Angiography derived assessment of the coronary microcirculation: is it ready for prime time?

References

• Sara JD, Widmer RJ, Matsuzawa Y, et al. Prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1445–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aribas E, Roeters van Lennep JE, Elias-Smale SE, et al. Prevalence of microvascular angina among patients with stable symptoms in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Res. 2022 Feb 21;118(3):763–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PWDMC, Meneveau N, de Jaegere P, et al. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity with sensor-tip guidewires: a new methodologic approach for assessment of coronary hemodynamics before and after coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71(14):41D–53D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon WF, Balsam LB, and Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003 Jul 1;107(25):3129–3132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, et al. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation. 2001 Jan 16;103(2):184–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Maria GL, Scarsini R, and Shanmuganathan M, et al. Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance as a novel, pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microcirculation in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Aug;36(8):1395–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarsini R, Shanmuganathan M, and Kotronias RA, et al. Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMRangio) as a novel pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):1801–1813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotronias RA, Terentes-Printzios D, and Shanmuganathan M, et al. Long-Term clinical outcomes in patients with an acute ST-Segment-Elevation myocardial infarction stratified by angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8(2297–055X(Print)):717114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ai H, Feng Y, and Gong Y, et al. Coronary angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance. Front Physiol. 2020;11:605356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai N, Che W, and Liu L, et al. Diagnostic value of angiography-derived IMR for coronary microcirculation and its prognostic implication after PCI. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:735743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KH, Dai N, and Li Y, et al. Functional coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 9;14(15):1670–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, and Di Girolamo D, et al. Angio-Based index of microcirculatory resistance for the assessment of the coronary resistance: a Proof of Concept Study. J Interv Cardiol. 2020;2020:8887369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia-Renteria H, Lee JM, and Choi KH, et al. Coronary microcirculation assessment using functional angiography: development of a wire-free method applicable to conventional coronary angiograms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):1027–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, et al. An EAPCI expert consensus document on ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in collaboration with European society of cardiology working group on coronary pathophysiology & microcirculation endorsed by coronary vasomotor disorders International Study Group. Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 1;41(37):3504–3520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogame N, Ono M, Kawashima H, et al. The impact of coronary physiology on contemporary clinical decision making. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 27;13(14):1617–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rrb RM. Regulation of coronary blood flow. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1975;18:105–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson NP, Gould KL, De Bruyne B. Autoregulation of coronary blood supply in response to demand: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 May 11;77(18):2335–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves M, Roque D, de Araujo Goncalves P, et al. Temporal trends in referral patterns for invasive coronary angiography - a multicenter 10-year analysis. Coron Artery Dis. 2021 May 1;32(3):224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford TJ, Corcoran D, and Oldroyd KG, et al. Rationale and design of the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Coronary Microvascular Angina (CorMicA) stratified medicine clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:86–94 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman H, Demir OM, and Khan F, et al. Physiological stratification of patients with angina due to coronary microvascular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 26;75(20):2538–2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook CM, Howard JP, and Ahmad Y, et al. Comparing invasive hemodynamic responses in adenosine hyperemia versus physical exercise stress in chronic coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;1(342):7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wijns WSP, Reiber JH, van den Brand M, et al. Quantitative angiography of the left anterior descending coronary artery: correlations with pressure gradient and results of exercise thallium scintigraphy. Circulation. 1985;71(2):273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Juillière Y, Zijlstra F, et al. Coronary blood flow velocity during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as a guide for assessment of the functional result. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Feb 1;61(4):253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NH, van Son JA, and Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. Circulation. 1993;87(4):1354–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijls NH, Bruyne BDe, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(26):1703–1708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen SEJ, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1392–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’t Veer M, Pijls NHJ, Hennigan B, et al. Comparison of different diastolic resting indexes to iFR: are they all equal? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3088–3096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson NP, Li W, Chen X, et al. Diastolic pressure ratio: new approach and validation vs. the instantaneous wave-free ratio. Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 14;40(31):2585–2594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanerud J, Ahn JM, Jeremias A, et al. Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: the resting full-cycle ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study. EuroIntervention. 2018 Sep 20;14(7):806–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echavarria-Pinto M, Escaned J, and Macías E, et al. Disturbed coronary hemodynamics in vessels with intermediate stenoses evaluated with fractional flow reserve: a combined analysis of epicardial and microcirculatory involvement in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2013 Dec 17;128(24):2557–2566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echavarria-Pinto M, Collet C, Escaned J, et al. State of the art: pressure wire and coronary functional assessment. EuroIntervention. 2017 Aug 25;13(6):666–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Westra J, Adjedj J, et al. Fractional flow reserve in clinical practice: from wire-based invasive measurement to image-based computation. Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 7;41(34):3271–3279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masdjedi K, van ZLJC, Balbi MM, et al. Validation of a three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based software to calculate fractional flow reserve: the FAST study. EuroIntervention. 2020 Sep 18;16(7):591–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Gong Y, Wang W, et al. Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR. Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Jun 1;116(7):1349–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Ding D, and Chang Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: a novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97(Suppl 2):1040–1047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collet C, Onuma Y, Sonck J, et al. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 14;39(35):3314–3321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano T, Katagiri Y, Chang CC, et al. Angiography-Derived fractional flow reserve in the SYNTAX II trial: feasibility, diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio, and clinical prognostic value of functional SYNTAX score derived from quantitative flow ratio in patients with 3-vessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 11;12(3):259–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Tu S, Song L, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10317):2149–2159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mario C, Meneveau N, Gil R, et al. Maximal blood flow velocity in severe coronary stenoses measured with a Doppler guidewire. Limitations for the application of the continuity equation in the assessment of stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71(14):54D–61D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mario C, Gil R, and de Feyter PJ, et al. Response of conductance and resistance coronary vessels to scalar concentrations of acetylcholine: assessment with quantitative angiography and intracoronary Doppler echography in 29 patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 1994;127(3):514–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suryapranata HZF, MacLeod DC, van den Brand M, et al. Predictive value of reactive hyperemic response on reperfusion on recovery of regional myocardial function after coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;89( 0009-7322(Print)):1109–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong AS, Layland J, and Fearon WF, et al. Calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance without coronary wedge pressure measurement in the presence of epicardial stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PF, de Waard GA, Hollander MR, et al. Doppler-derived intracoronary physiology indices predict the occurrence of microvascular injury and microvascular perfusion deficits after angiographically successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;8(3):e001786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi T, Murai T, Ciccarelli G, et al. Prognostic value of coronary microvascular function measured immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease: An International Multicenter Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e007889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon WF, Low AF, Yong AS, et al. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2013 Jun 18;127(24):2436–2441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Maria GL, Cuculi F, Patel N, et al. How does coronary stent implantation impact on the status of the microcirculation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction? Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 1;36(45):3165–3177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RP, de Waard GA, De Silva K, et al. Doppler versus thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance to predict coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction or stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;121(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitabata H, Imanishi T, Kubo T, et al. Coronary microvascular resistance index immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention as a predictor of the transmural extent of infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation anterior acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Mar;2(3):263–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitabata H, Kubo T, Ishibashi K, et al. Prognostic value of microvascular resistance index immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention on left ventricular remodeling in patients with reperfused anterior acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1046–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Yang HM, et al. Comparison of accuracy in the prediction of left ventricular wall motion changes between invasively assessed microvascular integrity indexes and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 15;102(2):129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X, Yoon MH, Seo KW, et al. Usefulness of hyperemic microvascular resistance index as a predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J. 2015 May;45(3):194–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 5;51(5):560–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim HS, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, et al. Usefulness of the index of microcirculatory resistance for invasively assessing myocardial viability immediately after primary angioplasty for anterior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2009 Dec;30(23):2854–2860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SG, Hung OY, Lee JW, et al. Combination of the thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve is highly predictive of microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after St-Segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 25;9(8):793–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrick D, Haig C, Ahmed N, et al. Comparative prognostic utility of indexes of microvascular function alone or in combination in patients with an acute St-Segment-Elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2016 Dec 6;134(23):1833–1847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeoch R, Watkins S, Berry C, et al. The index of microcirculatory resistance measured acutely predicts the extent and severity of myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul;3(7):715–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel N, Petraco R, Dall’Armellina E, et al. Zero-Flow pressure measured immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction provides the best invasive index for predicting the extent of myocardial infarction at 6 months: an OxAMI study (Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1410–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echavarria-Pinto M, van de Hoef TP, and Nijjer S, et al. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended to a coronary stenosis on the index of microcirculatory resistance. Implications for the invasive assessment of microcirculatory function in ischaemic heart disease. EuroIntervention. 2017 Oct 20;13(8):944–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melikian N, Vercauteren S, Fearon WF, et al. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention. 2010 Apr;5(8):939–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo C, Long M, Hu X, et al. Thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance and flow reserve in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(1):43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg OG, Ragnarsson A, Kvarsnes A, et al. Reference interval for the index of coronary microvascular resistance. EuroIntervention. 2014 Jan 22;9(9):1069–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Layland J, Jung JH, et al. Integrated physiologic assessment of ischemic heart disease in real-world practice using index of microcirculatory resistance and fractional flow reserve: insights from the international index of microcirculatory resistance registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(11):e002857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maznyczka AM, Oldroyd KG, Greenwood JP, et al. Comparative significance of invasive measures of microvascular injury in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May;13(5):e008505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Jung JH, Hwang D, et al. Coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;67(10):1158–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantinou K, Keeble TR, Davies JR, et al. Discordance between coronary flow reserve and the index of microcirculatory resistance post-revascularization for St-Segment-Elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec;14(12):e010529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardone M, McCarthy M, Ardern CI, et al. Concurrently low coronary flow reserve and low index of microvascular resistance are associated with elevated resting coronary flow in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb 9. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, and Howard JP, et al. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022 Apr 19;43(16):1582–1593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford TJ, Stanley B, and Good R, et al. Stratified medical therapy using invasive coronary function testing in angina: the CorMicA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23Pt A):2841–2855.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sezer M, Oflaz H, Gören T, et al. Intracoronary streptokinase after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 3;356(18):1823–1834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto K, Ito S, Nakasuka K, et al. Acute effect of sodium nitroprusside on microvascular dysfunction in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int Heart J. 2012;53(6):337–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Zeng J, Huang H. Intracoronary injection of tirofiban prevents microcirculation dysfunction during delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Apr;1(208):137–140.
   Google Scholar
• Maznyczka AM, McCartney PJ, and Oldroyd KG, et al. Risk stratification guided by the index of microcirculatory resistance and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restoring Microcirculatory Perfusion in. ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose intracoronary tenecteplase in STEMI patients with high microvascular resistance post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [cited 2022 Jan 31]. Available from: https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372400
   Google Scholar
• Park SD, Lee MJ, Baek YS, et al. Randomised trial to compare a protective effect of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor on coronary microvascular injury in St-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CV-TIME trial). EuroIntervention. 2016 Oct 10;12(8):e964–e971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlic D, Ostojic M, Beleslin B, et al. The randomized physiologic assessment of thrombus aspiration in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction trial (PATA STEMI): study rationale and design. J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Aug;27(4):341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausenloy DJ, Kharbanda RK, Møller UK. Hausenloy DJ, Kharbanda RK, Møller UK, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet.2019 Oct 19;394(10207):1415–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel RLM, Bates E, and O’Neill W, et al. Application of digital techniques to selective coronary arteriography: use of myocardial contrast appearance time to measure coronary flow reserve. Am Heart J. 1984;107:153–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand V, Hodgson JM, Bates ER, et al. Abnormal coronary flow reserve and abnormal radionuclide exercise test results in patients with normal coronary angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Dec;6(6):1245–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand V, Mancini GB, Bates ER, et al. Comparative study of coronary flow reserve, coronary anatomy and results of radionuclide exercise tests in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Nov;8(5):1022–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdu FA, Liu L, Mohammed AQ, et al. Prognostic impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur J Intern Med. 2021 Oct;92:79–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Takahashi T, and Rios SA, et al. Diagnostic performance and prognostic impact of coronary angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):286–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maznyczka AM, Oldroyd KG, McCartney P, et al. The potential use of the index of microcirculatory resistance to guide stratification of patients for adjunctive therapy in acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 27;12(10):951–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrni G, Wolfrum M, and De Maria GL, et al. Index of microcirculatory resistance at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention predicts early cardiac complications: insights from the OxAMI (Oxford Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction) cohort. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 7; 6(11):e005409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi J, Patel B, and Chatzizisis YS, et al. Real time reduced order model for angiography fractional flow reserve. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Feb;1(216):106674.
   Google Scholar
• Papamanolis L, Kim HJ, and Jaquet C, et al. Myocardial perfusion simulation for coronary artery disease: a coupled patient-specific multiscale model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 May;49(5):1432–1447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaars H, de Waard GA, and Schumacher SP, et al. Continuous thermodilution to assess absolute flow and microvascular resistance: validation in humans using [15O]H2O positron emission tomography. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 21;40(28):2350–2359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Li C, Chu M, et al. Angiography-based coronary flow reserve: the feasibility of automatic computation by artificial intelligence. Cardiol J. 2021 Aug. 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agewall S, Beltrame JF, Reynolds HR, et al. ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur Heart J. 2017 Jan 14;38(3):143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada K, Honda Y, Luikart H, et al. Early invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation predicts subsequent acute rejection after heart transplantation. Int J Cardiol. 2019 Sep;1(290):27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn JM, Zimmermann FM, Gullestad L, et al. Microcirculatory resistance predicts allograft rejection and cardiac events after heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Dec 14;78(24):2425–2435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang HM, Khush K, Luikart H, et al. Invasive assessment of coronary physiology predicts late mortality after heart transplantation. Circulation. 2016 May 17;133(20):1945–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey HZR, Marber M, Chiribiri A, et al. Coronary microcirculation in aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e007547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minten L, McCutcheon K, Jentjens S, et al. The coronary and microcirculatory measurements in patients with aortic valve stenosis study: rationale and design. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Dec 1;321(6):H1106–h1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möbius AF. Ueber die bestimmung des inhaltes eines polyëders. Leipziger Sitzungsberichte math phys Classe. 1865;17(1867):473–512.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel R. The radiographic assessment of coronary blood flow parameters. Circulation. 1985;72(3):460–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adjedj J, Picard F, Mogi S, et al. Accurate assessment of coronary blood flow by continuous thermodilution technique: validation in a swine model. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):836–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar