Mapping Qualitative Research in Psychology across Europe: Contemporary Trends

References

• Blackman, L & Walkerdine, V 2001, Mass hysteria, critical psychology and media studies, Palgrave Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S 2015, ‘Perils and potentials in qualitative psychology’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 49, pp. 162–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S, Jacobsen, MH & Kristiansen, S 2014, ‘Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences’, in P Leavy (ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J 1990, Acts of meaning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Camic, PM, Rhodes, JE & Yardley, LE 2003, Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C & Cornish, F 2014, ‘Reimagining community health psychology: maps, journeys and new terrains’, Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C & Murray, M 2004, ‘Community health psychology: promoting analysis and action for social change’, Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 187–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clot, Y 1999, La fonction psychologique du travail, PUF, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Clot, Y 2002, Avec Vygotski, La Dispute, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, C 2015, ‘New directions in qualitative research in psychology’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 49, pp. 125–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS 2011, The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D & Potter, J 1992, Discursive psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y, Miettinen, R & Punamaki, RL 1999, Perspectives on activity theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L & Gough, B (eds.) 2015, Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences, John Wiley and Sons, London.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U 1998, An introduction to qualitative research, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, D & Prilleltensky, I (eds.) 1997, Critical psychology: an introduction, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N & Nolas, SM 2013, ‘The contribution of pluralistic qualitative approaches to mixed methods evaluations’, New Directions for Evaluation, vol. 138, pp. 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, KJ 1985, ‘The social constructionist movement in modern psychology’, American psychologist, vol. 40, pp. 266–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, KJ 2015, An invitation to social construction, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A 1992, ‘A phenomenological reinterpretation of the Jamesian schema for psychology’, in ME Donnelly (ed.), Reinterpreting the legacy of William James, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 119–36.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A 2009, The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, B & Lyons, A 2016, ‘The future of qualitative research in psychology: accentuating the positive’, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 50, pp. 234–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG & Lincoln YS 1994, ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in NK Denzin and YS Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, Sage, London, pp. 163–94.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, KN & Pidgeon, N 1992, ‘Qualitative research and psychological theorizing’, British Journal of Psychology, vol. 83, pp. 97–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollway, W & Jefferson, T 2000, Doing qualitative research differently, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Holzkamp, K 1992, ‘On doing psychology critically’, Theory and Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, YS, Lynham, SA & Guba, EG 2011, ‘Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Sage, London, pp. 97–128.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C 1994, Phenomenological research methods, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M & Chamberlain, K (eds.) 1999, Qualitative health research: theories and methods, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M 2003, ‘Narrative psychology’, in JA Smith (ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods, Sage, London, pp. 111–31.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M 2017, ‘La recherche narrative’, in M Santiago-Delefosse & M del Rio Carral (eds.), Manuel pratique de méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines, Dunod, Paris, pp. 107–29.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I 1989, The crisis in modern social psychology and how to end it, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I 1992, Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for individual and social psychology, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I 2015, Critical discursive psychology, Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J 2012, ‘Discourse analysis and discursive psychology’, in H Cooper (ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 119–38.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Wetherell, M 1987, Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behavior, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, C 1997, Cultural psychology and qualitative methodology, Plenum, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, C 2008, ‘Cultural psychology and qualitative methodology: scientific and political considerations’, Culture and Psychology, vol. 14, pp. 259–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reavey, P 2015 (ed.), Visual methods in psychology: using and interpreting images in qualitative research, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, S, Evans, A & Robson, M 2018, Postfeminism and health, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago-Delefosse, M & del Rio Carral, M 2017, Manuel pratique de méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines, Dunod, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Sarbin, T 1986 (ed.), Narrative psychology. The storied nature of human conduct, Praeger, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, KJ 1998, ‘Toward a science of the heart: romanticism and the revival of psychology’, American Psychologist, vol. 53, pp. 277–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, JA 1996, ‘Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology’, Psychology and Health, vol. 11, pp. 261–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, JA 2011, ‘Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis’, Health Psychology Review, vol. 5, pp. 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, JA (ed.) 2015, Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C, Gibson, S & Riley, SC (eds.) 2012, Doing your qualitative psychology project, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, HJ 2004, ‘Unifying psychology: epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver?’, Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol 60, pp. 1259–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, EA 2018, ‘Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 25, pp. 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T 2014, Encyclopedia of critical psychology, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T 2015, ‘Critical psychology: a geography of intellectual engagement and resistance’, American Psychologist, vol. 70, pp. 243–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, CW & Maiers, W (eds.) 2006, Critical psychology: contributions to an historical science of the subject, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Tseliou, E & Borcsa, M 2018, ‘Discursive methodologies for couple and family therapy research: editorial to special section’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, vol. 44, pp. 375–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseliou, E, Smoliak, O, LaMarre, A & Quinn-Nilas, Ch 2019, ‘Discursive psychology as applied science’, in K O’Doherty & D Hodgetts (eds.), The Sage handbook of applied social psychology, Sage, London, pp. 400–19.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J 1989, Human development and culture, Heath, Lexington, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J 1997, Culture and the development of children’s actions, Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L 1999, La signification historique de la crise en psychologie, Delachaux et Niestlé, Lausanne-Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, FJ 2014, ‘Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology’, Qualitative Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C 2013, Introducing qualitative research in psychology, Open University Press, Berkshire.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C & Stainton-Rogers, WS (eds.) 2017, The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C, Bungay, H, Munn-Giddings, C & Boyce, M 2016, ‘Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the value and impact of the arts in healthcare settings: a critical review of the literature’, International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 56, pp. 90–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar