Affect and the reparative turn: Repairing qualitative analysis?

References

• Bayer, BM & Shotter, J (eds.) 1998, Reconstructing the psychological subject: bodies, practices, and technologies, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L 2011, Cruel optimism, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Best, S & Marcus, S 2009, ‘Surface reading: an introduction’, Representations, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S, Cromby, J, Harper, D, Johnson, K & Reavey, P 2011, ‘Researching “experience”: embodiment, methodology, process’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 493–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, SD & Stenner, P 2009, Psychology without foundations: history, philosophy and psychosocial theory, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, PT 2007, The affective turn: theorizing the social, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Craib, I 1997, ‘Social constructionism as a social psychosis’, Sociology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cromby, J 2015, Feeling bodies: embodying psychology, Palgrave, London.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, S 2008, ‘Making it after all: a reparative reading of The Mary Tyler Moore Show’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, A 1992, Mixed feelings: feminism, mass culture, and Victorian sensationalism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, A 2012, Depression: a public feeling, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, AR 1994, Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain, Papermac, London.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G 1988, Spinoza, practical philosophy, City Lights Books, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterley, J & Pryse, M 2003, Writing out of place: regionalism, women, and American literary culture, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, E 2010, Time binds: queer temporalities, queer histories, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, JK 2006, A postcapitalist politics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V, Harden, A, Johnson, K, Reavey, P, Strange, V & Willig, C 2004, ‘Women’s collective constructions of embodied practices through memory work: an exploration of memories of sweating and pain’, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 43, pp. 99–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, V, Harden, A, Johnson, K, Reavey, P, Strange, V & Willig, C 2005, ‘Painting pictures of embodied experience: the use of nonlinguistic data in the study of embodiment’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Greco, M 2004 ‘The politics of indeterminacy and the right to health’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, M & Stenner, P (eds.) 2008, Emotions: a social science reader, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M & Seigworth, GJ (eds.) 2010, The affect theory reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, E 2011, ‘The future's eve: reparative reading after sedgwick’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 101–19. doi:10.1215/00382876-2010-025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harete Martinussen, M 2017, ‘Book review sexuality: a psychosocial manifesto’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 564–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C 2005, ‘Invoking affect’, Cultural Studies, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 548–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollway, W 1989, Gender and psychology. Subjectivity and method in psychology: gender, meaning and science, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W & Jefferson, PT 2000, Doing qualitative research differently: free association, narrative and the interview method, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, L 2008, ‘Interpellated by affect: the move to the political in Brian Massumi’s parables for the virtual and Eve Sedgwick’s touching feeling’, Subjectivity, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 219–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, L 2012, ‘A queer sex, or, can feminism and psychoanalysis have sex without the phallus’, Feminist Review, vol. 102, pp. 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ibáñez, T 1983, Poder y libertad: estudio sobre la naturaleza, las modalidades y los mecanismos de las relaciones de poder, Hora, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Inckle, K 2010, ‘Telling tales? Using ethnographic fictions to speak embodied “truth”’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K 2015, Sexuality: a psychosocial manifesto, John Wiley & Sons, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K & Martinez-Guzman, A 2019, ‘The social psychology of gender and sexuality: from application to transformation’, in K O’Doherty & D. Hodgetts (eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M & Rivière, J 1960, Las emociones basicas del hombre: amor, odio y reparación, envidia y gratitud. Desarrollo del funcionamiento mental, Nova, Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, O, Raisborough, J & Frith, H 2010, ‘C’mon girlfriend: sisterhood, sexuality and the space of the benign in makeover TV’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 471–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, C 2018, The live art of sociology, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B 2004, ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B 2005, Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lentricchia, F & DuBois, A 2002, Close reading: the reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, R 2011, ‘The turn to affect: a critique’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 434–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljeström, M & Paasonen, S 2010, Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing differences, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J 2010, ‘Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies’, Cultural Geographies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 237–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, H 2010a, ‘Truth and consequences: on paranoid reading and reparative reading’, Criticism, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 235–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, H 2010b, ‘Close but not deep: literary ethics and the descriptive turn’, New Literary History, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 371–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B 2002, Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Papoulias, C & Callard, F 2010, ‘Biology’s gift: interrogating the turn to affect’, Body Society, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 29–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, I 1989, The crisis in modern social psychology—and how to end it. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Wetherell, M 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Radley, A 1991, The body and social psychology, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Reavey, P (ed) 2011, Visual Methods in psychology: using and interpreting images in qualitative research, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S 2000, ‘Against methodolatry: Some comments on Elliott, Fischer, and Rennie’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 39 (1), pp.1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S 2017, ‘Biology as Destiny or as Freedom?: On Reflexivity, Collectivity and the Realization of Human Potential’, In The Oxford Handbook of the Human Essence, J F Dovidio and M. van Zomeren, eds., pp. 173–184. Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S 2011, ‘Criticality, Not Paranoia: A Generative Register for Feminist Social Research’, NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, vol. 19 (2), pp. 124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Ryles, SM 1999, ‘A concept analysis of empowerment: Its relationship to mental health nursing’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 29 (3), pp. 600–607. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00928.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Pío, MJ 2007, 'Programas de Formación prospect', Norte de Salud Mental, vol. 7 (27), pp. 133–135. doi:10.4321/S0211-57352007000200015
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M 2009, ‘Contemporary Sociology and the Challenge of Descriptive Assemblage’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 12 (1), pp. 155–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, EK 1990/ 2008, Epistemology of the Closet, University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, EK 1997, Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction. Duke University Press, Durham and London.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, EK 2007, ‘Melanie Klein and the Difference Affect Makes’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 106 (3), pp. 625–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, EK & Frank, A 1995, ‘Shame in the cybernetic fold: reading Silvan Tomkins’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 21 (2), pp. 496–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, EK & Frank, A 2003, Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Duke University Press, Durham and London.
   Google Scholar
• Shahani, N 2012, Queer Retrosexualities: The Politics of Reparative Return, Lexington Books, Plymouth.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, P 2008 ‘A.N. Whitehead and Subjectivity’, Subjectivity, vol. 22 (1), pp. 90–109.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, P 2011, ‘James and Whitehead: Assemblage and Systematization of a Deeply Empiricist Mosaic Philosophy’, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, vol. 3 (1), pp. 101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, P 2017, Liminality and Experience - A Transdisciplinary Approach to the Psychosocial, Palgrave Macmillan UK, London
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, P and Moreno-Gabriel, E 2013, ‘Liminality and affectivity: the case of deceased organ donation’, Subjectivity, vol. 6 (3), pp. 229–253.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, NJ 2008, Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P 2015, Non-Representational Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M 2012, Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegman, R 2014, ‘The times we’re in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative ‘turn”, Feminist Theory, vol. 15 (1), pp. 4–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C 2008, Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method. Berkshire, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar