References
- Augoustinos, M 2013, ‘Discourse analysis in psychology: What’s in a name? ’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 10, pp. 244 –8.
- Bem, SL 1981, ‘Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing ’, Psychological Review, vol. 88, pp. 354 –64.
- Chamie, J 2008, The global abortion bind, online article, Online Opinion, Australia, viewed 27 July 2009, http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=7484
- Correia, H & Broderick, P 2009, ‘Access to reproductive technologies by single women and lesbians: social representations and public debate ’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 241 –56.
- Dahl, E, Beutel, M, Brosig, B, Grüssner, S, Stöbel-Richter, Y, Tinneberg, HR, and Brähler, E 2006, ‘Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK and the US ’, Journal of Assisted Reproductive Genetics, vol. 23, pp. 311 –8.
- Dahl, G & Moretti, E 2008, ‘Demand for sons ’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 75, pp. 1085 –120.
- Das Gupta, M, Zhenghua, J, Bohua, L, Zhenming, X, Chung, W & Hwa-Ok, B 2003, ‘Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea ’, The Journal of Development Studies, vol. 40, pp. 153 –87.
- Edwards, D 1999, ‘Emotion discourse ’, Culture and Psychology, vol. 5, pp. 271 –91.
- The Fertility Institutes n.d., Select the gender of your next baby, The Fertility Institutes, USA, viewed 7 February 2014, http://www.fertility-docs.com/programs-and-services/gender-selection/select-the-gender-of-your-baby-using-pgd.php
- Fairclough, N 2001, ‘The discourse of new labour: critical discourse analysis’, in M Wetherell, S Taylor & SJ Yates (eds.), Discourse as data, Sage, London, pp. 229 –66.
- Folgerø, T 2008, ‘Queer nuclear families? Reproducing and transgressing heteronormativity ’, Journal of Homosexuality, vol. 54, pp. 124 –49.
- Goodkind, D 1999, ‘Should prenatal sex selection be restricted? Ethical questions and their implications for research and policy’, Population Studies, vol. 53, pp. 49 –61.
- Gray, E & Evans, A, 2005, ‘Parity progression in Australia; what role does sex of existing children play? ’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol. 40, pp. 505 –20.
- Hank, K 2007. ‘Parental gender preferences and reproductive behaviour: a review of the recent literature ’, Journal of Biosocial Science, vol. 39, pp. 759 –67.
- Hays, S 1996, The cultural contradictions of motherhood, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
- HRC Fertility 2014, International laws on gender selection, viewed 1 May 2014, http://www.gender-baby.com/lifestyle/legal-issues/international-laws-on-gender-selection/
- Johnson, N 2005, Govt criticized over IVF sex selection ban, television program transcript, ABC, Australia, viewed 6 September 2009, http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2005/s1388834.htm
- Kane, E 2009. ‘I wanted a soul mate: gendered anticipation and frameworks of accountability in parents’ preferences for sons and daughters ’, Symbolic Interaction, vol. 32, pp. 372 –89.
- Kippen, R, Evans, A & Gray, E 2007, ‘Parental preferences for sons and daughters in a western industrial setting: evidence and implications ’, Journal of Biosocial Science, vol. 39, pp. 583 –97.
- Langdridge, D, Connolly, K & Sheeran. P 2000, ‘Reasons for wanting a child: a network analytic study ’, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 321 –38.
- Lupton, D 2000. ‘A love/hate relationship: the ideals and experiences of first-time mothers ’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 36, pp. 50 –63.
- Macnaghten, P & Uryy, J 1995. ‘Towards a sociology of nature’, Sociology, vol. 29,pp. 203 –20.
- Markham, A & Buchanan, E 2012, Ethical decision-making and Internet research, 2.0, recommendations from the AoIR working committee, Association of the Internet Research Ethics Working Committee, viewed 1 February 2014, http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
- Marleau, JD & Saucier, JF 2002, ‘Preference for a first-born boy in Western societies ’, Journal of Biosocial Science, vol. 34, pp. 13 –28.
- Matthews, K 2013, Sex selection techniques and regulations in Australia, kidspot, Victoria, Australia, viewed 2 February 2014, http://parenting.kidspot.com.au/sex-selection-techniques-regulations-australia/#.UwBfvCGwp9B
- Morison, T 2011, ‘“But what story?” A narrative-discursive analysis of “White” Afrikaners’ accounts of male involvement in parenthood decision-making’, PhD thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.
- Morison, T & Macleod, C 2013, ‘A performative-performance approach to analysis: Infusing Butlerian theory into a narrative-discursive approach ’, Qualitative inquiry, vol. 19, pp. 566 –77.
- Mungham, S & Lazard, L 2011, ‘Virtually experts: exploring constructions of mothers’ advice-seeking in online parenting communities’, Radical Psychology, vol. 9.
- NHMRC 2004, Ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research, Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines, NHMRC, Canberra, viewed 1 February 2014, https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e56.pdf
- NHMRC 2007, Ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research, Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines, NHMRC, Canberra, viewed 1 February 2014, http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e78.pdf
- NHMRC 2010, Ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research, Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council information page, NHMRC, Canberra, viewed 6 April 2010,http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e78syn.htm
- NHMRC 2014, Assisted reproductive technology, Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council information page, Canberra, viewed 25 January 2014, http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health-ethics/australian-health-ethics-committee-ahec/assisted-reproductive-technology-art/assisted-
- Parry, R 2010, Does every dad secretly want a boy? Why a primal desire still matters, online news site article, Mirror, viewed 19 May 2014, http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/does-every-dad-secretly-want-a-boy-247993
- Pillow, W 2003, ‘Confession, catharsis or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity in methodological power in qualitative research ’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 16, pp. 175 –96.
- Ramaekers, S & Suissa, J 2011, ‘The question of parenting ’, Ethics and Education, vol. 6, pp. 101 –8.
- Ramos-Ascensão, J 2012, Welcoming the more vulnerable, Jesuit European Social Centre website, Europeinfos, Belgium, viewed 1 June 2014, http://www.comece.eu/europeinfos/en/archive/issue153/article/5140.html
- Rowlands, L 2012, Choosing the sex of your baby is selfish beyond belief, online news site article, The Punch, viewed 7 February 2014, http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/choosing-your-babys-sex-is-selfish-beyond-belief/
- Rubinsztein-Dunlop, S & Kerin, L 2010, Roxon ‘uncomfortable’ over parents picking children’s sex, new site article, 13 March, ABC, Australia, viewed 8 April 2010, http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/13/2845037.htm
- Savulescu, J 1999 ‘Sex selection: the case for ’, The Medical Journal of Australia, vol.171, pp. 373 –5.
- Sills, ES & Palermos, GD 2002, ‘Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for elective sex selection, the IVF market economy and the child–another long day’s journey into night? ’, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol.19, pp. 433 –7.
- Steinbock, B 2002, ‘Sex selection: not obviously wrong ’, The Hasting Center Report, vol. 32, pp. 23 –30.
- Swetkis, D, Gilroy, FD & Steinbacher, R 2002, ‘Firstborn preference and attitudes towards using sex selection technology ’, The Journal of Genetic Psychology, vol. 163, pp. 228 –38.
- Tam, A 2006, Sculpting the world of the future, University of New South Wales online science magazine article, Onset, Sydney, Australia, viewed 9 September 2009, http://www.onset.unsw.edu.au/issue4/PGD/sculpting_the_future.html
- Valentine, C 2006, ‘Academic constructions of bereavement ’, Mortality: Promoting the Interdisciplinary Study of Death and Dying, vol. 11, pp. 57 –78.
- Van Balen, F & Bos, HMW 2004, ‘Infertility, culture and psychology in worldwide perspective ’, Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 245 –7.
- Wetherell, M 1998, ‘Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue ’, Discourse & Society, vol. 9, pp. 387 –412.
- Wetherell, M 2001, ‘Themes in discourse research: the case of Diana’, in M Wetherell, S Taylor & SJ Yates (eds.), Discourse theory and practice, Sage, London, pp. 14 –28.
- WHO, 2014, Gender and genetics, Genomic resource centre information page, World Health Organisation, viewed 1 May 2014, http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index4.html