Treatment strategies for mixed aortic valve disease in nonelderly patients

References

• Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 2005 Feb 22;111(7):920–925. PubMed PMID: 15710758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WC. The structure of the aortic valve in clinically isolated aortic stenosis: an autopsy study of 162 patients over 15 years of age. Circulation. 1970 July;42(1):91–97. PubMed PMID: 5425599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alegret JM, Palomares R, Duran I, et al. Effect of age on valvular dysfunction and aortic dilatation in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006 May;59(5):503–506. PubMed PMID: 16750148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt SA, Jeppesen JL, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Cardiovascular manifestations of systemic sclerosis: a danish nationwide cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sept 3;8(17):e013405. PubMed PMID: 31446827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andell P, Li X, Martinsson A, et al. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in a Swedish nationwide hospital-based register study. Heart. 2017 Nov;103(21):1696–1703. PubMed PMID: 28432156; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5749343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbe AC, Luis SA, Padang R, et al. outcomes in moderate mixed aortic valve disease: is it time for a paradigm shift? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 24;67(20): 2321–2329. PubMed PMID: 27199054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilberszac R, Gabriel H, Schemper M, et al. Outcome of combined stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 9;61(14):1489–1495. PubMed PMID: 23500223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbe AC, Connolly HM, Poterucha JT, et al. Bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valve: fate of moderate/severe mixed aortic valve disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017 Jan;12(1):24–31. PubMed PMID: 27375186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashedi N, Popovic ZB, Stewart WJ, et al. Outcomes of asymptomatic adults with combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):829–837. PubMed PMID: 24874975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda S, Kitai T, Okada Y, et al. Impact of aortic regurgitation on the prognosis of severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2012 Nov;98(21):1591–1594. PubMed PMID: 22888162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorajja P, Nelson P, Garberich R, et al. Clinical impact of chronic aortic regurgitation in asymptomatic patients with native aortic valve stenosis. Struct Heart. 2018 Sept 03;2(5):398–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker MW, Aurigemma GP. The simple arithmetic of mixed aortic valve disease: LVH + volume load = trouble. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 24;67(20):2330–2333. PubMed PMID: 27199055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(36):2739–2791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pibarot P. Mixed aortic valve disease: a double trouble. Struc Heart. 2018 Sept 03;2(5):405–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etnel JRG, Grashuis P, Huygens SA, et al. The Ross procedure: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and microsimulation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Dec;11(12):e004748. PubMed PMID: 30562065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girdauskas E, Petersen J, Sachweh J, et al. Aortic valve repair in adult congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Dec;8(6):789–798. PubMed PMID: 30740326; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6331383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gott VL, Alejo DE, Cameron DE. Mechanical heart valves: 50 years of evolution. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Dec;76(6):S2230–9. PubMed PMID: 14667692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harken DE, Taylor WJ, Lefemine AA, et al. Aortic valve replacement with a caged ball valve. Am J Cardiol. 1962 Feb;9:292–299. PubMed PMID: 13904712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhout I, Stevens LM, Mazine A, et al. Long-term outcomes after elective isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement in young adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1341–1346 e1. PubMed PMID: 24332113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puskas J, Gerdisch M, Nichols D, et al. Reduced anticoagulation after mechanical aortic valve replacement: interim results from the prospective randomized on-X valve anticoagulation clinical trial randomized food and drug administration investigational device exemption trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;1474:1202–1210; discussion 1210-1. PubMed PMID: 24512654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazine A, Ouzounian M. Aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults: looking beyond the tree that hides the forest. Ann Transl Med. 2017 Feb;5(4):92. PubMed PMID: 28275637; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5337212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu MI, Pakrashi BC, Holden MP, et al. Results of aortic valve replacement with frame-supported fascia lata and pericardial grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1972 Sept;64(3):340–353. PubMed PMID: 5054873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott DA, Coelho AT, Cooley DA, et al. Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft valve: hemodynamic evaluation and early clinical follow-up of 326 patients. Cardiovasc Dis. 1980 June;7(2):137–148. PubMed PMID: 15216265; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC287845.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Etnel JRG, Huygens SA, Grashuis P, et al. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in nonelderly adults: a systematic review, meta-analysis, microsimulation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005481. PubMed PMID: 30760011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar RR, Fontana G, Jilaihawi H, et al. Possible subclinical leaflet thrombosis in bioprosthetic aortic valves. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2015–2024. PubMed PMID: 26436963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sondergaard L, De Backer O, Kofoed KF, et al. Natural history of subclinical leaflet thrombosis affecting motion in bioprosthetic aortic valves. Eur Heart J. 2017 July 21;38(28):2201–2207. PubMed PMID: 28838044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarty T, Sondergaard L, Friedman J, et al. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study. Lancet. 2017 June 17;389(10087):2383–2392. PubMed PMID: 28330690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenaweser P, Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the Corevalve Revalving system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Nov 1;70(5):760–764. PubMed PMID: 17932876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalluri N, Atti V, Munir AB, et al. Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661–671. PubMed PMID: 29781182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis JM, Del Trigo M, Puri R, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring for treating aortic and mitral surgical prosthetic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 3;66(18):2019–2037. PubMed PMID: 26516006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz M, Simonato M, Webb JG, et al. Mortality prediction after transcatheter treatment of failed bioprosthetic aortic valves utilizing various international scoring systems: insights from the valve-in-valve international data (VIVID). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):1163–1170. PubMed PMID: 30079597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro HB, Rodes-Cabau J, Blanke P, et al. Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: insights from the VIVID registry. Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 21;39(8):687–695. PubMed PMID: 29020413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neupane S, Singh H, Lammer J, et al. Meta-analysis of transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo aortic valve surgery for bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2018 June 15;121(12):1593–1600. PubMed PMID: 29776652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29–322. PubMed PMID: 25520374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenstein J, Kim WK, Liebetrau C, et al. Challenges of coronary angiography and intervention in patients previously treated by TAVI. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Aug;104(8):632–639. PubMed PMID: 25720330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao DF, Seco M, Wu JJ, et al. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in middle-aged adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 July;102(1):315–327. PubMed PMID: 26794881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarne A, Leavitt BJ, Robich MP, et al. Tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in younger patients: a multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Mar;1(158):1529–1538.e2. PubMed PMID: 30929984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL, et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012 June;33(12):1518–1529. PubMed PMID: 22408037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon MR, Pasque MK, Munfakh NA, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Feb;812:481–488; discussion 489. PubMed PMID: 16427836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 6;53(1):39–47. PubMed PMID: 19118723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Vaquero D, Garcia JM, Diaz R, et al. Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch predicts cardiac events and advanced functional class in young and middle-aged patients undergoing surgery due to severe aortic stenosis. J Card Surg. 2014 Mar;29(2):127–133. PubMed PMID: 24330010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigtlander L, Seiffert M. Expanding TAVI to low and intermediate risk patients. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:92. PubMed PMID: 30050909; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6052659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers T, Thourani VH, Waksman R. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate- and low-risk patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 12;7(10). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007147. PubMed PMID: 29754127; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6015326.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy G, Wang Z, Nishimura RA, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for stenotic bicuspid aortic valves: systematic review and meta analyses of observational studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):975–983. PubMed PMID: 28963771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip F, Faza NN, Schoenhagen P, et al. Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):E88–98. PubMed PMID: 25914355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon SH, Lefevre T, Ahn JM, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early- and new-generation devices in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sept 13;68(11):1195–1205. PubMed PMID: 27609682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greason KL, Lahr BD, Stulak JM, et al. Long-term mortality effect of early pacemaker implantation after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;104(4):1259–1264. PubMed PMID: 28433222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delling FN, Hassan ZK, Piatkowski G, et al. Tricuspid regurgitation and mortality in patients with transvenous permanent pacemaker leads. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;117(6):988–992. PubMed PMID: 26833208; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4775321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarese EP, Andreotti F, Kolodziejczak M, et al. Age-related 2-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the YOUNG TAVR registry. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Feb;27(94):1457–1466. PubMed PMID: 30824280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D, et al. Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation. 2004 July 20;110(3):356–362. PubMed PMID: 15249504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers JC, Somerville J, Stone S, et al. Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: long-term results of the pioneer series. Circulation. 1997 Oct 7;96(7):2206–2214. PubMed PMID: 9337191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdajs DA, Muradbegovic M, Haselbach D, et al. Ross procedure: is the root replacement technique superior to the sub-coronary implantation technique? Long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec;46(6):944–951. PubMed PMID: 24771757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charitos EI, Takkenberg JJ, Hanke T, et al. Reoperations on the pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft after the Ross procedure: an update on the German Dutch Ross Registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Oct;1444:813–821; discussion 821-3. PubMed PMID: 22883549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece TB, Welke KF, O’Brien S, et al. Rethinking the ross procedure in adults. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):175–181. PubMed PMID: 24070703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Um KJ, McClure GR, Belley-Cote EP, et al. Hemodynamic outcomes of the Ross procedure versus other aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 June;59(3):462–470. PubMed PMID: 29327563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazine A, Rocha RV, El-Hamamsy I, et al. Ross procedure vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;3(10):978–987. PubMed PMID: 30326489; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6233830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares AL, van Geemen D, van den Bogaerdt AJ, et al. Mechanics of the pulmonary valve in the aortic position. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:557–567. PubMed PMID: 24035437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoof PH, Takkenberg JJ, van Suylen RJ, et al. Degeneration of the pulmonary autograft: an explant study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Dec;132(6):1426–1432. PubMed PMID: 17140971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mookhoek A, de Heer E, Bogers AJ, et al. Pulmonary autograft valve explants show typical degeneration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 June;139(6):1416–1419. PubMed PMID: 20363479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mookhoek A, Krishnan K, Chitsaz S, et al. Biomechanics of failed pulmonary autografts compared to native aortic roots. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1482–1488. PubMed PMID: 27765169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabkin-Aikawa E, Aikawa M, Farber M, et al. Clinical pulmonary autograft valves: pathologic evidence of adaptive remodeling in the aortic site. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Oct;128(4):552–561. PubMed PMID: 15457156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mookhoek A, Krishnan K, Chitsaz S, et al. Biomechanics of failed pulmonary autografts compared with normal pulmonary roots. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Dec;102(6):1996–2002. PubMed PMID: 27457832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher JT, Mahler GJ, Hockaday LA. Aortic valve disease and treatment: the need for naturally engineered solutions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011 Apr 30;63(4–5):242–268. PubMed PMID: 21281685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weind KL, Ellis CG, Boughner DR. The aortic valve blood supply. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Jan;9(1):1–7; discussion 7–8. PubMed PMID: 10678369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen J, Girdauskas E. Aortic valve repair-lessons to be learned. Ann Transl Med. 2017 Sept;5(17):356. PubMed PMID: 28936450; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5599296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider U, Aicher D, Miura Y, et al. Suture annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):783–785. PubMed PMID: 26777945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basmadjian L, Basmadjian AJ, Stevens LM, et al. Early results of extra-aortic annuloplasty ring implantation on aortic annular dimensions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May;151(5):1280–5 e1. PubMed PMID: 26794926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojacek J, Spatenka J, Holubec T, et al. Coroneo extra-aortic annuloplasty ring could stabilize even the pulmonary autograft annulus in a Ross operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Feb;43(2):431–433. PubMed PMID: 23096451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderveken E, Vastmans J, Verbelen T, et al. Reinforcing the pulmonary artery autograft in the aortic position with a textile mesh: a histological evaluation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;27(4):566–573. PubMed PMID: 29912400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratschiller T, Sames-Dolzer E, Schimetta W, et al. External prosthetic reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):14–20. PubMed PMID: 30153696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klieverik LM, Takkenberg JJ, Bekkers JA, et al. The Ross operation: a Trojan horse? Eur Heart J. 2007 Aug;28(16):1993–2000. PubMed PMID: 17303586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins RC, Thompson DM, Lane MM, et al. Ross operation: 16-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Sept;136(3):623–30, 630 e1–5. PubMed PMID: 18805263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam DY, Wijeysundera HC, Ouzounian M, et al. The Ross procedure versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in young patients: a decision analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 June 1;55(6):1180–1186. PubMed PMID: 30535102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hamamsy I, Eryigit Z, Stevens LM, et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 14;376(9740):524–531. PubMed PMID: 20684981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Athanasiou T, Ali A, et al. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome? J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Nov;136:904–912; discussion 912-3. PubMed PMID: 15597580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponga S, Barbera MD, Pavoni D, et al. Ten-year results of the freedom solo stentless heart valve: excellent haemodynamics but progressive valve dysfunction in the long term. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 May 1;24(5):663–669. PubMed PMID: 28329194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melina G, De Robertis F, Gaer JA, et al. Long-term survival after xenograft versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.119. PubMed PMID: 31735388.
   Google Scholar
• Borger MA, Prasongsukarn K, Armstrong S, et al. Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Sept;843:737–743; discussion 743-4. PubMed PMID: 17720369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar