Current and future applications of CT coronary calcium assessment

References

• Tarride JE, Lim M, DesMeules M, et al. A review of the cost of cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 2009;25:e195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RW, Thilo C, Chiaramida SA, et al. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:410–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnesorge BM, Hofmann LK, Flohr TG, et al. CT for imaging coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for its application. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005;21:85–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CR, Knez A, Jakobs TF, et al. Detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification with electron-beam and conventional CT. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:620–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CR, Schoepf UJ, Reiser MF. Methods for quantification of coronary artery calcifications with electron beam and conventional CT and pushing the spiral CT envelope: new cardiac applications. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2001;17:203–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erbel R, Mohlenkamp S, Moebus S, et al. Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1397–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel AG, Chen JT, Peter RH, et al. The significance of coronary calcification detected by fluoroscopy. A report of 360 patients. Circulation. 1974;49:1247–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detrano R, Salcedo EE, Hobbs RE, et al. Cardiac cinefluoroscopy as an inexpensive aid in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:1041–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon AK, Coulden RA. Coronary artery calcification on computed tomography. Lancet. 1997;350:1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker CR, Knez A, Ohnesorge B, et al. Visualization and quantification of coronary calcifications with electron beam and spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:629–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir K, Budoff MJ, Post WS, et al. Electron beam CT versus helical CT scans for assessing coronary calcification: current utility and future directions. Am Heart J. 2003;146:969–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003;228:826–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1430–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (assessment by coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–1732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and committee on cardiac imaging, council on clinical cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1761–1791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, et al. 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography and society of thoracic radiology. J Thorac Imaging. 2017;32:W54–W66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht H, Blaha MJ, Berman DS, et al. Clinical indications for coronary artery calcium scoring in asymptomatic patients: expert consensus statement from the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht HS, Blaha M, Kazerooni EA, et al. CAC-DRS: coronary artery calcium data and reporting system. An expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT). J Cardiovasc Computed Tomography. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, Moscariello A, et al. Coronary CT angiography: comparison of a novel iterative reconstruction with filtered back projection for reconstruction of low-dose CT-initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:275–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer LL, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, et al. State of the art: iterative CT reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2015;276:339–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2130–2138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renker M, Geyer LL, Krazinski AW, et al. Iterative image reconstruction: a realistic dose-saving method in cardiac CT imaging? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;11:403–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vliegenthart R, Song B, Hofman A, et al. Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo. Radiology. 2003;229:520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begemann PG, van Stevendaal U, Koester R, et al. Evaluation of the influence of acquisition and reconstruction parameters for 16-row multidetector CT on coronary calcium scoring using a stationary and dynamic cardiac phantom. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1985–1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, et al. Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology. 1998;208:807–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology. 2002;223:474–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland RL, Chung H, Detrano R, et al. Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2006;113:30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Gul KM. Expert review on coronary calcium. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:315–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Kessler P, Gao YL, et al. The interscan variation of CT coronary artery calcification score: analysis of the calcium acetate renagel comparison (CARE)-2 study. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:58–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Budoff MJ, Lu B, et al. Reproducibility of three different scoring systems for measurement of coronary calcium. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18:391–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokanson JE, MacKenzie T, Kinney G, et al. Evaluating changes in coronary artery calcium: an analytic method that accounts for interscan variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1327–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuiston AD, Muscogiuri G, Schoepf UJ, et al. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: a phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferencik M, Ferullo A, Achenbach S, et al. Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso D, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, et al. Correction factors for CT coronary artery calcium scoring using advanced modeled iterative reconstruction instead of filtered back projection. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:1480–1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland, P, LaBree, L, Azen, SP, et al. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. Jama. 2004;291:210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor RG, Haley RW, Willett DL, et al. The Dallas heart study: a population-based probability sample for the multidisciplinary study of ethnic differences in cardiovascular health. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1473–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozanski A, Gransar H, Shaw LJ, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1622–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thilo C, Gebregziabher M, Mayer FB, et al. Correlation of regional distribution and morphological pattern of calcification at CT coronary artery calcium scoring with non-calcified plaque formation and stenosis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:855–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1336–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland, P, Bonow, RO, Brundage, BH, et al., ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology foundation clinical expert consensus task force (ACCF/AHA writing committee to update the 2000 expert consensus document on electron beam computed tomography) developed in collaboration with the society of atherosclerosis imaging and prevention and the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007;49:378–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar A, Shaw LJ, Shapiro MD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:675–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelkar AA, Schultz WM, Khosa F, et al. Long-term prognosis after coronary artery calcium scoring among low-intermediate risk women and men. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e003742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeboah J, McClelland RL, Polonsky TS, et al. Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals. Jama. 2012;308:788–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias-Smale SE, Proenca RV, Koller MT, et al. Coronary calcium score improves classification of coronary heart disease risk in the elderly: the Rotterdam study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1407–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, et al. Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1253–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell JD, Paisley R, Moon P, et al. Coronary artery calcium and long-term risk of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke: the Walter Reed cohort study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov 10. pii: S1936-878X(17)30891-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.003. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Knapper JT, Khosa F, Blaha MJ, et al. Coronary calcium scoring for long-term mortality prediction in patients with and without a family history of coronary disease. Heart. 2016;102:204–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw LJ, Giambrone AE, Blaha MJ, et al. Long-term prognosis after coronary artery calcification testing in asymptomatic patients: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht HS, Narula J. Coronary artery calcium scanning in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift. J Diabetes. 2012;4:342–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Cox AJ, Herrington DM, et al. Coronary calcium score predicts cardiovascular mortality in diabetes: diabetes heart study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:972–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, et al. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1663–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez JA, Lipinski MJ, Flors L, et al. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and computed tomography-fractional flow reserve in functional myocardial ischemia assessment versus invasive fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:1469–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler N, Meyer M, Fink C, et al. Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Rofo. 2013;185:726–732.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M, et al. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:158–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoski, SG, Greenland, P, Wong, ND, et al. Coronary artery calcium scores and risk for cardiovascular events in women classified as “low risk” based on Framingham risk score: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2437–2442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberl R, Tittus J, Bohme E, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: an effective filter before catheter angiography? Am Heart J. 2005;149:1112–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggi P, Cooil B, Shaw LJ, et al. Progression of coronary calcium on serial electron beam tomographic scanning is greater in patients with future myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:827–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Hokanson JE, Nasir K, et al. Progression of coronary artery calcium predicts all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1229–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Young R, Lopez VA, et al. Progression of coronary calcium and incident coronary heart disease events: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1231–1239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann N, Erbel R, Mahabadi AA, et al. Value of progression of coronary artery calcification for risk prediction of coronary and cardiovascular events: result of the HNR study (Heinz Nixdorf Recall). Circulation. 2018;137:665–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmermund A, Achenbach S, Budde T, et al. Effect of intensive versus standard lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin on the progression of calcified coronary atherosclerosis over 12 months: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial. Circulation. 2006;113:427–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Roth M, et al. Treatment of asymptomatic adults with elevated coronary calcium scores with atorvastatin, vitamin C, and vitamin E: the St. Francis heart study randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Lin FY, Gidseg DS, et al. Determinants of coronary calcium conversion among patients with a normal coronary calcium scan: what is the “warranty period” for remaining normal? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1110–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orakzai RH, Nasir K, Orakzai SH, et al. Effect of patient visualization of coronary calcium by electron beam computed tomography on changes in beneficial lifestyle behaviors. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:999–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalia NK, Miller LG, Nasir K, et al. Visualizing coronary calcium is associated with improvements in adherence to statin therapy. Atherosclerosis. 2006;185:394–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinzpeter R, Higashigaito K, Morsbach F, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring for ruling-out acute coronary syndrome in chest pain CT. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:1565–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi F, Chang SM, Pratt CM, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring in the emergency department: identifying which patients with chest pain can be safely discharged home. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts ET, Horne A, Martin SS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery calcium testing for coronary heart and cardiovascular disease risk prediction to guide statin allocation: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kempen BJ, Spronk S, Koller MT, et al. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for coronary artery calcium in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1690–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voros S, Rivera JJ, Berman DS, et al., Guideline for minimizing radiation exposure during acquisition of coronary artery calcium scans with the use of multidetector computed tomography: a report by the society for atherosclerosis imaging and prevention tomographic imaging and prevention councils in collaboration with the society of cardiovascular computed tomography, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2011;5:75–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dey D, Nakazato R, Pimentel R, et al. Low radiation coronary calcium scoring by dual-source CT with tube current optimization based on patient body size. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6:113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazato R, Dey D, Gutstein A, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring using a reduced tube voltage and radiation dose protocol with dual-source computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:394–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marwan M, Mettin C, Pflederer T, et al. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7:32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht HS, de Siqueira ME, Cham M, et al. Low- vs. standard-dose coronary artery calcium scanning, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:358–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemink MJ, den Harder AM, Foppen W, et al. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonder M, Pelgrim GJ, Meyer M, et al. Dose reduction techniques in coronary calcium scoring: the effect of iterative reconstruction combined with low tube voltage on calcium scores in a thoracic phantom. Eur J Radiol. 2017;93:229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler A, Vliegenthart R, Schoepf UJ, et al. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo. Radiology. 2014;270:387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurata A, Dharampal A, Dedic A, et al. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:3246–3252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring: influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2932–2937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Kimura F, Umezawa T, et al. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Osch JA, Mouden M, van Dalen JA, et al. Influence of iterative image reconstruction on CT-based calcium score measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:961–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szilveszter B, Elzomor H, Karolyi M, et al. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32:153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Fukumoto W, et al. Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:1045–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renker M, Nance JW Jr., Schoepf UJ, et al. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology. 2011;260:390–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesche C, de Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, et al. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2017;91:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfaltrer G, Albrecht MH, Schoepf UJ, et al. High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5249-2. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Tesche C, de Cecco CN, Vliegenthart R, et al. Accuracy and radiation dose reduction using low-voltage computed tomography coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:675–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesche C, de Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, et al. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(5):354–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadri JR, Goetti R, Fiechter M, et al. Inter-scan variability of coronary artery calcium scoring assessed on 64-multidetector computed tomography vs. dual-source computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1865–1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiguchi J, Matsuura N, Yamamoto H, et al. Effect of heart rate and body mass index on the interscan and interobserver variability of coronary artery calcium scoring at prospective ECG-triggered 64-slice CT. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10:340–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi AD, Leifer ES, Yu J, et al. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:359–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonder M, Pelgrim GJ, Huijsse SEM, et al. Coronary artery calcium quantification on first, second and third generation dual source CT: a comparison study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11(6):444–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemink MJ, Vliegenthart R, Takx RA, et al. Coronary artery calcification scoring with state-of-the-art CT scanners from different vendors has substantial effect on risk classification. Radiology. 2014;273:695–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weininger M, Ritz KS, Schoepf UJ, et al. Interplatform reproducibility of CT coronary calcium scoring software. Radiology. 2012;265:70–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. [European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts)]. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2013;14:328–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013. ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2889–2934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:e50–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the sixth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2315–2381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14(Suppl 2):S1–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1635–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff DC Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013. ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2935–2959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler FA Jr., Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar