1,060
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices

, , , &

References

  • Adler, JM, 2018. Bringing the (disabled) body to personality psychology: a case study of Samantha. Journal of Personality, vol. 86no. 5,pp.803–824. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.v86.5.
  • Cech, EA, & Sherick HM, 2015, Depoliticization and the structure of engineering education. In: Christensen S., Didier C., Jamison A., Meganck M., Mitcham C., Newberry B. (eds) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 20. Springer, Cham
  • Cheville, A & Heywood, J 2016, From problem solvers to problem seekers: the necessary role of tension in engineering education, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, viewed 20 July 2017, https://peer.asee.org/26976.pdf
  • Faber, CJ, Bodnar, CA, Strong, AC, Lee, WC, McCave, EJ & Smith, CS 2016, Narrating the experiences of first-year faculty in the engineering education research community: developing a qualitative, collaborative research methodology,ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, viewed 18 October 2017, https://peer.asee.org/25771.pdf
  • Faulkner, W 2000, ‘Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp.759–92, doi: 10.1177/0306312706059745
  • Gadamer, H-G 2013, Truth and method, A&C Black, https://market.android.com/details?id=book-XaROAQAAQBAJ
  • Godfrey, E & Parker, L 2010, ‘Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education’, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 5–22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01038.x
  • Godwin, A & Potvin, G 2016, ‘Pushing and pulling Sara: a case study of the contrasting influences of high school and university experiences on engineering agency, identity, and participation’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 439–62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.21372
  • Hartas, D 2010, ‘The epistemological context of quantitative and qualitative research’, in D Hartas (ed.), Educational research and inquiry, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp. 33–53.
  • Heidegger, M 2010, Being and time, SUNY Press, Albany.
  • Huff, JL, Smith, JA, Jesiek, BK, Zoltowski, CB, Graziano, WG, & Oakes, WC 2014, From methods to methodology: Reflection on keeping the philosophical commitments of interpretative phenomenological analysis. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–9). IEEE. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie.2014.7044253.
  • Huff, JL, Smith, JA, Jesiek, BK, Zoltowski, CB, & Oakes, WC 2018, ‘Identity in engineering adulthood: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of early-career engineers in the United States as they transition to the workplace’, in Emerging adulthood, viewed 22 june 2018, http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/22463/
  • Huff, JL, Zoltowski, CB & Oakes, WC 2016, ‘Preparing engineers for the workplace through service learning: perceptions of EPICS alumni’, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 43–69, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20107
  • Jamieson, LH, & Lohmann, JR 2009, Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring US engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society, American Society for Engineering Education. Available at: https://www.asee.org/memberresources/reports/CCSSIE/CCSSIEE_Phase1Report_June2009.pdf [Accessed 01/08/19]
  • Kirn, A & Benson, L 2018, ‘Engineering students’ perception of the future: implications for student performance’, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 87–112, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20190
  • Kirn, A, Godwin, A, Cass, C, Ross, MS, & Huff, JL 2017, Mindful Methodology: A transparent dialogue on adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for engineering education research. In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/28669
  • Koro-Ljungberg, M & Douglas, EP 2008, ‘State of qualitative research in engineering education: meta-analysis of JEE articles, 2005–2006’, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 163–75, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00965.x/full
  • Lincoln, YS & Guba, EG 1985, Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75), Sage, Newbury Park, California, USA
  • Merleau-Ponty, M 2002, Phenomenology of perception, Psychology Press, New York, USA
  • Miller, B, Tsugawa-Nieves, M, Chestnut, JN, Perkins, H, & Cass, C, * Kirn, A 2017, The Influence of Perceived Identity Fit on Engineering Doctoral Student Motivation and Performance, In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, https://peer.asee.org/28982
  • National Research Council 2012, Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/13362.
  • Oborn, E & Dawson, S 2010, ‘Learning across communities of practice: an examination of multidisciplinary work’, British Journal of Management, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 843–58, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00684.x
  • Pawley, AL 2013, “Learning from small numbers” of underrepresented students’ stories: discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 23.1405.1–.21, viewed 31 July 2017, https://peer.asee.org/19030.pdf
  • Perkins, H, Tsugawa-Nieves, M, Chestnut, JN, Miller, B, Kirn, A, & Cass, C 2017, The role of engineering identity in engineering doctoral students’ experiences, in American society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, https://peer.asee.org/29006
  • Riley, D 2017, ‘Rigor/us: building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit’, Engineering Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 249–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631
  • Robinson, OC & McAdams, DP 2015, ‘Four functional roles for case studies in emerging adulthood research’, Emerging Adulthood, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 413–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815592727
  • Ross, MS, Capobianco, BM & Godwin, A 2017, ‘Repositioning race, gender, and role identity rormation for black women in engineering’, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 37–52, viewed 6 September 2017, http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,61720292656bf34f,28e77f761208a0ae.html
  • Shell, D, Husman, J, Benson, L, Hilpert, J, Jordan, M, Kraft, K, Kirn, A, & Muto-Nelson, K 2015, DBER in the Middle: Education Research in Disciplinary Contexts byContent Experts, Psychologists andEducation Researchers, In The Southwest Consortium for Innovative Psychology in Education Bi-Annual Conference, http://scipie.org/s/SCIPIE-2015-Program-Long-Version-final.pdf Accessed 01/08/19
  • Slaton, AE & Pawley, AL 2015, The power and politics of STEM research design: saving the “small n,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 26.1564.1–.13, viewed 31 July 2017, https://peer.asee.org/24901.pdf
  • Smith, JA 2011a, ‘Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis’, Health Psychology Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
  • Smith, JA 2011b, ‘“We could be diving for pearls”: the value of the gem in experiential qualitative psychology’, Qualitative Methods in Psychology Bulletin, issue 12, pp. 6–15, http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/6330
  • Smith, JA, Flowers, P & Larkin, M 2009, Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research, London, Sage.
  • Torbert, WR 1981, ‘Why educational research has been so uneducational: the case for a new model of social science based on collaborative inquiry’, in P Reason & J Rowan (eds.), 765 Human inquiry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 141–51, viewed 18 October 2017, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED242104.pdf
  • Tsugawa-Nieves, M, Perkins, H, Miller, B, Chestnut, JN, Cass, C, & Kirn, A 2017. The role of engineering doctoral students’ future goals on perceived task usefulness, In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, https://peer.asee.org/29005, Accessed: 01/08/19
  • Walther, J, Sochacka, NW, Benson, LC, Bumbaco, AE, Kellam, N, Pawley, AL, & Phillips, CM 2017, ‘Qualitative research quality: a collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives’, Journal Of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 398–430, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20170
  • Walther, J, Sochacka, NW & Kellam, NN 2013, ‘Quality in interpretive engineering education research: reflections on an example study’, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20029

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.