Current challenges and prevention strategies for chronic total occlusion (CTO) complications

References

• Rigger J, Hanratty CG, Walsh SJ. Common and uncommon CTO complications. Interv Cardiol. 2018 Sep;13(3):121–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 23;11(14):1325–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion performed by highly experienced Japanese specialists: the first report from the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 13;10(21):2144–2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantinidis NV, Werner GS, Deftereos S, et al. Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion interventions in Europe. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e006229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadros A, Belli KC, De Paula JET, et al. Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Latin America. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):1046–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Mashayekhi K, Tsuchikane E, et al. Guiding principles for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2019 Jul 30;140(5):420–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habara M, Tsuchikane E, Muramatsu T, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion outcome according to operator experience from the Japanese retrograde summit registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;87(6):1027–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Yan AT, et al. Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Heart. 2016 Sep 15;102(18):1486–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeremans J, Walsh S, Knaapen P, et al. The hybrid algorithm for treating chronic total occlusions in europe: the RECHARGE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;68(18):1958–1970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW, et al. Early procedural and health status outcomes after chronic total occlusion angioplasty: a report from the OPEN-CTO registry (outcomes, patient health status, and efficiency in chronic total occlusion hybrid procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1523–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu EB, Tsuchikane E, Ge L, et al. Retrograde versus antegrade approach for coronary chronic total occlusion in an algorithm-driven contemporary asia-pacific multicentre registry: comparison of outcomes. Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Jun;29(6):894–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neupane S, Gupta A, Basir M, et al. Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: identifying patients at risk of complications. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 May;18(5):269–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni F, Spangaro A, Carlino M, et al. Impact of renal function on the immediate and long-term outcomes of percutaneous recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct;15(317):200–206.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini L, Ojeda S, Demir OM, et al. Recanalization of chronic total occlusions in patients with vs without chronic kidney disease: the impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Can J Cardiol. 2018 Oct;34(10):1275–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Wu PJ, Fang CY, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on chronic total occlusion revascularization outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 23;10(3):440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megaly M, Ali A, Saad M, et al. Outcomes with retrograde versus antegrade chronic total occlusion revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):1037–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajti P, Xenogiannis I, Gargoulas F, et al. Technical and procedural outcomes of the retrograde approach to chronic total occlusion interventions. EuroIntervention. 2020 Dec 4;16(11):e891–e899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini L, Poletti E, Ayoub M, et al. Coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2019 Oct 4;15(9):e804–e811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos G, Kandzari DE, Yeh RW, et al. Development and validation of a novel scoring system for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: the PROGRESS CTO (prospective global registry for the study of chronic total occlusion intervention) score. JACC Cardiovasc Interventions. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting periprocedural complications during percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusions: the prospective global registry for the study of chronic total occlusion intervention (PROGRESS CTO) complications score. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct;11(10):5.
   Google Scholar
• Patel SM, Menon RV, Burke MN, et al. Current perspectives and practices on chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Feb;30(2):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Tajti P, et al. Incidence, treatment, and outcomes of coronary perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15;120(8):1285–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2725–2730. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES. Manual of percutaneous coronary interventions. 1st ed. London: Elsevier; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Xenogiannis I, Tajti P, Hall AB, et al. Update on cardiac catheterization in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1635–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenogiannis I, Vemmou E, Nikolakopoulos I, et al. Challenges associated with treatment of left internal mammary artery graft thrombosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan;95(1):E17–E20. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES. Manual of chronic total occlusion interventions, a step-by-step approach. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel L, Scott B, Prihadi E, et al. Is a covered stent justifiable in the treatment of coronary artery perforation? An observational analysis of long-term results of two different covered stent types. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenogiannis I, Tajti P, Nicholas Burke M, et al. An alternative treatment strategy for large vessel coronary perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 1;93(4):635–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Karim AR, Vo M, Main ML, et al. Interventricular septal hematoma and coronary-ventricular fistula: a complication of retrograde chronic total occlusion intervention. Case Rep Cardiol. 2016;2016:8750603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TH, Wu DK, Su HM, et al. Septum hematoma: a complication of retrograde wiring in chronic total occlusion. Int J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 10;113(2):e64–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghobrial MSA, Egred M. Right ventricular wall hematoma following angioplasty to right coronary artery occlusion. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Apr;31(4):E66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sabbagh A, Patel VG, Jeroudi OM, et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing retrograde percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 3,482 patients from 26 studies. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 15;174(2):243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael TT, Papayannis AC, Banerjee S, et al. Subintimal dissection/reentry strategies in coronary chronic total occlusion interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(5):729–738. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen-Trong PK, Rangan BV, Karatasakis A, et al. Predictors and outcomes of side-branch occlusion in coronary chronic total occlusion interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Apr;28(4):168–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsia A, Christopoulos G, Brilakis ES. Use of the retrograde approach for preserving the distal bifurcation after antegrade crossing of a right coronary artery chronic total occlusion. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Apr;26(4):E48–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparini GL, Sanz-Sanchez J, Regazzoli D, et al. Device entrapment during percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: incidence and management strategies. EuroIntervention. 2020 Sep 8. DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00781.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Best PJ, Elesber AA, et al. Incidence, retrieval methods, and outcomes of stent loss during percutaneous coronary intervention: a large single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Nov;66(3):333–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iturbe JM, Abdel-Karim AR, Papayannis A, et al. Frequency, treatment, and consequences of device loss and entrapment in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 May;24(5):215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megaly M, Sedhom R, Pershad A, et al. Complications and failure modes of coronary microcatheters: insights from the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database. EuroIntervention. 2020 Jul 7.
   Google Scholar
• Almendarez M, Gurm HS, Mariani J Jr., et al. Procedural strategies to reduce the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury during percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 14;12(19):1877–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vemmou E, Alaswad K, Khatri JJ, et al. Patient radiation dose during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct;13(10):e009412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Yaginuma K, Koch M, et al. Modulated radiation protocol achieves marked reduction of radiation exposure for chronic total coronary occlusion intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 15. DOI:10.1002/ccd.29132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaswad K, Menon RV, Christopoulos G, et al. Transradial approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: insights from a contemporary multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;85(7):1123–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Moriyama N, Ochiai T, et al. Transradial coronary interventions for complex chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):235–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajti P, Alaswad K, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions via the radial approach: insights from an international chronic total occlusion registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):346–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul;3(7):751–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatasakis A, Akhtar YN, Brilakis ES. Distal coronary perforation in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the importance of early treatment. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):412–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar