Personalizing antiplatelet prescribing using genetics for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

References

• Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2016;134(10):e123–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(24):e44–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrono C, Baigent C, Hirsh J, et al. Antiplatelet drugs: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):199S–233S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(7):494–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combescure C, Fontana P, Mallouk N, et al. Clinical implications of clopidogrel non-response in cardiovascular patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(5):923–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuldiner AR, O’Connell JR, Bliden KP, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. JAMA. 2009;302(8):849–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross L, Sibbing D. Current role of platelet function testing in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2017;6(1):151–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sangkuhl K. Klein TE and Altman RB. Clopidogrel pathway. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2010;20(7):463–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94(3):317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Shuldiner AR, et al. PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 19. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22(2):159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzel KW, Elsey AR, Langaee TY, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation: approaches, successes, and challenges. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166C(1):56–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen DL, Wang B, Bai J, et al. Clinical value of CYP2C19 genetic testing for guiding the antiplatelet therapy in a Chinese population. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2016;67(3):232–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caudle KE, Dunnenberger HM, Freimuth RR, et al. Standardizing terms for clinical pharmacogenetic test results: consensus terms from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). Genet Med. 2017;19(2):215–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbing D, Gebhard D, Koch W, et al. Isolated and interactive impact of common CYP2C19 genetic variants on the antiplatelet effect of chronic clopidogrel therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(8):1685–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(4):354–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbing D, Koch W, Gebhard D, et al. Cytochrome 2C19*17 allelic variant, platelet aggregation, bleeding events, and stent thrombosis in clopidogrel-treated patients with coronary stent placement. Circulation. 2010;121(4):512–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Genetic variants in ABCB1 and CYP2C19 and cardiovascular outcomes after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1312–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reny JL, Combescure C, Daali Y, et al. Influence of the paraoxonase-1 Q192R genetic variant on clopidogrel responsiveness and recurrent cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(7):1242–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresukosol D, Suktitipat B, Hunnangkul S, et al. Effects of cytochrome P450 2C19 and paraoxonase 1 polymorphisms on antiplatelet response to clopidogrel therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Hochholzer W, Frelinger AL 3rd, et al. Dosing clopidogrel based on CYP2C19 genotype and the effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stable cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2011;306(20):2221–2228.
   Google Scholar
• Price MJ, Murray SS, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Influence of genetic polymorphisms on the effect of high- and standard-dose clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GIFT (Genotype Information and Functional Testing) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(22):1928–1937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreras ET, Hochholzer W, Frelinger AL 3rd, et al. Diabetes mellitus, CYP2C19 genotype, and response to escalating doses of clopidogrel. Insights from the ELEVATE-TIMI 56 Trial. Thromb Haemost. 2016;116(1):69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet JP, Hulot JS, Pena A, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism in young patients treated with clopidogrel after myocardial infarction: a cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373(9660):309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti B, Gori AM, Marcucci R, et al. Relation of cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism to occurrence of drug-eluting coronary stent thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103(6):806–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon T, Verstuyft C, Mary-Krause M, et al. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(4):363–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenk D, Hochholzer W, Fromm MF, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 681G>A polymorphism and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity associated with adverse 1-year clinical outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(20):1925–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin L, James S, Storey RF, et al. Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: a genetic substudy of the PLATO trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1320–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;304(16):1821–1830.
   Google Scholar
• Hulot JS, Collet JP, Silvain J, et al. Cardiovascular risk in clopidogrel-treated patients according to cytochrome P450 2C19*2 loss-of-function allele or proton pump inhibitor coadministration: a systematic meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(2):134–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer T, Bouman HJ, van Werkum JW, et al. Impact of CYP2C19 variant genotypes on clinical efficacy of antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;343:d4588.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YP, Hao PP, Zhang MX, et al. Association of genetic variants in CYP2C19 and adverse clinical outcomes after treatment with clopidogrel: an updated meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2011;128(6):593–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes MV, Perel P, Shah T, et al. CYP2C19 genotype, clopidogrel metabolism, platelet function, and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(24):2704–2714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang JS, Cho KI, Jin HY, et al. Meta-analysis of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among coronary artery disease patients of different ethnic groups treated with clopidogrel. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(4):502–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabalza M, Subirana I, Sala J, et al. Meta-analyses of the association between cytochrome CYP2C19 loss- and gain-of-function polymorphisms and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease treated with clopidogrel. Heart. 2012;98(2):100–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorich MJ, Rowland A, McKinnon RA, et al. CYP2C19 genotype has a greater effect on adverse cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention and in Asian populations treated with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2014;7(6):895–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll JA, Neely ML, Roe MT, et al. Impact of CYP2C19 metabolizer status on patients with ACS treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(8):936–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pare G, Mehta SR, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of CYP2C19 genotype on outcomes of clopidogrel treatment. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1704–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresci S, Depta JP, Lenzini PA, et al. Cytochrome p450 gene variants, race, and mortality among clopidogrel-treated patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2014;7(3):277–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Tang HL, Hu YF, et al. The gain-of-function variant allele CYP2C19*17: a double-edged sword between thrombosis and bleeding in clopidogrel-treated patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(2):199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms and the response to prasugrel: relationship to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical outcomes. Circulation. 2009;119(19):2553–2560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Oude Ophuis T, et al. Long-term tolerability of ticagrelor for the secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events: a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(4):425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorich MJ, Vitry A, Ward MB, et al. Prasugrel vs. clopidogrel for cytochrome P450 2c19-genotyped subgroups: integration of the TRITON-TIMI 38 Trial Data. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(8):1678–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for Cardiovascular A, Interventions, Society of Thoracic S, et al. ACCF/AHA clopidogrel clinical alert: approaches to the FDA “boxed warning”: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(5):537–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuldiner AR, Palmer K, Pakyz RE, et al. Implementation of pharmacogenetics: the University of Maryland Personalized Anti-platelet Pharmacogenetics Program. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166C(1):76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson JF, Field JR, Unertl KM, et al. Physician response to implementation of genotype-tailored antiplatelet therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100(1):67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JA, Lee CR, Reed BN, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy algorithm in high-risk coronary artery disease patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16(4):303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada S, Zhou Y, Duncan S, et al. Precision Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: laying the foundational processes through implementation of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017. doi: 10.1002/cpt.631. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 28124392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallari LH, Beitelshees AL, Blake KV, et al. The IGNITE pharmacogenetics working group: an opportunity for building evidence with pharmacogenetic implementation in a real-world setting. Clin Transl Sci. 2017;10(3):143–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallari LH, Weitzel KW, Elsey AR, et al. Institutional profile: University of Florida Health Personalized Medicine Program. Pharmacogenomics. 2017;18(5):421–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JD, Wells GA, Le May MR, et al. Point-of-care genetic testing for personalisation of antiplatelet treatment (RAPID GENE): a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1705–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Ma YT, Yang YN, et al. Personalized antiplatelet therapy according to CYP2C19 genotype after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized control trial. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):3736–3740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deiman BA, Tonino PA, Kouhestani K, et al. Reduced number of cardiovascular events and increased cost-effectiveness by genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the Netherlands. Neth Heart J. 2016;24(10):589–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzel KW, Alexander M, Bernhardt BA, et al. The IGNITE network: a model for genomic medicine implementation and research. BMC Med Genomics. 2016;9:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallari LH, Denny JC, Lee CR, et al. Prospective clinical implementation of CYP2C19-genotype guided antiplatelet therapy after PCI: a multi-site investigation of MACE outcomes in a real-world setting. Circulation. 2016;134:e711–e712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos J, Davila-Fajardo CL, Toledo Frias P, et al. Results of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients who undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent. Int J Cardiol. 2016;225:289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubert D, Von Beckerath N, Grimberg G, et al. Impact of P-glycoprotein on clopidogrel absorption. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;80(5):486–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman RB. Pharmacogenomics: “noninferiority” is sufficient for initial implementation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(3):348–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt WR, Fowkes FG, Heizer G, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in symptomatic peripheral artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(1):32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar