Antegrade versus retrograde techniques for Chronic Total Occlusions (CTO): a review and comparison of techniques and outcomes

References

• Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, et al. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian multicenter chronic total occlusions registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(11):991–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW, et al. Early procedural and health status outcomes after chronic total occlusion angioplasty: a report from the OPEN-CTO registry (Outcomes, patient health status, and efficiency in chronic total occlusion hybrid procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(15):1523–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, et al. A randomized multicenter trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(26):2484–2493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obedinskiy AA, Kretov EI, Boukhris M, et al. The IMPACTOR-CTO trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(13):1309–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, et al. Complete revascularization with multivessel PCI for myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(15):1411–1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias J, Van Dongen IM, Hoebers LP, et al. Improved recovery of regional left ventricular function after PCI of chronic total occlusion in STEMI patients: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the randomized controlled EXPLORE trial. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nombela-Franco L, Mitroi CD, Fernandez-Lozano I, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias among implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients for primary prevention: impact of chronic total coronary occlusion. Circ Arrhythm and Electrophys. 2012;5(1):147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MF, Wendel CS, Thai HM, et al. Effects of percutaneous revascularization on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion. Cath Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(1):95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(14):1325–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenogiannis I, Gkargkoulas F, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020;32(4):153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Granthan JA, Rinfret S, et al. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(4):367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Mashayeki K, Tsuchikane E, et al. Guiding principles for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a global expert consensus document. Circ. 2019;140(420–33). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.039797.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Cho JY, Kim JS, et al. A comparison of procedural success rate and long-term clinical outcomes between in-stent restenosis chronic total occlusion and de novo chronic total occlusion using multicenter registry data. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(6):628–637.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh SJ, Cosgrove C, Spratt JC, et al. A technical focus on antegrade dissection and reentry for coronary chronic total occlusions: a practice update for 2019. Korean Circ J. 2019;49(7):559–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra S, Doshi D, Sapontis J, et al. Outcomes of retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the OPEN-CTO registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn JK, Hartzler G. Retrograde coronary angioplasty of isolated arterial segments through saphenous vein grafts. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990;20(2):88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Nagamatsu W, Tsuchikane E, Oikawa Y, et al. Successful guidewire crossing via collateral channel at retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: the J-Channel Score. EuroInterv. 2020;15(18):e1624–e1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumitsuji S, Inoue K, Ochiai M, et al. Fundamental wire technique and current standard strategy of percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion with histopathological insights. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(9):941–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sabbagh A, Patel VG, Jeroudi OM, et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing retrograde percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 3482 patients from 26 studies. Intern J Cardiol. 2014;174(2):243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael TT, Mogabgab O, Alomar M, et al. Long-term outcomes of successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions using the antegrade and retrograde approach. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(5):465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmpaliotis D, Karatasakis A, Alaswad K, et al. Outcomes with the use of the retrograde approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions in a contemporary multicenter US registry. Circ Interv. 2016;9e003434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galassi AR, Sianos G, Werner GS, et al. Retrograde recanalization of chronic total occlusions in Europe: procedural, in-hospital, and long-term outcomes from the multicenter ERCTO registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(22):2388–2400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikuklic K, Schwencke C, Schofer J. Long-term major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate: comparison of retrograde and antegrade recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017;129:243–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon O, Lee PH, Lee SW, et al. Retrograde approach for the percutaneous recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions: contribution to clinical practice and long term outcomes. EuroInterv. 2019;15(4):e354–e361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Ohya M, Kubo S, et al. Impact of retrograde approach on long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary chronic total occlusion interventions. EuroInterv. 2018;14(11):e1183–e1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megaly M, Ali A, Saad M, et al. Outcomes with retrograde versus antegrade chronic total occlusion revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(5):1037–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar