Procedural characteristics and outcomes following chronic total occlusion coronary intervention: pooled analysis from 5 registries

References

• Galassi AR, Grantham A, Kandzari D, et al. Percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusion. Part 2: technical approach. Interv Cardiol Rev. 2014;9(3):201–207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rinfret S, Joyal D, Spratt JC, et al. Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention case selection and techniques for the antegrade-only operator. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85(3):408–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeremans J, Knaapen P, Stuijfzand WJ, et al. Antegrade wire escalation for chronic total occlusions in coronary arteries: simple algorithms as a key to success. J Cardiovasc Med. 2016;17(9):680–686.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlow PL, Burke MN, Lombardi WL, et al. Use of a novel crossing and re-entry system in coronary chronic total occlusions that have failed standard crossing techniques: results of the FAST-CTOs (Facilitated Antegrade Steering Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(4):393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Werner GS, Schofer J, Sievert H, et al. Multicentre experience with the BridgePoint devices to facilitate recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions through controlled subintimal re-entry. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(2):192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael TT, Papayannis AC, Banerjee S, et al. Subintimal dissection/reentry strategies in coronary chronic total occlusion interventions. Circ: Cardiovasc Interventions. 2012;5(5):729–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore S, Katoh O, Matsuo H, et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ: Cardiovasc Interventions. 2009;2(2):124–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito S. Different strategies of retrograde approach in coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71(1):8–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Thompson CA, et al. The retrograde approach to coronary artery chronic total occlusions: a practical approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79(1):3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyal D, Thompson CA, Grantham JA, et al. The retrograde technique for recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a stepby-step approach. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini L, Vo M, Dens J, et al. Myths to debunk to improve management, referral, and outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion of an epicardial coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(11):1774–1780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, et al. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(4):367–379.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson CA. The hybrid approach for percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2012;1:349–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Habara M, Tsuchikane E, Muramatsu T, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion outcome according to operator experience from the Japanese retrograde summit registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(6):1027–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galassi AR, Sianos G, Werner GS, et al. Retrograde recanalization of chronic total occlusions in Europe: procedural, in-hospital, and long-term outcomes from the multicenter ERCTO registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(22):2388–2400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Reifart N, et al. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(4):472–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautov R, Manh Nguyen C, Altisent O, et al. Recanalization of chronic total occlusions in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery and consideration of retrograde access via saphenous vein grafts. Circ: Cardiovasc Interventions. 2016;9(7):e003515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchikane E, Yamane M, Mutoh M, et al. Japanese multicenter registry evaluating the retrograde approach for chronic coronary total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(5):E654–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VG, Brayton KM, Tamayo A, et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6(2):128–136.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, et al. Trends in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: a 25-year experience from the Mayo clinic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(15):1611–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael TT, Mogabgab O, Fuh E, et al. Application of the “hybrid approach” to chronic total occlusion interventions: a detailed procedural analysis. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(1):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Yan AT, et al. Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Heart. 2016;102(18):1486–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo MN, McCabe JM, Lombardi WL, et al. Adoption of the hybrid CTO approach by a single non-CTO operator: procedural and clinical outcomes. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pershad A, Eddin M, Girotra S, et al. Validation and incremental value of the hybrid algorithm for CTO PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(4):654–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels DV, Banerjee S, Alaswad K, et al. Safety and efficacy of the hybrid approach in coronary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: the hybrid video registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91(2):175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teramoto T, Tsuchikane E, Matsuo H, et al. Initial success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in a native coronary artery is decreased in patients who underwent previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2014;7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.012.
   Google Scholar
• Christopoulos G, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. Application and outcomes of a hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in a contemporary multicenter US registry. Int J Cardiol. 2015;198:222–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, Jerez-Valero M, et al. Validation of the J-chronic total occlusion score for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in an independent contemporary cohort. Circ: Cardiovasc Interventions. 2013;6(6):635–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Jacobs AK, et al. Patients with chronic total occlusions undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: characteristics, success, and outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(5):e003586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramunddal T, Hoebers LP, Henriques JP, et al. Prognostic impact of chronic total occlusions: a report from SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9:1535–1544.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Jadhav ST, Harcombe AA, et al. Impact of proctoring on success rates for percutaneous revascularisation of coronary chronic total occlusions. Open Heart. 2015;2(1):e000228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman H, Seth M, Zein R, et al. Mehta, Hitinder GurmEdouard Daher. Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion—The Michigan experience: insights from the BMC2 registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2020 Jun;13(11):1357–1368.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. for the NCDR registry participants. contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the national cardiovascular data registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(18):1923–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al. Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):409–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid A, Buch AN, Satler LF, et al. Management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(7):911–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CM, Kwong Mak GY, Chung DT. Distal coronary artery perforation resulting from the use of hydrophilic coated guidewire in tortuous vessels. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;44(1):93–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bittl JA, Ryan TJ Jr., Keaney JF Jr., et al. Coronary artery perforation during excimer laser coronary angioplasty. The percutaneous excimer laser coronary angioplasty registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21(5):1158–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini L, Poletti E, Ayoub M, et al. Coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes. EuroIntervention. 2019 Oct 4;15(9):e804–e811. PMID: 31217142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis ES, Karmpaliotis D, Patel V, et al. Complications of chronic total occlusions angioplasty. Interventional Cardiol Clin. 2012;1(3):373–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka H, Morino Y, Abe M, et al. mpact of J-CTO score on procedural outcome and target lesion revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: a substudy of the J-CTO registry (Multicentre CTO Registry in Japan). EuroIntervention. 2016 Jan 22;11(9):981–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu EB, Tsuchikane E, Ge L, et al. Retrograde versus antegrade approach for coronary chronic total occlusion in an algorithm-driven contemporary Asia-Pacific multicentre registry: comparison of outcomes. Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Jun;29(6):894–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar