Entering the ethnographic mind: A grounded theory of using ethnography in psychological research

References

• Adams, G 2014, ‘Decolonizing methods: African studies perspectives and qualitative research,’ Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, vol. 31, pp. 467–74.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P & Morriss, L 2017, ‘On ethnographic knowledge,’ Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 23, pp. 323–31, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416655825
   Google Scholar
• Babchuk, WA & Hitchcock, RK 2013, ‘Grounded theory ethnography: merging methodologies for advancing naturalistic inquiry’, in EP Isaac-Savage (ed.), Proceedings of the 54th annual adult education research conference, Lindwenwood University, St. Charles, MO, pp. 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, TT & Brown, JR 2012, ‘Mixed methods, culture, and psychology: a review of mixed methods in culture-specific psychological research’, International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, vol. 1, pp. 177–90, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029219
   Google Scholar
• Case, AD Todd NR & Kral, MJ 2014, ‘Ethnography in community psychology: promises and tensions’, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 54, pp. 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K 2014, Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, RM, Fretz, RI & Shaw, LL 2007, ‘Participant observation and fieldnotes’, in P Atkinson, A Coffey, S Delamont, J Lofland & L Lofland (eds.), Handbook of ethnography, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 352–68.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, DE 2002, ‘Critical ethnography: the reflexive turn, ’ Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 15, pp. 469–90, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390210145534
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, T 2005, ‘Taking culture seriously: making the social survey ethnographic,’ in T
   Google Scholar
• Weisner (ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children’s) development: mixed
   Google Scholar
• methods in the study of childhood and family life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 185–221.
   Google Scholar
• Gone, JP 2011, ‘Is psychological science a-cultural?,’ Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, vol. 17, pp. 234–42, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023805
   Google Scholar
• Gone, JP & Alcántara, C 2010, ‘The ethnographically contextualized case study method: exploring ambitious achievement in an American Indian community,’ Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, vol. 17, pp. 159–68, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013873
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, PM 2000, ‘Three approaches to the psychology of culture: where do they come from? Where can they go?,’ Asian Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 223–40, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00066
   Google Scholar
• Hall, GCN, Yip, T & Zárate, MA 2016, ‘On becoming multicultural in a monocultural
   Google Scholar
• research world: a conceptual approach to studying ethnocultural diversity,’ American Psychologist, vol. 71, pp.40–51, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039734
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, WE, Kim, SS, Kim, JHJ, Nguyen, TU, Wendt, DC, Nagata, DK & Gone, JP 2013, ‘In search of cultural diversity, revisited: recent publication trends in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology’, Review of General Psychology, vol. 17, pp. 243–54, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032260
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, WE, St. Arnault, DM & Gone, JP 2018, ‘A return to “the clinic” for community psychology: lessons from a clinical ethnography in urban American Indian behavioral health, ’ American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 62–75, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12212
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J, Heine, S & Norenzayan, A 2010, ‘The weirdest people in the world,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 33, pp. 61–83, doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyl, BS 2007, ‘ Ethnographic interviewing,’ in P Atkinson, A Coffey, S Delamont, J Lofland & L Lofland (eds.), Handbook of ethnography, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 369–83.
   Google Scholar
• Jessor, R, Colby, J & Shweder, RA 1996, Ethnography and human development: context
   Google Scholar
• and meaning in social inquiry’, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, SA 2002, ‘The role of qualitative research in psychological journals,’ Psychological
   Google Scholar
• Methods, vol. 7, pp. 126–38, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.126
   Google Scholar
• Kim, U, Park, Y & Park, D 2000, ‘The challenge of cross-cultural psychology: the role of indigenous psychologies,’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 63–75, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031001006
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A & Gough, B 2008, ‘ Qualitative research and its place in psychological science,’
   Google Scholar
• Psychological Methods, vol. 13, pp. 254–71, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013220
   Google Scholar
• Manning, P 2009, ‘ Three models of ethnographic research: Wacquant as risk-taker,’ Theory &
   Google Scholar
• Psychology, vol. 16, pp. 756–77, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309349156
   Google Scholar
• Miller, PJ 1996, ‘ Instantiating culture through discourse practices: some personal reflections on
   Google Scholar
• socialization and how to study it,’ in R Jessor, A Colby & R Shweder (eds.), Ethnography and
   Google Scholar
• human development, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 183–204.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K 2012, Ethnographic methods, 2nd edn, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Shweder, RA 1999, ‘ Why cultural psychology?,’ Ethos, vol. 27, pp. 62–73, doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1999.27.1.62
   Google Scholar
• Simonds, LM, Camic, PM & Causey, A 2012, ‘Using focused ethnography in psychological research,’ in H Cooper (ed.), Handbook of qualitative methods in psychology: vol. 2. Research designs, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 157–70.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, LA, Mattis, JS, Ahluwalia, MK & Quizon, CA 2005, ‘Ethnography in counseling psychology research: possibilities for application,’ Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 206–14.
   Google Scholar
• Tavory, I & Timmermans, S 2009, ‘ Two cases of ethnography: grounded theory and the extended case method,’ Ethnography, vol. 10, pp. 243–63, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138109339042
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S & Tavory, I 2012, ‘Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis’, Sociological Theory, vol. 30, pp. 167–86, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
   Google Scholar
• Weisner, TS 1996, ‘Why ethnography should be the most important method in the study of
   Google Scholar
• human development,’ in R Jessor, A Colby & R Shweder (eds.), Ethnography and human development, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 305–26.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, BB 1976, ‘Unpackaging variables,’ in KF Riegel & JA Meacham (eds.), The changing individual in a changing world, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 303–9.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, BB & Whiting, JWM 1975, Children of six cultures: a psychocultural analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, JWM & Whiting, BB 1978, ‘A strategy for psychocultural research,’ in G Spindler (ed.), The making of psychological anthropology, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Yakushko, O, Hoffman, L, Morgan Consoli, ML & Lee, G 2016, ‘On methods, methodologies, and continued colonization of knowledge in the study of “ethnic minorities”: comment on Hall et al. (2016),’ American Psychologist, vol. 71, pp. 890–1, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000060
   Google Scholar