Online Research with Informal Caregivers: Opportunities and Challenges

References

• Angeletou, S, Rowe, M & Alani, H 2011, ‘Modelling and analysis of user behaviour in online communities’, The Semantic Web–ISWC 2011, pp. 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, A, Boniel-Nissim, M & Suler, J 2008, ‘Fostering empowerment in online support groups’, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1867–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P, Hale, B & Butler, M 2014, Family care and social capital: transitions in informal care, Springer, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Biddix, JP & Park, HH 2008, ‘Online networks of student protest: the case of the living wage campaign’, New Media & Society, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 871–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, RM & Brown, SL 2014, ‘Informal caregiving: a reappraisal of effects on caregivers’, Social Issues and Policy Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 74–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, T 2014, ‘Deliberative research as a tool to make value judgements’, Qualitative Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 353–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge, L, Winch, S & Clavarino, A 2007, ‘Reluctance to care: a systematic review and development of a conceptual framework’, Cancer Nursing, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. E9–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan, J, Hayes, C & Daly, EM 2010, ‘Decomposing discussion forums and boards using user roles’, ICWSM, vol. 10, pp. 215–8.
   Google Scholar
• Denissen, JJ, Neumann, L & van Zalk, M 2010, ‘How the Internet is changing the implementation of traditional research methods, people’s daily lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research’, International Journal of Behavioral Development, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 564–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneulin, S & Shahani, L (eds.) 2009, An introduction to the human development and capability approach: freedom and agency, IDRC. Earthscan, London, Sterling, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrof, J & Ebenstein, H 2003, ‘Family caregiver self-identification: implications for healthcare and social service professionals’, Generations, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 33–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausset, CB, Harley, L, Farmer, S & Fain, B 2013, ‘Older adults’ perceptions and use of technology: a novel approach’, in Universal access in human-computer interaction.User and context diversity lecture notes in computer science, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 51–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen-Goldsen, KI & Hooyman, NR.2007, ‘Caregiving research, services, and policies in historically marginalized communities: where do we go from here?’, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, vol. 18, no. 3–4, pp. 129–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, SD, Vazire, S, Srivastava, S & John, OP 2004, ‘Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires’, American Psychologist, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S & Griffin, AJ 2013, ‘Internet-mediated technologies and mixed methods research problems and prospects’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, C 2008, ‘Internet-mediated research as an emergent method and its potential role in facilitating mixed-method research’, in SN Hesse-Biber & P Leavy (eds.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research, The Guildford Press, New York, pp. 543–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C 2008, ‘Internet research as emergent practice’, in SN Hesse-Biber & P Leavy (eds.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research, The Guildford Press, New York, pp. 525–41.
   Google Scholar
• Horrell, B, Stephens, C & Breheny, M, in press, ‘Capability to care: supporting the health of informal caregivers for older people’, Health Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, D & Kies, R 2005, ‘Online forums and deliberative democracy’, Acta Política, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 317–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, JL 2003, ‘Public spheres on the Internet: anarchic or government-sponsored—a comparison’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 26, pp. 349–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N 2012, ‘Doing template analysis’, in G Symon & C Cassell (eds.), Qualitative organizational research: core methods and current challenges, Sage, London, pp. 426–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, JM & Stephens, MAP 1989, ‘Hassles and uplifts of giving care to a family member with dementia’, Psychology and Aging, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 402–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg, L, Weir, CJ, Langhorne, P, Smith, LN & Stott, DJ 2013, ‘Is informal caregiving independently associated with poor health? A population-based study’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 95–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leist, AK 2013, ‘Social media use of older adults: a mini-review’, Gerontology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 378–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D, Madsen, A, Wright, E, Barar, RE, Santelli, J & Bull, S 2011, ‘Formative research on MySpace: online methods to engage hard-to-reach populations’, Journal of Health Communication, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 448–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, K, Elbanna, A, Hercheui, M, Panagiotopoulos, P & Saad, E 2012, ‘Exploring the democratic potential of online social networking: the scope and limitations of e-participation’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 30, pp. 239–54.
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, A 2004, ‘Characterizing e-participation in policy-making’, in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265300.
   Google Scholar
• Madge, C & O’Connor, H 2002, ‘Online with e-mums: exploring the Internet as a medium for research’, Area, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, M & Moreno-Riaño, G 2013, The prospect of Internet democracy, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Farnham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, MF, Dietrich, AS, Strickland, O & Myerburg, S 2003, ‘Using Internet discussion boards as virtual focus groups’, Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 274–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moylan, CA, Derr, AS & Lindhorst, T 2015, ‘Increasingly mobile: how new technologies can enhance qualitative research’, Qualitative Social Work, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M, Wiles, R, Bengry-Howell, A & Crow, G 2013, ‘Methodological innovation and research ethics: forces in tension or forces in harmony?’, Qualitative Research, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 650–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard, S 2010, ‘The “good carer”: moral practices in late modernity’, Sociology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 471–87.
   Google Scholar
• Pinquart, M & Sörensen, S 2003, ‘Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis’, Psychology and Aging, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 250–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinquart, M & Sörensen, S 2007, ‘Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: a meta-analysis’, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 126–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, GR, Lee, HC, Lim, RSH & Fullerton, J 2010, ‘Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy’, Nursing & Health Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 369–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbø, Ø, Rose, J & Skiftenes Flak, L 2008, ‘The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area’, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 400–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, HL, Herrman, HE, Bloch, S, Howe, A & Singh, B 1997, ‘A profile of Australian family caregivers: diversity of roles and circumstances’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A 1980, ‘Equality of what?’, in S McMurrin (ed.), Tanner lectures on human values, volume I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A 2004, ‘Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation’, Feminist Economics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 77–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, B, Barroso, J & Davis, LL 2012, ‘A comparative qualitative analysis of stories of spousal caregivers of people with dementia: negative, ambivalent, and positive experiences’, International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 220–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, M 2014, ‘Observing women caregivers’ everyday experiences: new ways of understanding and intervening’, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Advance online publication, doi/abs/10.1080/01634372.2014.939384#.U8n0n_mSz1Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G, John, P & Sturgis, P 2013, ‘Taking political engagement online: an experimental analysis of asynchronous discussion forums’, Political Studies, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 709–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, OL, Moloney, MF, Dietrich, AS, Myerburg, S, Cotsonis, GA & Johnson, RV 2003, ‘Measurement issues related to data collection on the World Wide Web’, Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 246–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suler, J 2005, ‘The online disinhibition effect’, International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 184–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tates, K, Zwaanswijk, M, Otten, R, van Dulmen, S, Hoogerbrugge, PM, Kamps, WA & Bensing, JM 2009, ‘Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology’, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 9, article 15, doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toljamo, M, Perälä, ML & Laukkala, H 2012, ‘Impact of caregiving on Finnish family caregivers’, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 211–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, PM & Peter, J 2009, ‘Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: a decade of research’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A & Van Dijk, J 2011, ‘Internet skills and the digital divide’, New Media & Society, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 893–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Durme, T, Macq, J, Jeanmart, C & Gobert, M 2012, ‘Tools for measuring the impact of informal caregiving of the elderly: a literature review’, International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 490–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Groenou, MIB, de Boer, A & Iedema, J 2013, ‘Positive and negative evaluation of caregiving among three different types of informal care relationships’, European Journal of Ageing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 301–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, AJ, Pratt, CC & Eddy, L 1995, ‘Informal caregiving to aging family members: a critical review’, Family Relations, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 402–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S, Clausen, MG, Robertson, A, Peacock, S & McPherson, K 2012, ‘Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health research’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 368–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, JL and Kasper, JD 2006, ‘Caregivers of frail elders: updating a national profile’, The Gerontologist, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 344–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S & Street, J 2007, ‘Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums’, New Media & Society, vol. 9, pp. 849–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarit, SH, Reever, KE & Bach-Petersen, J 1980, ‘Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden’, Gerontologist, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 649–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar