Participant Anonymity in the Internet Age: From Theory to Practice

References

• Bargh, H & McKenna, K 2003, ‘The Internet and social life ’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 573–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, D & Marwick, A 2011, ‘Social privacy in networked publics: teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies ’, in Proceedings of a Decade in Internet Time, OII Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, University of Oxford, pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A 2006, ‘Anonymising research data ’, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Real Life Methods Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, A & Conigrave, K 2008, ‘Managing confidentiality in illicit drugs research: ethical and legal lessons from studies in remote Aboriginal communities ’, Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 38, pp. 60–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ess, C & Association of Internet Researchers 2002, ‘Ethical decision making and Internet research’, Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee, viewed 18 June 2014, http://www.fsa.ulaval.ca/cours/mrk64662/popup/%C3%A9thique%20de%20la%20recherche%20dans%0SL/ethicsSL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, M & Siang, S 1999, ‘Ethical and legal aspects of human subject research on the Internet’, Report from a workshop convened by the AAAS Program on Scientific Freedom, Responsibility and Law, viewed 18 June 2014, https://nationalethicscenter.org/resources/187/download/ethical_legal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grinyer, A 2002, ‘The anonymity of research participants: assumptions, ethics and practicalities ’, Social Research Update, vol. 36, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K 2009, ‘Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research ’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1632–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A 2009, ‘In defence of anonymity: rejoining the criticism ’, British Educational Research Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 431–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C & Kitzinger, J 2014, ‘Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives ’, Journal of Medical Ethics, doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J & Kitzinger, C 2013, ‘The “window of opportunity” for death after severe brain injury: family experiences ’, Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1095–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maczewski, M, Storey, MA & Hoskins, M 2004, ‘Conducting congruent, ethical, qualitative research in Internet-mediated research environments ’, in E Buchanan (ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: issues and controversies, Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp. 62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, A 2012, ‘Fabrication as ethical practice: qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet contexts ’, Information, Communication and Society, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 334–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, A 2013, ‘The dramaturgy of digital experience ’, in C Edgley (ed.), The drama of social life: a dramaturgical handbook, Burlington, Ashgate, pp. 279–93.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, A & Buchanan, E 2012, ‘Ethical decision-making and Internet research, recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0)’, viewed 18 June 2014, http://www.expertise121.com/curriculum/3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, H & Porter, K 2009, ‘Playing a good game: ethical issues in researching MMOGs and virtual worlds ’, International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–37.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council 2014, ‘Proposed revisions to the common rule for the protection of human subjects in the behavioral and social sciences ’, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H 2004, ‘Privacy as contextual integrity ’, Washington Law Review, vol. 79, pp. 101–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B, Kitzinger, J & Kitzinger, C 2014, ‘Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice ’, Qualitative Research, doi:10.1177/1468794114550439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senft, T 2008, Camgirls: celebrity and community in the age of social networks, Peter Lang, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sveningsson, M 2004, ‘Ethics in Internet ethnography ’, in E Buchanan (ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: issues and controversies, Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp. 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Sveningsson Elm, M 2009, ‘How do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative internet research? ’, in A Markham & N Baym (eds.), Internet inquiry: conversations about method, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoonaard, W & van den Hoonaard, D 2013, Essentials of thinking ethically in qualitative research, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G 2005, ‘Research ethical guidelines and anonymity ’, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, L 2007, ‘Methodological and ethical issues in Internet mediated research in the field of health: an integrated review of the literature ’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 782–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, R, Coffey, A, Robinson J & Heath, S 2012, ‘Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, R, Crow, J, Heath, S & Charles, V 2008, ‘The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research ’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 417–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W v M & Ors 2011, England and Wales High Court (EWHC) 2443 (Family Division) (28 September 2011), viewed 10 December 2014, http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2011/2443.html.
   Google Scholar