Triangulating qualitative approaches within mixed methods designs: A theory-driven proposal based on a French research in social health psychology

References

• Abric, JC 2003, Pratiques sociales et représentations, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Apostolidis, T 2006, ‘Représentations sociales et triangulation: une application en psychologie sociale de la santé’, Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, vol. 22, no. ( 2), pp. 211–226.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvois, JL 1982, ‘Théories implicites de la personnalité, évaluation et reproduction idéologique’, L’année Psychologique, vol. 82, no. ( 2), pp. 513–536.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, FL 2015, ‘Using mixed methods research designs in health psychology: An illustrated discussion from a pragmatist perspective’, British Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 20, pp. 5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosisio, F & Santiago-Delefosse, M 2014, ‘Intérêts et limites de l’utilisation d’une méthodologie mixte: à propos d’une recherche en psychologie de la santé’. Pratiques Psychologiques, vol. 20, no. ( 1), pp. 39–53. doi:10.1016/j.prps.2013.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. ( 2), pp. 77–101, doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bruchez, C, Roux, P & Santiago Delefosse, M 2017, ‘Validité et qualité en recherche qualitative: aspects pratiques’, in M Santiago-Delefosse & M Del Rio Carral (eds.), Les méthodes qualitatives en psychologie et sciences humaines de la santé, Dunod, France, pp. 225–241.
   Google Scholar
• Caillaud, S & Flick, U 2016, ‘Triangulation méthodologique. Ou comment penser son plan de recherche’, in G Lo Monaco & P Rateau (eds.), Les représentations sociales, De Boeck, Bruxelles, pp. 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, P, Tassy, L, Lurkin, A, Blay, J-Y, Meeus, P, Mignotte, H, Faure, C, Ranchere-Vince, D, Bachelot, T, Guastalla, J-P, Sunyach, M-P, Guerin, N, Treilleux, I, Marec-Berard, P, Thiesse, P & Ray-Coquard, I 2012, ‘Multidisciplinarity and medical decision, impact for patients with cancer: sociological assessment of two tumour committees’ organization’, Bulletin du Cancer, vol. 99, no. ( 4), pp. 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, JA, Potter, DA, & McKinlay, J B 1991, ‘Bringing social structure back into clinical decision-making.’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 32, no. ( 8), pp. 853–866.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS, EG 2000, ‘Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (4th edn), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, NK, Lynham, SA & Guba, EG 2011, ‘Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited’, in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (4th edn), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, RM & Moscovici, S 1984, Social representations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U 1992, ‘Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative?’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 22, no. (2), pp. 175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C 1983, Local Knowledge. Further essays in Interpretive Anthropology, Basic Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hajjaj, F, Salek, M, Basra, M, & Finlay, A 2010, ‘Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.’, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine , vol. 103, no. ( 5), pp. 178–187, doi:10.1258/jrsm.2010.100104
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 2003a, ‘Aperçus des méthodes qualitatives’, in S Moscovici & F Buschini (eds.), Les méthodes des sciences humaines, Presses Universitaires de France, France, Paris, pp. 219–240.
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 2003b, ‘Les représentations sociales’, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Jodelet, D 2006, ‘Place de l’expérience vécue dans les processus de formation des représentations sociales’, in V Haas (ed.), Les savoirs du quotidien. Transmissions, appropriations, représentations, Presses Uuniversitaires de Rennes, Paris, France, pp. 235–255.
   Google Scholar
• Jovchelovitch, S 2002, ‘Re-thinking the diversity of knowledge: cognitive polyphasia, belief and representation’, Psychologie et Société, vol. 5, no. 5(1), pp. 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampalikis, N & Apostolidis, T 2016, ‘La perspective sociogénétique des representations sociales’, in G Le Monaco, S Delouvée & P Rateau (eds.), Les représentations sociales, De Boeck, Bruxelles, pp. 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lutfey, KE, Campbell, SM, Renfrew, M. R., Marceau, L. D., Roland, M., & McKinlay, J. B. 2008, ‘How are patient characteristics relevant for physicians’ clinical decision-making in diabetes? An analysis of qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment.’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 67, no. ( 9), pp. 1391–1399.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, M & Apostolidis, T 2002, ‘Contexte social et santé’, in GN Fischer (ed.), Traité de psychologie de la santé, Dunod, France, Paris, pp. 463–491.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 2001, ‘Introduction: le domaine de la psychologie sociale’, in S Moscovici (ed.), in Psychologie sociale, Presses Universitaires de France, France, Paris, pp. 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S 2004, La psychanalyse, son image et son public, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Munafò, MR & Davey Smith, G, 2018, ‘Robust research needs many lines of evidence’, Nature, vol. 553, pp. 399–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, W, Stefanek, M, Peters, E, & McCaul, KD 2005, ‘Basic and applied decision making in cancer control’, Health Psychology, vol. 24, no. (4, Suppl), pp. S3–S8.
   Google Scholar
• Orgerie, M B, Duchange, N, Pélicier, N, Chapet, S. Dorval, E. Rosset, P, Lemarié, E, Hervé, C, Moutel, G 2010, ‘La réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire: quelle place dans la décision médicale en cancérologie ?’, Bulletin du Cancer, vol. 97, no. ( 2), pp. 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Paicheler, H 2011, ‘L’épistémologie du sens commun : de la perception à la connaissance de l’autre’, in S Moscovici (ed.), Psychologie sociale, Presses Universitaires de France, France, Paris, pp. 279–309.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C, & Mays, N 1995, ‘Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research’, British Medical Journal, vol. 311, no. (6996), pp. 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Restivo, L, Julian-Reynier, C and Apostolidis, T 2017, 'Pratiquer l'Analyse Interprétative Phénoménologique : une illustration dans le cadre de l'enquête psychosociale par entretiens de recherche', Pratiques psychologiques.
   Google Scholar
• Restivo, L, C Julian-Reynier, and T Apostolidis 2018 'What makes decision-making difficult for oncologists faced with critical situations? The socio-affective side of the physician-patient relationship', Journal of Health Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Restivo, L, T Apostolidis, A-D Bouhnik, S Garcia, T Aurran, and C Julian-Reynier 2016 'Patients' non-medical characteristics contribute to collective medical decision-making at multidisciplinary oncological team meetings', Plos One.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V F, Nelson, W L, Han, P K, & Pignone, M P 2015, ‘Decision making and cancer’, American Psychologist, vol. 70, no. ( 2), pp. 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago-Delefosse, M 2002, ‘Les méthodes de recherche qualitatives et la psychologie de la santé’, in GN Fischer (ed.), Traité de psychologie de la santé, Dunod, France, Malakoff, pp. 187–207.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R 2001, ‘Why use interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology?’, Health Psychology Update, vol. 10, pp. 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, JA 1996, ‘Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Uusing interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology’, Psychology & Health, vol. 11, no. ( 2), pp. 261–271, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870449608400256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, JA, Flowers, P & Larkin, M 2009, Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research, Sage, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar