465
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Psychotherapists’ experiences of co-facilitating large encounter PCEP groups: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of six interviews

Expériences de psychothérapeutes cofacilitateurs de grands groupes de rencontre selon la Psychothérapie Centrée sur la Personne et Expérientielle (PCPE): Une analyze phénoménologique interprétative de six interviews.

Psychotherapeutische Erfahrungen beim Co-Facilitating grosser PCEP Encounter-Gruppen: eine interpretative phänomenologische Analyse von sechs Interviews

Expériences de psychothérapeutes cofacilitateurs de grands groupes de rencontre selon la Psychothérapie Centrée sur la Personne et Expérientielle (PCPE): Une analyze phénoménologique interprétative de six interviews.

Expériences de psychothérapeutes cofacilitateurs de grands groupes de rencontre selon la Psychothérapie Centrée sur la Personne et Expérientielle (PCPE): Une analyze phénoménologique interprétative de six interviews.

Expériences de psychothérapeutes cofacilitateurs de grands groupes de rencontre selon la Psychothérapie Centrée sur la Personne et Expérientielle (PCPE): Une analyze phénoménologique interprétative de six interviews.

Pages 251-270 | Received 26 Feb 2019, Accepted 27 Jan 2020, Published online: 06 Aug 2020

References

  • Blackburn, S. (2006). Truth. Penguin.
  • Bozarth, J. D. (1986). The basic encounter group: An alternative view. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 11(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933928608411861
  • Bozarth, J. D. (1995, May). Designated facilitators; Unnecessary and insufficient [ Paper presentation]. A paper presented at the national conference for the Association of the Development of the Person-Centered Approach, Tampa, FL.
  • Brison, C., Zech, E., Jaeken, M., Priels, J.-M., Verhofstadt, L., Van Broeck, N., & Mikolajczak, M. (2015). Encounter groups: Do they foster psychology students’ psychological development and therapeutic attitudes? Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 14(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757.2014.991937
  • British Psychological Society (BPS). (2010). Code of human research ethics. BPS.
  • Brocki, J. M., & Wearden, A. J. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 21(1), 87–108.
  • Buber, M. (1996). I and Thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Simon & Schuster.
  • Burlingame, G. M., McClendon, D. T., & Yang, C. (2018). Cohesion in group therapy: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 384–398. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pst0000173
  • Cole, P. (2013). In the shadow of the leader: Power, reflection, and dialogue in gestalt group therapy. Gestalt Review, 17(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.5325/gestaltreview.17.2.0178
  • Dierick, P., & Lietaer, G. (1990). Member and therapist perceptions of therapeutic factors in therapy and growth groups. In G. Lietaer, J. Rombauts, & R. Van Balen (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the nineties (pp. 741–770). Leuven University Press.
  • Eatough, V., & Smith J. A. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C. Willing, and W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 179–194). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Kirschenbaum, H. (2009). The life and work of Carl Rogers American Counseling Association. Also published by PCCS Books, Ross-on-Wye, UK, 2007.
  • Lago, C. (2015). The person centred approach to encounter groups. In M. Sakanaka, T. Motoyama, & M. Mikuni (Eds.), Core conditions; “Unconditional positive regard” (pp. 78–99). Shigen Sha.
  • Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp062oa
  • Lietaer, G. (1993). Authenticity, congruence and transparency. In D. Brazier (Ed.), Beyond Carl Rogers (pp. 17–46). Constable and Company.
  • Lietaer, G., & Dierick, P. (1996). Client-centered group psychotherapy in dialogue with other orientations: Commonality and specificity (R. Hutterer, G. Pawlowsky, P. F. Schmid, & R. Stipsits Eds). Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.
  • Mangione, L., Forti, R., & Iacuzzi, C. M. (2007). Ethics and endings in group psychotherapy: Saying good-bye and saying it well. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 57(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijgp.2007.57.1.25
  • Mikuni, M. (2011). “My soul needs to be washed”: An exploration of the basic encounter group in Japan. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/leedsmet.ac.uk
  • Moodley, R. (2009). Multi(ple) cultural voices speaking “Outside the sentence” of counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 22(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070903302364
  • Morse, J. M. (2005). Evolving trends in qualitative research: Advances in mixed-method design. Qualitative Health Research, 15(5), 583–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305275169
  • Natiello, P. (2001). The person-centered approach: A passionate presence. PCCS Books.
  • O’Hara, M. (1997). Relational empathy: From egocentric modernism to socio-centric postmodernism. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 295–320). American Psychological Association.
  • O’Hara, M. (2003). Cultivating consciousness: Carl R. Rogers’s person-centered group process as transformative androgogy. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703251646
  • O’Hara, M., & Wood, J. K. (2003). Transforming communities: Person-centered encounters and the creation of integral conscious groups. In B. H. Banathy & P. M. Jenlink (Eds.), Dialogue as a means of collective communication (pp. 95–126). Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Okech, J. E. A., & Kline, W. B. (2006). Competency concerns in group co-leader relationships. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 2, 165.
  • Palmer, R. (1969). Hermeneutics. Northwestern University Press.
  • Pringle, J., Drummond, J., McLafferty, E., & Hendry, C. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: A discussion and critique. Nurse Researcher, 18(3), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.04.18.3.20.c8459
  • Proctor, G. (2002). The dynamics of power in counselling and psychotherapy: Ethics, politics and practice. PCCS.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1970). Carl Rogers on encounter groups. Harper and Row.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1977). Carl Rogers on personal power: Inner strength and its revolutionary impact. Delacorte Press.
  • Roy, V., Lindsay, J., & Dallaire, L.-F. (2013). Mixed-gender co-facilitation in therapeutic groups for men who have perpetrated intimate partner violence: Group members’ perspectives. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 38(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2012.732981
  • Schmid, P. F., & O’Hara, M. (2013). Working with groups. In M. Cooper, M. O’Hara, P. F. Schmid, & A. C. Bohart (Eds.), The handbook of person-centred psychotherapy and counselling (2nd ed., pp. 223–236). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schmid, P. F. (2015a). Encounter-oriented learning programs for person-centered psychotherapists: Some learnings from decades of experience and their theoretical background. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 14(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757.2014.1001914
  • Schmid, P. F. (2015b). Person and society: Towards a person-centered sociotherapy. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 14(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757.2015.1062795
  • Schmid, P. F. (2017). Encounter Group (T group). In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1463-1
  • Schmid, P. F., & O’Hara, M. (2007). Group therapy and encounter groups. In M. Cooper, M. O’Hara, P. F. Schmid, & G. Wyatt (Eds.), The handbook of person-centred psychotherapy and counselling (pp. 93–106). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Skourteli, M. C., & Apostolopoulou, A. (2015). An interpretative phenomenological analysis into counselling psychologists’ relationship with research: Motives, facilitators and barriers – A contextual perspective. Counselling Psychology Review, 30(4), 16–33. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-03754-003
  • Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage.
  • Smith, J. A. (2008). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
  • Washington, K. (2010). Zulu traditional healing, Afrikan worldview and the practice of Ubuntu: Deep thought for Afrikan/black psychology. Journal of Pan African Studies, 3(8), 24–39. Retrieved from http://www.jpanafrican.org/docs/vol3no8/3.8ZuluTraditional.pdf
  • Wood, J. K. (1984). Communities for learning: A person-centered approach. In J. M. Shlien & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Client-centered therapy and the person-centered approach: New directions in theory and practice (pp. 297–316). Praeger.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.