A rose by any other name: participants choosing research pseudonyms

References

• Abma, TA & Stake, R 2014, ‘Science of the particular: an advocacy of naturalistic case study in health research,’ Qualitative Health Research, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1150–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, RES & Wiles, JL 2013a, ‘How older people position their late-life childlessness: A qualitative study,’ Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 206–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, RES & Wiles, JL 2013b, ‘The utility of positioning theory to the study of ageing: Examples from research with childless older people,’ Journal of Aging Studies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 175–87.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, RES & Wiles, JL 2014, ‘Receiving support when older: What makes it OK?,’ The Gerontologist, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 670–82.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association 2010, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edn, Author, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Battiste, M 2008, ‘Research ethics for protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: institutional and researcher responsibilities’, in NK Denzin, YS Lincoln & LT Smith (eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 497–510.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, SG 2013, ‘Private talk: testimony, evidence, and the practice of anonymization in research’, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–45. doi:10.1353/ijf.2013.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S, Wiles, JL, Okalik, L, Kilabuk, J & Egeland, GM 2009, ‘Methodological consideration of story telling in qualitative research involving indigenous peoples’, Global Health Promotion, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bickford, J & Nisker, J 2015, ‘Tensions between anonymity and thick description when “studying up” in genetics research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 276–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolican, H 1990, Research methods and statistics in psychology, Hodder & Stoughton, London.
   Google Scholar
• Corden, A & Sainsbury, R 2006, ‘Exploring “quality”: research participants’ perspectives on verbatim quotations’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, F 2009, ‘Maintaining indigenous voices’, in DM Mertens & PE Ginsberg (eds.), The handbook of social research ethics, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 308–22.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, JW 2013, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Damianakis, T & Woodford, MR 2012, ‘Qualitative research with small connected communities: generating new knowledge while upholding research ethics’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 708–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen, VP 2009, ‘Constructing academic alter-egos: identity issues in a blog-based community’, Identity in the Information Society, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• England, KVL 1994, ‘Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality and feminist research’, The Professional Geographer, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 80–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, A, Hunt, G & Moloney, M 2011, ‘“It’s one of the better drugs to use”: perceptions of cocaine use among gay and bisexual Asian American men’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 625–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechner, MJ 2011, ‘Berliners’ models of heart disease causation’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 807–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer, A 2002, ‘The anonymity of research participants: assumptions, ethics and practicalities’, Social Research Update, vol. 36, viewed 11 January 2016, <http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU36.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Gulbas, LE & Zayas, LH 2015, ‘Examining the interplay among family, culture, and Latina teen suicidal behavior’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 689–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R & van Langenhove, L 1999, Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R, Moghaddam, FM, Cairnie, TP, Rothbart, D & Sabat, SR 2009, ‘Recent advances in positioning theory’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgesson, G 2014, ‘Informants a potential threat to confidentiality in small studies’, Medical Health Care and Philosophy, doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9579-4.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, SC & Paolillo, JC 2006, ‘Gender and genre variation in weblogs’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 439–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K 2009, ‘Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1632–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser-Jones, K 2003, ‘Continuing to conduct research in nursing homes despite controversial findings: reflections by a research scientist’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 114–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, V & Cram, F 2010, ‘Ethics of researching with whānau collectives’, MAI Review, issue 3, 8 pp., viewed 11 January 2016, <http://review.mai.ac.nz/index.php/MR/issue/view/17>.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, GM & Randall, WL 2001, ‘Narrative gerontology: an overview’, in GM Kenyon, P Clark & B De Vries (eds.), Narrative gerontology: theory, research and practice, Springer, New York, pp. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, GM, Clark, P & De Vries, B (eds.) 2001, Narrative gerontology: theory, research and practice, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• King, N, Finlay, L, Ashworth, P, Smith, JA, Langdridge, D & Butt, T 2008, ‘“Can’t really trust that, so what can I trust?”: a polyvocal, qualitative analysis of the psychology of mistrust’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 80–102.
   Google Scholar
• LaFrance, J, Nichols, R & Kirkhart, KE 2012, ‘Culture writes the script: on the centrality of context in indigenous evaluation’, in DJ Rog, JL Fitzpatrick & RF Conner (eds.), Context: a framework for its influence on evaluation practice. New directions for evaluation, 135, pp. 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, L 2009, QSR NVivo 8: part one: working with data, University of Auckland, Centre for Academic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazoe, T & Anderson, T 2011, ‘Anonymity in blended learning: who would you like to be?’, Educational Technology & Society, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 175–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S, Peter, E, Gastaldo, D & Howell, D 2015, ‘The “conflicted dying”: the active search for life extension in advanced cancer through biomedical treatment’, Qualitative Health Research, online, doi:10.1177/1049732315572772.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, JM & Coulehan, J 2015, ‘Maintaining confidentiality in qualitative publications’, Editorial. Qualitative Health Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 151–2, doi:10.1177/1049732314563489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J 2000, ‘Anonymity and place in qualitative inquiry’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 546–69.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, M, Hanson, E, Grant, G & Keady, J 2007, User participation in health and social care research: voices, values, and evaluation, Open University Press, Berkshire.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, BD 1995, ‘Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 290–310.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, WL 2007, ‘Narrative and chaos: acknowledging the novelty of lives-in-time’, Interchange, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 367–89.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, LD 2015, ‘Ethical issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 314–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, A 2007, ‘Interview methods can democratize research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 982–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B, Kitzinger, J & Kitzinger, C 2014a, ‘Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice’, Qualitative Research, doi:10.1177/1468794114550439.
   Google Scholar
• —– 2014b, ‘Participant anonymity in the internet age: from theory to practice’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Online first, doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.948697.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, CR 2005, ‘Anonymity in applied communication research: tensions between IRBs, researchers, and human subjects’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 242–57.
   Google Scholar
• Spottswood, EL, Walther, JB, Holmstrom, AJ & Ellison, NB 2013, ‘Person-centered emotional support and gender attributions in computer-mediated communication’, Human Communication Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 295–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, DR & Hodges, ID 2010, Designing and managing your research project: core knowledge for social and health researchers, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, AR & Russo, K 2012, ‘Ethical dilemmas for clinical psychologists in conducting qualitative research’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, L & Woodthorpe, K 2011, ‘Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher’, Qualitative Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolich, M 2010, ‘A critique of current practice: ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1599–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walford, G 2005, ‘Research ethical guidelines and anonymity’, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 83–93, doi:10.1080/01406720500036786.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R, Crow, G, Heath, S & Charles, V 2008, ‘The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 417–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar