The personal and the political: how a feminist standpoint theory epistemology guided an interpretative phenomenological analysis

References

• Anderson Droogsma, R. 2007. Redefining hijab: American Muslim women’s standpoints on veiling. Journal of Applied Communication Research 35 (3):294–319. doi:10.1080/00909880701434299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, N., and S. Collins. 2014. Counsellors, counselling, and social justice: The professional is political. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy 48:171–77. https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/article/view/61030.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, N., and S. Collins. 2015. Multicultural counseling, education, and supervision. In Canadian counselling and counselling psychology in the 21st century, ed. A. L. Sinacore and F. Ginsberg, 42–67. Montreal & Kingston, CA: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Audet, C., and D. Paré, Eds. 2017. Social justice and counseling: Discourses in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J., N. Caddick, J. C. Clarke, H. McDermott, M. E. H. Willis, and G. Wiltshire. 2014. Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: Reflections on a meta-study. Qualitative Methods in Psychology Bulletin 17:35–41. https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/85qz0.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, R. K. 1996. Wife rape: Understanding the response of survivors and service providers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R. 2015. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 15 (2):219–34. doi:10.1177/1468794112468475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. 2013. Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 10 (2):405–24. doi:10.1017/S1742058X13000283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones, C., F. Irvine, and S. Sambrook. 2010. Phenomenology and participant feedback: Convention or contention? Nurse Researcher 17 (2):25–33. doi:10.7748/nr2010.01.17.2.25.c7459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. 2011. Feminist standpoint epistemology building knowledge and empowerment through women’s lived experience. In Feminist research practice, ed. S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. L. Leavy, 53–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412984270.n3.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., D. Western, and J. Pascal. 2013. Using the f-word: Feminist epistemologies and postgraduate research. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work 28 (4):440–50. doi:10.1177/0886109913503266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., and S. M. Wasco. 2000. Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology 28 (6):773–91. doi:10.1023/A:1005159716099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caretta, M. A. 2016. Member checking: A feminist participatory analysis of the use of preliminary results pamphlets in cross-cultural, cross-language research. Qualitative Research 16 (3):305–18. doi:10.1177/1468794115606495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, K. 2000. Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology 5 (3):285–96. doi:10.1177/135910530000500306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chamberlain, K. 2012. Do you really need a methodology? Qualitative Methods in Psychology Bulletin 13:59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. D., and L. B. Farmer. 2017. Making the case for interpretative phenomenological analysis with LGBTGEQ+ persons and communities. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling 11 (4):285–300. doi:10.1080/15538605.2017.1380558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2019. Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection. Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review 2 (1):13–28. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/854611.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, G., G.Craig, and C.McCourt. 2018. “Am iz kwiin” (I’m his queen): Combining interpretative phenomenological analysis with a feminist approach to work with gems in a resource-constrained setting. Qualitative Research in Psychology 16 (2):237–52. doi:10.1080/14780887.2018.1543048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coemans, S., A. Raymakers, J. Vandenabeele, and K. Hannes.2017.Evaluating the extent to which social researchers apply feminist and empowerment frameworks in photovoice studies with female participants: A literature review.Qualitative Social Work 18 (1):37–59. doi:10.1177/1473325017699263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. A.,A.Kassan,andK.Wada.2020.Learning from the standpoints of minoritized students: An exploration of multicultural and social justice counselling training.Manuscript submitted for publication,Educational Studies in Counselling Psychology: Werklund School of Education,University of Calga.
   Google Scholar
• Collins,P.H. 1986. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems 33 (6):514–30. doi:10.2307/800672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 1989. The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14 (4):745–73. doi:10.1086/494543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London, UK: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, M. 2012. Philosophy of phenomenology: How understanding aids research. Nurse Researcher 20 (1):28–32. doi:10.7748/nr2012.09.20.1.28.c9305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crasnow, S. 2009. Is standpoint theory a resource for feminist epistemology? An introduction. Hypatia 24 (4):189–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20618188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crasnow, S. 2013. Feminist philosophy of science: Values and objectivity. Philosophy Compass 8 (4):413–23. doi:10.1111/phc3.12023.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis-Boles, H., and E. Bourg. 2010. Experiences of students of color in a graduate-level diversity course. Training and Education in Professional Psychology 4 (3):204–12. doi:10.1037/a0017985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, M. 2006. Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher 13 (3):7–21. doi:10.7748/nr2006.04.13.3.7.c5975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doyle, S. 2007. Member checking with older women: A framework for negotiating meaning. Health Care for Women International 28 (10):888–908. doi:10.1080/07399330701615325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eatough, V., and J. A. Smith. 2017. Intrepretative phenomenological analysis. In The Sage handbook of qualitative psychology, ed. C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers, 2nded., 53–80. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781119975144.ch9.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A., A. Holt, P. Shinebourne, C. Esin, S.-M. Nolasa, L. Mehdizadeh, and B. Brooks-Gordon. 2011. Collective findings, individual interpretations: An illustration of a pluralistic approach to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology 8 (1):93–113. doi:10.1080/14780887.2010.500351.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. A., M. N. Sevasti, B. Brooks-Gordon, C. Esin, A. Holt, L. Mehdizadeh, and P. Shinebourne. 2010. Pluralism in qualitative research: The impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Research 10 (4):441–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. [1960] 2004. Truth and method (J. Weinsheime & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser,B. G.&Strauss,A. L.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser,B. G.&Strauss,B. G.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (J. New BrunswickNJ:Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, D. 2011. Who we are and what we want: A feminist standpoint approach to defining effective ICT use for West Virginian women. Information, Communication & Society 17 (7):1019–41. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.649773.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A., B. Liang, J. E. Helms, R. E. Latta, E. Sparks, and S. B. Weintraub. 2004. Training counseling psychologists as social justice agents: Feminist and multicultural principles in action. The Counseling Psychologist 32 (6):793–836. doi:10.1177/0011000004268802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. K. Denzig and Y. S. Lincoln, 105–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. http://steinhardtapps.es.its.nyu.edu/create/courses/3311/reading/10-guba_lincoln_94.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., D. Szymanski, and F. T. L. Leong. 2011. The “model minority myth”: Internalized racialism of positive stereotypes as correlates of psychological distress, and attitudes toward help-seeking. Asian American Journal of Psychology 2 (2):101–14. doi:10.1037/a0024183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs and women. Routledge and London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1993. The biopolitics of postmodern bodies: Determinations of self in immune system discourse. In American feminist thought at century’s end: A reader, ed. L. S. Kauffman, 199–233. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1994. A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the last quarter. In Feminism and postmodernism, ed. L. Nicholson, 580–671. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 1987. Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In Feminism and methodology, ed. S. Harding, 1–14. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 1998. Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 2004. Introduction: Standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debate. In The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies, ed. S. G. Harding, 1–15. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 2009. Standpoint theories: Productively controversial. Hypatia 24 (4):192–200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20618189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 2014. Feminist standpoints. In Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis, ed. S. Nagy Hesse-Biber, 46–64. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. C. M. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science, ed. S. G. Harding and M. B. Hintikka, 283–310. Hingham, MA: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. C. M. 1985. Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. C. M. 1987. Rethinking modernism: Minority vs majority theories. Cultural Critique 7 (7):187–206. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1354155.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. [1927] 1996. Being in time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1979. Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 85 (3):551–75. doi:10.1086/227049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (F. Kersten, Trans.).Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Intemann, K. 2010. 25 years of feminist empiricism and standpoint theory: Where are we now? Hypatia 25 (4):778–96. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janesick, V. J. 1994. The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 209–19. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, G. G., and D. R. Davis. 1998. Honoring voice and visibility: Sensitive-topic research and feminist interpretive inquiry. Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work 13 (3):289–311. doi:10.1177/088610999801300303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B. 2012. Dialectical pluralism and mixed research. American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6):751–54. doi:10.1177/0002764212442494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrani, T., V. Deliyanni-Kouimtzi, and C. Athanasiades. 2015. Greek female clients’ experience of the gendered therapeutic relationship: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 37 (1):77–92. doi:10.1007/s10447-014-9227-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, M., and A. R. Thompson. 2012. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners, ed. D. Harper and A. Thompson, 99–116. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119973249.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, M., S. Watts, and E. Clifton. 2006. Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):102–20. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp062oa.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. L. 2011. Feminist postmodernism and poststructuralism. In Feminist research practice, ed. S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. L. Leavy, 83–108. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412984270.n4.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. C., and R. A. Rodgers. 2008. Counselor advocacy: Affecting systemic change in the public arena. Journal of Counseling & Development 82:284–87. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00108.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mascolo, M. F. 2017. How objectivity undermines the study of personhood: Toward an intersubjective epistemology for psychological science. New Ideas in Psychology 44:41–48. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. 2005. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology 52 (2):250–60. doi:10.1037/00220167.52.2.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moules, N. J., G. McCaffery, J. C. Field, and C. M. Laing. 2015. Conducting hermeneutic research: From philosophy to practice. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien Hallstein, D. L. 2000. Where standpoint stands now: An introduction and commentary. Women Studies in Communication 23 (1):1–15. doi:10.1080/07491409.2000.11517687.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1988. Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In Doing feminist research, ed. H. Roberts, 30–61. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ollivier, M., and M. Tremblay. 2000. Questionnements feministes et methodologie de la recherche. France: Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Palaganas, E. C., M. C. Sanchez, M. V. P. Molintas, and R. D. Caricativo. 2017. Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. Qualitative Report 22 (2):426–38. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss2/5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, P. B. 2001. Multiculturalism and the paradigm shift in counselling: Controversies and alternative futures. Canadian Journal of Counselling 35 (1):15–25. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ622695.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pietkiewicz, I., and J. A. Smith. 2014. A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne Psychological Journal 20 (1):7–14. doi:10.14691/cppj.20.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. S., and C. Mayo. 2007. Toward understandings of feminist ethnography. In Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis, ed. S. N. Hesse-Biber, 155–72. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, D. L. 1994. Human science and counselling psychology: Closing the gap between research and practice. Counselling Psychology Quarterly 7 (3):235–50. doi:10.1080/09515079408254149.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, J. 2013. Reflexivity in research: Disability between the lines. Disability Studies Quarterly 33 (2). doi: 10.18061/dsq.v33i2.3711.
   Google Scholar
• Rolin, K. 2009. Standpoint theory as a methodology for the study of power relations. Hypatia 24 (4):218–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20618192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. 1956. Being in nothingness. New York, NY: Washington Square Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saukko, P. 2008. The anorexic self: A personal, political analysis of a diagnostic discourse. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiermacher, F. 1998. Hermeneutics and criticism and other writings (A. Bowie, Trans.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R., and N. Frost. 2015. Breaking out of the silo mentality. Psychologist 28 (8):638–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinebourne, P. 2011. The theoretical underpinnings of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis 22 (1):16–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, D. K., and K. J. Krone. 2000. Women managers and gendered values. Women’s Studies in Communication 23 (1):111–30. doi:10.1080/07491409.2000.11517692.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 1990. The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. 1996. Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health 11 (2):261–71. doi:10.1080/08870449608400256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., P. Flowers, and M. Larkin. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London, UK: SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://books.google.ca/books?id=obvh6pwgt2IC.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., and M. Osborn. 2007. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, ed. J. A. Smith, 2nd ed., 53–80. London, UK: Sage Publications, Lt.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. 2016. Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J., and D. Kobrynowicz. 2006. A feminist epistemology. In Handbook of the sociology of gender, ed. J. Saltzman Chafetz, 25–44. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stoetzler, M., and N. Yuval-Davis. 2002. Standpoint theory, situated knowledge and the situated imagination. Feminist Theory 3 (3):315–33. doi:10.1177/146470002762492024.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., B. Rickett, and K. Day. 2018. Feminist relational discourse analysis: Putting the personal in the political in feminist research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 15 (1):93–115. doi:10.1080/14780887.2017.1393586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wormer, K. 2009. Restorative justice as social justice for victims of gendered violence: A standpoint feminist perspective. Social Work 54 (2):107–16. doi:10.1093/sw/54.2.107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuest, J. 1995. Feminist grounded theory: An exploration of the congruency and tensions between two traditions in knowledge discovery. Qualitative Health Research 5 (1):125–37. doi:10.1177/104973239500500109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar