Managing the challenge of a small aortic annulus in patients with severe aortic stenosis

References

• Iung B, Baron G, Tornos P, et al. Valvular heart disease in the community: a European experience. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2007;32(11):609–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2007.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–1011. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CR, Leon MB, MacK MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:687–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1790–1798. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, et al. Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1321–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695–1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1609–1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1706–1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbring M, Alexiou K, Schumann E, et al. Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus – a high risk group on long-term follow-up with a total of 1066 patient-years. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61(S 01):379–385. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1332704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodés-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Suri RM, et al. Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement insights from the PARTNER trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(5):701–711. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, et al. Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1(1):74–81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.780858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Buz S, et al. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: classification, pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment approaches, and prevention. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalavrouziotis D, Rodés-Cabau J, Bagur R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(10):1016–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Yakubov SJ, et al. Impact of annular size on outcomes after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(4):1129–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelghani M, Mankerious N, Allali A, et al. Bioprosthetic valve performance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding versus balloon-expandable valves in large versus small aortic valve Annuli: insights from the CHOICE trial and the CHOICE-Extend registry. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(24):2507–2518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hase H, Yoshijima N, Yanagisawa R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Evolut R versus Sapien 3 in Japanese patients with a small aortic annulus: the OCEAN-TAVI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97(6):E875–E886. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regazzoli D, Chiarito M, Cannata F, et al. Transcatheter self-expandable valve implantation for aortic stenosis in small aortic Annuli: the TAVI-SMALL registry. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(2):196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigtländer L, Kim WK, Mauri V, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a small aortic annulus: performance of supra-, intra- and infra-annular transcatheter heart valves. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110(12):1957–1966. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01918-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers T, Steinvil A, Gai J, et al. Choice of balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve impacts hemodynamics differently according to aortic annular size. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(6):900–904. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri V, Kim WK, Abumayyaleh M, et al. Short-term outcome and hemodynamic performance of next-generation self-expanding versus balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves in patients with small aortic annulus: a multicenter propensity-matched comparison. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(10):1–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzikas A, Schultz CJ, Piazza N, et al. Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77(6):868–875. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2011;8:74–81.
   Google Scholar
• ACT N, Delgado V, Van Der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2-and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;3(1):94–102. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.885152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(14):1275–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalique OK, Kodali SK, Paradis JM, et al. Aortic annular sizing using a novel 3-dimensional echocardiographic method use and comparison with cardiac computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(1):155–163. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanke P, Weir-McCall JR, Achenbach S, et al. Computed tomography Imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Tavi)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an Expert consensus document of the society of Cardiovascular computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(1):1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas-Ferraz AB, Tirado-Conte G, Dagenais F, et al. Aortic stenosis and small aortic Annulus: clinical challenges and Current therapeutic alternatives. Circulation. 2019;139(23):2685–2702. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Hayashida K, Lefèvre T, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients of small body size. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(2):272–280. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima M, Watanabe Y. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in small anatomy: patient selection and technical challenges. Interv Cardiol Research Resources. 2018;13(2):1–68. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:28:1
   Google Scholar
• Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58(1):20–24. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.58.1.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RLJ, et al. The impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. European Heart Journal. 2012;33(12):1518–1529. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of echocardiography, and the Brazilian department of Cardiovascular Imaging †. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(6):589–590. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin F, Yingchoncharoen T, Wilson WM, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular myocardial mechanics after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(2):1–12. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann HC, Daneshvar SA, Fonarow GC, et al. Prosthesis–patient mismatch in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: from the STS/ACC TVT registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(22):2701–2711. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon JM, DeSimone JP, Brennan JM, et al. The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106(1):14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali A, Patel A, Ali Z, et al. Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival. J Thorac Cardiov Surg. 2011;142(2):285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JS, Huang JH, Chiu KM, et al. Extent of left ventricular mass regression and Impact of global left ventricular afterload on cardiac events and mortality after aortic valve replacement. J Clin Med. 2022;11(24):11. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2020;143(5): 2021. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganathan AP, Woo YR, Sung HW, et al. In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92(2):198–209. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)35899-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann G, Ogbamicael SA, Jochens A, et al. Impact of patient–prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on short-term survival: a retrospective single center analysis of 632 consecutive patients with isolated stented biological aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(6):469–474. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Russo F, et al. Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic annulus and valve prosthesis–body surface area mismatch. The Journal Of Thoracic And Cardiovascular Surgery. 1994;108(1):57–62. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(94)70218-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgi A, Cetin S, Altekin E, et al. [Hemodynamic performance of mechanical aortic valves in narrow aortic annulus cases]. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2005;5(1):30–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minardi G, Manzara C, Creazzo V, et al. Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-1-27
   Google Scholar
• Stock S, Lohmann I, Hanke T, et al. Rest and exercise haemodynamics in patients with one of two stented bioprostheses and in healthy controls with small aortic annuli†. Interactive CardioVascular And Thoracic Surgery. 2018;26(3):425–430. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Wu QC. Intra-supra annular aortic valve and complete supra annular aortic valve: a literature review and hemodynamic comparison. Scand J Surg. 2010;99(1):28–31. doi: 10.1177/145749691009900107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Kim HJ, Kim JB, et al. Supra-annular versus intra-annular prostheses in aortic valve replacement: impact on haemodynamics and clinical outcomes†. Interactive CardioVascular And Thoracic Surgery. 2019;28(1):58–64. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali A, Halstead JC, Cafferty F, et al. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Circulation. 2006;114(1_supplement):114. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000950
   Google Scholar
• Murashita T, Okada Y, Kanemitsu H, et al. Efficacy of stentless aortic bioprosthesis implantation for aortic stenosis with small aortic annulus. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;63(6):446–451. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1389106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repossini A, Di Bacco L, Passaretti B, et al. Early hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of isolated aortic valve replacement with stentless or transcatheter valve in intermediate-risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(3):549–558.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalabi A, Spiegelstein D, Sternik L, et al. Sutureless versus stented valve in aortic valve replacement in patients with small annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(1):118–122. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya YP, Cavanaugh SM, Sandhu AA. Surgical aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus. J Card Surg. 2021;36(7):2502–2509. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersak B, Fischlein T, Folliguet TA, et al. Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an international Expert consensus panel. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(3):709–718. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore A, Gueldich M, Folliguet T. Sutureless valves fit/perform well in a small aortic annulus. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;9(5):414–416. doi: 10.21037/acs.2020.04.02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small W, Valves S, Study AM, et al. Challenge for Perceval: aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(4):1248–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theron A, Gariboldi V, Grisoli D, et al. Rapid deployment of aortic bioprosthesis in elderly patients with small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1434–1441. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, et al. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(1):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(6):1608–1612. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00127-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V RR, Manlhiot C, Feindel CM, et al. Surgical enlargement of the aortic root does not increase the operative risk of aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2018;137(15):1585–1594. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvette V, Sénéchal M, Barrette V, et al. Annulus root enlargement during redo aortic valve replacement: perioperative results and hemodynamic impact. J Card Surg. 2020;35(9):2158–2164. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Ghita C, Palmer S. Y-incision aortic root enlargement with modified aortotomy upsizing the annulus by 5 valve sizes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114(6):E479–E481. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction using self-developed aortic valve plasty system in aortic valve disease. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(4):550–553. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.253682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, et al. A total of 404 cases of aortic valve reconstruction with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1):301–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiyama S, Iida Y, Shimura K, et al. Midterm outcome of aortic valve neocuspidization for aortic valve stenosis with small annulus. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(8):762–767. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01299-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, He G, Imin E, et al. ‘‘Chimney’’ Bentall procedure in the small aortic root after prior aortic valve operations. The Annals Of Thoracic Surgery. 2020;110(3):e241–e243. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoneim A, Bouhout I, Demers P, et al. Management of small aortic annulus in the era of sutureless valves: a comparative study among different biological options. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(4):1019–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiariello GA, Bruno P, Villa E, et al. Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with small aortic annulus: results with three different bioprostheses. Innovations. 2019;14(1):27–36. doi: 10.1177/1556984519826430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claessen BE, Tang GHL, Kini AS, et al. Considerations for optimal device selection in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:102–112. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;43(7):561–632. 2022. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavel MA, Webb JG, Pibarot P, et al. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(20):1883–1891. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A, Schwartz AL, Uretzky G, et al. Hemodynamic performance and outcome of percutaneous versus surgical stentless bioprostheses for aortic stenosis with anticipated patient–prosthesis mismatch. The Journal Of Thoracic And Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014;147(6):1892–1899. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirado-Conte G, Rodés-Cabau J, Oteo JF, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with extra- small aortic annuli. EuroIntervention. 2023;19(4):e340–e351. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason TG, Reardon MJ, Popma JJ, et al. 5-year outcomes of self-expanding transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(22):2687–2696. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pibarot P, Ternacle J, Jaber WA, et al. Structural deterioration of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve bioprostheses in the PARTNER-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(16):1830–1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar RR, et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2485–2491. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60290-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroutan F, Guyatt GH, Otto CM, et al. Structural valve deterioration after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2017;103(23):1899–1905. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen TH, Thyregod HGH, Ihlemann N, et al. Eight-year outcomes for patients with aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk randomized to transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(30):2912–2919. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard L, Ihlemann N, Capodanno D, et al. Durability of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients at lower surgical risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(5):546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, et al. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interven. European Journal Of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2017;52(3):408–417. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Trigo M, Muñoz-Garcia AJ, Wijeysundera HC, et al. Incidence, timing, and predictors of valve hemodynamic deterioration after transcatheter aortic valve replacement multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(6):644–655. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahjoub H, Mathieu P, Larose E, et al. Determinants of aortic bioprosthetic valve calcification assessed by multidetector CT. Heart. 2015;101(6):472–477. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataruka A, Otto CM. Valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(S30):S3629–S3636. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flameng W, Herregods MC, Vercalsteren M, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch predicts structural valve degeneration in bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 2010;121(19):2123–2129. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.901272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vemulapalli S, Holmes DR, Dai D, et al. Valve hemodynamic deterioration and cardiovascular outcomes in TAVR: a report from the STS/ACC TVT registry. Am Heart J. 2018;195:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas AE, Mando R, Kadri A, Khalili H, Hanzel G, Shannon F, et al. Comparison of Transvalvular Aortic Mean Gradients Obtained by Intraprocedural Echocardiography and Invasive Measurement in Balloon and Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valves. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(19):e021014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyasaka M, Tada N, Taguri M, et al. Incidence, predictors, and clinical Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Asian patients: the OCEAN-TAVI registry. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(8):771–780. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, et al. Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(5):452–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri R, Byrne J, Muller R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with small aortic annuli using a 20 mm balloon-expanding valve. Heart. 2017;103(2):148–153. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pibarot P, Magne J, Leipsic J, et al. Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(1):149–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn RT, Leipsic J, Douglas PS, et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal transcatheter valve function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbanti M, Yang TH, Rodès Cabau J, et al. Anatomical and procedural features associated with aortic root rupture during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2013;128(3):244–253. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanke P, Reinöhl J, Schlensak C, et al. Prosthesis oversizing in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with contained rupture of the aortic root. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(4):540–548. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihdayhid AR, Leipsic J, Hahn RT, et al. Impact of annular oversizing on paravalvular regurgitation and Valve Hemodynamics: new insights from PARTNER 3. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(19):2158–2169. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann HC, Abdel-Wahab M, Attizzani GF, et al. Rationale and design of the SMall Annuli randomized to Evolut or SAPIEN trial (SMART trial). Am Heart J. 2022;243:92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltchaninoff H, Bonaros N, Prendergast B, et al. Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter heart valve replacement in female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve intervention R. Am Heart J. 2020;228:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar