4,240
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Experienced qualitative researchers’ views on teaching students qualitative research design

References

  • American Psychological Association. 2019. Publication manual of the American psychological association. 7th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2021. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 21 (1):37–47. doi:10.1002/capr.12360.
  • Bulhan, H. A. 2015. Stages of colonialism in Africa: From occupation of land to occupation of being. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 3 (1):239–56. doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.143.
  • Carrera-Fernández, M. J., J. Guàrdia-Olmos, and M. Peró-Cebollero. 2014. Qualitative methods of data analysis in psychology: An analysis of the literature. Qualitative Research 14 (1):20–36. doi:10.1177/1468794112465633.
  • Collins, H. 2010. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Creswell, J. W., W. E. Hanson, V. L. Plano Clark, and A. Morales. 2007. Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist 35 (2):236–64. doi:10.1177/0011000006287390.
  • Dudgeon, P., and R. Walker. 2015. Decolonising Australian psychology: Discourses, strategies, and practice. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 3 (1):276–97. doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.126.
  • Fielden, A. L., S. Goldie, and E. Sillence. 2012. Taking another look: Developing a sustainable and expandable programme of qualitative research methods in psychology. Psychology Learning & Teaching 11 (1):46–51. doi:10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.46.
  • Flick, U. 2018. The concepts of qualitative data: Challenges in neoliberal times for qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 25 (8):713–20. doi:10.1177/1077800418809132.
  • Fox, R., and B. Nic Giolla Easpaig. 2021. Engaging critical methodologies in qualitative research methods with undergraduate psychology students. Journal of Community Psychology 49 (1):228–40. doi:10.1002/jcop.22472.
  • Gergen, K. J., R. Josselson, and M. Freeman. 2015. The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist 70 (1):1–9. doi:10.1037/a0038597.
  • Gibson, S., and C. Sullivan. 2018. A changing culture? Qualitative methods teaching in UK psychology. Qualitative Psychology 5 (2):197–206. doi:10.1037/qup0000100.
  • Haverkamp, B. E., S. L. Morrow, and J. G. Ponterotto. 2005. A time and place for qualitative and mixed methods in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology 52 (2):123–25. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.123.
  • Jackson, M. R. 2015. Resistance to qual/quant parity: Why the “paradigm” discussion can’t be avoided. Qualitative Psychology 2 (2):181–98. doi:10.1037/qup0000031.
  • Kalpokaite, N., and I. Radivojevic. 2020. “ I wish I knew what I know now”: Exploring psychology undergraduate students’ experiences when learning about qualitative research and CAQDAS. The Qualitative Report 25 (7):1817–40.
  • Levitt, H. M., M. Bamberg, J. W. Creswell, D. M. Frost, R. Josselson, and C. Suárez-Orozco. 2018. Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist 73 (1):26–46. doi:10.1037/amp0000151.
  • Levitt, H. M., S. L. Motulsky, F. J. Wertz, S. L. Morrow, and J. G. Ponterotto. 2017. Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology 4 (1):2–22. doi:10.1037/qup0000082.
  • Malterud, K., V. D. Siersma, and A. D. Guassora. 2016. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research 26 (13):1753–60. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444.
  • Maxwell, S. E., M. Y. Lau, and G. S. Howard. 2015. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist 70 (6):487–98. doi:10.1037/a0039400.
  • McMullen, L. M., and C. E. Winston-Proctor. 2018. Qualitative inquiry in undergraduate psychology curricula and research training: Contexts and practices for transforming the optional into the obligatory. Qualitative Psychology 5 (2):191–96. doi:10.1037/qup0000123.
  • McMullen, L. M. 2018. Teaching qualitative inquiry as a stand-alone course: Affordances and interrogations. Qualitative Psychology 5 (2):228–42. doi:10.1037/qup0000103.
  • Murray, M. 2019. Some thoughts on qualitative research in psychology in Europe. Qualitative Research in Psychology 16 (3):508–12. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1605279.
  • Ponterotto, J. G., J. T. Mathew, and B. Raughley. 2013. The value of mixed methods designs to social justice research in counseling and psychology. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology. 5(2):42–68. Retrieved from. https://openjournals.bsu.edu/jsacp/article/view/489.
  • Ponterotto, J. G. 2005. Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology 52 (2):126–36. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126.
  • Poucher, Z. A., K. A. Tamminen, J. G. Caron, and S. N. Sweet. 2019. Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: A focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Advance online publication. 1–24. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2019.1656276.
  • Povee, K., and L. D. Roberts. 2014. Qualitative research in psychology: Attitudes of psychology students and academic staff. Australian Journal of Psychology 66 (1):28–37. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12031.
  • Riley, S., J. Brooks, S. Goodman, S. Cahill, P. T. Branney, G. J. Treharne, and C. Sullivan. 2019. Celebrations amongst challenges: Considering the past, present and future of the qualitative methods in psychology section of the british psychology society. Qualitative Research in Psychology 16 (3):464–82. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275.
  • Roberts, L. D., and E. Castell. 2016. “Having to shift everything we’ve learned to the side”: Expanding research methods taught in psychology to incorporate qualitative methods. Frontiers in Psychology 7:688. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00688.
  • Rubin, J. D., S. Bell, and S. I. McClelland. 2018. Graduate education in qualitative methods in US psychology: Current trends and recommendations for the future. Qualitative Research in Psychology 15 (1):29–50. doi:10.1080/14780887.2017.1392668.
  • Sargeant, S. 2012. ‘I don’t get it’: A critical reflection on conceptual and practical challenges in teaching qualitative methods. Psychology Learning & Teaching 11 (1):39–45. doi:10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.39.
  • Shaw, R. L., F. L. Bishop, J. Horwood, J. Chilcot, and M. A. Arden. 2019. Enhancing the quality and transparency of qualitative research methods in health psychology. British Journal of Health Psychology 24 (4):739–45. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12393.
  • Tafreshi, D., K. L. Slaney, and S. D. Neufeld. 2016. Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 36 (4):233–49. doi:10.1037/teo0000048.
  • TARG Meta-Research Group. (2020). Statistics education in undergraduate psychology: A survey of UK course content.
  • Wagner, C., B. Kawulich, and M. Garner. 2019. A mixed research synthesis of literature on teaching qualitative research methods. SAGE Open 9 (3):1–18. doi:10.1177/2158244019861488.
  • Wertz, F. J. 2014. Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology. Qualitative Psychology 1 (1):4–16. doi:10.1037/qup0000007.
  • Wiggins, S., A. Gordon-Finlayson, S. Becker, and C. Sullivan. 2016. Qualitative undergraduate project supervision in psychology: Current practices and support needs of supervisors across North East England and Scotland. Qualitative Research in Psychology 13 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/14780887.2015.1075641.
  • Wingen, T., J. Berkessel, and B. Englich. 2019. No replication, no trust? How low replicability influences trust in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550619877412.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.