. Is transcatheter aortic valve replacement a durable therapeutic strategy? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(8):1092–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt D, Al-Rashid F, Kahlert P, et al. Low incidence of paravalvular leakage with the balloon-expandable Sapien 3 transcatheter heart valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(3):819-825; discussion825-816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muneretto C, Alfieri O, Cesana BM, et al. A comparison of conventional surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and sutureless valves in “real-world” patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate- to high-risk profile. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(6):1570-1577; discussion 1577-1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Moggi A, et al. Treating the patients in the ‘grey-zone’ with aortic valve disease: a comparison among conventional surgery, sutureless valves and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(1):90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio A, Messina A, Lorusso R, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement as an alternative treatment for patients belonging to the “gray zone” between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and conventional surgery: a propensity-matched, multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(5):1010–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio A, Rizzoli G, Messina A, et al. Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: what is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(5):1065-1070; discussion 1070-1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio A, Salizzoni S, Rubino AS, et al. The rise of new technologies for aortic valve stenosis: A comparison of sutureless and transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(1):99-+.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamperidis V, Van Rosendael PJ, De Weger A, et al. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(5):670–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Jessl J, et al. Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(2):561–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli A, Gilmanov D, Murzi M, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2016;49(3):960–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischlein T, Meuris B, Hakim-Meibodi K, et al. The sutureless aortic valve at 1 year: a large multicenter cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(6):1617-+.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flameng W, Herregods MC, Hermans H, et al. Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(6):1453–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcillo J, Bouchard D, Nguyen A, et al. Perioperative outcomes with sutureless versus stented biological aortic valves in elderly persons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(6):1629–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha M, Fischlein T, Meuris B, et al. European multicentre experience with the sutureless Perceval valve: clinical and haemodynamic outcomes up to 5 years in over 700 patients. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2016;49(1):234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischlein T, Gersak B, Pfeiffer S. How to prevent a pacemaker implantation after sutureless bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(2):635–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt F, Pfeiffer S, Dell’Aquila AM, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22(3):253–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borger MA. Minimally invasive rapid deployment Edwards Intuity aortic valve implantation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):193–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhout I, Noly PE, Parisi A, et al. First case of Perceval S prosthesis early structural valve deterioration: not an easy reoperation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(3):e71–73.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagawa B, Cruz J, Boisvert L, et al. A simple modification to lower incidence of heart block with sutureless valve implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(2):630–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischlein T, Dell’Aquila AM, Santarpino G. Technical changes in the implant of sutureless aortic valves: the sense of being pioneers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(1):288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart GR, Accola KD, Grossi EA, et al. TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct 15. pii: S0022-5223(16)31292-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar