Personalized biomechanical insights in atrial fibrillation: opportunities & challenges

References

• Kornej J, Börschel CS, Benjamin EJ, et al. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st century: novel methods and new insights. Circ Res. 2020;127(1):4–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Ham HA, Klungel OH, Singer DE, et al. Comparative performance of ATRIA, CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc risk scores predicting stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from a national primary care database. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(17):1851–1859. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SE, Sagris D, Hill A, et al. Atrial fibrillation and stroke. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023;21(1):35–56. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2160319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allessie M, Ausma J, Schotten U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;54(2):230–246. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00258-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghi S, Song C, Gray WA, et al. Left atrial appendage function and stroke risk. Stroke. 2015;46(12):3554–3559. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojadinović P, Deshraju A, Wichterle D, et al. The hemodynamic effect of simulated atrial fibrillation on left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33(12):2569–2577. doi: 10.1111/jce.15669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu D, Peng L, Ghista DN, et al. Left atrial remodeling mechanisms associated with atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2021;12(3):361–372. doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00527-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijesurendra RS, Casadei B. Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2019;105(24):1860–1867. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honarbakhsh S, Schilling RJ, Orini M, et al. Structural remodeling and conduction velocity dynamics in the human left atrium: relationship with reentrant mechanisms sustaining atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(1):18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Fan P, Jin F, et al. Dynamic and static biomechanical traits of cardiac fibrosis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1042030. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1042030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijesurendra RS, Casadei B. Atrial fibrillation: effects beyond the atrium? Cardiovasc Res. 2015;105(3):238–247. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvv001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabel S, Knierim M, Stehle T, et al. Effects of atrial fibrillation on the human ventricle. Circ Res. 2022;130(7):994–1010. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis P, Zografos T, Christoforatou E, et al. The electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation: from basic mechanisms to catheter ablation. Cardiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:4109269. doi: 10.1155/2021/4109269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong P, Christia P, Frangogiannis NG. The pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71(4):549–574. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1349-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama K, Imanaka-Yoshida K. The pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis: a review of recent progress. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2617. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon M, Yang PS, Jang E, et al. Improved population-based clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation by compliance with the simple ABC (atrial fibrillation better care) Pathway for Integrated care management: a nationwide cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 2019;119(10):1695–1703. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger WR, Meulendijks ER, Limpens J, et al. Persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of invasive strategies. Int J Cardiol. 2019;278:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangeli P, Zado ES, Hutchinson MD, et al. Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(2):374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Xiong F, Qi XY, et al. Altered calcium handling produces reentry-promoting action potential alternans in atrial fibrillation-remodeled hearts. JCI Insight. 2020;5(8): doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.133754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnkopf C, Badger TJ, Burgon NS, et al. Evaluation of the left atrial substrate in patients with lone atrial fibrillation using delayed-enhanced MRI: implications for disease progression and response to catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(10):1475–1481. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellman J, Sheikh F. Atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, therapeutics, and future directions. Compr Physiol. 2015;5(2):649–665. doi 10.1002/cphy.c140047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliot E, Botto GL, Crijns HJ, et al. Quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: how to assess it and how to improve it. Europace. 2014;16(6):787–796. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crijns H, Van Gelder IC. Paradigm shifts in pathophysiology and management of atrial fibrillation-a tale of the RACE trials in the Netherlands. Neth Heart J. 2020;28(Suppl 1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01476-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanakrishnan R, Wang N, Larson MG, et al. Atrial fibrillation begets heart failure and vice versa: temporal associations and differences in preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. 2016;133(5):484–492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergau L, Bengel P, Sciacca V, et al. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2510. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. 2019 diseases and injuries collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams HP Jr., Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CW, Kerber RE, Weiss HR, et al. The effects of atrial fibrillation on atrial pressure-volume and flow relationships. Circ Res. 1982;51(2):205–215. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.51.2.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Lee DC, Furiasse N, et al. Left atrial and left atrial appendage 4D blood flow dynamics in atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(9):e004984. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta KB, Ratcliffe MB, Fallert MA, et al. Changes in passive mechanical stiffness of myocardial tissue with aneurysm formation. Circulation. 1994;89(5):2315–2326. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.89.5.2315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoit BD. Left atrial size and function: role in prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(6):493–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghi S, Chang A, Ignacio G, et al. Left atrial appendage morphology improves prediction of stagnant flow and stroke risk in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(2):e008074. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudzińska-Szczerba K, Kułakowski P, Michałowska I, et al. Association between left atrial appendage morphology and function and the risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022;11:e09. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajeev JK, Kalman JM, Dewey H, et al. The atrium and embolic stroke: myopathy not atrial fibrillation as the requisite determinant? Jacc-Clin Electrophy. 2020;6(3):251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.12.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roka A, Burright I. Remodeling in persistent atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology and therapeutic targets—a systematic review. Physiologia. 2023;3(1):43–72. doi: 10.3390/physiologia3010004
   Google Scholar
• Denham NC, Pearman CM, Caldwell JL, et al. Calcium in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1380. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugenbiel P, Wenz F, Govorov K, et al. Atrial fibrillation complicated by heart failure induces distinct remodeling of calcium cycling proteins. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0116395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke JD, Caldwell JL, Horn MA, et al. Perturbed atrial calcium handling in an ovine model of heart failure: potential roles for reductions in the L-type calcium current. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;79:169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh YH, Wakili R, Qi XY, et al. Calcium-handling abnormalities underlying atrial arrhythmogenesis and contractile dysfunction in dogs with congestive heart failure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(2):93–102. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.107.754788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niort BC, Recalde A, Cros C, et al. Critical link between calcium regional heterogeneity and atrial fibrillation susceptibility in sheep left atria. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):746. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiser M, Lederer WJ, Schotten U. Alterations of atrial Ca(2+) handling as cause and consequence of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89(4):722–733. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotten U, Greiser M, Benke D, et al. Atrial fibrillation-induced atrial contractile dysfunction: a tachycardiomyopathy of a different sort. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53(1):192–201. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00453-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salles S, Espeland T, Molares A, et al. 3D myocardial mechanical wave measurements: toward in vivo 3D myocardial elasticity mapping. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(8):1495–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claridge B, Drack A, Pinto AR, et al. Defining cardiac fibrosis complexity and regulation towards therapeutic development. Clin Transl Disc. 2023;3(1):e163. doi: 10.1002/ctd2.163
   Google Scholar
• López B, Ravassa S, Moreno MU, et al. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis: mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(7):479–498. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00504-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangogiannis NG. Cardiac fibrosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(6):1450–1488. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheule S, Tuyls E, Gharaviri A, et al. Loss of continuity in the thin epicardial layer because of endomysial fibrosis increases the complexity of atrial fibrillatory conduction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(1):202–211. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.975144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohr S. Arrhythmogenic implications of fibroblast-myocyte interactions. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(2):442–452. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.957647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif W, Alex L, Su Y, et al. Left atrial remodeling, hypertrophy, and fibrosis in mouse models of heart failure. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2017;30:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2017.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall C, Gehmlich K, Denning C, et al. Complex relationship between cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes in health and disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(5):e019338. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellini C, Di Martino ES. A mechanical characterization of the porcine atria at the healthy stage and after ventricular tachypacing. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134(2):021008. doi: 10.1115/1.4006026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson WJ, Clarke SA, Quinn TA, et al. Physiological implications of myocardial scar structure. Compr Physiol. 2015;5(4):1877–1909. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JW, Nuñez JA, Covell JW. Functional implications of myocardial scar structure. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(5 Pt 2):H2123–2130. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.272.5.H2123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sirry MS, Butler JR, Patnaik SS, et al. Characterisation of the mechanical properties of infarcted myocardium in the rat under biaxial tension and uniaxial compression. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;63:252–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendiola EA, Neelakantan S, Xiang Q, et al. Contractile adaptation of the left ventricle post-myocardial infarction: predictions by rodent-specific computational modeling. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(4):846–863. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03102-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomovsky GM, Holmes JW. Evolution of scar structure, mechanics, and ventricular function after myocardial infarction in the rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;298(1):H221–228. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00495.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita M, Eckert CE, Matsuzaki K, et al. Modification of infarct material properties limits adverse ventricular remodeling. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(2):617–624. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RD, Camelliti P. Role of non-myocyte gap junctions and connexin hemichannels in cardiovascular health and disease: novel therapeutic targets? Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):866. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Chen Q, Ma S. Left atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, clinical evaluation and management. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(6):2764–2775. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CY, Zhang JR, Hu WN, et al. Atrial fibrosis underlying atrial fibrillation (review). Int J Mol Med. 2021;47(3):1–1. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong AM, Maass AH, Oberdorf-Maass SU, et al. Mechanisms of atrial structural changes caused by stretch occurring before and during early atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89(4):754–765. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada M, Nattel S. Implications of inflammation and fibrosis in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021;13(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2020.11.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sygitowicz G, Maciejak-Jastrzębska A, Sitkiewicz D. A review of the molecular mechanisms underlying cardiac fibrosis and atrial fibrillation. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4430. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herum KM, Choppe J, Kumar A, et al. Mechanical regulation of cardiac fibroblast profibrotic phenotypes. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28(14):1871–1882. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e17-01-0014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorov YV, Rosenshtraukh LV, Glukhov AV. Arrhythmogenic interaction between sympathetic tone and mechanical stretch in rat pulmonary vein myocardium. Front Physiol. 2020;11:237. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalifa J, Jalife J, Zaitsev AV, et al. Intra-atrial pressure increases rate and organization of waves emanating from the superior pulmonary veins during atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;108(6):668–671. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000086979.39843.7B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Känel R, Kudielka BM, Haeberli A, et al. Prothrombotic changes with acute psychological stress: combined effect of hemoconcentration and genuine coagulation activation. Thromb Res. 2009;123(4):622–630. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vita JA, Holbrook M, Palmisano J, et al. Flow-induced arterial remodeling relates to endothelial function in the human forearm. Circulation. 2008;117(24):3126–3133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward MR, Pasterkamp G, Yeung AC, et al. Arterial remodeling. Mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation. 2000;102(10):1186–1191. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.10.1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo K, Li K, Liu M, et al. Correlation of left atrial wall thickness and atrial remodeling in atrial fibrillation: study based on low-dose-ibutilide-facilitated catheter ablation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(15):e15170. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaquero M, Calvo D, Jalife J. Cardiac fibrillation: from ion channels to rotors in the human heart. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(6):872–879. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.02.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinart R, Khurram IM, Liu S, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping of left atrial myocardium. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(9):1325–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling LH, McLellan AJ, Taylor AJ, et al. Magnetic resonance post-contrast T1 mapping in the human atrium: validation and impact on clinical outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1551–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopman L, Mulder MJ, van der Laan AM, et al. Impaired left atrial reservoir and conduit strain in patients with atrial fibrillation and extensive left atrial fibrosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021;23(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00820-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisi M, Mandoli GE, Cameli M, et al. Left atrial strain by speckle tracking predicts atrial fibrosis in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(6):829–835. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöteli C, Hazırolan T, Aytemir K, et al. Evaluation of atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation patients with three different methods. Turk J Med Sci. 2022;52(1):175–187. doi: 10.3906/sag-2103-194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun BJ, Park JH, Lee M, et al. Normal reference values for left atrial strain and its determinants from a large Korean multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;28(3):186–198. doi: 10.4250/jcvi.2020.0043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen AB, Skaarup KG, Djernæs K, et al. Left atrial contractile strain predicts recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation. Int J Cardiol. 2022;358:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebermair J, Kholmovski EG, Marrouche N. Assessment of left atrial fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging: methodology and clinical implications. Jacc-Clin Electrophy. 2017;3(8):791–802. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison JL, Jensen HK, Peel SA, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance and electroanatomical mapping of acute and chronic atrial ablation injury: a histological validation study. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(22):1486–1495. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann C, Akoum N, Patel A, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome is predicted by left atrial remodeling on MRI. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):23–30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan S, Barrett CJ, Crossman DJ. Imaging tools for assessment of myocardial fibrosis in humans: the need for greater detail. Biophys Rev. 2020;12(4):969–987. doi: 10.1007/s12551-020-00738-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menacho K, Ramirez S, Segura P, et al. INCA (Peru) study: impact of non-invasive cardiac magnetic resonance assessment in the developing world. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(17):e008981. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopman L, Bhagirath P, Mulder MJ, et al. Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(9):1182–1190. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle PM, Sarairah S, Kwan KT, et al. Elevated fibrosis burden as assessed by MRI predicts cryoballoon ablation failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34(2):302–312. doi: 10.1111/jce.15791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA. 2014;311(5):498–506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrouche NF, Wazni O, McGann C, et al. Effect of MRI-Guided fibrosis ablation vs conventional catheter ablation on atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the DECAAF II randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(23):2296–2305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.8831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbal F, Benito E, Teis A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided fibrosis ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: the ALICIA trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(11):e008707. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito EM, Carlosena-Remirez A, Guasch E, et al. Left atrial fibrosis quantification by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance: a new method to standardize the thresholds for reproducibility. EP Europace. 2017;19(8):1272–1279. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Tang Z, Li B, et al. Recent advances in fibrosis and scar segmentation from cardiac MRI: a state-of-the-art review and future perspectives. Front Physiol. 2021;12:709230. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.709230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krul SP, Berger WR, Smit NW, et al. Atrial fibrosis and conduction slowing in the left atrial appendage of patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgical pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(2):288–295. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Yamaguchi T, Otsubo T, et al. Histological validation of atrial structural remodelling in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(35):3339–3353. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers IA, Lamb HJ. Clinical application and technical considerations of T(1) & T(2)(*) mapping in cardiac, liver, and renal imaging. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1092):20170825. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsafty HG, El Shafey M, El Arabawy R, et al. Could native T1 mapping replace late gadolinium enhancement in the assessment of myocardial fibrosis in patients with cardiomyopathy? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021;52(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s43055-021-00520-2
   Google Scholar
• Bouazizi K, Rahhal A, Kusmia S, et al. Differentiation and quantification of fibrosis, fat and fatty fibrosis in human left atrial myocardium using ex vivo MRI. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granitz M, Motloch LJ, Granitz C, et al. Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: reference values and clinical implications. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019;131(7–8):143–155. doi: 10.1007/s00508-018-1411-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child N, Suna G, Dabir D, et al. Comparison of MOLLI, shMOLLLI, and SASHA in discrimination between health and disease and relationship with histologically derived collagen volume fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(7):768–776. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich JF, Weng AM, Donhauser J, et al. T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0362-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rauhalammi SM, Mangion K, Barrientos PH, et al. Native myocardial longitudinal (T1) relaxation time: regional, age, and sex associations in the healthy adult heart. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;44(3):541–548. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Boomen M, Slart R, Hulleman EV, et al. Native T(1) reference values for nonischemic cardiomyopathies and populations with increased cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(4):891–912. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottbrecht M, Kramer CM, Salerno M. Native T1 and extracellular volume measurements by cardiac MRI in healthy adults: a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2019;290(2):317–326. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cau R, Bassareo P, Suri JS, et al. The emerging role of atrial strain assessed by cardiac MRI in different cardiovascular settings: an up-to-date review. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(7):4384–4394. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08598-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppahally SS, Akoum N, Burgon NS, et al. Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(3):231–239. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.865683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Park SJ, Jeong DS, et al. Left atrial strain predicts fibrosis of left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing totally thoracoscopic ablation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1130372. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1130372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A, et al. Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making? Eur Heart J. 2016;37(15):1196–1207. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scatteia A, Baritussio A, Bucciarelli-Ducci C. Strain imaging using cardiac magnetic resonance. Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(4):465–476. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9621-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan GCH, Ferkh A, Boyd A, et al. Left atrial function: evaluation by strain analysis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018;8(1):29–46. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.06.08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu YY, Buckert D, Ma GS, et al. Quantitative assessment of left and right atrial strains using cardiovascular magnetic resonance based tissue tracking. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:690240. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.690240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caixal G, Alarcón F, Althoff TF, et al. Accuracy of left atrial fibrosis detection with cardiac magnetic resonance: correlation of late gadolinium enhancement with endocardial voltage and conduction velocity. EP Europace. 2021;23(3):380–388. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyley MM, Parker KJ. Elastography: general principles and clinical applications. Ultrasound Clin. 2014;9(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cult.2013.09.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Correia ETO, Barbetta L, Silva O, et al. Left atrial stiffness: a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019;112(5):501–508. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalobos Lizardi JC, Baranger J, Nguyen MB, et al. A guide for assessment of myocardial stiffness in health and disease. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2022;1(1):8–22. doi: 10.1038/s44161-021-00007-3
   Google Scholar
• Khan S, Fakhouri F, Majeed W, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance elastography: a review. NMR Biomed. 2018;31(10):e3853. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caenen A, Pernot M, Nightingale KR, et al. Assessing cardiac stiffness using ultrasound shear wave elastography. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67(2):02TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac404d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arani A, Arunachalam SP, Chang ICY, et al. Cardiac MR elastography for quantitative assessment of elevated myocardial stiffness in cardiac amyloidosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(5):1361–1367. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villemain O, Correia M, Mousseaux E, et al. Myocardial stiffness evaluation using noninvasive shear wave imaging in healthy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathic adults. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7 Pt 1):1135–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alan B, Alan S. Evaluation of carotid artery stiffness in patients with coronary artery disease using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography. Vascular. 2023;31(3):564–572. doi: 10.1177/17085381221076679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvijic M, Bézy S, Petrescu A, et al. Interplay of cardiac remodelling and myocardial stiffness in hypertensive heart disease: a shear wave imaging study using high-frame rate echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21(6):664–672. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyerly SA, Vejdani-Jahromi M, Dumont DM, et al. The evolution of tissue stiffness at radiofrequency ablation sites during lesion formation and in the peri-ablation period. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(9):1009–1018. doi: 10.1111/jce.12709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiecinski W, Provost J, Dubois R, et al. Quantitative evaluation of atrial radio frequency ablation using intracardiac shear-wave elastography. Med Phys. 2014;41(11):112901. doi: 10.1118/1.4896820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskander-Rizk S, Kruizinga P, van der Steen AFW, et al. Spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging of radiofrequency ablation in the left atrium. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9(3):1309–1322. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.001309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskander-Rizk S, Kruizinga P, Beurskens R, et al. Real-time photoacoustic assessment of radiofrequency ablation lesion formation in the left atrium. Photoacoustics. 2019;16:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-J, Wolf PD, Bahnson TD. Shear wave elastography with intracardiac echocardiography characterizes atrial stiffness during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140:A17083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayseng V, Grondin J, Salgaonkar VA, et al. Catheter ablation lesion visualization with intracardiac strain imaging in canines and humans. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020;67(9):1800–1810. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.2987480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couade M, Pernot M, Messas E, et al. In vivo quantitative mapping of myocardial stiffening and transmural anisotropy during the cardiac cycle. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011;30(2):295–305. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2076829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder R, Clymer BD, White RD, et al. In-vivo waveguide cardiac magnetic resonance elastography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17(S1): doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P35
   Google Scholar
• Miller R, Kolipaka A, Nash MP, et al. Relative identifiability of anisotropic properties from magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 2018;31(10):e3848. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashakhanloo F, Herzka DA, Ashikaga H, et al. Myofiber architecture of the human atria as revealed by submillimeter diffusion tensor imaging. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(4):e004133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators Committee on Echocardiography. Transesophageal echocardiographic correlates of thromboembolism in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(8):639–647. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-8-199804150-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman ME, Pearce LA, Hart RG, et al. Pathophysiologic correlates of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: I. Reduced flow velocity in the left atrial appendage (the stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation [SPAF-III] study). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12(12):1080–1087. doi: 10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70105-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DC, Markl M, Ng J, et al. Three-dimensional left atrial blood flow characteristics in patients with atrial fibrillation assessed by 4D flow CMR. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(11):1259–1268. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello BT, Voskoboinik A, Qadri AM, et al. Measuring atrial stasis during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using 4 dimensional flow imaging: 4D flow imaging of atrial stasis. Int J Cardiol. 2020;315:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng J, Markl M, Lee DC, et al. Structural remodeling determinants of reduced left atrial blood flow measured by 4D flow MRI in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014;130(suppl_2):A15673.
   Google Scholar
• van Ooij P, Allen BD, Contaldi C, et al. 4D flow MRI and T1-mapping: assessment of altered cardiac hemodynamics and extracellular volume fraction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43(1):107–114. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanken CPS, Farag ES, Boekholdt SM, et al. Advanced cardiac MRI techniques for evaluation of left-sided valvular heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48(2):318–329. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyverfeldt P, Bissell M, Barker AJ, et al. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bissell MM, Raimondi F, Ait Ali L, et al. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijman J, Sutanto H, Crijns H, et al. Computational models of atrial fibrillation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives for improving clinical care. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(7):1682–1699. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederer SA, Lumens J, Trayanova NA. Computational models in cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(2):100–111. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0104-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher AG, Osborne JM. Seven challenges in the multiscale modeling of multicellular tissues. WIREs Mech Dis. 2022;14(1):e1527. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1527
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beheshti M, Umapathy K, Krishnan S. Electrophysiological cardiac modeling: a review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2016;44(1–2):99–122. doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016454
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clayton RH, Aboelkassem Y, Cantwell CD, et al. An audit of uncertainty in multi-scale cardiac electrophysiology models. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020;378(2173):20190335. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trayanova NA, Rice JJ. Cardiac electromechanical models: from cell to organ. Front Physiol. 2011;2:43. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quarteroni A, Lassila T, Rossi S, et al. Integrated heart—coupling multiscale and multiphysics models for the simulation of the cardiac function. Comput Method Appl M. 2017;314:345–407. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avazmohammadi R, Soares JS, Li DS, et al. A contemporary look at biomechanical models of myocardium. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2019;21(1):417–442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirschhorn M, Tchantchaleishvili V, Stevens R, et al. Fluid-structure interaction modeling in cardiovascular medicine - a systematic review 2017-2019. Med Eng Phys. 2020;78:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris PD, Narracott A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine. Heart. 2016;102(1):18–28. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim CW, Su Y, Yeo SY, et al. Automatic 4D reconstruction of patient-specific cardiac mesh with 1-to-1 vertex correspondence from segmented contours lines. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razeghi O, Solís-Lemus JA, Lee AWC, et al. CemrgApp: an interactive medical imaging application with image processing, computer vision, and machine learning toolkits for cardiovascular research. SoftwareX. 2020;12:100570. doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2020.100570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadakkumpadan F, Rantner LJ, Tice B, et al. Image-based models of cardiac structure with applications in arrhythmia and defibrillation studies. J Electrocardiol. 2009;42(2):157 e151–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman MJ. The visible human project. Proc IEEE. 1998;86(3):504–511. doi: 10.1109/5.662875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachse FB. Modeling the anatomy of the human heart using the cryosection images of the visible female dataset. The third visible human project conference proceedings; 2000 October 5–6; Bethesda, Maryland, United States. https://wayback.archive-it.org/5215/20150204210656/http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20120702/research/visible/vhpconf2000/MAIN.HTM
   Google Scholar
• Vigmond EJ, Clements C, McQueen DM, et al. Effect of bundle branch block on cardiac output: a whole heart simulation study. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008;97(2–3):520–542. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2008.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahid S, Cochet H, Boyle PM, et al. Patient-derived models link re-entrant driver localization in atrial fibrillation to fibrosis spatial pattern. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;110(3):443–454. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvw073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Hansen BJ, Wang Y, et al. Three-dimensional integrated Functional, structural, and computational mapping to define the structural “fingerprints” of heart-specific atrial fibrillation drivers in human heart ex vivo. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8): doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strocchi M, Augustin CM, Gsell MAF, et al. A publicly available virtual cohort of four-chamber heart meshes for cardiac electro-mechanics simulations. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0235145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastl TE, Tobon-Gomez C, Crozier A, et al. Personalized computational modeling of left atrial geometry and transmural myofiber architecture. Med Image Anal. 2018;47:180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoermann JM, Pfaller MR, Avena L, et al. Automatic mapping of atrial fiber orientations for patient-specific modeling of cardiac electromechanics using image registration. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019;35(6):e3190. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roney CH, Bendikas R, Pashakhanloo F, et al. Constructing a human atrial fibre atlas. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021;49(1):233–250. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02525-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzolin L, Eichenlaub M, Nagel C, et al. AugmentA: patient-specific augmented atrial model generation tool. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2023;108:102265. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter RJ, Liu Y, Lu Y, et al. Left atrial wall stress distribution and its relationship to electrophysiologic remodeling in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(2):351–360. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz T, Wieners C, Seemann G, et al. Simulation of the contraction of the ventricles in a human heart model including atria and pericardium. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2014;13(3):627–641. doi: 10.1007/s10237-013-0523-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustin CM, Neic A, Liebmann M, et al. Anatomically accurate high resolution modeling of human whole heart electromechanics: a strongly scalable algebraic multigrid solver method for nonlinear deformation. J Comput Phys. 2016;305:622–646. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.10.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörmann JM, Bertoglio C, Nagler A, et al. Multiphysics modeling of the atrial systole under standard ablation strategies. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2017;8(2):205–218. doi: 10.1007/s13239-017-0308-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Gao H, Griffith B, et al. Analysis of a coupled fluid-structure interaction model of the left atrium and mitral valve. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019;35(11):e3254. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago A, Aguado-Sierra J, Zavala-Aké M, et al. Fully coupled fluid-electro-mechanical model of the human heart for supercomputers. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018;34(12):e3140. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustin CM, Fastl TE, Neic A, et al. The impact of wall thickness and curvature on wall stress in patient-specific electromechanical models of the left atrium. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2020;19(3):1015–1034. doi: 10.1007/s10237-019-01268-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerach T, Schuler S, Fröhlich J, et al. Electro-mechanical whole-heart digital twins: a fully coupled multi-physics approach. Mathematics-Basel. 2021;9(11):1247. doi: 10.3390/math9111247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss R, Wülfers EM, Schuler S, et al. A fully-coupled electro-mechanical whole-heart computational model: influence of cardiac contraction on the ECG. Front Physiol. 2021;12:778872. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.778872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerach T, Schuler S, Wachter A, et al. The impact of standard ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation on cardiovascular performance in a four-chamber heart model. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023;14(2):296–314. doi: 10.1007/s13239-022-00651-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer CB, Norton PT, Ferguson JD, et al. Changes in global and regional mechanics due to atrial fibrillation: insights from a coupled finite-element and circulation model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(7):1600–1613. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1256-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal N, Ali RL, Salvador M, et al. Presence of left atrial fibrosis may contribute to aberrant hemodynamics and increased risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Front Physiol. 2021;12:657452. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.657452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macheret F, Bifulco SF, Scott GD, et al. Comparing inducibility of reentrant arrhythmia in patient-specific computational models to clinical atrial fibrillation phenotypes. Jacc-Clin Electrophy. 2023;9(10):2149–2162. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.06.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Hara RP, Binka E, Prakosa A, et al. Personalized computational heart models with T1-mapped fibrotic remodeling predict sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Elife. 2022;11: doi: 10.7554/eLife.73325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederer SA, Campbell KS, Campbell SG. A short history of the development of mathematical models of cardiac mechanics. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;127:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice JJ, Wang F, Bers DM, et al. Approximate model of cooperative activation and crossbridge cycling in cardiac muscle using ordinary differential equations. Biophys J. 2008;95(5):2368–2390. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.119487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land S, Niederer SA, Beard DA. A spatially detailed model of isometric contraction based on competitive binding of troponin I explains cooperative interactions between tropomyosin and crossbridges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(8):e1004376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate J, Ferrantini C, Johnson CA, et al. Alpha and beta myosin isoforms and human atrial and ventricular contraction. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(23):7309–7337. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03971-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prodanovic M, Geeves MA, Poggesi C, et al. Effect of myosin isoforms on cardiac muscle twitch of mice, rats and humans. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1135. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz T, Dössel O, Krueger M. Electromechanical modeling of the human atria. Biomed Technol (Berl). 2013;58(SI–1–Track–N):000010151520134321. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2013-4321
   Google Scholar
• Brocklehurst P, Ni H, Zhang H, et al. Electro-mechanical dynamics of spiral waves in a discrete 2D model of human atrial tissue. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazhar F, Regazzoni F, Bartolucci C, et al. A Novel Human Atrial Electromechanical Cardiomyocyte Model with Mechano-Calcium Feedback Effect. 2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). Tampere, Finland: IEEE; 2022. p. 1–4. doi: 10.22489/CinC.2022.195
   Google Scholar
• Zile MA, Trayanova NA. Increased thin filament activation enhances alternans in human chronic atrial fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315(5):H1453–H1462. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00658.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazhar F, Bartolucci C, Regazzoni F, et al. A detailed mathematical model of the human atrial cardiomyocyte: integration of electrophysiology and cardiomechanics. J Physiol. 2023. doi: 10.1113/JP283974
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narolska NA, Eiras S, van Loon RB, et al. Myosin heavy chain composition and the economy of contraction in healthy and diseased human myocardium. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2005;26(1):39–48. doi: 10.1007/s10974-005-9005-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeniran I, MacIver DH, Garratt CJ, et al. Effects of persistent atrial fibrillation-induced electrical remodeling on atrial electro-mechanics – insights from a 3D model of the human atria. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikhmakhtiar AK, Tekle AA, Lim KM. Influence of fibrosis amount and patterns on ventricular arrhythmogenesis and pumping efficacy: computational study. Front Physiol. 2021;12:644473. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.644473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phung TN, Moyer CB, Norton PT, et al. Effect of ablation pattern on mechanical function in the atrium. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(6):648–654. doi: 10.1111/pace.13086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palit A, Bhudia SK, Arvanitis TN, et al. In vivo estimation of passive biomechanical properties of human myocardium. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018;56(9):1615–1631. doi: 10.1007/s11517-017-1768-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jernigan SR, Buckner GD, Eischen JW, et al. Finite element modeling of the left atrium to facilitate the design of an endoscopic atrial retractor. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(6):825–837. doi: 10.1115/1.2801650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellini C, Di Martino ES, Federico S. Mechanical behaviour of the human atria. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(7):1478–1490. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0699-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javani S, Gordon M, Azadani AN. Biomechanical properties and microstructure of heart chambers: a paired comparison study in an ovine model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(11):3266–3283. doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1658-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caggiano LR, Holmes JW. A comparison of fiber based material laws for myocardial scar. J Elast. 2021;145(1–2):321–337. doi: 10.1007/s10659-021-09845-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martonová D, Alkassar M, Seufert J, et al. Passive mechanical properties in healthy and infarcted rat left ventricle characterised via a mixture model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;119:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provost J, Nguyen VT, Legrand D, et al. Electromechanical wave imaging for arrhythmias. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(22):L1–11. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/F01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb CS, Melki L, Wang DY, et al. Noninvasive localization of cardiac arrhythmias using electromechanical wave imaging. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(536): doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax6111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagos M, van Herck IGM, Sundnes J, et al. Computational modeling of electrophysiology and pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation: recent advances and future challenges. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1221. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Martino ES, Bellini C, Schwartzman DS. In vivo porcine left atrial wall stress: computational model. J Biomech. 2011;44(15):2589–2594. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni H, Adeniran I, Zhang H. In-silico investigations of the functional impact of KCNA5 mutations on atrial mechanical dynamics. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2017;111:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satriano A, Vigmond EJ, Schwartzman DS, et al. Mechano-electric finite element model of the left atrium. Comput Biol Med. 2018;96:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele M, Piersanti R, Regazzoni F, et al. A comprehensive and biophysically detailed computational model of the whole human heart electromechanics. Comput Method Appl M. 2023;410:115983. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.115983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola F, Del Corso G, De Paulis R, et al. GPU accelerated digital twins of the human heart open new routes for cardiovascular research. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):8230. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34098-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strocchi M, Longobardi S, Augustin CM, et al. Cell to whole organ global sensitivity analysis on a four-chamber heart electromechanics model using Gaussian processes emulators. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023;19(6):e1011257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola F, Meschini V, Verzicco R. Fluid–structure-electrophysiology interaction (FSEI) in the left-heart: a multi-way coupled computational model. Eur J Mech B-Fluid. 2020;79:212–232. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucelli M, Zingaro A, Africa PC, et al. A mathematical model that integrates cardiac electrophysiology, mechanics, and fluid dynamics: application to the human left heart. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2023;39(3):e3678. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle PM, Zghaib T, Zahid S, et al. Computationally guided personalized targeted ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3(11):870–879. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0437-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzolin L, Eichenlaub M, Nagel C, et al. Personalized ablation vs. conventional ablation strategies to terminate atrial fibrillation and prevent recurrence. EP Europace. 2023;25(1):211–222. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding WY, Gupta D, Lip GYH. Atrial fibrillation and the prothrombotic state: revisiting Virchow’s triad in 2020. Heart. 2020;106(19):1463–1468. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle PM, Del Alamo JC, Akoum N. Fibrosis, atrial fibrillation and stroke: clinical updates and emerging mechanistic models. Heart. 2021;107(2):99–105. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiderman K, Fogelson A. An overview of mathematical modeling of thrombus formation under flow. Thromb Res. 2014;133(Suppl 1):S12–14. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.03.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fogelson AL, Neeves KB. Fluid mechanics of blood clot formation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2015;47(1):377–403. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi A, Darwish O, Chubb H, et al. Modelling left atrial flow and blood coagulation for risk of thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation. 2020 Computing in Cardiology. Rimini, Italy: IEEE; 2020. p. 1–4.doi: 10.22489/CinC.2020.219
   Google Scholar
• Chen A, Stecker E, Warden BA. Direct oral anticoagulant use: a practical guide to common clinical challenges. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(13):e017559. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi R, Funamoto K, Hayase T, et al. Numerical analysis of hemodynamic changes in the left atrium due to atrial fibrillation. J Biomech. 2015;48(3):472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otani T, Al-Issa A, Pourmorteza A, et al. A computational framework for personalized blood flow analysis in the human left atrium. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(11):3284–3294. doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1590-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masci A, Alessandrini M, Forti D, et al. A proof of concept for computational fluid dynamic analysis of the left atrium in atrial fibrillation on a patient-specific basis. J Biomech Eng. 2020;142(1): doi: 10.1115/1.4044583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueñas-Pamplona J, García JG, Sierra-Pallares J, et al. A comprehensive comparison of various patient-specific CFD models of the left atrium for atrial fibrillation patients. Comput Biol Med. 2021;133:104423. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Villalba M, Rossini L, Gonzalo A, et al. Demonstration of patient-specific simulations to assess left atrial appendage thrombogenesis risk. Front Physiol. 2021;12:596596. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.596596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalo A, García-Villalba M, Rossini L, et al. Non-Newtonian blood rheology impacts left atrial stasis in patient-specific simulations. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022;38(6):e3597. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill J, Harrison J, Legghe B, et al. In-silico analysis of the influence of pulmonary vein configuration on left atrial haemodynamics and thrombus formation in a large cohort. In: Ennis DB, Perotti LE, Wang VY, editors. Functional imaging and modeling of the heart. Stanford, CA, USA: Springer International Publishing; 2021;605–616. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_58
   Google Scholar
• Corti M, Zingaro A, Dede L, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on left atrium haemodynamics: a computational fluid dynamics study. Comput Biol Med. 2022;150:106143. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz J, Henriksson L, Persson A, et al. Patient-specific simulation of cardiac blood flow from high-resolution computed tomography. J Biomech Eng. 2016;138(12): doi: 10.1115/1.4034652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili E, Daversin-Catty C, Olivares AL, et al. On the importance of fundamental computational fluid dynamics towards a robust and reliable model of left atrial flows: is there more than meets the eye? arXiv. 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.01716
   Google Scholar
• Alinezhad L, Ghalichi F, Ahmadlouydarab M, et al. Left atrial appendage shape impacts on the left atrial flow hemodynamics: a numerical hypothesis generating study on two cases. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;213:106506. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosi GM, Cook A, Rai R, et al. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the left atrial appendage to predict thrombosis risk. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:34. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon-Murphy D, Marlevi D, Ruijsink B, et al. Modeling left atrial flow, energy, blood heating distribution in response to catheter ablation therapy. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1757. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueñas-Pamplona J, García JG, Castro F, et al. Morphing the left atrium geometry: a deeper insight into blood stasis within the left atrial appendage. Appl Math Modell. 2022;108:27–45. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2022.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang R, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Impact of left atrial appendage location on risk of thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2021;20(4):1431–1443. doi: 10.1007/s10237-021-01454-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanni BM, Capellini K, Di Leonardo M, et al. Correlation between LAA morphological features and computational fluid dynamics analysis for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. Appl Sci. 2020;10(4):1448. doi: 10.3390/app10041448
   Google Scholar
• Flores O, Rossini L, Gonzalo A, et al. Evaluation of blood stasis in the left atrium using patient-specific direct numerical simulations. In: García-Villalba M, Kuerten H, and Salvetti M: Direct and Large Eddy Simulation XII, editors. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 485–490. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42822-8_64
   Google Scholar
• García-Isla G, Olivares AL, Silva E, et al. Sensitivity analysis of geometrical parameters to study haemodynamics and thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018;34(8):e3100. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz J, Gupta V, Henriksson L, et al. Impact of pulmonary venous inflow on cardiac flow simulations: comparison with in vivo 4D flow MRI. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019;47(2):413–424. doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-02153-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masci A, Barone L, Dede L, et al. The impact of left atrium appendage morphology on stroke risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: a computational fluid dynamics study. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1938. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanatkhani S, Nedios S, Menon PG, et al. Subject-specific calculation of left atrial appendage blood-borne particle residence time distribution in atrial fibrillation. Front Physiol. 2021;12:633135. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.633135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vella D, Monteleone A, Musotto G, et al. Effect of the alterations in contractility and morphology produced by atrial fibrillation on the thrombosis potential of the left atrial appendage. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:586041. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.586041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Qiao YH, Mao YK, et al. Numerical prediction of thrombosis risk in left atrium under atrial fibrillation. Math Biosci Eng. 2020;17(3):2348–2360. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng AS, Noseworthy PA. Prediction of atrial fibrillation using machine learning: a review. Front Physiol. 2021;12:752317. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.752317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahine Y, Magoon MJ, Maidu B, et al. Machine learning and the conundrum of stroke risk prediction. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023;12:e07. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco SF, Macheret F, Scott GD, et al. Explainable machine learning to predict anchored reentry substrate created by persistent atrial fibrillation ablation in computational models. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(16):e030500. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shade JK, Ali RL, Basile D, et al. Preprocedure application of machine learning and mechanistic simulations predicts likelihood of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(7):e008213. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roney CH, Sim I, Yu J, et al. Predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence by combining population data and virtual cohorts of patient-specific left atrial models. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15(2):e010253. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carluccio E, Cameli M, Rossi A, et al. Left atrial strain in the assessment of diastolic function in heart failure: a machine learning approach. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16(2):e014605. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Z, Xia Q, Hu Z, et al. A global benchmark of algorithms for segmenting the left atrium from late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Med Image Anal. 2021;67:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein J, Moghadasi N, Körperich H, et al. A machine learning challenge: detection of cardiac amyloidosis based on bi-atrial and right ventricular strain and cardiac function. Diagnostics. 2022;12(11):2693. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regazzoni F, Salvador M, Dedé L, et al. A machine learning method for real-time numerical simulations of cardiac electromechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2022;393:114825. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.114825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akoum N, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. MRI assessment of ablation-induced scarring in atrial fibrillation: analysis from the DECAAF study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(5):473–480. doi: 10.1111/jce.12650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King JB, Azadani PN, Suksaranjit P, et al. Left atrial fibrosis and risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(11):1311–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parwani AS, Morris DA, Blaschke F, et al. Left atrial strain predicts recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Open Heart. 2017;4(1):e000572. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopman L, Mulder MJ, van der Laan AM, et al. Left atrial strain is associated with arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: cardiac magnetic resonance rapid strain vs. feature tracking strain. Int J Cardiol. 2023;378:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzawski J, Janion-Sadowska A, Zandecki L, et al. Global peak left atrial longitudinal strain assessed by transthoracic echocardiography is a good predictor of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients in sinus rhythm with heart failure and very low ejection fraction - an observational study. Cardiovasc Ultrasoun. 2020;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12947-020-00188-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambatti M, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, et al. Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events. Circulation. 2014;129(21):2094–2099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandon K, Tirschwell D, Longstreth WT Jr., et al. Embolic stroke of undetermined source correlates to atrial fibrosis without atrial fibrillation. Neurology. 2019;93(4):e381–e387. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnlein P, Mahnkopf C, Majersik JJ, et al. Atrial fibrosis in embolic stroke of undetermined source: a multicenter study. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(11):3634–3639. doi: 10.1111/ene.15022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco SF, Scott GD, Sarairah S, et al. Computational modeling identifies embolic stroke of undetermined source patients with potential arrhythmic substrate. Elife. 2021;10:e64213. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyauchi S, Tokuyama T, Uotani Y, et al. Association between left atrial appendage fibrosis and thrombus formation: a histological approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33(4):677–687. doi: 10.1111/jce.15384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potpara TS, Lip GYH, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. The 4S-AF scheme (stroke risk; symptoms; severity of burden; substrate): a novel approach to in-depth characterization (rather than classification) of atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost. 2021;121(3):270–278. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar