A context-consent meta-framework for designing open (qualitative) data studies

References

• Bishop, L, 2016 Research ethics and data sharing [Online], UK Data Service, viewed 6 July 2018, https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/604362/bishop_rec_uel_20apr16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Branney, P, Witty, K, Bagnall, A-M, South, J “ White, A 2012, ‘"Straight to the gp; that would be where I would go”: an analysis of male frequent attenders’ constructions of their decisions to use or not use health-care services in the UK‘, Psychology & Health, vol. 27, pp. 865–80, doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.636443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branney, P, Woolhouse, M & Reid, K 2017, ‘The “innocent collection of details” and journal requests to make qualitative datasets public post-consent: open access data, potential author response and thoughts for future studies‘, QMiP Bulletin, pp. 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology‘, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society 2014, Code of human research ethics, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society 2016, Standards for the accreditation of undergraduate, conversion and integrated masters programmes in psychology, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society 2018, Code of ethics and conduct, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, NJ, Willis, MEH, Barnes, JS, Caddick, N, Cromby, J, Mcdermott, H & Wiltshire, G 2015, ‘Analytical pluralism in qualitative research: a meta-study‘, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 182–201, doi: 10.1080/14780887.2014.948980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corti, L, Foster, J & Thompson, P 1995, ‘Archiving qualitative research data‘, Social Research Update, vol. 10, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Corti, L & Thompson, P 1998, ‘Are you sitting on your qualitative data? Qualidata‘s mission‘, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 1, pp. 85–9, doi: 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846865.
   Google Scholar
• Fecher, B, & Friesike, S 2014, Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought, In S Bartling & S Friesike (editors), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 17–47.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N 2016, Practising research: why you‘re always part of the research process even when you think you‘re not, Palgrave, London.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N, Nolas, SM, Brooks-Gordon, B, Esin, C, Holt, A, Mehdizadeh, L & Shinebourne, P 2010, ‘Pluralism in qualitative research: the impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data‘, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, pp. 441–60, doi: 10.1177/1468794110366802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M 1997, ‘Qualitative data archiving: some reflections on its prospects and problems‘, Sociology, vol. 31, pp. 131–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M 2010a, ‘Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues‘, Sociological Research Online, vol. 15, pp. 1–7, http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.2076.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M– 2010b, ‘Reproducing or constructing? Some questions about transcription in social research‘, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, pp. 553–69, doi: 10.1177/1468794110375230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, J 1998, ‘Secondary analysis of qualitative data‘, Social Research Update, Working Paper No. 22, University of Surrey.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J 2004, Reworking qualitative data, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K 2012, ‘Masculinities, identities and risk: transition in the lives of men and fathers, 2000–2009 (dataset) ‘, UK DATA SERVICE, SN: 6984, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6984-1.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England, Research Councils UK, Universities UK & Wellcome Trust 2016, Concordat on open research data, UK Research & Innovation, London.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, A 2010, ‘Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note‘, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, pp. 113–21, doi: 10.1177/1468794109348686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsmo, FL 2010, ‘The origins and principles of the world data center system‘, Data Science Journal, vol. 8, pp. IGY55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, WJ, Drenth, P & Noort, E 2012, Flawed science: the fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel, University of Tilburg, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A, Flowers, P, Frost, N & Locke, A 2018, ‘A meta-methodology to enhance pluralist qualitative research: one man’s use of socio-sexual media and midlife adjustment to HIV‘, Psychology & Health, pp. 1–20, doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1475670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauthner, NS, Parry, O & Backett-Milburn, K 1998, ‘The data are out there, or are they? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data‘, Sociology, vol. 32, pp. 733–45.
   Google Scholar
• Morey, RD, Chambers, CD, Etchells, PJ, Harris, CR, Hoekstra, R, Lakens, D, Lewandowsky, S, Morey, CC, Newman, DP, Schönbrodt, FD, Vanpaemel, W, Wagenmakers, E-J & Zwaan, RA 2016, ‘ The peer reviewers‘ openness initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review‘, Royal Society Open Science, vol. 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, JM 2001, Using shadowed data, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Mort, M 2006, ‘Health and social consequences of the foot and mouth disease epidemic in North Cumbria, 2001–2003‘, UK DATA SERVICE, SN: 5407, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5407-1.
   Google Scholar
• Neuroskeptic 2012, ‘The nine circles of scientific hell‘, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 7, pp.643–44,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration 2015, ‘ Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science‘, Science, vol. 349, p. aac4716, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
   Google Scholar
• Research Councils UK 2013, RCUK policy on open access, Research Councils UK, London.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, N 2007, ‘Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists‘, Qualitative Research, vol. 7, pp. 203–16, doi: 10.1177/1468794107076020.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E & Edwards, D 2009, ‘Identities in neighbour discourse: community, conflict and exclusion, 2004–2006, UK DATA SERVICE, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6259-1.
   Google Scholar
• The OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy 2004, Science, technology and innovation for the 21st century, Meeting of the OECD committee for scientific and technological policy at ministerial level, 29–30 January 2004, final communique.
   Google Scholar