Qualitative variations in personality inventories: subjective understandings of items in a personality inventory

References

• Abrahams, F 1999, ‘Qualitative and statistical impacts of home language on responses to the items of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) in South Africa’, South African Journal of Psychology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 76–87.
   Google Scholar
• Allik, J, Realo, A, Mõttus, R, Borkenau, P, Kuppens, P & Hřebíčková, M 2010, ‘How people see others is different from how people see themselves: a replicable pattern across cultures’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 870–82, doi:10.1037/a0020963
   Google Scholar
• Allport, GW & Odbert, HS 1936, ‘Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study’, Psychological Monographs, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–171.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, JJ 2008, ‘The neglected 95%: why American psychology needs to become less American’, The American Psychologist, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 602–14, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, JB & Van Aken, MAG 2003, ‘Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: a 9 year longitudinal study’, European Journal of Personality, vol. 17, pp. 1–17, doi:10.1002/per.460
   Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, JB, Borkenau, P, Ostendorf, F & Van Aken, MAG 2001, ‘Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults’, European Journal of Personality, vol. 15, pp. 169–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, JB, Conner, M, Fruyt, FDE, Houwer, JANDE, Denissen, JJA, Fiedler, K, Fiedler, S, Funder, DC, Kliegl, R, Nosek, BA, Perugini, M, Roberts, BW, Schmitt, M, Vanaken, MAG, Weber, H & Wicherts, JM 2013, ‘Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology’, European Journal of Personality, vol. 27, pp. 108–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benet-Martínez, V & John, OP 1998, ‘Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 729–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D, Kievit, RA, Cervone, D & Hood, SB 2009, ‘The two disciplines of scientific sychology, or: the disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis;, in J Valsiner, PCM Molenaar, MCDP Lyra & N Chaudhary (eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences, Springer, New York, pp. 67–97, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D, Mellenbergh, GJ & van Heerden, J 2004, ‘The concept of validity’, Psychological Review, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1061–71, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, RB 1943, ‘The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters’, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 476–506.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, RB, Eber, HW & Tatsuoka, MM 1992, Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire, Institute for Personality & Ability Testing, Champaign, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Church, AT, Alvarez, JM, Mai, NTQ, French, BF, Katigbak, MS & Ortiz, FA 2011, ‘Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1068–89, doi:10.1037/a0025290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D & Rogosch, FA 1996, ‘Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology’, Development and Psychopathology, vol. 8, pp. 597–600, doi:10.1017/S0954579400007318
   Google Scholar
• Conner, TS, Barrett, LF, Tugade, MM & Tennen, H 2007, ‘Idiographic personality The theory and practice of experience sampling’, in RW Robins, RC Fraley & RF Krueger (eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Conte, JM & Gintoft, JN 2005, ‘Polychronicity, Big Five personality dimensions, and sales performance’, Human Performance, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 427–44, doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Paul, J, Terracciano, A & McCrae, RR 2001, ‘Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 322–31, doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, LJ 1948, ‘A validation design for qualitative studies of personality’, Journal of Consulting Psychology, vol. XII, no. 6, pp. 365–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, LJ 1957, ‘The two disciplines of scientific psychology’, American Psychologist, vol. 12, pp. 671–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, LJ & Meehl, PE 1955, ‘Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 281–302, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19586159
   Google Scholar
• Diriwächter, R, Valsiner, J & Sauck, C 2005, ‘Microgenesis in making sense of oneself: constructive recycling of personality inventory items, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research’, vol. 6, no. 1, Art. 11, viewed 3 December 2014, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501113
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, JE (ed.) 1981, Living groups: group psychotherapy and general system theory, Brunner/Mazel, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W 2001, ‘Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distributions of states’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1011–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W 2004, ‘Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 83–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, DC 2006, ‘Towards a resolution of the personality triad: persons, situations, and behaviors’, Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 21–34, doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funder, DC, Guillaume, E, Kumagai, S, Kawamoto, S & Sato, T 2012, ‘The person-situation debate and the assessment of situations’, The Japanese Journal of Personality, vol. 21, April, pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, JW, Jackson, BJ & McDaniel, BL 2006, ‘Bridging the idiographic-nomothetic divide: a follow-up study’, Journal of Personality, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1191–218, doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00407.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurven, M, von Rueden, C, Massenkoff, M, Kaplan, H & Vie, ML 2013, ‘How universal is the Big Five? Testing the Five-Factor Model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 354–70, doi:10.1037/a0030841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J, Heine, SJ & Norenzayan, A 2010, ‘The weirdest people in the world?’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 33, no. 2–3, pp. 61–135, doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hviid, P & Villadsen, JW 2014, ‘Cultural identities and their relevance to school practice’, Culture & Psychology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–69, doi:10.1177/1354067X13515938
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, JPA 2005, ‘Why most published research findings are false’, PLoS medicine, vol. 2, no. 8, p. e124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, M & Griffith, R 2004, ‘Using personality constructs to predict performance: narrow or broad bandwidth’, Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255–69, doi:10.1007/s10869-004-0551-9
   Google Scholar
• John, OP, Naumann, LP & Soto, CJ 2008, ‘Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five taxonomy’, in OP John, RW Robins & LA Pervin (eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research, 3rd edn, Guilford Publications, New York, pp. 114–58.
   Google Scholar
• Josephs, IE 2000, ‘A psychological analysis of a psychological phenomenon: the dialogical construction of meaning’, Social Science Information, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 115–29, doi:10.1177/053901800039001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D, Krueger, AB, Schkade, Da, Schwarz, N & Stone, AA 2004, ‘A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method’, Science, vol. 306, no. 5702, pp. 1776–80, doi:10.1126/science.1103572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotov, R, Gamez, W, Schmidt, F & Watson, D 2010, ‘Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 768–821, doi:10.1037/a0020327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z, Sinclair, L & Griffin, D 1997, ‘Equal ratings but separate meanings: stereotypes and the construal of traits’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 720–34, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.720
   Google Scholar
• Lamiell, JT 1998, ‘“Nomothetic” and “idiographic”: contrasting Windelband’s understanding with contemporary usage’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–38, doi:10.1177/0959354398081002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmann, L, Dammeyer, J & Mortensen, EL 2015, Translation and validation of two short Big Five inventories in Danish, Manuscript under preparation.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, RR & Costa, PT 1997, ‘Personality trait structure as a human universal’, The American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 509–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, RR & Terracciano, A 2005, ‘Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: data from 50 cultures’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 547–61, http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, FP, Campion, MA, Hollenbeck, JR, Murphy, K, Schmitt, N & Dipboye, RL 2007, ‘Reconsidering the use of personality testing in personnel selection contexts’, Personnel Psychology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 683–729, doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, BA, Spies, JR & Motyl, M 2012, ‘Scientific utopia: ii. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 615–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querstret, D & Robinson, OC 2013, ‘Person, persona, and personality modification: an in-depth qualitative exploration of quantitative findings’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 10, pp. 140–59, doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.586450
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B & John, O 2007, ‘Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German’, Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 203–12, doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, BW & DelVecchio, WF 2000, ‘The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 3–25, doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, PJ & Valsiner, J 2011, ‘The un-making of a method: from rating scales to the study of psychological processes’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 47–65, doi:10.1177/0959354309352913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvatore, S & Valsiner, J 2010, ‘Between the general and the unique: overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 817–33, doi:10.1177/0959354310381156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, T, Hidaka, T & Fukuda, M 2009, ‘Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences’, in J Valsiner, PCM Molenaar, MCDP Lyra & N Chaudhary (eds.), Depicting the dynamics of living the life: the trajectory equifinality model, Springer, New York, pp. 217–40, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1
   Google Scholar
• Sato, T & Valsiner, J 2010, ‘Time in life and life in time: between experiencing and accounting’, Ritsumeikan Journal of Human Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, DP, Allik, J, McCrae, RR & Benet-Martinez, V 2007, ‘The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 173–212, doi:10.1177/0022022106297299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, Ba, Weiss, A, Der, G, Taylor, MD & Deary, IJ 2007, ‘Neuroticism, extraversion, and mortality in the UK health and lifestyle survey: a 21-year prospective cohort study’, Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 923–31, doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815abf83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedslund, J 1995, ‘Psychologic: common sense and the pseudoempirical’, in JA Smith, R Harré & L van Langenhove (eds.), Rethinking psychology, Sage, London, pp. 196–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sovran, T 1992, ‘Between similarity and sameness’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 18, pp. 329–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sroufe, LA 1997, ‘Psychopathology as an outcome of development’, Development and Psychopathology, vol. 9, pp. 251–68.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, P, Schmidt, J & Shultz, J 2008, ‘Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 138–61, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoresen, CJ, Bradley, JC, Bliese, PD & Thoresen, JD 2004, ‘The Big Five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 835–53, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomela, A 2003, ‘Relationships between personality structure, structure of word meaning, and cognitive ability: a study of cultural mechanisms of personality’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 723–35, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomela, A 2007, ‘Culture of science: strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 6–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uher, J 2013, ‘Personality psychology: lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story—why it is time for a paradigm shift’, Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–55, doi:10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J 2012, A guided science: history of psychology in the mirror of its making, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• van Os, J, Park, SB & Jones, PB 2001, ‘Neuroticism, life events and mental health: evidence for person-environment correlation’, The British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement, vol. 40, pp. s72–7.
   Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy, L 1968, General system theory: foundations, development, applications, rev. edn, Braziller, New York.
   Google Scholar