Expecting the unexpected: preventing and managing the consequences of coronary perforations

References

• Shimony A, Joseph L, Mottillo S, et al. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27:843–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnaird T, Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E, et al. Incidence, determinants, and outcomes of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2013: an analysis of 527 121 cases from the British cardiovascular intervention society database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(8).
   Google Scholar
• Guttmann OP, Jones DA, Gulati A, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:e595–e601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnaird T, Anderson R, Ossei-Gerning N, et al. Legacy effect of coronary perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusive disease: an analysis of 26 807 cases from the British cardiovascular intervention society database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5).
   Google Scholar
• Karmpaliotis D, Karatasakis A, Alaswad K, et al. Outcomes with the use of the retrograde approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions in a contemporary multicenter US registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(6).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1325–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Tajti P, et al. Incidence, treatment, and outcomes of coronary perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:1285–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovic G, Orlic D, Corvaja N, et al. Incidence, predictors, in-hospital, and late outcomes of coronary artery perforations. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:213–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimony A, Zahger D, Van Straten M, et al. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:1674–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis E. Manual of coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a step-by-step approach. 2nd ed. Academic Press, Elsevier, Cambridge, MA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation. 1994;90:2725–2730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisoli TM, Afana M, Mawri S, et al. Respect the septal perforator: septal artery perforation during CTO PCI resulting in massive interventricular septal hematoma and biventricular cardiac obstructive shock. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e91–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajti P, Brilakis ES. Percutaneous treatment of coronary perforation in acutely occluded right coronary artery after reimplantation in the aortic root. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2018.  [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Tsuji M, Kodera S, Oshima T, et al. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with a prior modified Bentall procedure. Int Heart J. 2018;59:848–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio-Alonso B, Garcia-Tejada J, Granda-Nistal C. Coronary perforation to left ventricular cavity following stenting within a myocardial bridge. Coron Artery Dis. 2018;29:271–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher T, Baumann S, Huseynov A, et al. Coronary artery perforation in a patient with STEMI and a myocardial bridge: an increased risk for coronary artery perforation? Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:246–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourhoseini S, Bakhtiari M, Babaee A, et al. Increased risk of coronary perforation during percutaneous intervention of myocardial bridge: what histopathology says. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2017;9:108–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson LJ, Ricciardi MJ. Coronary artery perforation complicated by pericardial abscess formation: a clinical dilemma. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e005917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonda E, Edmundson A, Mann T. Late coronary stent infection: a unique complication after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007;19:E307–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu EB, Chan WW, Yu CM. Left main stem rupture caused by methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection of left main stent treated by covered stenting. Int J Cardiol. 2010;144:e39–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankari A, Kumar AN, Kabins S, et al. Staphylococcal pericarditis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;50:71–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara S, Tabata S, Inoue T. A novel method to bail out coronary perforation: micro-catheter distal perfusion technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:417–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagur R, Bernier M, Kandzari DE, et al. A novel application of contrast echocardiography to exclude active coronary perforation bleeding in patients with pericardial effusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:221–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the task force for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)endorsed by: the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2921–2964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kl V, Lj F, Ea W, et al. Use of an autologous blood recovery system during emergency pericardiocentesis in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20:280–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero H, Gupta N, Underwood PL, et al. Intracoronary autologous blood to seal a coronary perforation. Herz. 2001;26:157–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatasakis A, Akhtar YN, Brilakis ES. Distal coronary perforation in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the importance of early treatment. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016;17(6):412-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal C, Varghese J, Uretsky BF. Left atrial inflow and outflow obstruction as a complication of retrograde approach for chronic total occlusion: report of a case and literature review of left atrial hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:770–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson WM, Spratt JC, Lombardi WL. Cardiovascular collapse post chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention due to a compressive left atrial hematoma managed with percutaneous drainage. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:407–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adusumalli S, Morris M, Pershad A. Pseudo-pericardial tamponade from right ventricular hematoma after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention of the right coronary artery: successfully managed percutaneously with computerized tomographic guided drainage. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88:86–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto Y, Tonoike N, Kobayashi Y. Successful delivery of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent using rapid exchange guide extension catheter. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:142–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavani M, Cerrato E, Latib A, et al. Acute and long-term outcomes after polytetrafluoroethylene or pericardium covered stenting for grade 3 coronary artery perforations: insights from G3-CAP registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018  [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Ahmed WH. Fenestration of a papyrus PK covered stent to recover the occluded left main bifurcation after sealing a left main perforation during a CTO procedure. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18:41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniguchi N, Takahashi A, Mizuguchi Y, et al. Successful recanalization of a left circumflex artery jailed with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent after coronary perforation during stent implantation in the left main bifurcation. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2015;30:78–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi K, Furui K, Morishima I, et al. Usefulness of the jailed-balloon technique in percutaneous intervention for severe coronary perforation involving left main bifurcation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e209–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriyama N, Tanaka Y, Saito S. Bailout polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation for left main bifurcation perforation using the kissing stent technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89:1022–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurado-Roman A, Garcia-Tejada J, Hernandez-Hernandez F, et al. Coronary artery perforation: don’t rush, IVUS may be useful. Rev Port Cardiol. 2015;34(623):e621–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCormick LM, Ko BS, Zaman S, et al. Persistent type III cavity-spilling coronary perforation due to covered stent malapposition. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016;31:269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto H, Tanaka K, Ruparelia N, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes after polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation for the treatment of coronary perforation. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:1822–1826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval Y, Lobo AS, Brilakis ES. Covered stent implantation through a single 8-french guide catheter for the management of a distal coronary perforation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 1;90(4):584-588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assad-Kottner C, Hakeem A, Uretsky BF. Modified dual guide catheter (“ping-pong”) technique to treat left internal mammary artery graft perforation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 86(1):E28-31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Gal Y, Weisz G, Collins MB, et al. Dual catheter technique for the treatment of severe coronary artery perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:708–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Amat-Santos IJ, Jaguszewski M, et al. Optical coherence tomography imaging after successful percutaneous coronary intervention treatment of coronary perforation following bioabsorbable vascular scaffold implantation: consecutive ping-pong and child-in-mother techniques. Cardiol J. 2016;23:413–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto T, Nomura T, Miyawaki D, et al. Seesaw double guideliner((R)) catheter technique for a successful bail-out procedure from blow-out type coronary perforation. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:396–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos IA, Kossidas K, Garratt KN. Delayed perforation after percutaneous coronary intervention: rare and potentially lethal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:E45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemisa K, Karatasakis A, Brilakis ES. Management of guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation using autologous fat particles versus coil embolization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 20161;89(2):253-258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsanos K, Patel S, Dourado R, et al. Lifesaving embolization of coronary artery perforation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:1071–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assali AR, Moustapha A, Sdringola S, et al. Successful treatment of coronary artery perforation in an abciximab-treated patient by microcoil embolization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;51:487–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He LY, Han JL, Guo LJ, et al. Effect of transcatheter embolization by autologous fat particles in the treatment of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128:745–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George S, Cotton J, Wrigley B. Guidewire-induced coronary perforation successfully treated with subcutaneous fat embolisation: A simple technique available to all. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:1186–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka S, Nishigaki K, Ojio S, et al. Transcatheter embolization by autologous blood clot is useful management for small side branch perforation due to percutaneous coronary intervention guide wire. J Cardiol. 2008;52:285–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storger H, Ruef J. Closure of guide wire-induced coronary artery perforation with a two-component fibrin glue. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:237–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel PK. Delayed and repeated cardiac tamponade following microleak in RCA successfully treated with intra arterial sterile glue injection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:797–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleong G, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Alfonso F. Collagen embolization for the successful treatment of a distal coronary artery perforation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:332–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iakovou I, Colombo A. Management of right coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention with polyvinyl alcohol foam embolization particles. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:727–728.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo R, Yang L. The successful use of autologous skin in management of guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation. Clin Case Rep. 2017;5:1018–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarassy G, Apro D, Veress G. Successful sealing of a coronary artery perforation with a mesh-covered stent. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24:E80–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamane M, Muto M, Matsubara T, et al. Contemporary retrograde approach for the recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusion: on behalf of the Japanese retrograde summit group. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautov R, Urena M, Nguyen CM, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the surfing technique to cross septal collateral channels during retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 20163;12(15):e1859-e1867.
   Google Scholar
• Benincasa S, Azzalini L, Carlino M, et al. Outcomes of the retrograde approach through epicardial versus non-epicardial collaterals in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 18(6):393-398.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki Y, Kitabata H, Akasaka T. Unusual case of coronary perforation which developed delayed cardiac tamponade due to collateral flow from contralateral coronary artery. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2012;27:205–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boukhris M, Tomasello SD, Azzarelli S, et al. Coronary perforation with tamponade successfully managed by retrograde and antegrade coil embolization. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015;27:216–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsia AP, Brilakis ES, Karmpaliotis D. Thrombin injection for sealing epicardial collateral perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014;26:E124–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmert ME, van Bommel RJ, Diletti R, et al. Clinical characteristics and management of coronary artery perforations: a single-center 11-year experience and practical overview. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6 (9).
   Google Scholar
• Kinnaird T, Anderson R, Ossei-Gerning N, et al. Coronary perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery: an analysis of 309 perforation cases from the British cardiovascular intervention society database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10 (9).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer T, Boeder N, Nef HM, et al. Fate of patients with coronary perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Euro heart survey percutaneous coronary intervention registry). Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:1363–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsh J, Seth M, Green J, et al. Coronary artery perforations after contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions: evaluation of incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and predictors of mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89:966–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Lamee R, Ielasi A, Latib A, et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry C, Fraser D, Eichhofer J, et al. Coronary perforation in the drug-eluting stent era: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome: the UK experience. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar