148
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Intra-participant and inter-analyst cacophony: working the hyphen between modalities using provocative reflexivity

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abrego, L. J., and C. Menjívar. 2011. Immigrant Latina mothers as targets of legal violence. International Journal of Sociology of the Family 37 (1):9–26.
  • Anti-Defamation League. (2018). Mainstreaming hate: The anti-immigrant movement in the U.S. Accessed July 14, 2021.https://www.adl.org/the-anti-immigrant-movement-in-the-us
  • Anzaldúa, G. 1987. Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
  • Barad, K. 2014. Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax 20 (3):168–87. doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.
  • Becerra, D. 2016. Anti-immigration policies and fear of deportation: A human rights issue. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work 1 (3):109–19. doi:10.1007/s41134-016-0018-8.
  • Bernal, D. D. 1998. Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review 68 (4):555–83. doi:10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48.
  • Bomfim, Z. A. C., and E. Pol. 2005. Affective dimension in cognitive maps of Barcelona and São Paulo. International Journal of Psychology 40 (1):37–50. doi:10.1080/00207590444000122.
  • Bozalek, V., and M. Zembylas. 2017. Diffraction or reflection?: Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 30 (2):111–27. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166.
  • Caicedo, D. A., and V. Badaan. 2020. Legislation, linguistics, and location: Exploring attitudes on unauthorized immigration. Journal of International Migration and Integration 22 (3) 967–985 Online First.
  • Collins, P. H. 2002. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Cunliffe, A. L., and G. Karunanayake. 2013. Working within hyphen-spaces in ethnographic research: Implications for research identities and practice. Organizational Research Methods 16 (3):364–92. doi:10.1177/1094428113489353.
  • Daiute, C., R. Stern, and C. Lelutiu-Weinberger. 2003. Negotiating violence prevention. Journal of Social Issues 59 (1):83–101. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00006.
  • Daiute, C., T. Kovács Cerović, K. Mićić, B. Sullu, and S. Vracar. 2020. Dynamic values negotiating geo-political narratives across a migration system. Qualitative Psychology 7 (3) 1–17.
  • Daiute, C. 2014. Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • De Alba, M. 2011. Social representations of urban spaces: A comment on mental maps ofParis. Papers on Social Representations 20:29.1–29.14.
  • Esteban-Guitart, M., and L. C. Moll. 2014. Lived experience, funds of identity and education. Culture & Psychology 20 (1):70–81. doi:10.1177/1354067X13515940.
  • Finch, Jessie. “Media Coverage”. In Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: An Encyclopedia of their Experience, . edited by A. O. O’Leary, 457-460. California: ABC-CLIO, 2014.
  • Fine, M. 2006. Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance- a textbook for critical research. Social Justice Research 19 (1):83–108.
  • Fine, M. 1994. Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 70–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Frost, N. 2009. ‘Do you know what I mean?’: The use of a pluralistic narrative analysis approach in the interpretation of an interview. Qualitative Research 9 (1):9–29. doi:10.1177/1468794108094867.
  • Futch, V. A., and M. Fine. 2014. Mapping as a method: History and theoretical commitments. Qualitative Research in Psychology 11 (1):42–59. doi:10.1080/14780887.2012.719070.
  • Galinsky, A. D., C. S. Wang, J. A. Whitson, E. M. Anicich, K. Hugenberg, and G. V. Bodenhausen. 2013. The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: The reciprocal relationship between power and self-labeling. Psychological Science 24 (10):2020–29. doi:10.1177/0956797613482943.
  • Grigorieff, A., C. Roth, and D. Ubfal. 2020. Does information change attitudes toward immigrants? Demography 57 (3):1117–43. doi:10.1007/s13524-020-00882-8.
  • Guillemin, M., and S. Drew. 2010. Questions of process in participant-generated visual methodologies. Visual Studies 25 (2):177–88. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2010.502676.
  • Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi:10.2307/3178066.
  • Haraway, D. 1992. The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Cultural Studies, ed. I. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. A. Treichler, 295–337. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Harding, S. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Harrison, B. 2002. Seeing health and illness worlds- using visual methodologies in a sociology of health and illness: A methodological review. Sociology of Health & Illness 24 (6):856–72. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00322.
  • Honkanen, K., J. Poikolainen, and L. Karlsson. 2017. Children and young people as co-researchers: Researching subjective well-being in residential area with visual and verbal methods. Journal of Children’s Geographies 16 (2):184–95. doi:10.1080/14733285.2017.1344769.
  • Hunleth, J. 2011. Beyond on or with: Questioning power dynamics and knowledge production in ‘child-oriented’ research methodology. Childhood 18 (1):81–93. doi:10.1177/0907568210371234.
  • Iedema, R. 2003. Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication 2 (1):29–57. doi:10.1177/1470357203002001751.
  • James, A. 2007. Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist 109 (2):261–72. doi:10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.261.
  • Jodelet, Denise, and Stanley Milgramet al. “Psychological Maps of Paris”. In Environmental Psychology: People and their Physical Settings, 104–124. Edited by Harold Proshansky, William Ittelson, and Leanne Rivlin. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1976.
  • Katsiaficas, D., V. A. Futch, M. Fine, and S. R. Sirin. 2011. Everyday hyphens: Exploring youth identities with methodological and analytic pluralism. Qualitative Research in Psychology 8 (2):120–39. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.572743.
  • King, V., A. Garcia-Perez, R. Graham, C. Jones, A. Tickle, and L. Wilson. 2014. Collaborative reflections on using Island maps to express new lecturers’ academic identity. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives 15 (2):252–67. doi:10.1080/14623943.2014.883311.
  • Kitzinger, C., and H. Frith. 1999. Just say no?: The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society 10 (3):293–316. doi:10.1177/0957926599010003002.
  • Kteily, N., and E. Bruneau. 2017. Backlash: The politics and real-world consequences of minority group dehumanization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43 (1):87–104. doi:10.1177/0146167216675334.
  • Leavy, P. 2015. Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Lorde, A. 1984. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.
  • Lugones, M. 2010. Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia 25 (4):742–59. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.
  • Luttrell, W. 2019. Reflexive qualitative research. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education, ed. G. W. Noblitt. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 1–21 .
  • Martsin, M. “Beyond Verbal Narratives: Using Timeline Images in the Semiotic Cultural Study of Meaning Making.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52 (2018): 116–128.
  • Mignolo, W. D., and C. E. Walsh. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Moradian, A. “New York”. In Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: An Encyclopedia of their Experience, edited by A. O. O’Leary, 517-519. California: ABC-CLIO, 2014.
  • Mullen, Brian. “Ethnophaulisms for Ethnic Immigrant Groups.” Journal of Social Issues 57, no. 3 (2001): 457–475.
  • Pew Research Center. (2015). U.S. public has mixed views of immigrants and immigration. Accessed October 11, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2015/09/28/chapter-4-u-s-public-has-mixed-views-of-immigrants-and-immigration/
  • Pinedo, M. 2020. Deportation of family members of US-citizen Latinos and misuse of prescription drugs: United States, 2019. American Journal of Public Health 110 (4):560–66. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305516.
  • River, C. 1983. The combahee river collective statement. In Home girls: A black feminist anthology, ed. B. Smith. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press 264–274 .
  • Segalo, P., E. Manoff, and M. Fine. 2015. Working with embroideries and counter-maps: Engaging memory and imagination within decolonizing frameworks. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 3 (1):342–64. doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.145.
  • Segalo, P. 2018. Women speaking through embroidery: Using visual methods and poetry to narrate lived experiences. Qualitative Research in Psychology 15 (2–3):298–304. doi:10.1080/14780887.2018.1430013.
  • Sirin, S. R., and M. Fine. 2007. Hyphenated selves: Muslim American youth negotiating identities on the fault lines of global conflict. Applied Development Science 11 (3):151–63. doi:10.1080/10888690701454658.
  • Smith, L. T. 2013. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.
  • Solorzano, D. G., and T. J. Yosso. 2002. Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry 8 (1):23–44. doi:10.1177/107780040200800103.
  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Teo, T. 2020. Subhumanism: The re-emergence of an affective-symbolic ontology in the migration debate and beyond. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 50 (2): 1–17.
  • Thompson, M.2012.“Suburban Origins of the Tea Party: Spatial Dimensions of the New Conservative Personality.” Critical Sociology 38(4), (2012: 1–18.
  • Vygotsky, Lev. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Order Thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
  • Wagle, T., and D. T. Cantaffa. 2008. Working our hyphens: Exploring identity relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 14 (1):135. doi:10.1177/1077800407309328.
  • Wilkinson, S. 1998a. Focus groups in health research: Exploring the meanings of health and illness. Journal of Health Psychology 3 (3):329–48. doi:10.1177/135910539800300304.
  • Wilkinson, S. 1998b. Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1 (3):181–203. doi:10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874.
  • Wilkinson, S. 1999. Focus groups: A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly 23 (2):221–44. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00355.x.
  • Williamson, T.(2008). “Sprawl, Spatial Location, and Politics: How Ideological Identification Tracks the Built Environment.” American Politics Research 362008: 903–933.
  • Zaal, M., T. Salah, and M. Fine. 2007. The weight of the hyphen: Freedom, fusion, and responsibility embodied by young Muslim-American women during a time of surveillance. Applied Development Science 11 (3):164–77. doi:10.1080/10888690701454674.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.