Umbrella review and meta-analysis of reconstructed individual patient data of mortality following conventional endovascular and open surgical repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

References

• Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, et al. Editor’s Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8–93. DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AAA standards report 2020 to 2021. (Ed.^(eds) (NHS England, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Jacomelli J, Summers L, Stevenson A, et al. Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme. Br J Surg. 2016;103(9):1125–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensjö S, Björck M, Gürtelschmid M, et al. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation. 2011;124(10):1118–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøndal N, Søgaard R, Lindholt JS. Baseline prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease and hypertension in men aged 65-74 years from a population screening study (VIVA trial). Br J Surg. 2015;102(8):902–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Pickett E, Hedayati N, et al. Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(5):1107–1111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Vidal-Diez A, et al. Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical lessons from a comparison of outcomes in England and the USA. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):963–969. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60109-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10058):2366–2374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waton S JA, Birmpili P, Li Q, et al. National vascular registry: 2020 Annual report. (Ed.^(eds) (The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Boyle JR, Mao J, Beck AW, et al. Editor’s choice - variation in intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes by country: analysis of international consortium of vascular registries 2010 - 2016. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;62(1):16–24. DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meecham L, Jacomelli J, Davis M, et al. Outcomes in men from the NHS abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme with a large aneurysm referred for intervention. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61(2):192–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AW, Sedrakyan A, Mao J, et al. Variations in abdominal aortic aneurysm care: a report from the international consortium of vascular registries. Circulation. 2016;134(24):1948–1958. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paravastu SC, Jayarajasingam R, Cottam R, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:Cd004178.
   Google Scholar
• Bahia SS, Holt PJ, Jackson D, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term survival after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair 1969-2011: 5 year survival remains poor despite advances in medical care and treatment strategies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(3):320–330. DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khashram M, Williman JA, Hider PN, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influencing survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016;51(2):203–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdominal aortic aneurysm: diagnosis and management. Evidence review K: effectiveness of endovascular aneurysm repair, open surgical repair and non-surgical management of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. NICE guideline (Ed.^(eds). 2018. NICE: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556921/
   Google Scholar
• Tzani AI, Doulamis IP, Katsaros I, et al. Mortality after endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms - the newer the better? Vasa - Eur J Vasc. 2018;47(3):187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulder RMA, Bastiaannet E, Hamming JF, et al. Meta-analysis of long-term survival after elective endovascular or open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2019;106(5):523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZG, Tan SP, Diao YP, et al. The long-term outcomes of open and endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2019;42(10):899–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Khan S, Salata K, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(3):954–969.e30. DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederle FA, Kyriakides TC, Stroupe KT, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(22):2126–2135. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1715955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akers Jo, University of York. Systematic Reviews: Crd's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York (UK): CRD University of York; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JPT, et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2016;69:225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJNM, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic Reviews in Health Care. 2001. doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson A, Kontopantelis E. Applications of simple and accessible methods for meta-analysis involving rare events: a simulation study. Stat Methods Med Res. 2021;30(7):1589–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Beyond the forest plot: the drapery plot. Res Synth Methods. 2021;12(1):13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Davey Smith G. Sifting the evidence-what’s wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001;322(7280):226–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70(2):129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, et al. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1881–1889. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0909499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becquemin J-P. The ACE trial: a randomised comparison of open versus endovascular repair in good risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vascular Surg. 2009;50(1):222–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Torella F. Editor’s choice - endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of updated peri-operative and long term data of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):385–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannopoulos S, Kokkinidis DG, Armstrong EJ. Long-term outcomes of endovascular vs open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020;21(10):1253–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert U. When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care? Eur J Health Econ. 2003;4(3):143–150.
   Google Scholar