Novel diagnostic and imaging techniques in endovascular iliac artery procedures

References

• Zeller T. Current state of endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal artery disease. Vasc Med. 2007;12:223–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniz E. L’encephalographie arterielle, son importance dans la localisation des tumeurs cerebrales. Rev Neurol. 1927;2:72.
   Google Scholar
• Aboyans V, Ricco J-B, Bartelink M-LE-L, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:763–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström J, Holmberg A, Johansson L, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19:516–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legemate DA, Teeuwen C, Hoeneveld H, et al. Value of duplex scanning compared with angiography and pressure measurement in the assessment of aortoiliac arterial lesions. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1003–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch JL, Tetteroo E, Mali WP, et al. Iliac arterial occlusive disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Dutch iliac stent trial study group. Radiology. 1998;208:641–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen SGH, van den Heuvel DAF, Huberts W, et al. In vivo validation of patient-specific pressure gradient calculations for iliac artery stenosis severity assessment [Internet]. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6. DOI:10.1161/jaha.117.007328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris PD, Silva Soto DA, Feher JFA, et al. Fast virtual fractional flow reserve based upon steady-state computational fluid dynamics analysis: results from the VIRTU-fast study. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2017;2:434–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y, et al. Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: comparison with pressure wire - fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen SGH, van den Heuvel DAF, de Vries JPPM, et al. A geometry-based model for non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients over iliac artery stenoses. J Biomech. 2019;92:67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society of Radiology (ESR). White paper on radiation protection by the European society of radiology. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:357–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Radiology. Radiation protection protocols [Internet]. [ cited 2019 Dec 17]. Available from: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Radiology-Safety/Radiation-Safety
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. American College of Radiology (ACR) manual on contrast media, version 10.3 [Internet]. [ cited 2019 Dec 17]. Available from: http://www.acr.org/quality-safety/resources/contrast-manual
   Google Scholar
• European Society of Urogenital Radiology. ESUR guidelines on contrast media, version 10.0; 2018 Mar [ Internet]. [cited 2019 Dec 17]. Available from: http://www.esur.org/esur-guidelines/
   Google Scholar
• Solomon R, Dumouchel W. Contrast media and nephropathy: findings from systematic analysis and food and drug administration reports of adverse effects. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:651–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks CE, Middleton A, Dhillon R, et al. Predictors of creatinine rise post-endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [Internet]. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81:827–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawatani Y, Nakamura Y, Mochida Y, et al. Contrast medium induced nephropathy after endovascular stent graft placement: an examination of its prevalence and risk factors [Internet]. Radiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra ML, Eagleton MJ, Greenberg RK, et al. Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in fenestrated/branched aortic endografting. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobeiter H, Nahum J, Becquemin J-P. Zero-contrast thoracic endovascular aortic repair using image fusion. Circulation. 2011;124:e280–e282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek M, Berland TL, Maldonado TS, et al. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance angiography and the artis zeego fusion program to minimize contrast during endovascular repair of an iliac artery aneurysm [Internet]. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:261.e1–e261.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer AM, de Haan MW, Peppelenbosch AG, et al. CTA with fluoroscopy image fusion guidance in endovascular complex aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47:349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herwaarden JA Pre-clinical results of a 3D navigation innovation: fiber optic realShape (FORS) technology [Internet]. [ cited 2018 Oct 29–30]. Available from: https://www.aortic-live.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/1740_v-Herwaarden-Aortic-Live-2018_201018_Approved-NEWLpic.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Herwaarden JA Innovation in 3D navigation: results from the FORS - fiber optic realShape first-in-human clinical study [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://linc2019.cncptdlx.com/media/20190122_LINC_FINAL_JvH_PRESENTED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Herwaarden JA Modern imaging systems will revolutionize EVAR techniques [Internet]; 2020. Available from: https://linc2020.cncptdlx.com/media/van%20Herwaarden_LINC2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W, et al. Electromagnetic tracking in medicine–a review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33:1702–1725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jens S, Koelemay MJW, Reekers JA, et al. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:3104–3114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Met R, Bipat S, Legemate DA, et al. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301:415–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser K, Hunink MGM. Peripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US—a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2000;216:67–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke J, Larsen J. Meta-analysis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:325–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelemay MJ, den Hartog D, Prins MH, et al. Diagnosis of arterial disease of the lower extremities with duplex ultrasonography. Br J Surg. 1996;83:404–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollak AW, Norton PT, Kramer CM. Multimodality imaging of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: current role and future directions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:797–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Prince MR. Improving interpretation of MRA and CTA in patients with suspected renal artery stenosis. Vascular Dis Manage. 2011;8:E34–E37.
   Google Scholar
• May AG, de Weese JA, Rob CG. Hemodynamic effects of arterial stenosis. Surgery. 1963;53:513–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berguer R, Hwang NH. Critical arterial stenosis: a theoretical and experimental solution. Ann Surg. 1974;180:39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May AG, Van de Berg L, Deweese JA, et al. Critical arterial stenosis. Surgery. 1963;54:250–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein WM, van der Graaf Y, Seegers J, et al. Dutch iliac stent trial: long-term results in patients randomized for primary or selective stent placement. Radiology. 2006;238:734–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetteroo E, van der Graaf Y, Bosch JL, et al. Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease. Lancet. 1998;351:1153–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslau PJ, Jörning PJ, Greep JM. Assessment of aortoiliac disease using hemodynamic measures. Arch Surg. 1985;120:1050–1052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinney TB, Rose SC. Intraarterial pressure measurements during angiographic evaluation of peripheral vascular disease: techniques, interpretation, applications, and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore WS, Malone JM. Effect of flow rate and vessel calibre on critical arterial stenosis. J Surg Res. 1979;26:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udoff EJ, Barth KH, Harrington DP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of iliac artery stenosis: pressure measurements during angiography. Radiology. 1979;132:289–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen SG, de Boer SW, van den Heuvel DA, et al. Hemodynamic significance assessment of equivocal iliac artery stenoses by comparing duplex ultrasonography with intra-arterial pressure measurements. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;59:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetteroo E, van Engelen AD, Spithoven JH, et al. Stent placement after iliac angioplasty: comparison of hemodynamic and angiographic criteria. Dutch iliac stent trial study group. Radiology. 1996;201:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. [ Internet]. 2019. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Meta-analysis of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Radiology. 1997;204:87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery stenosis by quantitative flow ratio during invasive coronary angiography: the WIFI II study (Wire-free functional imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e007107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography [Internet]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;2024–2035. DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis [Internet]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:3077–3087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:435–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds SR. The haemodynamics of asymmetric stenoses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24:332–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen S, Gashi K, van den Heuvel D, et al. A metamodeling approach for instant severity assessment and uncertainty quantification of iliac artery stenoses. J Biomech Eng. [ Internet]. 2019. DOI:10.1115/1.4044502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-G, Ko J, Hae H, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-based machine learning for predicting fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery lesions [Internet]. Atherosclerosis. 2020;292:171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho H, Lee J-G, Kang S-J, et al. Angiography-based machine learning for predicting fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery lesions. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e011685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell T. Machine learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1997. ISBN: 0070428077.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva T, Punnoose J, Uneri A, et al. Virtual fluoroscopy for intraoperative C-arm positioning and radiation dose reduction. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018;5:015005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agarwal S, Parashar A, Bajaj NS, et al. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:558–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueler BA, Vrieze TJ, Bjarnason H, et al. An investigation of operator exposure in interventional radiology. Radiographics. 2006;26:1533–1541. . discussion 1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz CJ, Schmitt M, Böckler D, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of fusion imaging during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg JC. Update on new tools for three-dimensional navigation in endovascular procedures. Aorta (Stamford). 2014;2:279–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sailer AM, Schurink GWH, Wildberger JE, et al. Radiation exposure of abdominal cone beam computed tomography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38:112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth D, Pfister M, Maier A, et al. Adaption of 3D models to 2D X-ray images during endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. Munich, Germany: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 339–346.
   Google Scholar
• Lessard S, Kauffmann C, Pfister M, et al. Automatic detection of selective arterial devices for advanced visualization during abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair. Med Eng Phys. 2015;37:979–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnavas A, Carrell T, Penney G. Fully automated 2D-3D registration and verification. Med Image Anal. 2015;26:108–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modarai B Podium 1st: new developments in fusion imaging - artificial intelligence that deforms anatomy to maintain accuracy [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://youtu.be/Yq9f-_YR43U
   Google Scholar
• Southerland KW, Nag U, Turner M, et al. IF09. Image-based three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:e61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley CJ, Arko FR, Lee S, et al. Intravascular ultrasound scanning improves long-term patency of iliac lesions treated with balloon angioplasty and primary stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumakura H, Kanai H, Araki Y, et al. 15-year patency and life expectancy after primary stenting guided by intravascular ultrasound for iliac artery lesions in peripheral arterial disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1893–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudeketting SR, Heinen SGH, de Haan MW, et al. Fluoroscopy with MRA fusion image guidance in endovascular iliac artery interventions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (3DMR-Iliac-roadmapping study). Trials. 2018;19:603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury - Part 1: definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors: recommendations for updated ESUR contrast medium safety committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:2845–2855.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jens S, Schreuder SM, De Boo DW, et al. Lowering iodinated contrast concentration in infrainguinal endovascular interventions: a three-armed randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:2446–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally MM, Scali ST, Feezor RJ, et al. Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. AltaTrack - table side launch base instructions for use [Internet]. [ cited 2019 Dec 29]. Available from: https://fcc.report/FCC-ID/2AQ4B-432207025350
   Google Scholar
• de Lambert A, Esneault S, Lucas A, et al. Electromagnetic tracking for registration and navigation in endovascular aneurysm repair: a phantom study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43:684–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, et al. Electromagnetic tracking of flexible robotic catheters enables “assisted navigation” and brings automation to endovascular navigation in an in vitro study. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:1274–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon SB, Magee CA, Acker DE, et al. Experimental nonfluoroscopic placement of inferior vena cava filters: use of an electromagnetic navigation system with previous CT data. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:92–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, et al. Flexible robotics with electromagnetic tracking improves safety and efficiency during in vitro endovascular navigation. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:530–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood BJ, Zhang H, Durrani A, et al. Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:493–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode SD, Keltie K, Burn J, et al. Effect of procedure volume on outcomes after iliac artery angioplasty and stenting. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1189–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer SW, Heinen S, van den Heuvel D, et al. How to define the hemodynamic significance of an equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis: review of literature and outcomes of an international questionnaire. Vascular. 2017;25:598–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketteler ER, Brown KR. Radiation exposure in endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:35S– 38S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewska N, Blaszak MA, Juszkat R, et al. Patients’ radiation doses during the implantation of stents in carotid, renal, iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:372–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed T, Patel AS, Cho JS, et al. Radiation-induced DNA damage in operators performing endovascular aortic repair. Circulation. 2017;136:2406–2416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsky J. Cognitive behavior and clinical workflows. In: Zheng K, Westbrook J, Kannampallil TG, et al., editors. Cognitive informatics reengineering clinical workflow for safer and more efficient care. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing. 2019; p. 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Manske CL, Sprafka JM, Strony JT, et al. Contrast nephropathy in azotemic diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Med. 1990;89:615–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Williams RH, et al. Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med. 1989;86:649–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskey WK, Jenkins C, Selzer F, et al. Volume-to-creatinine clearance ratio: a pharmacokinetically based risk factor for prediction of early creatinine increase after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:584–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurm HS, Dixon SR, Smith DE, et al. Renal function-based contrast dosing to define safe limits of radiographic contrast media in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:907–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon H-J, Hur S-H. Determination of safe contrast media dosage to estimated glomerular filtration rate ratios to avoid contrast-induced nephropathy after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean Circ J. 2011;41:265–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar