66
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Pathophysiology and management of saphenous vein graft disease

, &
Pages 565-572 | Received 25 Apr 2023, Accepted 29 Jun 2023, Published online: 04 Aug 2023

References

  • Buxton BF, Galvin SD. The history of arterial revascularization: from Kolesov to Tector and beyond. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 2(4):41926–41426. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.24
  • Kunlin J. Le traitement de l’arterite obliterante par la greffe veineuse (1949). Arch Mal Coeur. 1949;42:371–379.
  • Connolly JE. The history of the in situ saphenous vein bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1):241–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.018
  • Hall KV. The great saphenous vein used in situ as an arterial shunt after extirpation of the vein valves. A preliminary report. Surgery. 1962;51:492–495.
  • Linton RR, Darling RC. Autogenous saphenous vein bypass grafts in femoropopliteal obliterative arterial disease. Surgery. 1962;51:62–73.
  • Mannick JA, Hume DM. Salvage of extremities by vein grafts in far-advanced peripheral vascular disease. Surgery. 1964;55:154–164.
  • Garrett HE, Dennis EW, DeBakey ME. Aortocoronary bypass with saphenous vein graft. Seven-year follow-up. JAMA. 1973;223(7):792–794. doi: 10.1001/jama.223.7.792
  • Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein graft in the surgical treatment of coronary artery disease: Operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;58(2):178–185. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)42599-3
  • Vineberg A, Munro DD, Cohen H, et al. Four years’ clinical experience with internal mammary artery implantation in the treatment of human coronary artery insufficiency including additional experimental studies. J Thorac Surg. 1955;29(1):1-32. discussion, 32-36. doi: 10.1016/S0096-5588(20)30730-3
  • Spencer FC, Yong NK, Prachuabmoh K. internal mammary-coronary artery anastomoses performed during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1964;5:292–297.
  • Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 1968;5(4):334–339. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66351-5
  • Marti MC, Bouchardy B, Cox JN. Aorto-coronary by-pass with autogenous saphenous vein grafts: histopathological aspects. Virchows Arch A Pathol Pathol Anat. 1971;352(3):255–266. doi: 10.1007/BF00600675
  • Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(1):1–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601023140101
  • Bakaeen FG, Svensson LG. Why don’t we kill 2 birds with 1 stone? Circulation. 2018; 137(16):1708–1711. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032885
  • Goldman S, McCarren M, Sethi GK, et al. Long-term mortality follow-up of radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter, randomized trial. Circulation. 2022;146(17):1323–1325. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062343
  • Jawitz OK, Lawton JS, Thibault D, et al. Sex differences in coronary artery bypass grafting techniques: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;113(6):1979–1988. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.039
  • Grondin CM, Thornton JC. The natural history of saphenous vein grafts. In: Lüscher T, Turina M, Braunwald E, editors. Coronary artery graft disease: mechanisms and prevention. Springer; 1994. p. 3–15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78637-2_1
  • Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(11):2149–2156. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.064
  • Tranbaugh RF, Schwann TA, Swistel DG, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery using the radial artery, right internal thoracic artery, or saphenous vein as the second conduit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(2):553–559. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.017
  • Xenogiannis I, Zenati M, Bhatt DL, et al. Saphenous vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to prevention and treatment strategies. Circulation. 2021;144(9):728–745. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052163
  • Barner HB, Farkas EA. Conduits for coronary bypass: vein grafts. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 45(5):275–286. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2012.45.5.275
  • Khaleel MS, Dorheim TA, Duryee MJ, et al. High-pressure distention of the saphenous vein during preparation results in increased markers of inflammation: a potential mechanism for graft failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(2):552–558. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.035
  • Foglesong A, Rusia A, Mertens A, et al. Wait for (h)it: immediate and complete bypass graft failure due to heparin induced thrombocytopenia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9_Supplement):2985–2985. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(22)03976-6
  • Kon ZN, Kwon MH, Collins MJ, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass leads to a regional hypercoagulable state not detectable using systemic markers. Innov Phila Pa. 2006;1(5):232–238. doi: 10.1097/01.imi.0000242160.21278.b7
  • Lee S, Lee RT. Mechanical stretch and intimal hyperplasia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(3):459–460. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.201509
  • Yazdani SK, Farb A, Nakano M, et al. Pathology of drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):666–674. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.12.017
  • Yahagi K, Kolodgie FD, Otsuka F, et al. Pathophysiology of native coronary, vein graft, and in-stent atherosclerosis. Nature Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:79-98. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.164.
  • Shelton ME, Forman MB, Virmani R, et al. A comparison of morphologic and angiographic findings in long-term internal mammary artery and saphenous vein bypass grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11(2):297–307. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90094-0
  • Mitra AK, Gangahar DM, Agrawal DK. Cellular, molecular and immunological mechanisms in the pathophysiology of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. Immunol Cell Biol. 2006; 84(2):115–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01407.x
  • Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease. Circulation. 1998; 97(9):916–931. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.9.916
  • Souza DSR, Dashwood MR, Tsui JCS, et al. Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(4):1189–1195. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03425-2
  • Tsui JCS, Souza D, Filbey D, et al. Localization of nitric oxide synthase in saphenous vein grafts harvested with a novel “no-touch” technique: potential role of nitric oxide contribution to improved early graft patency rates. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(2):356–362. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121072
  • Kim MS, Hwang HY, Kim JS, et al. Saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery as a Y-composite graft: Five-year angiographic and clinical results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156(4):1424–1433.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.123
  • Hage A, Voisine P, Erthal F, et al. Eight-year follow-up of the Clopidogrel After Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease (CASCADE) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(1):212–222.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.039
  • Roth JA, Cukingnan RA, Brown BG, et al. Factors influencing patency of saphenous vein grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1979;28(2):176–183. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63777-0
  • Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al. One-year coronary bypass graft patency. Circulation. 2004;110(22):3418–3423. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148139.79580.36
  • Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(6):2093–2097. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.027
  • Zenati MA, Shroyer AL, Collins JF, et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(2):338–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004
  • Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(3):235–244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900708
  • Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
  • Paterson HS, Bannon PG, Taggart DP. Competitive flow in coronary bypass surgery: The roles of fractional flow reserve and arterial graft configuration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154(5):1570–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.05.087
  • Toth G, De Bruyne B, Casselman F, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. Accessed Mar 10, 2023. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002740
  • Toth GG, De Bruyne B, Kala P, et al. Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: the GRAFFITI trial. EuroIntervention J Eur Collab Work Group Interv Cardiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2019;15(11):e999–e1005. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00463
  • Mehta RH, Ferguson TB, Lopes RD, et al. Saphenous vein grafts with multiple versus single distal targets in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 124(3):280-288, 2011. Accessed Mar 10, 2023. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.110.991299
  • Li J, Liu Y, Zheng J, et al. The patency of sequential and individual vein coronary bypass grafts: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(4):1292–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.038
  • American College of Cardiology: Latest in cardiology. Willemsen L, Janssen P, Klein P, et al. Therapies to improve vein graft patency after CABG. Accessed Feb. 25, 2023. Accessed from: https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2021/02/08/19/04/Therapies-to-Improve-Vein-Graft-Patency-After-CABG
  • Kim KB, Hwang HY, Hahn S, et al. A randomized comparison of the Saphenous Vein Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery as a Y-Composite Graft (SAVE RITA) trial: one-year angiographic results and mid-term clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(3):901–907. discussion 907-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.057
  • Samano N, Geijer H, Liden M, et al. The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(4):880–888. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.027
  • Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization. Circulation 2012; 125(23):2827-2835. Accessed Mar 10, 2023. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.111.069260
  • Harskamp RE, Alexander JH, Schulte PJ, et al. Vein graft preservation solutions, patency, and outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: follow-up from the PREVENT IV randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):798–805. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.87
  • Niclauss L. Techniques and standards in intraoperative graft verification by transit time flow measurement after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a critical review. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2017; 51(1):26–33. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw203
  • Ben-Gal Y, Taggart DP, Williams MR, et al. Expandable external support device to improve saphenous vein graft patency after CABG. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8(1):122. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-122
  • Goldstein DJ, Puskas JD, Alexander JH, et al. External support for saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7(8):808–816. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1437
  • Taggart DP, Webb CM, Desouza A, et al. Long-term performance of an external stent for saphenous vein grafts: the VEST IV trial. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;13(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0803-9
  • Solymoss BC, Nadeau P, Millette D, et al. Late thrombosis of saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts related to risk factors. Circulation. 1988;78(3 Pt2):I140-143. PMID 3261650.
  • Kugiyama K, Sakamoto T, Misumi I, et al. Transferable lipids in oxidized low-density lipoprotein stimulate plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and inhibit tissue-type plasminogen activator release from endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1993;73(2):335–343. doi: 10.1161/01.res.73.2.335
  • Brunkwall JS, Bergqvist D. Prostacyclin release from the human saphenous vein in diabetics is lower than in nondiabetics. World J Surg. 1992;16(6):1141–1145. discussion 1146. doi: 10.1007/BF02067081
  • Kulik A, Abreu AM, Boronat V, et al. Intensive versus moderate statin therapy and early graft occlusion after coronary bypass surgery: the aggressive cholesterol therapy to inhibit vein graft events randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(1):151–161.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.123
  • Eisen A, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, et al. The benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery and acute coronary syndrome in the IMPROVE-IT trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(48):3576–3584. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw377
  • Zimmermann N, Gams E, Hohlfeld T. Aspirin in coronary artery bypass surgery: new aspects of and alternatives for an old antithrombotic agent. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2008;34(1):93–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.023
  • Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Windecker S, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(370):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278
  • Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e18–e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038
  • Kulik A, Ruel M, Jneid H, et al. Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 2015;131(10):927-9264. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000182
  • McKavanagh P, Yanagawa B, Zawadowski G, et al. Management and prevention of saphenous vein graft failure: a review. Cardiol Ther. 2017; 6(2):203–223. doi: 10.1007/s40119-017-0094-6
  • Abdelrahman A, Dębski M, More R, et al. One-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries versus saphenous vein grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Cardiol J. 2022;29(3):396–404. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0131
  • de Winter RW, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery versus saphenous vein graft in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized PROCTOR trial. Am Heart J. 2023;257:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.014
  • Savage MP, Douglas JS, Fischman DL, et al. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. saphenous vein de novo trial investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(11):740–747. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709113371103
  • Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, et al. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation. 2002;105(11):1285–1290. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000012783.63093.0C
  • Paul TK, Bhatheja S, Panchal HB, et al. Outcomes of saphenous vein graft intervention with and without embolic protection device: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(12):e005538. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005538
  • Harskamp RE, Beijk MA, Damman P, et al. Clinical outcome after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in coronary bypass graft failure. J Cardiovasc Med 2013;14(6):438–445. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328356a4fc
  • Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, et al. Is reoperation still a risk factor in coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(5):1719–1727. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.033
  • Kindzelski BA, Bakaeen FG, Tong MZ, et al. Modern practice and outcomes of reoperative cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164(6):1755–1766.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.028

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.