Celebrations amongst challenges: Considering the past, present and future of the qualitative methods in psychology section of the British Psychology Society

References

• Ashworth, P 2008, ‘Conceptual foundations on qualitative psychology’, in J Smith (ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to methods, 3rd edn, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S & Riley, S 2018, ‘Active ink: analysing the experience and construction of tattoos as therapy using dual-focus methodology’, QMiP Bulletin, vol. 25, pp. 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society n.d.-a, About us, viewed 11 June 2018, https://www.bps.org.uk/about-us
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society n.d.-b, Member networks, viewed 11 June 2018, https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologists/member-networks
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society 2016, Standards for the accreditation of undergraduate, conversion and integrated masters programmes in psychology, BPS, Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Branney, P, Witty, K, Braybrook, D, Bullen, K, White, A & Eardley, I 2014, ‘Masculinities, humour and care for penile cancer: a qualitative study’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 2051–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J, King, N, Riley, S, Shaw, R & Willig, C 2018a, ‘Surviving and thriving REF2021 for qualitative psychologists: discussion panel event at QMiP 2017 conference’, QMiP Bulletin, vol. 25, pp. 29–33, https://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/qmip-bulletin-issue-25-spring-2018.html
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J, Goodman, S, Locke, A, Reavey, P, Riley, S & Seymour-Smith, S 2018b, Writing for the research excellence framework 2021: guidance for qualitative psychologists, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J & King, N 2017 (eds.), Applied qualitative research in psychology, Palgrave, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J, McCluskey, S, Turley, E & King, N 2015, ‘The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 202–22, doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, P, Chew, S & Sutton, E 2018, ‘Ethics in theory and pseudo-ethics in practice’, in C Macleod, J Marx, P Mnyaka & GJ Treharne (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of ethics in critical research, Palgrave-MacMillan, London, pp. 29–45, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74721-7_3
   Google Scholar
• Coma and disorders of consciousness research centre, viewed 11 June 2018, http://cdoc.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Corr, M, Roulston, G, King, N, Dornan, T, Blease, C & Gormley, GJ 2017, ‘Living with “melanoma”…for a day: a phenomenological analysis of medical students’ simulated experiences’, British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 17, pp. 771–8, doi:10.1111/bjd.15402
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, DRE, Miller, W & Kneale, P 2018, ‘The Cinderella of academia: is higher education pedagogic research undervalued in UK research assessment?’, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1625–36, doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1276549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, P, Dieppe, P, Macintyre, S, Michie, S, Nazareth, I, Petticrew, M 2008, ‘Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance’, British Medical Journal, vol. 337, p. a1655, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655
   Google Scholar
• Del Busso, LA & Reavey, P 2013, ‘Moving beyond the surface: a poststructuralist phenomenology of young women‘s embodied experiences in everyday life’, Psychology and Sexuality, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–61, doi:10.1080/19419899.2011.589866
   Google Scholar
• Economic & Social Science Research Council 2013, ESRC open access to research outputs, ESRC, London.
   Google Scholar
• Economic and Social Research Council 2018, ESRC research data policy, ESRC, London.
   Google Scholar
• Finfgeld-Connett, D 2016, ‘The future of theory-generating meta-synthesis research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 291–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S 2013, ‘Milgram’s obedience experiments: a rhetorical analysis’, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 290–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S & Sullivan, C 2018, ‘A changing culture? Qualitative methods teaching in UK psychology’, Qualitative Psychology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R 2007, ‘Postfeminist media culture: elements of a sensibility’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R 2017, ‘The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: a postfeminist sensibility 10 years on’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 606–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R & Orgad, S 2018, ‘The amazing bounce-backable woman: resilience and the psychological turn in neoliberalism’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 477–95.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S, Sirriyeh, A & McMahon, S 2017, ‘The evolving (re)categorisations of refugees throughout the “refugee/migrant crisis”’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 105–14, doi:10.1002/casp.2302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, B, Hugh-Jones, S & Lawton, R 2002, Developing guidelines for the supervision of undergraduate qualitative research in psychology, LTSN/HEA Report, tinyurl.com/q5gkmzj
   Google Scholar
• Gough, B & Deatrick, JA 2015, ‘Qualitative health psychology: diversity, power and impact’, Health Psychology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 289–92, doi:10.1037/hea0000206
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T, Annandale, E, Ashcroft, R, Barlow, J, Black, N, Bleakley, A, Boaden, R, Braithwaite, J, Britten, N, Carnevale, F 2016, ‘An open letter to the BMJ editors on qualitative research’, BMJ, vol. 352, p. i563.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T & Fahy, N 2015, ‘Research impact in the community based health sciences: an analysis of 162 case studies from the 2014 research excellence framework’, BMC Medicine, vol. 13, p. 232.
   Google Scholar
• Henriques, J, Hollway, W, Urwin, C, Venn, C & Walkerdine, V 1984, Changing the subject: psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, Methuen, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, JE 2001, ‘The desperate need for replications’, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 149–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, JPA 2016, ‘Why most clinical research is not useful’, PLOS Medicine, vol. 13, no. 6, p. e1002049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D 2012, ‘A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects’, Accessed on 7th May 2019: https://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.6716.1349271308!/suppinfoFile/Kahneman%20Letter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J & Kitzinger, C 2018, ‘Deaths after feeding-tube withdrawal from patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states: a qualitative study of family experience’, Palliative Medicine, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1180–8.
   Google Scholar
• Langdridge, D 2007, Phenomenological psychology: theory, research and method, Prentice Hall, Harlow.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, WJ, Drenth, P & Noort, E 2012, ‘Flawed science: the fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel’, Accessed on 7th May 2019: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/3ff904d7-547b-40ae-85fe-bea38e05a34a_Final%20report%20Flawed%20Science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, C, Marecek, J & Capdevila, R 2014, ‘Feminism & psychology going forward’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod, C, Marx, J, Mnyaka, P & Treharne, GJ 2018, ‘Ethics in critical research: stories from the field’, in C Macleod, J Marx, P Mnyaka & GJ Treharne (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of ethics in critical research, Palgrave-MacMillan, London, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A 2015, ‘Let a thousand flowers bloom’, The Psychologist, vol. 28, pp. 656–8, https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-28/august-2015/let-thousand-flowers-bloom
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madill, A & Todd, KZ 2002, ‘Proposal to the council of the British Psychological Society for the formation of a new section of the society’, Accessed on 7th May 2019: https://www.academia.edu/1635472/Madill_A._Todd_K._Z._2002_._Proposal_to_the_Council_of_the_British_Psychological_Society_for_the_formation_of_a_new_Section_of_the_Society_on_Qualitative_Methods_in_Psychology
   Google Scholar
• Makel, MC, Plucker, JA & Hegarty, B 2012, ‘Replications in psychology research: how often do they really occur?’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 537–42, doi:10.1177/1745691612460688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, S, RD, Chambers, CD, Etchells, PJ, Harris, CR, Hoekstra, R, Lakens, D, Lewandowsky, Coker Morey, C, Newman, DP, Schönbrodt, FD, Vanpaemel, W, Wagenmakers, EJ,  Zwaan, RA 2016, ‘The peer reviewers‘ openness initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review’, Royal Society Open Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, doi:10.1098/rsos.150547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, T 2017, ‘Revisiting the research excellence framework: ensuring quality in REF2021 or new challenges ahead?’, Perspectives, Policy and Practice in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 34–9.
   Google Scholar
• Neuroskeptic 2012, ‘The nine circles of scientific hell’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 643–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration, 2015, ‘Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science’, Science, vol. 349, no. 6251, p. aac4716, doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, I 1992, Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for social and individual psychology, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Pashler, H & Wagenmakers, EJ 2012, ‘Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: a crisis of confidence?’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 528–30.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Wetherell, M 1987, Discourse analysis: beyond attitudes and behaviour, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Rapport, F, Storey, A, Porter, A, Snooks, H, Jones, K, Peconi, J, Sánchez, A, Siebert, S, Thorne, K, Clement, C & Russell, I 2013, ‘Qualitative research within trials: developing a standard operating procedure for a clinical trials unit’, Trials, vol. 14, no. 54, pp. 1–8, doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-54
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C, Chandler, E, Harrison, E, Liddiard, K & Ferrari, M 2015, ‘Project Re•Vision: disability at the edges of representation’, Disability and Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 513–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Excellence Framework 2017, What is the REF?, viewed 11 June 2018, http://www.ref.ac.uk/about/whatref/
   Google Scholar
• Riley, S 2016, ‘What does the research excellence framework (REF) mean for qualitative psychologists?’, QMiP Bulletin, vol. 21, pp. 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, S, Evans, A, Elliott, S, Rice, C & Marecek, J 2017, ‘A critical review of postfeminist sensibility’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 11, no. 12, p. e12367, doi:10.1111/spc3.12367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B, Kitzinger, J & Kitzinger, C 2015, ‘Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice’, Qualitative Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 616–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour-Smith, S 2013, ‘A reconsideration of the gendered mechanisms of support in online interactions about testicular implants: a discursive approach’, Health Psychology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 91–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour-Smith, S, Brown, D, Cosma, G, Shopland, N, Battersby, S & Burton, A 2016, ‘“Our people has got to come to terms with that”: changing perceptions of the digital rectal examination as a barrier to prostate cancer diagnosis in African-Caribbean men’, Psycho-Oncology, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1183–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R 2001, ‘Why use interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology?’, Health Psychology Update, vol. 10, pp. 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J (ed.) 2015, Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to methods, 3rd edn, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, JA, Larkin, M & Flowers, P 2009, Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Statement of retraction 2014, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 37, no. 13, p. 2491.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C & Forrester, M (eds.) 2018, Doing qualitative research in psychology: a practical guide, 2nd edn, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C, Gibson, S & Riley, S 2012, Doing your qualitative psychology project, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S, Gordon-Finlayson, A, Becker, S & Sullivan, C 2015, ‘Qualitative undergraduate project supervision in psychology: current practices and support needs of supervisors across North East England and Scotland’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C 2016, ‘Constructivism and “the real world”: can they co-exist?’, QMiP Bulletin, vol. 21, pp. 33–7.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C, Ledingham, S & Baboulene, K 2017, Advancing dual focus methodology, Symposium at the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Conference, 5–7 July, Aberystwyth University.
   Google Scholar