Coronary chronic total occlusion intervention: utility or futility

References

• Sianos G, Werner GS, Galas AR, et al. Recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions: 2012 consensus document from the EuroCTO club. Eurointervention. 2012;8:139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham JA, Marso SP, Spertus JH, et al. Chronic total occlusion angioplasty in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;6:479–486.
   Google Scholar
• Khan JK. Angiographic suitability for catheter revascularization of total coronary occlusions in patients from a community hospital setting. Am Heart J. 1993;126:561–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofferson RD, Lehmann KG, Martin GV, et al. Effect of chronic total coronary occlusion on treatment strategy. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1088–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srininas VS, Brooks MM, Detre KM, et al. Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention versus balloon angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparison of the national, lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study. Circulation. 2002;106:1627–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto E, Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, et al. Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (from the CREDO-kyoto registry cohort-2). Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:767–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, et al. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian multicenter chronic total occlusion registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:991–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeroudi OM, Alomar ME, Michael TT, et al. Prevalence and management of coronary chronic total occlusions in a tertiary veterans affairs hospital. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(4):637–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramunddal T, Hoebers L, Henriques JP, et al. Chronic total occlusions in Sweden - a report from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty registry. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyal D, Mansour D. How to justify CTO revascularisation. In: Rinfret S, editor. Percutaneous intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion, the hybrid approach. Canada: Sprynger Quebec; 2016. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Joyal D, Afilalo J, Rinfret S. Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2010;160:179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MF, Wendel CS, Thai HM, et al. Effects of percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Yang S, Tang L, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic total occlusions. J Cardiothorac Surgery. 2014;9:9–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Surber R, Ferrari M, et al. The functional reserve of collaterals supplying long-term chronic total coronary occlusions in patients without prior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2406–2412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suttorp MJ, Laarman GJ, Rachel BM, et al. Primary stenting of totally occluded native coronary arteries II (PRISON II): a randomized comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions. Circulation. 2006;114:921–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham JA, Jones PG, Cannon L, et al. Quantifying the early health status benefits of successful chronic total occlusion recanalization: results from the Flow Cardia’s Approach to Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization (FACTOR) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:284–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Louvard Y. DECISION-CTO:A “negative” clinical trial? Really? Cardiol J. 2017;24(3):231–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Deja MA, et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1607–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Jones RH, et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1511–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoebers LP, Claessen BE, Elias J, et al. Meta-analysis on the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on left ventricular function and clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques JP, Hoebers LP, Ramunddal T, et al. Percutaneous intervention for concurrent chronic total occlusions in patients with STEMI: the EXPLORE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1622–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Surber R, Kuethe F, et al. Collaterals and the recovery on left ventricular function after recanalization of a chronic total coronary occlusion. Am Heart J. 2005;149:129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5 year follow up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013;381:629–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia S, Sandoval Y, Roukoz H, et al. Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1421–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head SJ, Mack MJ, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Incidence, predictors and outcomes of incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting: a subgroup analysis of 3 year SYNTAX data. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:535–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al. One-year coronary bypass graft potency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the Prague- 4 trial. Circulation. 2004;110:3418–3423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godino C, Bassanelli G, Economou FI, et al. Predictors of cardiac death in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion not revascularized by PCI. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:1402–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nombela-Franco L, Mitroi CD, Fernandez-Lozano I, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias among implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients for primary prevention: impact of chronic total coronary occlusion (VACTO primary study). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;1:147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Raja V, Wiegn P, Obel O, et al. Impact of chronic total occlusions and coronary revascularization on all-cause mortality and the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;116(9):1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoebers LP, Claessen BE, Dangas GD, et al. Contemporary overview and clinical perspectives of chronic total occlusions. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:458–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessen BE, Dangas GD, Weisz G, et al. Prognostic impact of a chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 3 year results from the HORIZON-AMI trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:768–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoebers LP, Vis MM, Claessen BE, et al. The impact of multivessel disease with and without a co-existing chronic total coronary occlusion on short- and long-term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with and without cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15:425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo JJ, Jeong HY, Seung-Hyuk C, et al. Long-term survival benefit of revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion and well-developed collateral circulation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Se Yeon C, Byoung Geol C, Seung-Woon R, et al. Percutaneous intervention versus optimal medical therapy for chronic total coronary occlusion with well-developed collaterals. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e006357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George S, Cockburn J, Clayton TC, et al. Long-term follow-up of elective chronic total coronary occlusion angioplasty: analysis from the U.K. central cardiac audit database. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:235–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessen BE, Dangas GD, Godino C, et al. Impact of target vessel on long-term survival after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Inter. 2013;82:76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windecker S, Kohl P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Intervention (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;3:2541–2619.
   Google Scholar
• Galassi RG, Brilakis ES, Bouchais M, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions: an overview. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2692–2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos G, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. Application and outcomes of a hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous intervention in a contemporary multicentre US registry. Int J Cardiol. 2015;198:222–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeremans J, Walsh S, Knaapen P, et al. The hybrid algorithm for treating chronic total occlusions in Europe: the recharge registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1958–1970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Azzarelli S, et al. Percutaneous coronary revascularization for chronic total occlusions: a novel predictive score of technical failure using advanced technologies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:911–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Yan AT, et al. Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Heart. 2016;102:1486–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habara M, Tsuchikane E, Muramatsu T, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion outcome according to operator experience from the Japanese retrograde summit registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:1027–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Reifart N, et al. In hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European registry of chronic total occlusion) registry. Eurointervention. 2011;7:472–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mario C, Werner GS, Sianos G, et al. European perspective in the recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions (CTO): consensus document from the EuroCTO Club. Eurointervention. 2007;3:30–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valenti R, Vergara R, Migliorini A, et al. Predictors of reocclusion after successful drug-eluting stent-supported percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:545–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2149–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soon KH, Selvanayagam JB, Cox N, et al. Percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions: review of the role of invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities. Int J Cardiol. 2007;116:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiello L, Colombo A, Gianrossi R, et al. Coronary angioplasty of chronic occlusions: factors predictive of procedural success. Am Heart J. 1992;124:581–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, et al. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi T, Miyazaki S, Morii I, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Determinants of primary success and long-term clinical outcome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;49:258–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini L, Ojeda S, Karatasakis A, et al. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting vs those who have not. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:310–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos G, Kandzari DE, Yeh RW, et al. Development and validation of a novel scoring system for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: the PROGRESS-CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) score. JACC Cardiov Interv. 2016;9:1–9. Elsevier
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CA, Jayne JE, Robb JF, et al. Retrograde techniques and the impact of operator volume on percutaneous intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions an early U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:834–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar