Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: current and future perspectives

References

• Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw LJ, Heller GV, Casperson P, et al. Gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in the clinical outcomes utilizing revascularization and aggressive drug evaluation (COURAGE) trial, Veterans Administration Cooperative study no. 424. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:685–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–2821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012;126:e354–e471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong-Poi H, Rim S-J, Le DE, et al. Perfusion versus function: the ischemic cascade in demand ischemia. Implications of Single-Vessel versus Multivessel Stenosis. 2002;105:987–992.
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrea A, Severino S, Caso P, et al. Prognostic value of supine bicycle exercise stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Echocardiography. 2005;6:271–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marwick TH, Case C, Vasey C, et al. Prediction of mortality by exercise echocardiography: a strategy for combination with the duke treadmill score. Circulation. 2001;103:2566–2571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rerkpattanapipat P, Gandhi SK, Darty SN, et al. Feasibility to detect severe coronary artery stenoses with upright treadmill exercise magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jekic M, Foster EL, Ballinger MR, et al. Cardiac function and myocardial perfusion immediately following maximal treadmill exercise inside the MRI room. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamon M, Fau G, Nee G, et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasu S, Bandettini WP, Hsu LY, et al. Regadenoson and adenosine are equivalent vasodilators and are superior than dipyridamole – a study of first pass quantitative perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink HL, Dickerson JA, Stephens JA, et al. Comparison of the safety of adenosine and regadenoson in patients undergoing outpatient cardiac stress testing. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35:1117–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation. 2004;110:835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, et al. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized P. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Van Rossum AC, et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:480–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379:453–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamitsos TD, Ntusi NA, Francis JM, et al. Feasibility and safety of high-dose adenosine perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidov A, Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, et al. Prognostic impact of hemodynamic response to adenosine in patients older than age 55 years undergoing vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion study. Circulation. 2003;107:2894–2899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belardinelli L, Shryock JC, Snowdy S, et al. The A2A adenosine receptor mediates coronary vasodilation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;284:1066–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manisty C, Ripley DP, Herrey AS, et al. Splenic switch-off: a tool to assess stress adequacy in adenosine perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology. 2015;276:732–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takx RAP, Blomberg BA, Aidi HE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JW, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt P, Spiess J, Levenson B, et al. Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:1292–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima H, Onishi K, Kurita T, et al. Hypertension impairs myocardial blood perfusion reserve in subjects without regional myocardial ischemia. Hypertens Res. 2010;33:1144–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeltfoort IA, Bondarenko O, Raijmakers PG, et al. Is subendocardial ischaemia present in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms? A cardiovascular MR study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1554–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson MA, Bell SP, Adkisson DW, et al. High reproducibility of adenosine stress cardiac MR myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail TF, Hsu LY, Greve AM, et al. Coronary microvascular ischemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy – a pixel-wise quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson LE, Wei J, Agarwal M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strach K, Meyer C, Thomas D, et al. High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1829–1835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshinski JN, Delfino JG, Sharma P, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 T: current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-Tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2440–2449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed MA, Paterson DI, Ingkanisorn WP, et al. Reproducibility and inter-observer variability of dobutamine stress CMR in patients with severe coronary disease: implications for clinical research. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7:763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Ferrari VA, et al. Determination of interobserver variability for identifying inducible left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennell DJ, Underwood SR, Manzara CC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine stress in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoenpanichkit C, Hundley WG. The 20 year evolution of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers D, Ho KY, Van Dijkman PR, et al. Dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the detection of myocardial ischemia with the use of myocardial tagging. Circulation. 2003;107:1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosoglou G, Lehrke S, Wochele A, et al. Strain-encoded CMR for the detection of inducible ischemia during intermediate stress. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 1999;99:763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley WG, Morgan TM, Neagle CM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of cardiac prognosis. Circulation. 2002;106:2328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebker R, Mirelis JG, Jahnke C, et al. Influence of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry on diagnostic accuracy of wall motion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine stress. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers DD, Janssen CH, Kuijpers D, et al. The additional value of first pass myocardial perfusion imaging during peak dose of dobutamine stress cardiac MRI for the detection of myocardial ischemia. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebker R, Jahnke C, Manka R, et al. Additional value of myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebker R, Frick M, Jahnke C, et al. Value of additional myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of intermediate coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartunek J, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR, et al. Effects of dobutamine on coronary stenosis physiology and morphology. Comparison with intracoronary adenosine. 1999;100:243–249.
   Google Scholar
• Kwong RY. Imaging the physiology of the ischemic cascade. Are 2 tools better than 1? 2008;1:92–93.
   Google Scholar
• Korosoglou G, Elhmidi Y, Steen H, et al. Prognostic value of high-dose dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging in 1,493 consecutive patients: assessment of myocardial wall motion and perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1225–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo KY, Leung KF, Chu CM, et al. Prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Qjm. 2011;104:425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel K, Broderick R, Gandla V, et al. Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2009;120:1390–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS, et al. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1427–1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilz G, Jeske A, Klos M, et al. Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1408–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho-Filho OR, Seabra LF, Mongeon FP, et al. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient’s sex. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:850–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodi V, Sanchis J, Lopez-Lereu MP, et al. Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1174–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers D, Van Dijkman PR, Janssen CH, et al. Dobutamine stress MRI. Part II. Risk stratification with dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients suspected of myocardial ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation. 2007;3:115.
   Google Scholar
• Lipinski MJ, McVey CM, Berger JS, et al. Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:826–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sketch MH, Mohiuddin SM, Lynch JD, et al. Significant sex differences in the correlation of electrocardiographic exercise testing and coronary arteriograms. Am J Cardiol. 1975;36:169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curzen N, Patel D, Clarke D, et al. Women with chest pain: is exercise testing worthwhile? Heart. 1996;76:156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2005;111:682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebker R, Jahnke C, Hucko T, et al. Dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. Heart. 2010;96:616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace EL, Morgan TM, Walsh TF, et al. Dobutamine cardiac magnetic resonance results predict cardiac prognosis in women with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood JP, Motwani M, Maredia N, et al. Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease from the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease (CE-MARC) trial. Circulation. 2014;129:1129–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle N, Wohrle J, Nusser T, et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance first pass perfusion imaging is equally potent in female compared to male patients with coronary artery disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99:21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem I, Greulich S, Heitner JF, et al. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:436–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis SE, Holubkov R, Conrad Smith AJ, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is highly prevalent in women with chest pain in the absence of coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI WISE study. Am Heart J. 2001;141:735–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin T, Hu HH, Pohost GM, et al. Three dimensional first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at 3T: feasibility study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motwani M, Kidambi A, Sourbron S, et al. Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt JF, Wissmann L, Manka R, et al. Iterative k-t principal component analysis with nonrigid motion correction for dynamic three-dimensional cardiac perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:68–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jogiya R, Schuster A, Zaman A, et al. Three-dimensional balanced steady state free precession myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3T using dual-source parallel RF transmission: initial experience. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manka R, Wissmann L, Gebker R, et al. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e003061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:514–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber A, Sourbron S, Klauss V, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion of the myocardium: semiquantitative and quantitative evaluation in comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:332–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold M, Swingen C, Seethamraju RT. Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. Med Phys. 2002;29:886–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack NA, DiBella EV, Rust TC, et al. Estimating myocardial perfusion from dynamic contrast-enhanced CMR with a model-independent deconvolution method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallee JP, Sostman HD, MacFall JR, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion by MRI after coronary occlusion. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:287–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallee JP, Lazeyras F, Kasuboski L, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion with FAST sequence and Gd bolus in patients with normal cardiac function. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichihara T, Ishida M, Kitagawa K, et al. Quantitative analysis of first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI using a Patlak plot method and blood saturation correction. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida M, Ichihara T, Nagata M, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow using model based analysis of first-pass perfusion MRI: extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA varies with myocardial blood flow in human myocardium. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:1391–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglands JD, Magee DR, Sourbron SP, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of four quantitative myocardial perfusion estimation methods used in cardiac MR imaging: CE-MARC substudy. Radiology. 2015;275:393–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordini FE, Haddad T, Hsu LY, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukpraphrute B, Drafts BC, Rerkpattanapipat P, et al. Prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance upright maximal treadmill exercise testing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman SV, Dickerson JA, Jekic M, et al. Real-time cine and myocardial perfusion with treadmill exercise stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients referred for stress SPECT. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster EL, Arnold JW, Jekic M, et al. An MR-compatible treadmill for exercise stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67:880–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer FA, Kellman P, Griswold MA, et al. Dynamic autocalibrated parallel imaging using temporal GRAPPA (TGRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:981–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman SV, Dickerson JA, Mazur W, et al. Diagnostic performance of treadmill exercise cardiac magnetic resonance: the prospective, multicenter exercise CMR’s accuracy for cardiovascular stress testing (EXACT) trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thavendiranathan P, Dickerson JA, Scandling D, et al. Comparison of treadmill exercise stress cardiac MRI to stress echocardiography in healthy volunteers for adequacy of left ventricular endocardial wall visualization: a pilot study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39:1146–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, et al. European Association of E. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:415–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:606–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison A, Adluru G, Damal K, et al. Rapid ungated myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: preliminary diagnostic accuracy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif B, Arsanjani R, Dharmakumar R, et al. All-systolic non-ECG-gated myocardial perfusion MRI: feasibility of multi-slice continuous first-pass imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74:1661–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Gerche A, Claessen G, Van De Bruaene A, et al. Cardiac MRI: a new gold standard for ventricular volume quantification during high-intensity exercise. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le TT, Bryant JA, Ting AE, et al. Assessing exercise cardiac reserve using real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar