Tensions and potentials of involving young people in discourse analysis: an example from a study on sexual consent

References

• Albury, K., A. A. Hasinoff, and T. Senft. 2017. From media abstinence to media production: Sexting, young people and education. In The Palgrave handbook of sexuality education, ed. L. Allen and M. L. Rasmussen, 527–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Angelides, S. 2013. ‘Technology, hormones, and stupidity’: The affective politics of teenage sexting. Sexualities 16 (5–6):665–89. doi:10.1177/1363460713487289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arribas-Ayllon, M., and V. Walkerdine. 2008. Foucauldian discourse analysis. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers, 91–108. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, A. 2009. Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research 9 (5):547–70. doi:10.1177/1468794109343625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, G., C. Ricardo, and M. Nascimento. 2007. Engaging men and boys in changing gender-based inequity in health: Evidence from programme interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Barter, C., N. Stanley, M. Wood, N. Aghtaie, C. Larkins, C. Øverlien, and P. Hellevik (2015) Safeguarding teenage intimate relationships (STIR): Connecting online and offline contexts and risks. Research Report. Retrieved from http://stiritup.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/06/STIR-Exec-Summary-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y. 2017. Critically sex/ed: Asking critical questions of neoliberal truths in sexuality education. In The Palgrave handbook of sexuality education, ed. L. Allen and M. L. Rasmussen, 343–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, H., I. Brodie, F. Factor, M. Melrose, J. Pearce, J. Pitts, L. Shuker, and C. Warrington. 2013. “It’s wrong … but you get used to it” A qualitative study of gang-associated sexual violence towards, and exploitation of, young people in England. University of Bedfordshire.
   Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. 2018. The proliferation of consent-focused rape prevention social marketing materials. In Orienting feminism: Media, activism and cultural representation, ed. C. Dale and R. Overell, 181–96. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, G., and P. Lowe. 2020. ‘Go on, go on, go on’: Sexual consent, child sexual exploitation and cups of tea. Children & Society 34 (1):78–92. doi:10.1111/chso.12358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragg, S., Ponsford, R., Meiksin, R., Emmerson, L., & Bonell, C. 2020. Dilemmas of school-based relationships and sexuality education for and about consent. Sex Education, 21(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1788528
   Google Scholar
• Burkett, M., and K. Hamilton. 2012. Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities 15 (7):815–33. doi:10.1177/1363460712454076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder-Dawe, O., and N. Gavey. 2016. Making sense of everyday sexism: Young people and the gendered contours of sexism. Women’s Studies International Forum 55:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carline, A., C. Gunby, and S. Taylor. 2018. Too drunk to consent? Exploring the contestations and disruptions in male-focused sexual violence prevention interventions. Social & Legal Studies 27 (3):299–322. doi:10.1177/0964663917713346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody, M. 2003. Sexual ethics and violence prevention. Social & Legal Studies 12 (2):199–216. doi:10.1177/0964663903012002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody, M. 2005. Ethical erotics: Reconceptualizing anti-rape education. Sexualities 8 (4):465–80. doi:10.1177/1363460705056621.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, M. 2006. Preventing adult sexual violence through education? Current Issues in Criminal Justice 18 (2):342–56. doi:10.1080/10345329.2006.12036393.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, M., and G. Ovenden. 2013. Putting ethical sex into practice: Sexual negotiation, gender and citizenship in the lives of young women and men. Journal of Youth Studies 16 (6):792–807. doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.763916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody, M., and K. Carrington. 2000. Preventing sexual violence? The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 33 (3):341–61. doi:10.1177/000486580003300306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadderton, C. 2012. Not capturing voices? In The student voice handbook: Bridging the academic/ practitioner divide, ed. G. Czerniawski and W. Kidd, 73–85. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, J. F., D. Tolman, and H. Kincaid. 2017. Constructing risk and responsibility: A gender, race, and class analysis of news representations of adolescent sexuality. Feminist Media Studies 17 (3):412–25. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1283348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, L., M. O’Sullivan, and E. Enright. 2018. ‘The Trouble with Normal’: (re)imagining sexuality education with young people. Sex Education 18 (2):157–71. doi:10.1080/14681811.2017.1410699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coy, M., L. Kelly, F. Elvines, M. Garner, and A. Kanyeredzi (2013) ‘“Sex without consent, I suppose that is rape”: How young people in England understand sexual consent: A report commissioned for the Office of the Children’s Commissioner’s Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Gangs and Groups’.
   Google Scholar
• Crofts, T., M. Lee, A. McGovern, and S. Milivojevic. 2016. Sexting and young people. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, M. L. 2000. Introducing narrative psychology : Self, trauma, and the construction of meaning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (2019) Relationships education, relationships and sex education (RSE) and health education: Draft statutory guidance for governing bodies, proprietors, head teachers, principals, senior leadership teams, teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. S., and J. Ringrose. 2016. Sext education: Pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyards of tagged and exposed. Sex Education 16 (1):1–14. doi:10.1080/14681811.2015.1050486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, N. 2014. Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 8 (1):1–18. doi:10.5817/CP2014-1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. 2014. “Who’s to blame?” Constructing the responsible sexual agent in neoliberal sex education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 11 (3):211–24. doi:10.1007/s13178-014-0158-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 1988. Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review 58 (1):29–54. doi:10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P. J., J. G. L. Lee, and S. L. Dworkin. 2014. “Real men don’t”: Constructions of masculinity and inadvertent harm in public health interventions. American Journal of Public Health 104 (6):1029–35. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, M. 2011. Pockets of participation: Revisiting child-centred participation research. Children & Society 25 (1):15–25. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00258.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. 2005. Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. 2007. Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, B., and P. Peace. 2000. Reconstructing gender at university: Men as victims. Gender and Education 12 (3):385–98. doi:10.1080/09540250050122267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasinoff, A. A. 2015. Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, S. E., and C. L. Muehlenhard. 1999. “By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. Journal of Sex Research 36 (3):258–72. doi:10.1080/00224499909551996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollway, W. 1984. Women’s power in heterosexual sex. Women’s Studies International Forum 7 (1):63–68. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(84)90085-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, C. R., A. Weckesser, J. Turner, and A. Wade. 2019. Young people’s views on sexting education and support needs: Findings and recommendations from a UK-based study. Sex Education 19 (1):25–40. doi:10.1080/14681811.2018.1475283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. 2019. Young people’s understandings of sexual consent and the impact of power inequalities within their sexual relationships. PhD diss., Leeds Beckett University.
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., and Z. D. Peterson. 2013. College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research 50 (6):517–23. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.700739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. 1987. The continuum of sexual violence. In Women, violence and social control, ed. J. Hanmer and M. Maynard, 46–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kesby, M. 2005. Retheorizing empowerment-through-participation as a performance in space: Beyond tyranny to transformation. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (4):2037–65. doi:10.1086/428422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. L., C. Lynn Sorsoli, K. Collins, B. A. Zylbergold, D. Schooler, and D. Tolman. 2007. From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research 44 (2):145–57. doi:10.1080/00224490701263660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, L., M. Ungar, and J. Ikeda. 2015. Neo-liberalism and responsibilisation in the discourse of social service workers. British Journal of Social Work 45 (3):1006–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, S., and M. Lafrance. 2014. Women voicing resistance: Discursive and narrative explorations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Gabriel, E., and K. Johnson. 2020. Affect and the reparative turn: Repairing qualitative analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 17 (1):98–120. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1604928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C., T. Humphreys, K. N. Jozkowski, and Z. Peterson. 2016. The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research 53 (4–5):457–87. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C., Z. Peterson, T. P. Humphreys, and K. N. Jozkowski. 2017. Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. The Journal of Sex Research 54 (4–5):549–76. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M. 2011. Participatory data analysis: A step too far? Qualitative Research 11 (4):349–63. doi:10.1177/1468794111404310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Byrne, R., S. Hansen, and M. Rapley. 2008. “If a girl doesn’t say ‘no’ …”: Young men, rape and claims of “insufficient knowledge”. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 18 (3):168–93. doi:10.1002/casp.922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Higgins, S., and S. N. Gabhainn. 2010. Youth participation in setting the agenda: Learning outcomes for sex education in Ireland. Sex Education 10 (4):387–403. doi:10.1080/14681811.2010.515096.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. 2004. Discovering discourses, tackling texts. In Critical strategies for social research, ed. W. K. Carroll, 252–61. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. 2014. Discourse dynamics : Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• PettyJohn, M. E., F. K. Muzzey, M. K. Maas, and H. L. McCauley. 2019. #HowIWillChange: Engaging men and boys in the #MeToo movement. Psychology of Men & Masculinities 20 (4):612–22. doi:10.1037/men0000186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, P., S. Denford, J. Shucksmith, C. Tanton, A. M. Johnson, J. Owen, R. Hutten, L. Mohan, C. Bonell, C. Abraham, et al. 2017. What is best practice in sex and relationship education? A synthesis of evidence, including stakeholders’ views. BMJ Open 7 (5):14791. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley, S. C. E., and S. Wiggins, [Aberystwyth University].(2016). Discourse analysis video tutorial.[Online video] Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYKuTHdFMPw [Accessed 26/07/2020].
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. H. 2012. “Difficult citizenship”: The precarious relationships between childhood, sexuality and access to knowledge. Sexualities 15 (3–4):257–76. doi:10.1177/1363460712436469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M., T. Crofts, and M. Lee. 2013. Beyond criminalisation and responsibilisation: Sexting, gender and young people. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 24 (3):301–16. doi:10.1080/10345329.2013.12035963.
   Google Scholar
• Saukko, P. 2008. The anorexic self: A personal, political analysis of a diagnostic discourse. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherriff, N., L. Gugglberger, C. Hall, and J. Scholes. 2014. “From start to finish”: Practical and ethical considerations in the use of focus groups to evaluate sexual health service interventions for young people. Qualitative Psychology 1 (2):92–106. doi:10.1037/qup0000014.
   Google Scholar
• Shoveller, J. A., and J. L. Johnson. 2006. Risky groups, risky behaviour, and risky persons: Dominating discourses on youth sexual health. Critical Public Health 16 (1):47–60. doi:10.1080/09581590600680621.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, W., and J. Gagnon. 2011. Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton Rogers, W. 2011. Social psychology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, V. (2010) A report by Baroness Vivien Stern CBE of an independent review into how rape complaints are handled by public authorities in England and Wales
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., B. Rickett, and K. Day. 2018. Feminist relational discourse analysis: Putting the personal in the political in feminist research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 15 (1):93–115. doi:10.1080/14780887.2017.1393586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. 2004. ‘An adult thing’? Young people’s perspectives on the heterosexual age of consent. Sexualities 7 (2):133–49. doi:10.1177/1363460704042160.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, E., and R. Thomson. 2018. Educating for consent: Beyond the binary. In Critical pedagogy, sexuality education and young people: Issues about democracy and active citizenry, ed. F. Sanjakdar and A. K. T. Yip, 49–64. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. 2008. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. 2013. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willott, S., and C. Griffin. 1997. `Wham bam, am I a man?’: Unemployed men talk about masculinities. Feminism & Psychology 7 (1):107–28. doi:10.1177/0959353597071012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar